AVS › AVS Forum › Blu-ray & HD DVD › HD DVD Players › Can HDA2/A3 'do' 24p with appropriate display
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Can HDA2/A3 'do' 24p with appropriate display

post #1 of 29
Thread Starter 
While I understand that the HDA2 and HDA3 do not natively support output of 24p signals, I'm intrigued. Given a high quality display can de-interlace the 1080i signal from these players and produce a 1080p image without loss, why can a high quality 1080/24p display not extract a 1080/24p image from the signal (maybe by discarding appropriate frames/fields from the signal)? Is that possible? I thought the underlying data on film-based content on an HD-DVD (or Blu-Ray for that matter) was 1080/24p so the information to do this would have been in the signal. If it's not possible can someone please provide or link to an explanation. I'd love to understand this better.

Thanks!
post #2 of 29
Sure, you can get 24p from 1080i60, you just need a good 24p TV or VP that does inverse telecine well.
post #3 of 29
Thread Starter 
Thanks, that's what I thought (or at least was hoping!). So why all the fuss about 24p support/upgrades on the higher-end players? If a display supports 24p isn't that a sign that it's a high-end product which is likely to do a good job with the inverse telecine? Or do some displays pass 24p but offer no conversion to 24p?

Background to my question: I have an HDA2 and a Sanyo Z2 720/30p projector which I will upgrade to a 1080/24p capable projector in a year or so when prices come down a bit - so I am wondering if I will be obliged to upgrade the HDA2 at that time or whether it would be a fine source for 24p display. Or should I return the HDA2 and get one of the 20, 30, 35, XA2 models?
post #4 of 29
Quote:
If a display supports 24p isn't that a sign that it's a high-end product which is likely to do a good job with the inverse telecine?

No, not really. Hopefully a display that accepts 24p can display at refresh rate which is a multiple of 24, eg, 48, 72. This makes the video processing easier for the display. If the display can't refresh at a multiple of 24 (but accepts 24p), then it's a matter of which device does the conversion to 1080p60 the best. (I'm assuming a 1080p display to keep things simple. Scaling is another thing all in itself).

larry
post #5 of 29
I not aware of display devices actually taking 1080p/i/60 and coming out with 1080p/24 (and then applying 2:2,3:3, etc. if necessary). I'm certainly aware of separate video processors doing that such as DVDO iScan. I suppose there are some very high end ones. So if you're upgrading to a 1080p projector and you want 1080p/24 you'll need the A30/35/or XA2 which pass 1080p/24.
post #6 of 29
Thread Starter 
Interesting comments, thanks. This seems to be a common trap for the unwary - the difference between signals accepted and the native resolution/framerate of a display device. I've watched other threads get bogged down in discussion of whether stating that 1080i is accepted means the display can actually resolve at 1080 (my projector accepts 1080(i) but down-rez's to 720(p), for example). I have colleagues at work who assume that the advertised 1080i support of their old HDTVs implies they can (by definition) see 1920 horizontal res, for example.

The observation you're making here is that while a display may advertise 24p support it will convert such an input signal to its own chosen framerate - which might not be a multiple of 24, correct? I wonder if any device/vendor would do that? Obviously presenting a 24p image at say 30 or 60 fps seems to completely undo the value of providing the device with a 24p fps signal in the first place. I would certainly want to be sure that a device that claimed 1080/24p was capable of actually displaying using a multiple of 24 fps. Do any devices today advertise 24p but convert to a framerate that is not a multiple of 24? It would seem almost deceptive if they did?

Also, I wonder if we will see display devices support conversion of 1080/60i to 1080/24p or whether the assumption by display vendors is that the disc players will do the 'conversion'? This all seems unecessarily complex - all the data is on the disk - it should just be piped to the display in its native format which should display it the best it can (a naive perspective, perhaps!).
post #7 of 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by EZRider View Post

This all seems unecessarily complex - all the data is on the disk - it should just be piped to the display in its native format which should display it the best it can (a naive perspective, perhaps!).

Being new to HD, I share the same 'naive' perspective
I'm surpised we still have to deal with what is basically just the reminescence of compatibility constrainte due to electrical current being 60 Hz (in the US at least)
post #8 of 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by HPforMe View Post

I not aware of display devices actually taking 1080p/i/60 and coming out with 1080p/24 (and then applying 2:2,3:3, etc. if necessary). I'm certainly aware of separate video processors doing that such as DVDO iScan. I suppose there are some very high end ones. So if you're upgrading to a 1080p projector and you want 1080p/24 you'll need the A30/35/or XA2 which pass 1080p/24.

