AVS › AVS Forum › Blu-ray & HD DVD › Dual Format Players › The *Official* Samsung BD-UP5000 tracking thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The *Official* Samsung BD-UP5000 tracking thread - Page 3

post #61 of 1255
I agree with dpak right now.

$499 is my max for a Universal player. If Samsung can deliver the successor to the UP5000 next year with solid features and a sub $500 price the ability to conserve an HDMI port on my future AVR and the space savings would be worth paying a premium IMO. SACD support would be a huge bonus.

My ideal setup is

HDTV
AVR
Universal HD player
Apple TV for music/video/photos
Xbox 360 for gaming.
1 open HDMI port for future expansion
Universal remote.
post #62 of 1255
Quote:
Originally Posted by dpak2005 View Post

If you met ALL of those specifications, then yes I guess I'd agree with you, but who really does? Ok I'm pretty typical, but I own an HDMI receiver, so I don't care about the analog outs, and TrueHD works without a problem over PCM to my receiver. I don't care about the 1080p 24, because I own a 768p 50" Panasonic plasma, but even if I owned a 1080p HDTV you lose absolutely ZERO detail on film sources with a 1080i input. 1080p is no better for film sources than 1080i. You don't need Reon on BOTH, just one, because the only thing that's good for is upscaling, so you only need 1 out of the 2 to have Reon, and I'd make that the BR player, and take the $99 A2 for HD-DVD. Shelf space is a non issue for me as well, because it's all going in a cabinet. So honestly, atleast for me, none of your points matter much.

Well, I'm really, really happy for you, but that's not how you came across in your first post. Let's review what you said:

Quote:
Originally Posted by dpak2005 View Post

It wouldn't be a smart move to buy this at all.

You didn't say that it wouldn't be smart for you. You didn't say that it wouldn't be smart for people who don't need or want the features of the BD-UP5000. Nope, you said, "It wouldn't be a smart move to buy this at all". Kinda arrogant to tell the rest of the world that they aren't smart to want or need something just because you don't want or need it isn't it?
post #63 of 1255
Quote:
Originally Posted by kelpie View Post

Hi dpak2005. IMHO, you need to compare apples-to-apples when you discuss cost. Think of the announced/planned/rumored features of the Samsung. They're aiming at the market of buyers that need or want Blu-ray and HD DVD players that:
  • can both internally decode the Dolby True HD and DTS-HD Master Audio lossless formats and pass them via bitstream in more than 2 channel output for both HD DVD and Blu-ray discs (after firmware update?)
  • include 7.1 analog audio outputs for each format
  • provide Profile 1.1 features on the Blu-ray side (after firmware update?)
  • output in 1080p/24 for both formats
  • include Reon-equivalent upscaling for DVD's
  • take up only 16.9 X 3.1 x 12.8" of shelf space
  • what did I leave off?

Can you name any $99 HD DVD player and $399 Blu-ray player combo that can do all of that? It wouldn't be a smart move at all to buy a player that doesn't do what you want/need it to do, would it?

The second HDMI cable and socket it connects to.
post #64 of 1255
Quote:
Originally Posted by grubavs View Post

on paper

Agreed. For now
post #65 of 1255
Originally Posted by dpak2005
Quote:


I don't care about the 1080p 24, because I own a 768p 50" Panasonic plasma, but even if I owned a 1080p HDTV you lose absolutely ZERO detail on film sources with a 1080i input. 1080p is no better for film sources than 1080i

not true. what about some of the sets that can refresh up 72 hz? 1080p24 is ideal for them not needing the 3:2 pulldown that adds judder to camera pans with 24p matched with 72p there is no 3:2 pulldown it's even 3:3 no missing frames.

so 1080p is very important and makes a big difference viewing perceptions .

