AVS › AVS Forum › Video Components › Home Theater Computers › Suppose I make it easy for all the newbies and budget folks?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Suppose I make it easy for all the newbies and budget folks? - Page 18

post #511 of 1046
Although I really like the mATX Antec NSK 2400, I wouldn't mind at all holding off a little on this whole project. It could be that the LG dual drive is just a couple of weeks away, and other components might be really close, too. Full ATX would also give some breathing room for component expansion, if some of us early adopters to this project wanted to upgrade. As you've said, Troy, the good thing about this project is that there is no one specifying a deadline except you. I can wait a couple of weeks more, or a month. I think the "there's always something better just around the corner" dilemma may just be true in this case.
post #512 of 1046
Quote:
Originally Posted by pcCinema View Post

I hear there's an Asus that is almost a clone of this, but I can't find it.

The simple search in NEWEGG:
G33

gives 20 replies.

Both ASUS P5K-V and VM have only D-Sub.

I went through those and still I have to agree if staying within the most of the borders as outlined so far:
- mATX with Intel chipset
- good digital output: DVI, HDMI
- good digital sound

this GA-G33M-S2H is best of these choices (if X3100 in G33 is satisfying the needs with Intel driver update in the future for the HD/Blue-Ray material..)
Couple others had DVI, most had only D-Sub.

So this with G33 chipset and not expanding search to P35/ATX motherboards..

Personally I think that I will wait for G35 motherboards that should be appearing to the scene this month.
Does anyone have any info for the pre-tests anywhere?

Regards Sjorma
post #513 of 1046
Thread Starter 
If we collectively wanted to agree to wait, I could go along with that. What concerns me though is how often promised release dates are pushed back time and time again.

How long would we really have to wait if there's something that holds up the next set of boards? It's not impossible that there could be something that holds them all up. (Not even counting the lg drive.)

One of our goals was to have a working system as long before x-mas as possible. If things are pushed back to november/december we could miss having anything concrete this year completely.


This board may not be for everyone, but it may be ideal for many and a good place to start.

Are you sure on that 16x slot not working at 16x? Please post a link to proof if you can. I have a hard time believing this, as the onboard video is disabled when an add in card is put in, from what I can tell, so they aren't sharing. Or there must be a way to disable onboard video.

Sjorma, yes I have looked them all up. But there was supposed to be one that had all the same features, not just vga or some of them. I think that was a myth and they must have been referring to the one that's just vga.

Troy
post #514 of 1046
Thread Starter 
How do I get this signature to display properly?


Troy
post #515 of 1046
I think it probably is a good idea to wait. Blu-ray and HD-DVD are relatively new, so waiting will give substantially more and better choices. Regardless of whether we have decided the hardware or not, we will still be able to work on large parts of the software aspect of the project.

For the signature, instead of
What do we do?

... this is tricky. I can't find a way to disable recognizing the URL tags. Just hit "quote" to get the code for how to do it.

What do we do?
post #516 of 1046
From the posts above, isn't the Gigabyte board problematic because it doesn't support HD DVD/Blu-ray natively right now, even though there is a promise of 1080p support down the line?

Just to clarify, why is mATX preferred over ATX in this project? Not that I object - I've made it clear how much I like the mATX Antec NSK 2400 case.
post #517 of 1046
Thread Starter 
Because many people need a small solution, and a uATX fits in anything just about. It can work for both full size and tiny cases. Those that want a tiny pc could run a board like this with no add in cards and an external power supply (if one exists that's powerful enough) and it would be as small as a book. I'm thinking like the pico power supply/wall wort solutions. Even in just a slimline case with a normal or smaller standard supply it would be just the size of a common dvd player. There are many attractive small cases it could fit. These days uATX boards are just as capable as full, except they have fewer slots, but everything has a usb and external solution these days and there's so much built into these boards that the number of slots aren't as important as they used to be. Please chime in with all your opinions. This isn't just about what I think or want.

We surely do want to offer a full size alternative as well.

Yes there is a lot we can still work on. However testing takes a lot of time too for the final platform, and for bluepill to be adapted and for linux to be configured for the board we select. So unless we get something selected in plenty of time and get going soon we risk missing xmas, the biggest buying opportunity of the season and our best chance at getting widespread attention and adoption.

I'm still open to waiting. This could be our fallback option and we could set a cut off date for waiting. I wouldn't call it problematic really. Once you get the right drivers working it's reportedly stable as a dream and does in fact work in powedvd now just as well as any other board does. This just gives the possibility of more features down the line whereas other boards have no possibility to do this audio unless you replace the sound card. I also am very curious what kind of quality is has audio wise just for lossless audio etc via analog since many people do want to run analog.

Thanks Greeniguana, I'll try that in a sec.

