AVS › AVS Forum › AVS Forum Information › Forum Operations Center › Thread Wiki - PLEASE!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Thread Wiki - PLEASE!

post #1 of 33
Thread Starter 
One great feature of another forum is the ability to have a thread wiki. I believe it's automatic, but when someone creates a new thread, the second post is a thread wiki that is editable by everyone. It has a user name of WikiPost. AVS Forum is perfect for something like this. I have the Onkyo 605 receiver. The 605 thread on AVSF has 110 pages. It would probably be more like 50-60 pages if we didn't constantly get people reposting the same questions over and over again. Some of the blame can be for poor searching sure but some of the blame can also be 110 pages. If users could simply go to post #2 and see a user edited FAQ, it would benefit the users with faster more accurate information, and benefit AVSF with leaner threads and less needless traffic.

Here's an example of a wikipost - (see post #2)
http://forums.slickdeals.net/showthr...d=171&t=618827
post #2 of 33
Hi...

Thanks, but the issue is in a case like a site like this is that people then can remove other people thoughts if they do not agree with what they posted. Not to mention you then can have people that do not like the product just into it just to mess the information up.

But it is interesting and can be considered.
post #3 of 33
Thread Starter 
I agree about removing other peoples thoughts, but a thread wiki isn't a place to put thoughts. It's a place for facts. Where people can post the hidden easter eggs in a product or how to enter the maintenance menu on your TV. An example in the 605 forum. We get post after post after post on why people don't see "TrueHD" light up on a HDMI 1.3 level 4 receiver. It would be great to have a thread wiki with an FAQ that includes "Why you won't see TrueHD light up on your 605 receiver, and why that's OK" Or "What menu settings do I need to set on my PS3 when connecting the 605". These questions are asked over and over, and the thread OP's typically do a poor job of updating the first post to include FAQ. People could provide links to manuals, give product dimensions, etc.

Maybe it's something that can be added later to a thread? Like when a thread gets out of hand with pages a Mod can add a thread wiki on page 1? Or maybe the OP has the option of creating a thread wiki when creating a thread? What to do about Wiki Vandals? I don't know, but Wikis seem to work pretty good elsewhere. Thanks for your consideration.
post #4 of 33
I understand what you are stating...but you are going on that no one is out to hurt anthers product. Any one could go in at any time can really spread miss information by changing the wiki. Can... XYZ Can do this to a simple XYZ Can Not Do this. Adding NOT. Who will police it? How do you fix the damage when done? How can you track it? In that example you listed, any member could go in and remove all the content and post "THIS PRODUCT SUCKS" just to be a jerk. These are just some examples of why wikis can not be trusted and people tend to take them as fact. Kind of scary actually.

Still interesting though.
post #5 of 33
I just read an article about computer security and a new trend for hackers and cyber-criminals to use Wikipedia and similar "open" sites to post malicious links and pics.

I've used Wikipedia many times in the past but am not sure how freely I'll use it in the future.
post #6 of 33
http://www.news.com/Study-Wikipedia-...3-5997332.html

I would certainly be in favor of any type of AVS Wiki.
post #7 of 33
New item soon to come to avs is a member blogs. Shhhh A wiki will not work on this site I am sorry to say. Even more so when you consider issues areas like HD-DVD vs Blu-ray.
post #8 of 33
When I first read this thread idea...I thought how crazy it would get in either of the HDM forums....god save the queen. I like the concept of keeping redundancy to a minimum. I do think ppl don't put much effort into "trying" the search engine. Normally, I don't have to put much effort into a search and find the info or threads on the topic pretty quickly.
post #9 of 33
Is it not possible to setup a wiki so that only the originating author can edit the page they started? Any changes would then be suggested in the discussion part of the page. The originating author would then be able to control the contents.

The alternative is to start a thread and either post 10 or 20 reserved posts or setup a companion discussion thread. Then post all the reference or presentation information in the first part of the thread. It works OK but people don't seem to know enough to read the first few posts and so you end up constantly answering questions with "read the thread from the beginning".
post #10 of 33
Thread Starter 
The originating author can currently edit the first post anytime he wants. That's the issue. People start posts about a piece of equipment, then don't update information on the first post to help people out. By the time some people buy or research the gear, it's 54 pages of posts they have to sort out.

Wikipedia seems to work ok, even the HD DVD and Blu Ray pages. Nobody is going around vandalizing those pages, and if people are, there's enough supporters on both sides to correct and fix the pages, thats how the system works. To use powder keg topics like HD DVD and Blu Ray as an example of why thread wiki's wouldn't work is silly. Sure there might be a few special topics where you have problems, but anyone can go in and fix it, and EVERYBODY knows that wikis are user edited, not fact.