Athansios
post #66 of 1255
Remember guys that earlier in this or another thread a Samsung rep. was quoted as saying that Samsung's usual policy is to ship to brick and morter stores first, then follow up with the e-tailers later. So it is consistent to see BB and CC have expectations of product in mid-november while amazon doesn't think they'll see anything until January.
post #67 of 1255
I'm very skeptical that a combo unit will be able to match some of the standalone units in image quality (it hasn't happened on any video format to date that I'm aware). I imagine it will be fine for most of the population, but for some us, it may not be. In addition, having single standalone units allow one to swap out players easier as you don't have that "marriage" issue with a combo if you know what I mean (unless you replace it with another, improved combo). I've been using a PS3 for BD, but recently purchased the new Panasonic BD30 which actually has a better image. Considering you can purchase the BD30 and Toshiba A35 for about the same price of the Samsung and these units have my main priorities (Optimal video quality at 1080/24p and bitstream), I'm finding less reason to wait for the Samsung. Admittingly, one player would be nice, but certainly not an issue for me and, again, it makes it easier for me to upgrade a single format by having separates.
post #68 of 1255
Quote:


I've been using a PS3 for BD, but recently purchased the new Panasonic BD30 which actually has a better image.

Comparing PQ of PS3 and fully featured BD player is ridiculous. It is like comparing PS2 DVD PQ with Denon universal player. Samsung player is miles ahead of PS3. You can read Samsung's press statement and see that they incorporated their best parts in this multi unit. I'm not saying Samsung is better than the best Sony BD player but it is equal or better than the best Samsung BD player. I have never seen any Samsung unit so I can't comment on Samsung PQ.

There is no need to be concerned about PQ of multi unit. It all depends on manufacturer of the unit and what components they used it. Let's say tomorrow Denon releases multi unit at 3K and then you say PS3 has better picture than Denon because it is stand alone BD player. Utter crap!
post #69 of 1255
Quote:
Originally Posted by RavenX View Post

Comparing PQ of PS3 and fully featured BD player is ridiculous. It is like comparing PS2 DVD PQ with Denon universal player.

Obivously, you're quite ignorant of the fact that the PS3 was widely considered to be just as good as ANY of the first generation Blu-ray players by top videophiles and reviewers. In addition, it has been more future proof than some so-called "fully featured" players. Your faulty comparison of the PS2 is ridiculous because that was/is a POS DVD player - even for the time it was released. Blu-ray was/is key to the PS3; DVD was not to the PS2.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RavenX View Post

Samsung player is miles ahead of PS3. You can read Samsung's press statement and see that they incorporated their best parts in this multi unit. I'm not saying Samsung is better than the best Sony BD player but it is equal or better than the best Samsung BD player. I have never seen any Samsung unit so I can't comment on Samsung PQ.

So, you've never seen any Samsung unit but you know it's miles ahead of the PS3 but not the Sony?!? You're seem to think you know an awful lot without having viewed ANY of these units it sounds to me.


Quote:
Originally Posted by RavenX View Post

There is no need to be concerned about PQ of multi unit.

I'm not concerned, but I think you're not grasping what I meant and coming up with some false assumptions like the following...

Quote:
Originally Posted by RavenX View Post

It all depends on manufacturer of the unit and what components they used it. Let's say tomorrow Denon releases multi unit at 3K and then you say PS3 has better picture than Denon because it is stand alone BD player. Utter crap!

Oh, so now you're going to make up statements of hypotheticals of what I might say?!? That is utter crap.
post #70 of 1255
Quote:
Originally Posted by RavenX View Post

Comparing PQ of PS3 and fully featured BD player is ridiculous. It is like comparing PS2 DVD PQ with Denon universal player. Samsung player is miles ahead of PS3. You can read Samsung's press statement and see that they incorporated their best parts in this multi unit. I'm not saying Samsung is better than the best Sony BD player but it is equal or better than the best Samsung BD player. I have never seen any Samsung unit so I can't comment on Samsung PQ.

There is no need to be concerned about PQ of multi unit. It all depends on manufacturer of the unit and what components they used it. Let's say tomorrow Denon releases multi unit at 3K and then you say PS3 has better picture than Denon because it is stand alone BD player. Utter crap!