I could always start testing with one unofficially... And just sell it on ebay if something better comes along to get most of the money back to put into other things we need. (Like a motherboard of the same type for each of the core members to test and develop on.)

Troy
post #518 of 1046
Thread Starter 
Well that worked perfectly, thanks G.

When we have a proper FAQ I'll update the sig, this is just temporary.

If any of you (non core members) are good writers and have followed the project enough to know all our goals we could use a well written faq. I think I can do ok, but clearly writing is not my strong suit. Everything has been spelled out perfectly clearly I think, but it's scattered among many posts and pages of this thread and has grown more and more as time went by.

If nobody steps up I'll just do the best I can and this will be one of the things I'll work on while we are in a holding pattern.

We also need to select a suitable common VFD. Kapone says the imon is wonderful... Any other opinions? We had already planned to have the actual MS brand remote/receiver which may be best for the broadest support but if the imon is truly compatible and well supported enough we could change that plan. We must have ir emitters and broad support of the whole thing.

It will be critically important down the line.

Troy
post #519 of 1046
Thread Starter 
Greeniguana

What kind of setup is needed in LinuxMCE to support standard USB keyboards and mice as the main controller vs ps2 vs wireless vs bluetooth vs the gyration mouse and keyboard vs a ms type remote? Does it even support the ms remote and emitters? Is it like windows where it will just install the drivers and use what it detects as long as we bundle all the drivers in?

Sorry I just don't have time to look into this. The goal being to load up on options here rather than being stuck to just one solution. People have their own strong preferences in this area.

Troy
post #520 of 1046
Quote:
Originally Posted by pcCinema View Post

Greeniguana

What kind of setup is needed in LinuxMCE to support standard USB keyboards and mice as the main controller vs ps2 vs wireless vs bluetooth vs the gyration mouse and keyboard vs a ms type remote? Does it even support the ms remote and emitters? Is it like windows where it will just install the drivers and use what it detects as long as we bundle all the drivers in?

Sorry I just don't have time to look into this. the goal being to load up on options here rather than being stuck to one solution. People have their own strong preferences in this area.

Troy

LinuxMCE will work with USB and PS2 keyboards and mice that can be wired, RF wireless, or bluetooth, as well as the gyration mouse (which it is primarily designed for) and the Microsoft MCE remote. It will all work by default when LinuxMCE is installed.
post #521 of 1046
Thread Starter 
Cool. We can give options.
I think I want to set up windows for the gyration too, but I've never had my hands on one to know how good it actually works and feels. It sure looks great on the linuxMCE videos.

Troy
post #522 of 1046
I have a Gyration mouse (and keyboard), but I have to admit I use it mainly in regular mouse mode. I find it a lot easier than waving it in the air - a testament, I suppose, to my lack of mental and physical flexibility. Logitech has a similar mouse that CPU Magazine (or is it Maximum PC?) just raved about in its latest issue. They actually compare it to the Gyration media remote control, which they thoroughly trash.
post #523 of 1046
Quote:
Originally Posted by pcCinema View Post

Are you sure on that 16x slot not working at 16x? Please post a link to proof if you can. I have a hard time believing this, as the onboard video is disabled when an add in card is put in, from what I can tell, so they aren't sharing. Or there must be a way to disable onboard video.

Troy

Here is the block diagram from the GA-G33M-S2H user's manual.


The PCI Express x16 slot is hard wired to ICH9 and even if onboard video disabled, it will run only at x4.

As for ATX vs. mATX, a typical case size is:
  • SilverStone LC17 (ATX & mATX): W425 x D425 x H170 mm
  • Antec NSK2400 (mATX only): W445 x D414 x H140 mm
A mATX case is not so space-saving unless you choose a slim case (with a non-ATX power supply). Moreover the number of available desktop cases (excluding slim cases) in the US market is:
  • ATX cases: ~40
  • mATX cases: ~10
Clearly you have much more options for ATX cases.
post #524 of 1046
Thread Starter 
Hmm I have a couple Asrock 775dualVSTA's that also limit the x16 to x4 or something, but in use it only dropped benchmarks by a very small margin when compared to the same card on better boards.
(because todays stuff doesn't utilize all that bandwith anyway)
But this is sure disappointing. Why would they do such a thing?

Thank you for that Renethx that was very nice of you to find and post that block diagram.

I'm open to reconsider going full atx and no onboard video if enough people would prefer that, my case will fit full size boards and I wanted the gaming power of a real add in card myself anyway.

I just wanted more options to keep cost down (as well as size) for others just for the sake of the ultimate flexibility of our build to be used in any form.

Should we vote on it?

I don't know the numbers but some wanted full and some wanted micro.

Voting could help ensure we meet the needs of the most users possible with the first build.