For the thousands of other threads about projectors, receivers, displays, software, stands, etc, thread wikis would provide an invaluable service to those visiting AVSF.

Searching is great, but not everybody knows what to search for. Sometimes people don't know there's new firmware or easter eggs or undocumented features. It'd be great if all of that info can be compiled into one place.
post #11 of 33
I would really like to see this on AVS. My current thoughts on this site are that everything I want to know is available on here, but buried within 200 page threads. If wiki editing was limited to members with over a certain number of posts, de-facing the wiki would be limited, especially if people were banned for doing it. I certainly don't see how it would make the site worse. Sites like fatwallet and slickdeals both use the wikipost, and it is nothing but helpful. As with any wiki, people would have to verify the information themselves before taking it as fact. I think wikis have already proven themselves as being useful despite the potential drawbacks or their use wouldn't be so widespread.
post #12 of 33
I think AVS would benefit greatly from a wiki-style sister site, or subdomain. We would be able to post/edit solutions,work-arounds, "how-to"s in an orderly manner. In addition, i think it would be tremendously helpful to have the second post in every thread be automatically reserved for wiki style editing, as is done at sites like fatwallet/slickdeals. I understand the concern about potential abuse - but those sites are huge sites, and I have seen very little if any abuse there. I'm not sure why it would be any different here.

That way we could edit a post near the beginning of the thread with valuable information discovered far later on. Some of the threads end up being 1000's of posts. So if we could have a quick summary of known issues, or faqs in the wiki post (community edited of course), would be able to increase the functionality of the site as well as eliminate several annoying repeat questions.

As for the bad apples... I'm not sure. I mean if it works at other big sites, why not here? Does anyone know how they deal with such things?

edit:
mell1n's idea to restrict wiki-editing to those with XXX+ posts, and banning abusers seems like it would be fantastic. The same logic could be applied to open account registration. "If anyone could sign up for AVS, then they will take advantage and poison the forum style discussion". And there are some annoying users, but 99% of them are helpful.
post #13 of 33
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by T3ddyG View Post

I mean if it works at other big sites, why not here? Does anyone know how they deal with such things?

Sites like slickdeals.net have a revision history that shows who made a change and what they changed. Vandals would easily be tracked and if someone did vandalize, the wiki can easily be reverted to a previous revision with one click of the mouse.

Here's an example of a wiki history from a HD DVD thread on slickdeals with over 1700 posts. No history of vandalism. Of course this is a non hot-button thread, just like 99.9% of all avsforum threads, so there's no reason for fan boys to vandalize.

http://forums.slickdeals.net/posthis...view&p=8373201

And it's pretty simple, if it becomes an issue on a certain topic, disable the wiki. But I just don't see how people are going to vandalize user edited FAQ's on TV's or AV Receivers.
post #14 of 33
I understand that it doesn't mean a whole lot coming from a new member, but these would definitely help. A LOT! Can't post links yet but thread number 854964 is 226 pages.

226 may be pretty low comparing it to some threads out there, but having information in a readable format would be a definite plus for any device.
post #15 of 33
Have yet to find a good Wiki program for Vb.
post #16 of 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Bott View Post

Have yet to find a good Wiki program for Vb.

Design one...not difficult at all.
post #17 of 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Bott View Post

Have yet to find a good Wiki program for Vb.

I assume you've checked out vbWiki? Pretty much an integration between MediaWiki and vB. A couple other sites I've been on have used it and were pretty happy.
post #18 of 33
Thread Starter 
I think AVS would better benefit from an in-line wiki (like slickdeals.net) vs a separate page wiki. The problem with having two separate areas, is that you're constantly linking back and forth between the two. People don't read the wikis before posting the same ole question again. If a new AV receiver comes out, there could be pages of posts before someone creates a wiki and creates a link for it. With an in-line wiki, the second post of a thread becomes a "wiki". It's not really a traditional wiki, but more like a multi-user edited post. With a system like this, the Forum becomes the index for the "wiki". If you want info on a D* reciever, you visit the thread and you find the wiki FAQ and discussion all in one place. If something new comes up in the discussion and one wants to add it to the FAQ, they simply go to page one and hit EDIT on the wiki post.

I hate to keep going back to slickdeals.net but I really like how it works there. It's very sucessful, people use it. And I haven't seen any vandalism, even on hot button topics like HD DVD players and Microsoft software- and there can be a lot of trash talking in those threads. Here's a copy of the announcement of thread wikis at slickdeals.net. It explains how it works there much better than I can. I've asked the admins over there how they do it but haven't recieved a response. I think they custom wrote this feature.

