AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Speakers › Non-compromised center channels
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Non-compromised center channels

post #1 of 62
Thread Starter 
Let's talk about center channels that are not compromised in their design, that is, free from the usual lobing\\wave interference issues that plague most center speakers on the market.

Let me quote from another post:

"Center-channel speakers, although designed to serve that function, are, in reality, an accomodation for people that need a horizontally-oriented speaker to "fit" in their center location. Most people can't place a vertically-oriented tower or even a bookshelf in the center; hence the need for "center-channel speakers".

But a vertically-oriented speaker actually disperses sound horizontally, into the room, much better than a horizontally-oriented speaker, which disperses sound vertically, toward the floor and ceiling, providing a very narrow "sweet spot" and producing unwanted reflections off the floor and ceiling. That's why most "normal" stereo speaker pairs are, and have always been, vertically-oriented; they disperse sound best, horizontally. You also want your center speaker to disperse sound best, horizontally, with a wide "sweet spot", so that everyone in the room can hear it well.

Additionally, horizontal MTM speakers (midwoofer-tweeter-midwoofer; the design that the majority of horizontal center channel speakers exhibit) suffer from something called "lobing", which is, basically, an interference phenomenon caused by adjacent placement of two identical drivers that are producing acoustically identical output. The result of lobing, with respect to the horizontal mid-woofer to mid-woofer arrangement and distance encountered in most MTM center channels, is a dip in horizontal, off-axis midrange frequency response. Since most dialogue relies heavily upon midrange frequencies for reproduction of human voices, a midrange dip is exactly what you don't want from a center-channel speaker.

There ARE designs that attempt to alleviate the problems associated with horizontal center channel speakers; both the dispersion issue and the lobing issue.

Horizontal MTMs are usually designed with a lower crossover point between the midwoofers and tweeter, so that the single tweeter produces some of the midrange content that would normally be cancelled due to lobing. Sometimes an offset tweeter design is used which allows for closer spacing of the 2 midwoofers, which helps reduce the lobing effect. Another common method used in horizontal center speakers to reduce lobing is to simply add a midrange driver, arranged vertically with a tweeter, both located between the two midwoofers; the so-called WTMW design. There are also some asymmetric 2.5-way crossover designs where both midwoofers operate at the lowest frequencies, but only one midwoofer operates through the critical midrange frequencies. But none of these designs eliminates the vertical dispersion issues inherent to horizontal speakers.

Another design, and perhaps the best, is the coincidental array design, where the tweeter is located in the center of a single midwoofer. This design, with only a single midwoofer, completely eliminates the lobing issue. But even the horizontal coincidental array designs do not disperse sound as ideally as a vertically-oriented coincidental array speaker would.

So, the horizontal center-channel speaker, no matter the design, is not ideal. It is a compromise. Many people incorrectly assume that the best choice for their center speaker must be the speaker that the manufacturer of their speakers markets specifically as a "center channel speaker". But the best center channel speaker would be a single, vertically-oriented tower, bookshelf, or LCR (vertical MTM) that identically matches your front left and right speakers."

For further info on why most centers are inherently flawed, see this article:
http://www.audioholics.com/education...peaker-designs

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

So what I'm looking for are center channels that have been designed well enough to minimize or even eliminate these problems.

Please chime in!
post #2 of 62
M&k S-150thx
post #3 of 62
post #4 of 62
Maybe somebody can clear this up for me, but I'm a little confused about the claim that horizontal center channels disperse sound vertically, whereas traditional speakers have a horizontal dispersion. Now...why? Unless I'm mistaken, most drivers are perfectly round, so an individual driver cannot be "oriented" vertically as opposed to horizontally, and vice versa. So why then would the same driver start dispersing in a completely different manner? Does it "know" that it's in a horizontally oriented speaker design? Or does the enclosure itself play a part? I'm not sure I think that's the case, as most speakers are manufactured to have enclosures that don't funk with the sound.

And another question; another layout is what I will refer to as the WTMP, woofer-tweeter-mid-passive where the 2nd woofer is simply a passive radiator. I'm assuming this would hinder the lobing that can occur, since you have only one driver per "assignment".

