or Connect
AVS › AVS Forum › Blu-ray & HD DVD › HDTV Software Media Discussion › HDM Rumor thread! Put all rumors here.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

HDM Rumor thread! Put all rumors here. - Page 52  

post #1531 of 1560
Quote:
Originally Posted by spam.curitiba View Post

That has been found out to be false and they will continue to produce them

I'll take anything posted at the digital bits as being rumor, so I guess it's posted in the right place.
post #1532 of 1560
Quote:
Originally Posted by spam.curitiba View Post

That has been found out to be false and they will continue to produce them
http://www.thedigitalbits.com/#mytwocents

So we're supposed to take Bill Hunt's word as factual? He's the guy who invented (using nice words there) the "150 Million came from Microsoft" nonsense. Anything he says, I would think the opposite is likely true.

Robert posted the Warner/combo info.
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=914750

I'll take Robert's word over Bill Hunt's any day.
post #1533 of 1560
Quote:
Originally Posted by quantumred View Post

So we're supposed to take Bill Hunt's word as factual? He's the guy who invented (using nice words there) the "150 Million came from Microsoft" nonsense. Anything he says, I would think the opposite is likely true.

Robert posted the Warner/combo info.
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=914750

I'll take Robert's word over Bill Hunt's any day.

Normally - so would I - in a heartbeat. But Bill is posting a retraction to a post he made the day before. He is correcting the wrong info that he had. He even quotes WHV. Robert either was given wrong info, didn't understand the info he got, or he is correct and Bill is lying.
post #1534 of 1560
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lee Stewart View Post

Normally - so would I - in a heartbeat. But Bill is posting a retraction to a post he made the day before. He is correcting the wrong info that he had. He even quotes WHV. Robert either was given wrong info, didn't understand the info he got, or he is correct and Bill is lying.

Robert is not infallible:

http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=903461

And why would Hunt lie about this?

Someone has incorrect info, but to suggest lying about it is ridiculous.
post #1535 of 1560
Quote:
Originally Posted by brian1212 View Post

Robert is not infallible:

http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=903461

And why would Hunt lie about this?

Someone has incorrect info, but to suggest lying about it is ridiculous.

Personally I do not believe either party is lying. i believe there was some errornous info floating around and it was taken out of context.

"For the foreseeable future"

Got to love those hard as nails, can't argue with that, no question about it studio answers.

YES . . . I really do feel like a mushroom when it comes to the Hollywood studios and how they communicate with us "little people."

Hollywood Mantra:

"You can't nail JELL-O to the wall!"
post #1536 of 1560
How much more can Sony possibly strip from out the PS3 to make it more affordable? What a joke the PS3 has turned out to be, if true, this moves stinks of pure desperation.
post #1537 of 1560
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Channel View Post

Rumor: Sony to Announce $399 PS3
Multiple sources claim budget SKU for the holidays.
http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3163191



I suspect that they will deliver on this. The big question mark is will this be a high production volume sku, or will Sony make this in small quantities like the original 20GB PS3 due to the greater subsidy involved with the lower price point.

If it's only a teaser model, they may find that it will not have the desired effect of lifting their sales out of third place.

The new "5 Free HD Movie" offer which runs thru Jan 08 includes 3 different sku for PS3 (presumably 60 gig, 80 gig, and maybe new 40 gig?). But in any case there are three listed; and since 20 is long out of production and this is a new promotion I don't think that's it. I'm guessing they eliminate the card reader and put in the smaller disc; I would have thought they eliminate wi-fi; but Sony has filed papers with the FCC which seem to indicate a new wi-fi PS3, if I interpret the info correctly.

There are separate threads on both these items. I'll see if I can find them and link to them.

EDIT: Here is the thread; which contains links to both items I mentioned.
post #1538 of 1560
http://wesleytech.com/samsung-bdp-24...-canceled/380/

Samsung BDP-2400 Blu-ray player cancelled:
Quote:
If you were looking forward to get the new Samsung BDP-2400, I have bad news for you; I just received word that Samsung has cancelled all plans to release their upcoming high-end Blu-ray Disc player. All orders for the player have been cancelled, and the model will not be brought to the market.