What is Thread Wiki?
Many of you have undoubtedly heard of Wikipedia - free web based encyclopedia where all content is contributed by its members. Thread Wiki is a post in a thread right after the first post for better visibility by another thread viewer, where all content is contributed by more than one SlickDeals.net user.

How does it work?
Pretty simple, really. Members have complete freedom to Create, Contribute, Control.

Create
When a new thread is created, the first post of the thread will contain a button, which you click on to create a wiki - on demand. Once a wiki is created, the second post in the thread appears, listed under the "helper" user wikipost (slickalerts' sister). The post will contain a pre-set brief information.

Contribute
Right after creation, the user who just clicked the button is taken to Edit mode - just as you would with a new post, and adds the information he or she believes is important for a thread. This information can be anything... information about the thread (Cliff Notes anybody?), a new price, a better price, a new rebate, a fillable rebate, a coupon... push your imagination.

Control
Okay, so someone added something, and you don't think it's valid, or you think you can do better? Do it. It's controlled by users, and as long as it's within forums rules - it can contain anything, really.

A few more things bound to be asked, a.k.a. The FAQ:

Q: Can I see previous contributions to Thread Wiki?
A: Absolutely. Just like with real Wiki, you can see every edit. Just click the "REVISIONS" button.

Q: Can I restore to a previous revision?
A: Yep, you sure can. When in Revisions mode, use "REVERT" button to restore to a previous version. While at it, you might as well contribute if you need it, as everything is done using a standard Edit dialog. One catch - you can't restore a current version, marked by a slightly different color and "CURRENT VERSION" button.

Q: Can I delete a revision I really don't like?
A: Yes.... if you are a moderator . You can still Mod Alert a revision if you believe it's in violation of forum guidelines, just remember to mention who made it. Remember, use Mod Alert button on a Wiki Post, as you can not modalert the actual revision from the Revisions screen.

Q: Can I rep the contributor?

A: Yes, just like with any post in forums where it is enabled, you can give reputation to a contributor. One per post (regardless of how many contribution that user has made), as usual . Although you can rep 2 or more different users who contributed to Thread Wiki.

Q: What if someone tries to add/edit a Thread Wiki when I am doing it?
A: Not to worry, since all revisions are tracked separately, the information you or ther other person adds will not vanish. So if an edit happens simultaneously, you can still add it by copying it. Once a Thread Wiki is added the button will no longer be there to add, but one can Edit the Wiki Post.

Q: Can there be more than one Thread Wiki?
A: One per thread, sorry . You are free to post under your own name, however .

Q: Can I easily see what has been updated when looking at Revisions?
A: Absolutely. The new text between 2 subsequent revisions is higlighted with green color and italics. Text that has been removed is crossed out. Changes are tracked line by line. So if a line is changed, the changes will reflect that.

Q: Can anyone Create, Contribute and Control?
A: Yes, as long as you have a valid SlickDeals.net account (what? you don't have one yet? ), which is in good standing and is not under moderation. Anyone (including anonymous users) can view the post, however, just like with any other post in the forum.

Q: What about vandalism?
A: As with real wikis, vandalism can be an issue. And just with any wikis, members can fix it without having to wait for a moderator. If you see anyone posting anything inappropriate, anything in violation of forum rules, offensive, etc - feel free to edit it out, modalert the Thread Wiki post, and mention who made the offensive edit. The moderation team will be happy to assist with this. Thanks in advance. Wannabe vandals - beware, a new warning has been added for wiki abuse. Excessive abuse will result in the removal of wiki privileges.

What is Post History?
Post history is a feature, which is shared with Thread Wiki, and allows you to view your own post history using the "Revisions" button just like you would with a Thread Wiki. The only exception is that only you can view that history, unlike with Thread Wiki, which is viewed by anyone as described above. The same rules apply, there is a Revert button, the Current Version label, and the only thing absent is obviously the Thread Wiki button, since well, it's not a Wiki. We hope you put it to good use, in case something ever happens to your own post, and you need to restore changes.
post #19 of 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by perryw View Post

I assume you've checked out vbWiki? Pretty much an integration between MediaWiki and vB. A couple other sites I've been on have used it and were pretty happy.

