Quote:
Originally Posted by
Robert Whitehead 
Sorry if I sounded too melodramatic. My association with NAD goes decades back, pre HT, when it was in Mass. and US built. I knew several of the people there.
I hope I didn't come off too preachy

Not intended at all if that's the case. If so, my apologies.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Robert Whitehead 
I have a B&K AVR507 now, and am pleased you found the sound of the NAD superior to your B&K equipment. One question: do you find the NAD sound quality superior to the B&K without Audyssey?
actually, yes. I think the NAD amp is superior, but remember I was using lower power 80 wpc amps. Two of them were adcom and one was NAD. I didn't ever feel like there was quite enough power during big dynamic transients with that setup. Also, I like the burr-brown's better than the AK DAC's in the Reference 30.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Robert Whitehead 
No, I'm not going to wait for the B&K, which is still in the design stage with an optomistic release date of March 08. I expect its price will be higher than the NADs.
glad to hear you also enjoyed B&K, which is a Buffalo, NY company, my hometown.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Robert Whitehead 
also not due until March, is the Sherwood Newcastle R-972 which is, I believe, the first to incorporate Trinnov room correction, which is said to work in 3 dimensions.
I'm very interested to see how this receiver performs vs. those with audyssey.
John