BD-UP5000 dual-format player delayed until December:
Quote:
The Samsung BD-UP5000 has been moved back to December. The BD-UP5000 is a dual-format player and with this new release date means it is a minimum 1.1 spec, but it has all the required hardware to be a 2.0 spec.
post #1539 of 1560
Maybe Samsung is planning their own standalone HD DVD player.
post #1540 of 1560
Quote:
Originally Posted by rdjam View Post

Chill everyone. No need to get excited here. Things will happen that are going to happen, so we can all relax. Whether they happen now or tomorrow is immaterial.

We know that one format has delivered as promised and the other is having issues, so I think we can be fairly comfortable about which direction things will eventually go, and which direction is "unfeasible" in terms of rumoured happenings.

I don't think it's a good idea to "beat up" on people here in general. You never know who or what may be behind that "user name", as top industry folks mingle freely with us ordinary users here on a pretty regular basis.

So respect is always the best idea.

God bless...

RDJAM...just after CEDIA you said someting was coming in a month..i think that is next week...is that still on track and any further hints..or a review of hints in case we missed a post.
post #1541 of 1560
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrevorS View Post

I think this is an excellent example of the kind of post that is inappropriate on ANY forum, including a rumor thread. It is clearly designed to create disquiet -- basically a baiting post. It occurs to me as being both irresponsible and inconsiderate to the rest of the member population!

I agree!

Still, when semi-serious rumors are reported, it can be a lot of fun.

However, no one wants the "I know something big because I know someone in the know who works for a big important company which I cannot name...and I can't tell you what the something big is; just that it is coming soon" type of post.
post #1542 of 1560
I think we need some sort of format for posting rumors

for example:

rumor:

my source is.......

I have [have not] sent additional info to mods

etc


feel free to PM ideas, or post them here

We see the value in this thread but want to curb abuse
post #1543 of 1560
IMO - the most important item is a link to the rumor. If there is no link when the rumor is posted - then the rumor post MUST be deleted.

Facts and proof are needed to add credibility to the rumor. Without them the rumor is nothing more than heresay and should not be allowed.

If this was adhered to from the getgo - that hoax rumor that was posted 2 days ago would have been removed 5 minutes after it was posted and none of the problems would have resulted.

There were no links provided in that post.

Links will stop any hoax's in the future.
post #1544 of 1560
Bill's information is spot on, IMO.
post #1545 of 1560
In some cases it may be impossible to post links since it is a rumor. Instead of links why not require the posting of where the information came from without posting names. I would also require that if the rumor proves false the poster should be required to tell us where the rumor came from.
post #1546 of 1560
Quote:
Originally Posted by markrubin View Post

...
We see the value in this thread but want to curb abuse

I don't think links should be required. I recall reading from Kosty something to the effect: 'I heard from my sources at Cedia that TL51 is compatible with existing players.' I consider this reasonable and I don't expect a link.

I see two troublesome types of posts.

1) The FUD post which does not provide the substance of the rumor.
Quote:
Originally Posted by HD-DownUnder View Post

Oh dear!

I have just received some troubling news in regards to Warner Bros and the format war.

All I can say is that something has happened in the last 24hrs hours which may change a lot of things.

More to come soon!

Quote:
Originally Posted by beatboy77 View Post

Guys I am around 24 to 48 hours away from being able to report a MAJOR Blu-ray announcement. I have learned today from a BDA insider that this Paramount development was actually a pre-emptive strike to counter a soon to be made MAJOR annoucement from the BDA...

I think these should be summarily deleted. If the substance of the rumor will not be posted, I think these posts do nothing except lower the value of the thread and the forum.