You obviously have never seen a PS3 playback a Blu-ray disc. I own both a PS3 and a first gen Samsung BD player. The PS3 has the PQ edge over the Samsung stand alone. Oh, and I also hve my preorder in for the BD-UP5000.

Can we now get back on topic? This thread has a gone way off topic.
post #71 of 1255
Obviously ignorance is bliss.

The Cell Broadband Engine in the PS3 is lightyears ahead of the current crop, and as a result Sony is trickling out firmware upgrades that make more and more things possible on the PS3.

The PS3 is an outstanding BD and SACD player, at least on my RX-V2700/Sherbourn amps/Paradigm Reference system.

I will only move to a dual player unless it will offer SACD and DVD-A playback.

Oh BTW did i forget to tell you that i also browse the internet, and no, i have not played a game on it and will not until they allow TrackIR implementations for 3D aerial combat

IMHO for $399 it is a no brainer for the BD/SACD HDMI 1.2 pre/pro audiophile.
post #72 of 1255
Enough with the arguing children!

The topic of this thread isn't "Which hardware is better". nor is it "Passive-aggressive name calling" or "Snooty reference system one-ups man-ship".

NO! The topic (for those who need a more blatant reminder) is "Samsung BD-UP5000 tracking thread".

Now, since the Samsung BD-UP5000 has yet to hit the retail market, I can see that a few of you would still like to argue on other points. I would like to politely ask that you go off to one of the other threads, or create your own.

This one, as it states in the title, is for something other than arguing.

That said, please let those of us anxiously awaiting the release of this device enjoy our blissful anticipation (and possible angry frustration) continue to enjoy our thread.

Time to move on to your own sandbox gentlemen, this one is not for you.

Moderator? Please feel free to shut this thread down if these people can't behave themselves.

Spence
post #73 of 1255
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by PNYBOY View Post

Can we now get back on topic? This thread has a gone way off topic.

agreed
post #74 of 1255
well said
post #75 of 1255
Right on!

Folks come to this thread for news and rumors on Sammy 5000 availability and don't want to have to wade thru a lot of unrelated posts.

Personally I don't mind a few off-topic comments as part of an on-topic post but I think most would agree that a whole series of totally off-topic (and not very polite) posts are clearly off base.
post #76 of 1255
i dont know if anybody has noticed but when i went to samsungs official site and went to the blu-ray section on the left part under product finder if you click the drop down arrow it gives an option for Duo HD player. looks like they are getting ready to place the 5000 on their page.
post #77 of 1255
Quote:
Originally Posted by syk69 View Post

i dont know if anybody has noticed but when i went to samsungs official site and went to the blu-ray section on the left part under product finder if you click the drop down arrow it gives an option for Duo HD player. looks like they are getting ready to place the 5000 on their page.

Nice find Syk69! It could eventually grow, with the announcement of new models. ...I'm not saying that I have read anything of any new Samsung Duo HD player mind you, but since LG has their second model on the market, it would be short sited of Samsung to not have a second model in development at some point.

By the way, I am still hoping someone will stop into their local Best Buy and snap a photo of an empty display area (or the Circuit City employee's offer of a screen shot indicating an anticipated delivery date).

Cheers!
Spence
post #78 of 1255
Although I don't plan on buying one as soon as they hit the shelves I'm eagerly awaiting it to see if it lives up to it's potential. If it does I'll have one. Hopefully we will see them before Christmas. Maybe if sales are good we'll see a bd-up3000 for those who do not want every option.
post #79 of 1255
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobpaule View Post

Obviously ignorance is bliss.

The Cell Broadband Engine in the PS3 is lightyears ahead of the current crop, and as a result Sony is trickling out firmware upgrades that make more and more things possible on the PS3.

The PS3 is an outstanding BD and SACD player, at least on my RX-V2700/Sherbourn amps/Paradigm Reference system.

I will only move to a dual player unless it will offer SACD and DVD-A playback.