Yes, but the developers future is in question as he has not been around.
post #20 of 33
mtiffee...Sounds great. Where do I get something to do this? Nowhere that I am aware of for Vb. I am not a programmer, I do not have a staff, thus the issue currently.
post #21 of 33
Thread Starter 
David, I've been looking!
I haven't found anything either! I'll keep looking and bugging slickdeals. I was a programmer in a former life, maybe I'll create something and donate it to AVS and sell it to others.
post #22 of 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Bott View Post

mtiffee...Sounds great. Where do I get something to do this? Nowhere that I am aware of for Vb. I am not a programmer, I do not have a staff, thus the issue currently.

David,

I responded in another post that I can help out. Let me know.

Bob
post #23 of 33
this place seriously needs a wiki, moreso than slickdeals. The admin is scared about the abuses of the wiki system, which is understandable, but if you take a look at slickdeals, the wiki feature has been very very useful, and hasnt been abused. You can simply exclude the wiki feature in some forums, like chat areas.
post #24 of 33
sorry to bring this up again, but a wiki would be great for AVS forum

a great example would be for all of the calibration settings. It's so difficult to go through tens of pages of posts looking for peoples calibration settings, and on top of that they post updated versions and then you have to find those. Having a wiki would make this simple. A TV would have a calibration wiki where everyone could put their settings and update them.
post #25 of 33
I may not post to this site much, but it's been an invaluable source of information and research for me for a while. The one thing it needs though is a Wiki of some sort.

There is a wealth of information and tutorials on these boards, particularly in the stickies, which would be much more accessible in a Wiki or similar form.

I understand the security and accuracy concerns that have been brought up in this thread, but there's no reason safeguards can't be put into place, or any reason to believe it would be any less accurate than the stickies themselves.

An effective solution would be to use a permissions-based wiki. The main pages should be modifiable only by moderators (or other 'trusted' forum members). Exceptions may be made for certain informational sections: such as say cable channel listings or reception experience.

Other options include an 'approved' wiki page, viewed by default, that has been vetted by a moderator. All other changes made by public members may remain hidden on a development/discussion page (marked as such) until approved. Such discussion could even remain with the current sticky threads, with moderators copying reference information from there into a more accessible Wiki-page.

Of course the rules of such a Wiki system should require posts to be limited to verifiable facts or informative advise providing it is clearly marked as opinion. Ideally, sections could also be locked and a poll included for members to rate the quality/accuracy/usefulness of the information.

Such a system would make this site a truly indispensable resource, and ensure that information isn't lost in the myriad of 5+ page stickies.


- My 2 cents
post #26 of 33
I also support the creation of a Wiki. For new product releases/settings threads it would be the perfect addition.

As for controlling the edits to prevent hacking/trolling, the simplest thing is to only give paid AVS members access to editting the wiki. Obviously its a privilege and so there should be some value associated to it.

My company provides professional communities for a variety of large corps...what we've found in large scale communities is that Wiki's tend to police themselves more than most people think. Thats one of the reasons Wikipedia works so well.
post #27 of 33
There are Wiki-integrated modifications available for vBulletin. There are Usergroup permissions that the Admin can set.
post #28 of 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gmo0ve View Post

There are Wiki-integrated modifications available for vBulletin. There are Usergroup permissions that the Admin can set.

I realize this is an old, old thread, but since it was linked from a (somewhat) recent question on the subject, I figured it would be worthwhile to post. Plus, there aren't a whole lot of recent discussions of this.

The above quote is exactly what a wiki on AVS, with all of its contentious debates, needs. In-line wikis are the only way it works, though. Give the thread starter the ability to set per-user or usergroup permissions on the wiki, then allow the thread starter to transfer ownership of the wiki permissions to others (perhaps with mod consent, or some such). Have a wiki edit history feature so that if, in the very rare event that a wiki gets destroyed by someone (for whatever reason), it can be resurrected to its last known good state. I think these are features of existing wikis, and I hope they will be implemented in the very near future, raising AVS from a simple, helpful forum, to a commanding, easily-referenced repository of organized and up-to-date factual information.

I, for one, can't wait!
post #29 of 33
Hi,

Consider it something we're looking into.

Thanks!
post #30 of 33
Thread Starter 
Glad to hear this is something you're still looking in to. I honestly believe it will be one of the most popular and used feature on the site. I've been following a few projector threads but haven't been on in a while. It would be so awesome if I could simply to go to the first page of the thread which has the inline wiki as the second post and catch up on all the important information that has trickled it's way from the hundreds of pages on info, into the wiki.

Keep up the good work guys!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Forum Operations Center
AVS › AVS Forum › AVS Forum Information › Forum Operations Center › Thread Wiki - PLEASE!