But I'm still confused as to the vertical vs horizontal displacement. It's not that I don't believe it, I would just like to understand the why.


EDIT: After looking at that article, it appears that the vertical vs. horizontal issue is again a result of redundant drivers. Would the above-mentioned WTMP resolve this issue?
post #5 of 62
Quote:
Originally Posted by swartzy.baby View Post

Maybe somebody can clear this up for me, but I'm a little confused about the claim that horizontal center channels disperse sound vertically, whereas traditional speakers have a horizontal dispersion. Now...why? Unless I'm mistaken, most drivers are perfectly round, so an individual driver cannot be "oriented" vertically as opposed to horizontally, and vice versa. So why then would the same driver start dispersing in a completely different manner? Does it "know" that it's in a horizontally oriented speaker design? Or does the enclosure itself play a part? I'm not sure I think that's the case, as most speakers are manufactured to have enclosures that don't funk with the sound.

None of the above. It is the radiation of pressure waves from each driver that interacts with those of other drivers. How they interact (and interfere) depends on their physical relationship.

Quote:


EDIT: After looking at that article, it appears that the vertical vs. horizontal issue is again a result of redundant drivers. Would the above-mentioned WTMP resolve this issue?

Not just redundant/duplicate drivers but with any two (or more) drivers reproducing the same signals, e.g., a woofer and tweeter at their common crossover frequency.
post #6 of 62
post #7 of 62
Could a person just take their CC and orient in vertically? Or is there more to it than that?

Rob
post #8 of 62
Quote:
Originally Posted by Highside View Post

Could a person just take their CC and orient in vertically? Or is there more to it than that?

Rob

You could. For someone shopping for a new setup, they would be better buying a matching bookshelf speaker to their mains or a center channel which is designed properly.

Paradigm recently updated the majority of their center channel speakers to compensate for the effects discussed here.
post #9 of 62
Thread Starter 
Here's an interesting design:
http://www.amazon.com/KEF-iQ2C-Chann...028445&sr=1-17


I wonder how this speaker sounds. I hear mixed opinions on coaxial speaker designs.
post #10 of 62
What about this center channel? Seems to do well in some reviews.

http://dynaudiona.com/products/evide...nter/ecent.htm
post #11 of 62
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThrottleAbuse View Post

What about this center channel? Seems to do well in some reviews.

http://dynaudiona.com/products/evide...nter/ecent.htm

Gee whiz. I hope they did something very special with the crossover network because, on the face of it, this is a poster-boy for how not to get good and even horizontal dispersion. The Dynaudio guys are pretty smart but they offer no info on that page as to how they deal with the (obvious) issues.
post #12 of 62
Thread Starter 
So Kal, based on what we know about center channel design problems, wouldn't you get a better result by simply buying a tower or bookshelf with no redundant drivers, and turning it sideways?

For example, take this speaker:
Pioneer S-HF41-LR


Or this one:
Sony SS-B3000


Both of these large bookshelves feature a WMT design. The only redudancy is where the frequencies overlap (where one driver crosses over to the next one). So you'd think there's less potential for wave interference compared to a typical MTM center design.

So, all other things being equal, wouldn't either of these speakers (turned sideways) work better as a center channel than a horizontal MTM?
post #13 of 62
Quote

"The symmetric driver array, in combination with Dynaudio's advanced crossover filter technology, provides the speakers a greatly reduced horizontal dispersion"

This is from the page for that Dynaudio center. Isn't "reduced horizontal dispersion" exactly what you don't want in a center channel??!
post #14 of 62
Aerial Acoustics Model CC5, and their CC3b.

www.aerialacoustics.com


nuff said
post #15 of 62
I told you I wasn't going to participate in this thread, but I just can't resist.


Quote:
Originally Posted by mbaxter View Post

So Kal, ..................

Leave Kal alone.



Quote:
Originally Posted by mbaxter View Post

....................less potential for wave interference compared to a typical MTM center design.

What is this "wave interference" you keep referring to? If you mean lobing, there is no real potential for ANY significant lobing if none of the drivers are producing identical output.



Quote:
Originally Posted by mbaxter View Post

So, all other things being equal, wouldn't either of these speakers (turned sideways) work better as a center channel than a horizontal MTM?