Oh BTW did i forget to tell you that i also browse the internet, and no, i have not played a game on it and will not until they allow TrackIR implementations for 3D aerial combat

IMHO for $399 it is a no brainer for the BD/SACD HDMI 1.2 pre/pro audiophile.

You do know that the $399 model does not play SACDs and only the Panasonic 10A played DVD-As.
No single format HDM player does both.
post #80 of 1255
ABT finally fessed up with the January release delay. B&M to save the day? To be continued...
post #81 of 1255
Vinnie97,

Did you call ABT or go visit them in person? I'm just curious, because I live near Abt Electronics and they have a huge store. So in one sense they can be considered B&M. However, I know they also do internet sales.

I'm just wondering if you called their internet division. I was thinking about going over one of these days to ask about the Sammy player. I would definitely much rather buy from them than from any BB or CC in my area.

Just wondering....
post #82 of 1255
Quote:
Originally Posted by vinnie97 View Post

ABT finally fessed up with the January release delay. B&M to save the day? To be continued...

See what did I tell you ABT was just late in the game

For one until it is confirmed by someone that it is IN the store going on shelves I am taking any third party notice on here with a grain of salt.
post #83 of 1255
Ph8, that's sage advice. Unfortunately, I heard they were reliable and 'ssumed some tings when they didn't get the shipment update like everybody else.

Quote:
Originally Posted by roundy View Post

Vinnie97,

Did you call ABT or go visit them in person? I'm just curious, because I live near Abt Electronics and they have a huge store. So in one sense they can be considered B&M. However, I know they also do internet sales.

I'm just wondering if you called their internet division. I was thinking about going over one of these days to ask about the Sammy player. I would definitely much rather buy from them than from any BB or CC in my area.

Just wondering....

Roundy, definitely the internet division as their B&M is nowhere near me. I'm not sure how they apportion stock between the 2 but it wouldn't hurt to ask them.
post #84 of 1255
I called my friend at the local Circuit City to inquire today. It is in the system, but 0 on hand and 0 at the warehouse. "Any day now" is what he's heard. I told him I would check with him on Friday.
post #85 of 1255
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecodeman View Post

I called my friend at the local Circuit City to inquire today. It is in the system, but 0 on hand and 0 at the warehouse. "Any day now" is what he's heard. I told him I would check with him on Friday.

Codeman, which specific Circuit City in Dallas is this?
post #86 of 1255
Checked with my new best friend/s at my local Best Buy in Madison.

They confirmed (similar to the Circuit City post above) that the device is in their system, but showing no stock in either local store, or regional distribution center.

Could be any day... could be any month.

Anticipation of this product grows like a blind date via an on-line dating service posting full of "glamour shots" and (ahem) "out dated" height and weight statistics.

Keep flyin'

Spence
post #87 of 1255
Quote:
Originally Posted by vinnie97 View Post

Codeman, which specific Circuit City in Dallas is this?

This would be the one in Cedar Hill. Technically not Dallas, but I'm in GP and it's the closest one to me
post #88 of 1255
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecodeman View Post

This would be the one in Cedar Hill. Technically not Dallas, but I'm in GP and it's the closest one to me

Thanks for that. The one in Mesquite claims they have it in their system but have no idea on availability (CSR claimed they have no information on the product yet either so not a good sign). At least the etailers have this information.
post #89 of 1255
I want this bad boy sooner rather than later - but I'm willing to wait, as long as they get it right when it finally ships. It SHOULD ship 1.1 compliant out of the box, because the new Panasonic already is. I wonder if that has something to do with the delay?

I think Samsung knows they have a lot to lose if the Bd-UP5000 ships "buggy", as everybody will want to review this thing. How many magazines do you see doing reviews of prototype products?

I'm being optomistic - I think Samsung will deliver a product that we will all be happy we waited for.

Patrick
post #90 of 1255
I will say that the manager at that Cedar Hill location mentioned above claimed they'd have it in a "few weeks," so we'll see.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Dual Format Players
AVS › AVS Forum › Blu-ray & HD DVD › Dual Format Players › The *Official* Samsung BD-UP5000 tracking thread