The Pioneer Kuro Plasmas have a PureCinema mode that does just this with 1080i when they detect 24 fps source -- displays them at 1080p/72 fps (3:3 as opposed to 2:3 pulldown).
post #9 of 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by miata View Post

The Pioneer Kuro Plasmas have a PureCinema mode that does just this with 1080i when they detect 24 fps source -- displays them at 1080p/72 fps (3:3 as opposed to 2:3 pulldown).


True and I have the XA2 outputting 1080p/24 to a Denon 3808CI to a Pioneer 150FD Kuro which works perfect.
post #10 of 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by miata View Post

The Pioneer Kuro Plasmas have a PureCinema mode that does just this with 1080i when they detect 24 fps source -- displays them at 1080p/72 fps (3:3 as opposed to 2:3 pulldown).

Even the older generations of Pioneer plasma's can do that. I have a older "6th generation" display (436XDE) connected to an Toshiba E1 (European version of the A2), and there is a noticeable difference switching 'PureCinema" on and off. it greatly reduces judder....
post #11 of 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord Humungus View Post

Even the older generations of Pioneer plasma's can do that.

I read that some of the older gen pios did not make the conversion correctly, but pio fixed in the 8th gen. I don't recall what was missing, I think it was something about not always detecting the cadence. I also hear some 1080p/24 players convert the disks 1080p/24 to 1080i/60 and then back to 1080p/24 for implementation simplicity.

It seems that 1080p/24 - 1080i/60 - 1080p/24 is one of those things that should be easy to implement but often not in practice. If you are making a perchase decision, make sure it works correctly in the devices your contiplating. Check out the reviews as manufacture's litature is often not clearly worded (24p capability without the necessary native refresh rate being one example).

Taking 1080p/24 directly off the disc and sending that to the display which displays directly at a multiple of 24fps elliminates many chances of error.

The 1080i/60-1080p/24 pull down works for video shot with 24 or 30 fps, which is nearly 100% of the video out ther today.

Some video games are starting to make video at 1080p/60, so 1080p/60 is more of an issue for game systems.
post #12 of 29
Thread Starter 
Does anyone know if any of the recent crop of 1080p LCD projectors support this kind of conversion? It will certainly be an interesting capability to watch for. I could well imagine this being a key selling point - it would improve their ability to sell the projector to the current crop of A2/A3 users, without requiring they upgrade to a 1080p capable player to get full benefit from their projector - effectively lowering the cost of entry.

Given the likely population of A2s, A3s it might make sense for a projector manufacturer to specifically target Toshiba HD-A2/3 compatibility in their testing.
post #13 of 29
I've asked this question over in the Sony XBR4/5 owner's thread about that display in particular, but it is possibly going to get answered here faster when phrased this way:

What displays are known to support the 1080i conversion to 1080p24 from an A2? i.e. convert the 1080i60 signal to 1080p24, and then display it at some multiple of 24Hz like 72Hz or 120Hz. I'm looking to get a bigger better display, and the XBR4/5s look pretty tempting with the 120Hz support and 5:5 frame display of 24p signals.

shinksma
post #14 of 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColdCase View Post

Taking 1080p/24 directly off the disc ...

Do all HD-DVD's have 1080p/24 content?
post #15 of 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by HPforMe View Post

I not aware of display devices actually taking 1080p/i/60 and coming out with 1080p/24 (and then applying 2:2,3:3, etc. if necessary). I'm certainly aware of separate video processors doing that such as DVDO iScan. I suppose there are some very high end ones. So if you're upgrading to a 1080p projector and you want 1080p/24 you'll need the A30/35/or XA2 which pass 1080p/24.

From everything that I have heard and understand, the Pioneer 1080p plasmas are supposed to be capable of this as long as they are fed 24p 1080i/60 encoded signal. If the display is set to PurceCinema ADVANCE mode which activates the 72hz refresh rate then it should properly inverse telecine and then 3:3 cadence back to 72hz from the 1080i/60 --> 1080p/24 --> 1080p/72 conversion. I don't think that there are any other displays on the market that can do this correctly though right now.

I have the Pioneer 60" 1080p PDP and just ordered a Toshiba HD-A2 off eBay an hour ago and plan on testing this sometime late this week or early next week. If my TV can handle all of this on a player I can pick up for less than $150 (with 5 free HD-DVDs) then I see no need to spend any more right now on a 1080p/24 HD-DVD player (which would cost double). I will still do the majority of my movie watching from my Blu-ray player; I just don't want to miss out on the HD-DVD fun either.
post #16 of 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaltA View Post

Do all HD-DVD's have 1080p/24 content?

