post #1 of 1
Thread Starter 
Game Over for Streaming TV

Streaming video is the latest, coolest thing, but still no match for a full-size, high-definition TV.

It's early in the baseball season, but I have a lot on my plate. My World Champion Cardinals are going to be the target of every teamand they need me there rooting them on. The trouble is, I live in New York, and they play half their schedule in St. Louis. That makes me an out-of-market fan.

In the past, I've fed my baseball appetite with a combination of pricey Extra Innings TV programming from satellite and cable TV providers, in addition to some jerry-rigged electronics.

A few years ago, I paid DirecTV an arm and a leg to receive 100-plus Cards' games. When my trees grew too tall, I shifted to cable for its equally steep Major League Baseball package. I even took the games out to the deck so I could enjoy baseball the way it was meant to be experienced: outdoors. One year a Sharp wireless TV brought in the feed; the next year my enabler was a Belkin wireless TV transmission system.

This year, things took a twist while America's pastime renewed its commitment to capitalism. In March, it looked as if only DirecTV would be offering Major League Baseball Extra Innings. I seethed over the exclusive package deal cooked up between the baseball and dish people. Then democracy took root, and everybody from John Kerry to me weighed in, protesting the fact that millions of cable TV fans would be locked out of America's summer tradition. The outrage had some legs. In April, MLB opened the video turnstiles to the rest of us and inked a deal with In Demand, a cable consortium owned by Comcast, Cox Communications and Time Warner Cable. Now just about everybody who pays to watch TV can pay more to see his or her favorite team.

For more of Rebecca Day's rant, go to