Personally I prefer a big case and the most upgrade ability but I do like as many onboard features as possible.

I really wouldn't use on board video myself at this time other than to test it for you all.

My case is 4u sized rackmount but short depth like a standard desktop.

I have not been looking at full size motherboard options, but I'd want all that's been discussed so far plus if we could find something with the same new audio chip that would be nice. We're pretty well comitted to 45nm support, I think that's best for us all so the system remains viable longer.
I guess we'd be looking at the g35 chipsets?

Maybe we should look at more block diagrams for those upcoming boards to see their shortcomings too if those details are out yet.


I am willing to start on the p33 board and I could have that all done before the g35 and do the g35 as well if you guys are willing to expand the effort to both systems. I would just tear down the first system when done with it and move on to the same testing with the second board and same hardware if we don't have enough money to build two complete systems right away.

bluepill and linux setup would have to be expanded to support both platforms.

If it's a month wait that could be enough time to do both and once we have something concrete I imagine we would get enough donors and supporters to have both systems built to continue tuning both as time goes by.

There is around $600 in the bank for this now... With the 360 drive paid for already and we have an offer for a loaner hdhomerun so we don't have to buy one. Also GreenIguana says he doesn't need a motherboard for his work, and Binary64 may not either so it would only be the added cost of one additional motherboard for right now.

I am also willing to sell my current htpc's and wrap that money into completing the second and just use both of those for my daily drivers so refinements can continue to come out for both platforms. They can share optical drives so it's just the base systems needing to be built.

Troy
post #525 of 1046
I'd like full ATX for the expansion possibilities and the greater variety of boards to choose from. I won't be terribly unhappy, though, if more people want mATX, since I want that Antec NSK 2400 case. Seems to me, though, that the next iteration of this project might allow me to reuse a larger HTPC case, PS, etc., and still have room for things like more advanced sound and video cards that might have trouble fitting into a small case.
post #526 of 1046
If we're voting, I like the ATX better, but I am not disappointed if the micro wins the vote.
post #527 of 1046
I would like to sugget several options.

1. Wait for G35 and GeForce 7050/nForce 630i mATX motherboards (both are coming in a month or so) and see what motherboards are available.

2. Choose
It supports RAID and IEEE 1394. It's SLI, but actually very good for general desktop users. This board and its brother P6N SLI Platinum is MSI's greatest hit since K8NGM2-FID. Look at Hard|Forums - MSI P6N SLI-FI / Platinum Thread to see how people are excited at this mb. Shorcomings are that overclocking Q6600 is limited to ~2.7GHz and that the support for Penryn is unknown yet.

3. If you drop the requirement for IEEE 1394, then some of the best ATX mb are
IEEE 1394 could be optional. A PCI-IEEE 1394 card can be purchased at less than $10.

4. If IEEE 1394 is a must, then
All of them have been proved very stable, support Penryn and have good oc features.
post #528 of 1046
Boy, if we picked the Asus P5B-Plus I'd be set! I have that board, an E4300 running comfortably at 3 GHZ, good overclocking Corsair RAM and an Asus EN8600GT Silent video card.

None of the cards has on-board video, though.
post #529 of 1046
Thread Starter 
You'll have to give me time to go over them all in depth but once again great work by Renethx.

Do you know off the top of your head if any of those have the same audio chipset as the p33? I guess that's not so important on full size since there is one more slot to add even a high end sound card.

If we do go full atx we would not be looking for any on board video, this would be a switch to a more high end capable board and video would be just expected to be the 8600gt minimum.

I must say the p5b plus seems to have it all. I still like to see a serial port and parallel port plus little things like the spdif on the back panel are just nice...How about 45nm support? Please tell us all about it Joseph. How about power management, WOL, speedstep, fan control, temp sensors working right in 3rd party apps, anything you can think of good or bad.

I will keep doing more research and think about things a bit while more people have a chance to voice their opinions.

Troy
post #530 of 1046
Thread Starter 
On a completely unrelated topic.

I don't know how much work you have going on GreenIguana but I have noticed XBMC for linux is nearing it's first release. How hard would it be to include that in the LinuxMCE build as an optional front end once it's stable?
(If you have your hands full already forget it.)
There's no telling when it will actually be ready for prime time but it's looks like they are really close.

Also what can you tell us about the fate of guide data for MythTV? I keep hearing it'll be cut off, and may be a pay service, which goes against the entire point of linux in my mind.

Troy
post #531 of 1046
Abit boards may be excluded because they do not have paralle/Serial port/header.