Not all, but most do. Anything film-based will be 24 fps - so all those movies from the cinemas will be 1080p24. Video-based material will be 30 or 60 fps. I think some European-sourced material might be 25 fps or 50 fps.

shinksma
post #17 of 29
Thread Starter 
SpeedDemon - please post the results of your experiment when you've tried it! Also love to hear from anyone else who gets this to work on their display. I think this is little understood capability - it would be good to get more people asking for this!
post #18 of 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaltA View Post

Do all HD-DVD's have 1080p/24 content?

Technically they don't have to be and it could be mixed. All the major movies released are 1080p/24 on the disk, however. I don't know of any video widely released that is not 1080p/24, although the disk menu may be 30fps..
post #19 of 29
I just wanted to add that all content on HD-DVD discs is encoded as 1080i/60 unlike Blu-ray which is encoded at 1080p/24 natively. The 1080i/60 content is 24hz originally, but in order to output at 1080p/24, all HD-DVD players have to perform an inverse telecine. This is the same thing as what a good 1080p/48/72/96/120 display does that has an accurate processor.
post #20 of 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by EZRider View Post

SpeedDemon - please post the results of your experiment when you've tried it! Also love to hear from anyone else who gets this to work on their display. I think this is little understood capability - it would be good to get more people asking for this!

I got impatient and ran out to Sears and picked up an HD-A3 on sale for $180. I hooked it up and from what I can tell it definitely appears to be outputting at 1080i/60 and being detected and converted by the TV to 1080p/72.

I think that it would be a waste of money for anyone who owns a Pioneer plasma to spend anymore money on an HD-DVD player than the HD-A2/3 if picture quality is the concern.
post #21 of 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpeedDemon View Post

I just wanted to add that all content on HD-DVD discs is encoded as 1080i/60 unlike Blu-ray which is encoded at 1080p/24 natively. The 1080i/60 content is 24hz originally, but in order to output at 1080p/24, all HD-DVD players have to perform an inverse telecine. This is the same thing as what a good 1080p/48/72/96/120 display does that has an accurate processor.

I have always heard HD DVD titles are encoded at 1080p/24 (film) and that the 1080p/24 output on the XA2 player is directly off the disc.
post #22 of 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpeedDemon View Post

I got impatient and ran out to Sears and picked up an HD-A3 on sale for $180. I hooked it up and from what I can tell it definitely appears to be outputting at 1080i/60 and being detected and converted by the TV to 1080p/72.

I think that it would be a waste of money for anyone who owns a Pioneer plasma to spend anymore money on an HD-DVD player than the HD-A2/3 if picture quality is the concern.

True but if you want to squeeze every bit of quality out of the format then having a player that outputs 1080p/24 gets rid of any induced Judder and the Pioneer plasma's will output same at 72hz.
post #23 of 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert D View Post

I have always heard HD DVD titles are encoded at 1080p/24 (film) and that the 1080p/24 output on the XA2 player is directly off the disc.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert D View Post

True but if you want to squeeze every bit of quality out of the format then having a player that outputs 1080p/24 gets rid of any induced Judder and the Pioneer plasma's will output same at 72hz.

Nope, HD-DVD content is almost always encoded as 1080i/60 and then the added frames are flagged for removal during the inverse telecine process. If you have a display capable of properly inverse telecine'ing 1080i/60 film-based (24hz) content then you will receive the exact same effect as if you have a player than can output at 1080p/24 because the two are essentially doing THE EXACT same thing, just at different stages. In both scenarios there will be zero judder since you will be watching at a refresh rate native to 24hz. Just remember though that very few displays can refresh at a native rate of 24hz and even fewer can properly perform an inverse telecine on 1080i/60 film-based content.
post #24 of 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpeedDemon View Post

Nope, HD-DVD content is almost always encoded as 1080i/60 and then the added frames are flagged for removal during the inverse telecine process. If you have a display capable of properly inverse telecine'ing 1080i/60 film-based (24hz) content then you will receive the exact same effect as if you have a player than can output at 1080p/24 because the two are essentially doing THE EXACT same thing, just at different stages. In both scenarios there will be zero judder since you will be watching at a refresh rate native to 24hz. Just remember though that very few displays can refresh at a native rate of 24hz and even fewer can properly perform an inverse telecine on 1080i/60 film-based content.

