AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Speakers › The Official Salk Sound Owner's And Discussion Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The Official Salk Sound Owner's And Discussion Thread - Page 70

post #2071 of 8730
Quote:
Originally Posted by kokishin View Post

Interesting read:
Rolling Stones Top 100 Guitarists http://www.rollingstone.com/news/coverstory/5937559

Cool, thanks for that link. I am a huge fan of Jimi's (though I did not care for his music when I first heard it). I can't wait to hear how it sounds through the HT3s... at least the better recordings.

Someone mentioned Dylan's "All along the Watchtower," and how Jimi made it his own. I like "Like a Rolling Stone", particularly the "Live at Monterey" recording. An outstanding example of why Hendrix is what he is. There is a fluidity to his playing, a spontaneity, and a beauty that makes me stop what I am doing (whenever I hear that version) and just listen... "You'll have to 'scuse me for a minute, jus' let me play my guitar... " what an amazing vibe...

Also, I must add to the ever growing list with a highly underrated, and excellent guitarist named Eddie Hazel (parliament/funkadelic). The 10min. (+)Maggot Brain contains one of the greatest solos ever laid to wax.

The midrange of any Salk speaker would unleash that monster.

Last guy I want to mention is none other than Prince. Though I am not a huge fan, there is no denying that he is a musical genius, and an amazing guitarist.

Grant Green,
Wes Montgomery,
Dick Dale,
are a few more of my favorites...

Cheers,
Funk

Now to see if RollingStone contains any similarities...

Sorry to continue the sideline.
post #2072 of 8730
Another interesting link...
100 Greatest Guitar Solos (Eddie Hazel's "Maggot Brain" is #71)
http://guitar.about.com/library/bl100greatest.htm



Quote:
Originally Posted by funkmonkey View Post

Cool, thanks for that link. I am a huge fan of Jimi's (though I did not care for his music when I first heard it). I can't wait to hear how it sounds through the HT3s... at least the better recordings.

Someone mentioned Dylan's "All along the Watchtower," and how Jimi made it his own. I like "Like a Rolling Stone", particularly the "Live at Monterey" recording. An outstanding example of why Hendrix is what he is. There is a fluidity to his playing, a spontaneity, and a beauty that makes me stop what I am doing (whenever I hear that version) and just listen... "You'll have to 'scuse me for a minute, jus' let me play my guitar... " what an amazing vibe...

Also, I must add to the ever growing list with a highly underrated, and excellent guitarist named Eddie Hazel (parliament/funkadelic). The 10min. (+)Maggot Brain contains one of the greatest solos ever laid to wax.

The midrange of any Salk speaker would unleash that monster.

Last guy I want to mention is none other than Prince. Though I am not a huge fan, there is no denying that he is a musical genius, and an amazing guitarist.

Grant Green,
Wes Montgomery,
Dick Dale,
are a few more of my favorites...

Cheers,
Funk

Now to see if RollingStone contains any similarities...

Sorry to continue the sideline.
post #2073 of 8730
I really dig Buddy Guy's work. There's a lot of excitement in his style, and he just puts a great energy out with his songs. Good stuff!
post #2074 of 8730
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by kokishin View Post

Loved Hendrix. Besides writing/creating some incredible music, he reinvented Dylan's "All Across the Watchtower" to the point that Dylan gave props to Hendrix for the cover.

Other greats and favorites of mine in no particular order: Ritchie Blackmore, Slash, Neal Schon, Billy Gibbons, Stevie Ray Vaughan, George Harrison, Mick Ronson, David Gilmour, Alvin Lee, Mike Campbell who have all laid down some awsome riffs and licks over the years.

Interesting read:
Rolling Stones Top 100 Guitarists http://www.rollingstone.com/news/coverstory/5937559

Definitely some good guitarists on your list, but I can't stand Rolling Stone's list. Rather than go by talent they use other means to judge and decide. That's just not right IMO.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kokishin View Post

Another interesting link...
100 Greatest Guitar Solos (Eddie Hazel's "Maggot Brain" is #71)
http://guitar.about.com/library/bl100greatest.htm

Another good link - thanks!

I do wish they'd branch out more, though. I am sorry, but anyone who knows John Petrucci knows his solos can stop your heart and practically bring you to tears. To put him at 98 out of 100 is an insult IMO.

Again, I think they put all the mainstream guys first rather than the truly talented, though many of the first few are true talented...don't get me wrong.

I guess I have an issue with mainstream music magazines. They just don't dig deep enough and expand their search far enough to find the hidden talents. Many of the guys you've mentioned I've not heard off; the same goes with mainstream mags. It's a pity. Curt Cobain? Come on!


Wow...I really took this thread off topic. Sorry guys. Should I start a new thread elsewhere?
post #2075 of 8730
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nuance View Post

Definitely some good guitarists on your list, but I can't stand Rolling Stone's list. Rather than go by talent they use other means to judge and decide. That's just not right IMO.

Another good link - thanks!

I do wish they'd branch out more, though. I am sorry, but anyone who knows John Petrucci knows his solos can stop your heart and practically bring you to tears. To put him at 98 out of 100 is an insult IMO.

Again, I think they put all the mainstream guys first rather than the truly talented, though many of the first few are true talented...don't get me wrong.

I guess I have an issue with mainstream music magazines. They just don't dig deep enough and expand their search far enough to find the hidden talents. Many of the guys you've mentioned I've not heard off; the same goes with mainstream mags. It's a pity. Curt Cobain? Come on!


Wow...I really took this thread off topic. Sorry guys. Should I start a new thread elsewhere?