All other things being equal (which really isn't possible in this or any example like it, as any comparable MTM would automatically be a DIFFERENT speaker), yes, however I would strongly encourage anyone who is considering this option to, if possible, try and orient the speaker as it was intended to be used, vertically. If you are looking for the reason more people don't utilize this option, even horizontally, it is because, as I've pointed out, many people just assume that the speaker that is marketed to them as the matching center-channel speaker for their front speakers must be the best option. I also have pointed out that it is often hard to buy a single bookshelf speaker (or even a tower speaker) as they are usually marketed in pairs.

Now, as far as an MTM LCR is concerned, in which all things ARE equal, the vertical orientation, when possible, would be much-prefered over the horizontal orientation.



Quote:
Originally Posted by mbaxter View Post

So what I'm looking for are center channels that have been designed well enough to minimize or even eliminate these problems.

It is no mystery as to what makes for a better center-channel speaker. These are very simple concepts. But don't be led to believe that whether a speaker is an MTM or not is the sole consideration one should take into account when choosing a center-channel-specific speaker. A poor quality bookshelf, used vertically, will still probably perform worse as a center-channel speaker than a high-quality horizontal MTM.
post #16 of 62
Quote:
Originally Posted by swartzy.baby View Post

Quote

"The symmetric driver array, in combination with Dynaudio's advanced crossover filter technology, provides the speakers a greatly reduced horizontal dispersion"

This is from the page for that Dynaudio center. Isn't "reduced horizontal dispersion" exactly what you don't want in a center channel??!

Yup but, at least, it's honest.
post #17 of 62
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbaxter View Post

So Kal, based on what we know about center channel design problems, wouldn't you get a better result by simply buying a tower or bookshelf with no redundant drivers, and turning it sideways?

Both of these large bookshelves feature a WMT design. The only redudancy is where the frequencies overlap (where one driver crosses over to the next one). So you'd think there's less potential for wave interference compared to a typical MTM center design.

So, all other things being equal, wouldn't either of these speakers (turned sideways) work better as a center channel than a horizontal MTM?

They would compromised as well. Mebbe less, mebbe not. The problem is the horizontal arrangement of the drivers. Take a vertical array and turn it sideways and you get the same.
post #18 of 62
Quote:
Originally Posted by sivadselim View Post

What is this "wave interference" you keep referring to? If you mean lobing, there is no real potential for ANY significant lobing if none of the drivers are producing identical output.

Which they all do at and around crossover frequencies.
post #19 of 62
Aperion Audio Intimus 532-C




Aperion Audio Intimus 533-VAC




Aperion Audio Intimus 634-VAC






However, any of these, used vertically, would most likely make for a better center-channel speaker.
post #20 of 62
post #21 of 62
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kal Rubinson View Post

Which they all do at and around crossover frequencies.

Yes, but it is not that significant. At least not nearly as significant as the lobing that occurs in the critical midrange region with the midwoofer-to-midwoofer distances encountered in most horizontal MTM center-channel speakers.

And any small amount of lobing that IS there is not in the critical horizontal plane if the speakers are being used vertically. Who cares if there is some lobing 10 feet above your ears?
post #22 of 62
Quote:
Originally Posted by swartzy.baby View Post

Quote

"The symmetric driver array, in combination with Dynaudio's advanced crossover filter technology, provides the speakers a greatly reduced horizontal dispersion"

This is from the page for that Dynaudio center. Isn't "reduced horizontal dispersion" exactly what you don't want in a center channel??!

In all fairness we should post Dynaudio's entire discussion of the speaker's horizontal dispersion characterisitics.

"The symmetric driver array, in combination with Dynaudio's advanced crossover filter technology, provides the speakers a greatly reduced horizontal dispersion (most ideal for a specifically designed Center speaker for Home Theater and multi-channel listening). Therefore, less energy is transferred to the side walls and acoustical obstructions in the room, thus eliminating any reflections or cancellations off of these boundaries, making the Evidence Center much less dependent upon room acoustics and listening position as compared to any other high-end loudspeakers, and a perfect Center for use with either the Evidence Master or Evidence Temptation main loudspeakers."