The data on (most) HD DVD discs is encoded progressively at 24fps. What's happening in most cases is internally the player is converting it to 1080i then de-interlacing the video before it leaves the player. Though if done correctly the results will be transparent. There is a update coming soon for the XA2 that will allow it to pass the 24 fps video directly from the disc, skipping the interlacing/de-interlacing/inverse telicine steps happening in the player.
post #25 of 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert D View Post

I have always heard HD DVD titles are encoded at 1080p/24 (film) and that the 1080p/24 output on the XA2 player is directly off the disc.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert D View Post

True but if you want to squeeze every bit of quality out of the format then having a player that outputs 1080p/24 gets rid of any induced Judder and the Pioneer plasma's will output same at 72hz.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Montezuma58 View Post

The data on (most) HD DVD discs is encoded progressively at 24fps. What's happening in most cases is internally the player is converting it to 1080i then de-interlacing the video before it leaves the player. Though if done correctly the results will be transparent. There is a update coming soon for the XA2 that will allow it to pass the 24 fps video directly from the disc, skipping the interlacing/de-interlacing/inverse telicine steps happening in the player.

Sorry, but not true....

Quote:
Originally Posted by ptorr View Post

HD DVD encodes audio and video in Program Streams and uses field syntax with 30 frame per second timing to represent both 30 fps interlace and 24 fps progressive content. “Missing fields” for 24P content are replaced by “repeat field flags”, the same as DVD-Video. Decoders can ignore the “flags” to output P24 or use them to output 30i. Blu-ray encodes audio and video in Transport Streams and has the option to use frame syntax to encode 24fps content with 24fps timing.

This is a quote from an HD-DVD developer from Microsoft that is also quoted on Wikipedia. You can read this content directly on his blog: http://blogs.msdn.com/ptorr/archive/...5/HDFacts.aspx. HD-DVD players are only progressive at 1080p/24 just how DVD players can be progressive at 480p except for that no DVD player allows for 480p/24 to be outputted which is why many prefer to output at 480i/60 and let the TV inverse telecine and de-interlace. The content itself is stored on the disc in its rawest form as 1080i/60 it just so happens that because of this all the information necessary to reconstruct either 1080p/24 or 1080p/30 is there be it the TV or Player that does this! Only blu-ray stores entirely end-to-end at 1080p/24 (not that his makes any difference though with what you end up seeing on your screen).
post #26 of 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpeedDemon View Post

Nope, HD-DVD content is almost always encoded as 1080i/60 and then the added frames are flagged for removal during the inverse telecine process

Most HD-DVD as well as DVD are encoded (compressed) at 24 progressive frames, which makes perfect sense since you don't want to waste previous storage to encode duplicate frames/fields.
But the content timing mapped with the frames is indexed on a 1080i60 basis, so the player does not have to decide the order of the fields when it outputs in 1080i
If the player ignore those timings, it can output directly 24p from the disc, without the internal conversion to/from 1080i60
post #27 of 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpeedDemon View Post

Sorry, but not true....

No need to apologize.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SpeedDemon View Post

This is a quote from an HD-DVD developer from Microsoft that is also quoted on Wikipedia. You can read this content directly on his blog: http://blogs.msdn.com/ptorr/archive/...5/HDFacts.aspx.


A couple of quotes from your source:
Quote:


Both formats support (up to) 1920 x 1080p content. Some news stories claim that HD DVD only supports 1080i, but that claim is false. Additionally, both formats support a wide variety of framerates, including 1080p24 (24 frames per second) which is the native frame rate of film and the most accurate way to store motion picture content. Players (in both formats) may choose to output at 1080i for various reasons -- component cost vs. small number of 1080p-capable displays; etc. -- but the content on the disc will almost certainly be at 1080p24.

Quote:


HD DVD encodes audio and video in Program Streams and uses field syntax with 30 frame per second timing to represent both 30 fps interlace and 24 fps progressive content. Missing fields for 24P content are replaced by repeat field flags, the same as DVD-Video. Decoders can ignore the flags to output P24 or use them to output 30i. Blu-ray encodes audio and video in Transport Streams and has the option to use frame syntax to encode 24fps content with 24fps timing.

The data on the discs is progressive. HD DVD includes extra info to assist the player in performing the pull down if needed. The players are not reconstructing a progressive signal from an interlaced source.
post #28 of 29
Thanks Brad for taking the time to look up the quote and clarify the details. So what is next, Transport streams are better than Program streams ?
post #29 of 29
Sorry to tag on to this post - but this issue has puzzled me too.

I just bought the Panny TC-32lx700 with 120hz and motion picture pro (24fps).

So do I want the tohisba HD-A3 or HD-A30 to enjoy 24fps with the Panny?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: HD DVD Players
AVS › AVS Forum › Blu-ray & HD DVD › HD DVD Players › Can HDA2/A3 'do' 24p with appropriate display