ASUS P5B-Plus supports 45 nm processors according to this ASUS page. Chipsets are:

NB: P965
SB: ICH8R
Super I/O: W83627DHG
IDE/SATA controller: JMB363
LAN controller: Attansic L1
Audio codec: AD1988A (DAC/ADC SNR: 95/90 dB)
IEEE 1394: VT6307

I am not sure about linux support for them. The board has a serial header and a serial port bracket can be purchased at less than $5.

GIGABYTE GA-P35-DS3P and its various siblings are the most popular P35 boards and got already many awards. Audio codec is ALC889A.
post #532 of 1046
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joseph Clark View Post

Boy, if we picked the Asus P5B-Plus I'd be set! I have that board, an E4300 running comfortably at 3 GHZ, good overclocking Corsair RAM and an Asus EN8600GT Silent video card.

None of the cards has on-board video, though.

I second that. I have the P5B-Deluxe/8600GT/E4300 combo running stable at 2.7 GHz- very easy to OC, lots of features, stable all-around (except for software interaction, FFDShow, MyMovies, tuners, etc..., hence the reason for this project!) I understand the debate over micro vs. the larger mobo's (personally I like a larger case like the Antec Overture I use, for room for hard-drives, multiple tuner cards, etc..) Anyway, if you go micro I understand, but don't just dismiss the Asus boards since they are "high-end", as I think most people building an HTPC, while budget is never a non-factor, would still rather spend an extra $50 or so for stability and easy overclocking if necessary. Just my 2 cents....
post #533 of 1046
If we are voting, put me down for an ASUS P5B too, with a 4300/4400 in it.
Micro ATX are pretty pointless, if you are too cheap for a proper graphics card
I think you will find a Nvidia 7300 ($25) will play anything you like with a Intel e4x00 clocked to 266FSB.
post #534 of 1046
ASUS P5B Deluxe was the champion in the FSB 1066 era. A good thing is that it also supports FSB 1333 and in particular 45 nm processors. However it is discontinued and not available in major US retailers any longer. P5B-Plus is the last member of the P5B family (released in April 2007) and should be available for the next couple of months.

The new champion in the FSB 1333 era seems to be GIGABYTE GA-P35-DQ6/DS4/DS3P/DS3R (someone may say it is abit!). The DS4 should be equivalent to P5B Deluxe pricewise (~$200), but is not available in US. The DQ6 is too pricey (> $200) and DS3R lacks FireWire. So DS3P is the choice (it lies at a midpoint between the high-end and mid-range classes).
post #535 of 1046
As I've said before, P5B.
__________________________________________________________

BTW, a recent claim by an LG rep. of a September release date for their dual-format drives:
http://www.blu-ray.com/news/?id=483

"The internal GGW-H20L rewriter will be released in the US and Europe in September and retail for $499 (400). The internal GGC-H20L drive will be released in the US and Europe in September and retail for $399 (300). Finally, the external GGW-E10L rewriter will cost $499 (400), but won't be available until Q1 2008. We weren't able to get any information about the release date and pricing of the GBW-T10N Blu-ray rewriter."
post #536 of 1046
I checked the block diagram of Intel DG33TL that supports DVI (HDCP-compliant).


Both the PCI Express x16 slot and the DVI transmitter are connected to G33 and the PCI Express x16 works at x16. GA-G33M-S2H is perplexing.

BTW DG33TL could be a nice HTPC motherboard, but it lacks oc options in BIOS.
post #537 of 1046
renethx, if you know, do the g33/35 Intel IGPs allow correction of overscan on all outputs, and do they support a HDTV header (for component out)?
post #538 of 1046
Thread Starter 
Just to clarify We don't require parallel and serial connections, it's just a nice feature to have for some gear like crestron and other hardware like my beloved CRT projectors which all used serial control. Some VFD/LCD's of a certain age all used parallel and serial also though now there are USB versions.

Both of those things can be added with cheap USB converters so we don't want to stay all hung up on that.

Joseph Clark has professional writing skills and has stepped up to create a well written FAQ for us. Thank you Joseph!

We now also have an offer for a loaner BR drive if it turns out we can't afford one. Thank you Mikegnds.

It's nice to see we're picking up more and more support. It's very much appreciated, we couldn't do anything without all the volunteers and supporters making this possible.

Troy
post #539 of 1046
Quote:
Originally Posted by renethx View Post

P5B-Plus is the last member of the P5B family (released in April 2007) and should be available for the next couple of months.

If it's out the door soon, maybe we should reconsider the P5B-Plus. Get all the testing done and Asus discontinues it - not good.
post #540 of 1046
grittree

I don't know the answer to the 1st question. Intel IGP is capable of supporting TV out, but its implementation (integrating a TV encoder) is left to the mb manufacturer. So far there is no G33 mb that has TV out.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Home Theater Computers
AVS › AVS Forum › Video Components › Home Theater Computers › Suppose I make it easy for all the newbies and budget folks?