2) The prank rumor. Of course this was made legendary from the br.com incident, however I don't recall seeing it occur here. I don't think this needs to be defended too much because posting history is valued here and if someone comes in and posts a prank rumor without a reasonable posting history, it is treated with suspicion.
post #1547 of 1560
Links are preferred, if available
post #1548 of 1560
updated:

rumor:

my source is.......

Link (if avail)

I have [have not] sent additional info to mods

Time frame

Certainty of this rumor [scale 1-10]

post #1549 of 1560
Here is the problem with the non-linked rumor:

EXAMPLE:

Rumor: "X Title Will Be Cancelled"

"I spoke to a friend of mine who is a distributor for HDM movies. He received a notice that X Tile will not be shipping on the 24th as was expected."

So what is the point? To get the rumor posted first? So the poster can say "I posted the rumor first here at AVS . . ?" If the title in question is delayed or cancelled then the studio will make an announcement about it.

Without a link you can post anything (as we are seeing already).
post #1550 of 1560
Quote:
Originally Posted by HD-DownUnder View Post

Oh dear!

I have just received some troubling news in regards to Warner Bros and the format war.

All I can say is that something has happened in the last 24hrs hours which may change a lot of things.

More to come soon!

just an example: not trying to get anyone in trouble:

this to me does not qualify as posted: some basis, link, more info would have to be posted under the new guidelines
post #1551 of 1560
Quote:
Originally Posted by markrubin View Post

Links are preferred, if available

lol yupe . this place is for us to post and discuss rumors. not create them . if you want to create rumor, please go to BD.com. That is what they are for
post #1552 of 1560
Quote:
Originally Posted by beatboy77 View Post

Guys I am around 24 to 48 hours away from being able to report a MAJOR Blu-ray announcement. I have learned today from a BDA insider that this Paramount development was actually a pre-emptive strike to counter a soon to be made MAJOR annoucement from the BDA...

another example only:

this might be OK: we could challenge the poster to provide more info: either by post or PM to mods if he wanted it to remain undisclosed. If mods were not satisfied, we would delete
post #1553 of 1560
I support the use of links. The only exception is if the poster give supporting info to the mods and the mods approve the posting.
post #1554 of 1560
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulGo View Post

I support the use of links. The only exception is if the poster give supporting info to the mods and the mods approve the posting.

Agreed. The Mod(s) have to make a post that they have reviewed the source of the rumor and agree that it qualifies for this thread.
post #1555 of 1560
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulGo View Post

I support the use of links. The only exception is if the poster give supporting info to the mods and the mods approve the posting.

they certainly are preferred:

that is exactly what happened a week ago with a rumor posted with no link: I challenged poster to provide more info and he did by PM: I was satisfied with his basis and in fact it turned out to be true
post #1556 of 1560
Also no bashing of flaming of these posts. Lets try to keep this thread like the Insiders thread which is now very much on topic.
post #1557 of 1560
And no PMs between members who support one side or the other keeping hoaxes going just for their own giggles.
post #1558 of 1560
Hi,

I have nothing against a requirement to post a link, but unfortunately it doesn't prevent a recurrence of this recent debacle. The source of the problem posting was Bluray.com. If a similiar pot-stirring posting were to be posted there, or anywhere else for that matter, what would a link to another site accomplish?

We need some rules guiding minimum information requirements. In addition, there probably needs to be some sanctions against members if it can be reasonably determined, after the fact, that the "rumor" was a deliberate hoax designed to stir things up.

I admit this is an extremely difficult situation to attempt to moderate. Perhap PMs to the moderators really is the best way to go.

Larry
post #1559 of 1560
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fergy View Post

And no PMs between members who support one side or the other keeping hoaxes going just for their own giggles.

jawohl mon commandant
post #1560 of 1560
Thread Starter 
Mark and I have opted to close this thread and start a new one.

We'll incorporate a lot of the above suggestions into the new PART DEUX rumor thread: http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...6#post11763726
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: HDTV Software Media Discussion
This thread is locked  
AVS › AVS Forum › Blu-ray & HD DVD › HDTV Software Media Discussion › HDM Rumor thread! Put all rumors here.