Interesting take.
post #23 of 62
The Polk LSiC features a 2.5-way asymmetric crossover design.

As do several of the Klipsch centers, such as the RC-62, which also has a low HF crossover point, as do many of Klipsch's speakers due to their horns' capabilities.
post #24 of 62
I am not expert on any of this, but I wonder what the thought process is for many of these high end manufactures. If it is common knowledge that these horizontal arrangements are not as good as a vertical arrangement why do these engineers keep building stuff that is not as good. Now I could understand from a lower end company, but someone like dynaudio building a $25000 center I just dont get it. It seems that at $25000 it is no holds barred design. Dunno. I cant see a bunch of highly skilled engineers building something to that supposed level and then compromising so it asthetically looks good. I am by no means trying to say the horizontal is better I am just kind of wondering in text. Could they really be doing it just for cosmetic reasons?


Sorry to go off topic, but should I put my Contour T2.1 in a vertical arrangement above my TV slighlty angled toward the seating position? I have not finnished with the room, but I was planning on mounting it on a TV wall stand above my TV horizontally and with a slight angle towards the seating position. I cant put it under the TV and its a 70" so my only guess was above angled down.
post #25 of 62
Someone mentioned using the equivalent bookshelf speaker for the center. Is this better than using the equvilent "real" center channel? I.E. same brand/components and timbre matched.

Also, I agree that this is not the easiest to do since speakers, aside from the CC, are sold in pairs. That being said, could a person set up the pair and use them both as the center channel? Will a person just creat lobing by doing this?

Thanks,
Rob

PS trying to stay on topic and learn about other "non-compromising" options with regular speakers.
post #26 of 62
If your video display can accomodate it, yes it's best to put the same speaker that you are using for left/right in the center. One way to minimize some of the issues mentioned (if properly implemented) is to use a low enough cross-over point that it supposedly is less of an issue; then use a vertical stack of mid & tweeter in the middle. That is how all of Revel's Performa and Ultima dedicated center speakers are designed (as well as the Aerial's mentioned above, and many others).
post #27 of 62
I'm surprised no one has mentioned these yet:

http://www.energy-speakers.com/v2/pr...age.php?id=270
post #28 of 62
Quote:
Originally Posted by Highside View Post

Someone mentioned using the equivalent bookshelf speaker for the center. Is this better than using the equvilent "real" center channel? I.E. same brand/components and timbre matched.

Also, I agree that this is not the easiest to do since speakers, aside from the CC, are sold in pairs. That being said, could a person set up the pair and use them both as the center channel? Will a person just creat lobing by doing this?

Thanks,
Rob

PS trying to stay on topic and learn about other "non-compromising" options with regular speakers.

Most speaker companies realize that their speaker systems need to do double duty in an HT environment, and will offer a center speaker matched to their pairs in the product line. I would recommend using this center if at all possible.
post #29 of 62
Quote:
Originally Posted by sivadselim View Post

In all fairness we should post Dynaudio's entire discussion of the speaker's horizontal dispersion characterisitics.

"The symmetric driver array, in combination with Dynaudio's advanced crossover filter technology, provides the speakers a greatly reduced horizontal dispersion (most ideal for a specifically designed Center speaker for Home Theater and multi-channel listening). Therefore, less energy is transferred to the side walls and acoustical obstructions in the room, thus eliminating any reflections or cancellations off of these boundaries, making the Evidence Center much less dependent upon room acoustics and listening position as compared to any other high-end loudspeakers, and a perfect Center for use with either the Evidence Master or Evidence Temptation main loudspeakers."

Interesting take.

It's called making a silk purse from a sow's ear.
post #30 of 62
Quote:
Originally Posted by Highside View Post

Someone mentioned using the equivalent bookshelf speaker for the center. Is this better than using the equvilent "real" center channel? I.E. same brand/components and timbre matched.

Also, I agree that this is not the easiest to do since speakers, aside from the CC, are sold in pairs. That being said, could a person set up the pair and use them both as the center channel? Will a person just creat lobing by doing this?

Use one, yes. Use two and the same problems arise.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Speakers
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Speakers › Non-compromised center channels