You certainly have struck a nerve haven't you, and it really seems to have been a good one. If you wish to start a new thread i am sure many would chime in as we have in the most part 40 or more years to dwell upon. This will just give us more ammunition for our Salk speakers.BY the way most lists are popularity contests to satisfy the masses. Its easier to be part of the herd than a stray( the general public thinks Bose makes a good product). I personally like the stray aspect, searching for what works for me. Thanks for the topic
post #2076 of 8730
Thread Starter 
Gentleman, a new thread was started and can be found here. If you don't mind, please re-post your thoughts there as it will make for a very good discussion. Thanks!
post #2077 of 8730
Nice thread over there Nuance! I posted my two cents.

Does anybody happen to have the ST's in Satin Black that would mind posting some pics of them? I looked around and the only image i could find looks sorta brown and as many of us have found, the pics on teh Salk site are rarely indicative of the beauty of their finishes. Thanks!
post #2078 of 8730
Thought you guys here in Salk town might want to read this too.

I took a trip to Chicago to listen to some speakers, as this is a Salk thread my impressions of the first three have been left out, but they do get referenced. The Avalon Acoustics Indra, Dynaudio Sapphire and Magico V3. For anyone that wants to read those impressions, you can find them http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...4#post14895914 and http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...7#post14897777.

Salk HT3
AVA Transcendance 8, AVA Ultra DAC, AVA FET Valve 550, Sony Blu as Transport


So, my intention on this trip was to listen to some speakers that will sell used for somewhat more than the Salks retail for. Namely Revel StudioII, KEF Ref 205/2, ProAc D38, perhaps even Paradigm S8v.2. I utterly failed in this regard. The cheapest speaker I listened to Friday is selling for 13000 on A'Gon, with the Avalon Indra and Magico V3 nowhere to be found, but likely in the same ballpark since neither are limited production even though more expensive. So, maybe I set up the HT3 for failure. Maybe I didn't want to like it and I filled my head with sound from such expensive speakers to keep myself in the Monitor Audio GS60s for a little while longer. Or maybe I was offered a chance to listen to some speakers that cost as much as my Benz on gear that made the system quite a bit costlier. I thought on this while I waited to get on the highway. An hour later I arrived at the home of the hugely hospitable owner of the aforementioned and pictured system.

DISCLAIMER - Before replying with hate mail read all of this. This audition was a long one and both myself and my host went on a bit of a journey.

We started off with some Diana Krall on DVD. I am not at all familiar with Ms K, but this was a nice piece that showcased her non-singing talent. Decent arrangement, good band and excellent recording. We talked a bit while Abbey Rd sat in the transport waiting to be played. Marty (my host) mentioned it was one of his favorites and how he wished it sounded as good as it could.... Uh Oh.

I played it, as this disc has to work. If Abbey Rd doesn't work through a system I might as well walk away. Instead of just letting the disc flow, I basically went straight to "You Never Give Me Your Money" since I had noted harshness in Paul's voice (intended harshness that can get painful) on multiple speakers, including the Dynaudio Sapphires and Monitor Audio PL300. I think this song should be a bit edgy, but this was painful territory. I paused, turned and asked if that edginess was common. I was told, nope. Now, I was sad. We play a little while longer, getting a bit into the Medley and it became time for Chinese. While we break from speaker-talk, I want everyone to know that Martyo is an excellent host and lover of his Salk/AVA gear as he well should be.

Needless to say, during dinner I was berating myself internally for spoiling my ears with Magicos and Indras. I mean, when Sapphire Dynaudios are outclassed, how can't a monitor retailing for 1/3 their price also be completely outclassed?

Back from dinner we listened to an array of music, most of it wonderfully rendered. No magic tricks for the Kinks, but I didn't expect it either as these are not warm or laid back speakers. Neutrality in spades, with possibly a touch of edginess in the mids. Enormously similar to my take on the PL300, from reviewing my impressions. Some point shortly after dinner, Marty made a comment about toeing in and its effect on the soundstage. Added depth at the sacrifice of some width seemed a respectable trade as I found these to have a somewhat forward presentation. Not as far as the Dyn's but closer to stage than I had fallen for with the Magico and Indra. For perspective, the Indra and V3 put you about 20th row, the Dyns 4th row, and the HT3 were somewhere in the middle.

Toe-in is something I really would not have expected to change much. Change it did though. Suddenly I had depth for yards beyond the speaker plane, and it really seemed like there was a LOT more bass without sacrificing detail and the mids seemed more in-line with what I wanted. This was further unexpected. I made almost no notes during any of this listening because I was just loving it so much, but I remember getting chills regularly, particularly on Tom Waits' "Take it with Me" from "Mule Variations". If you know Waits you know his voice is utterly unique. Suddenly on a pair of speakers I could afford now instead of in 10 years, I was hearing all the density and nuance of this man's wonderfully evocative voice. I was impressed. Same thing with Jeff Buckley on "Last Goodbye" off of "Grace". So, at some point I thought I should look into the female voice. I started the women off with Madeline Peyroux (thanks Mark!) and her nearly perfect performance of Elliot Smith's "Between the Bars". She has a very Lady Day quality and it was reproduced to maximum effect through the HT3. Aimee Mann and Cesaria Evora, who are polar opposites vocally were also both mesmerizing. Score 1 for Salk on Vocal tracks. Score one for affordable listening. Score one for Tom Waits through Salk and AVA.

The Neil Young at Massey Hall CD made another spin, with a couple new tracks to listen to. The Salks did not quite have that perfect sense of space I got with the Magico V3, but his voice and guitar were rendered without excess or recess, sounding really excellent. Jazz was brilliant here as well. Not quite up to the Dyn's probably, though I would have to have both in the same room on the same gear to actually make that call. "Festival Junction" was great, solos were great, everything was great. The Mingus was again full bodied and wonderful, tugging at my brass heartstrings. Speaking of brass, "Dr Feelgood" was very close to sounding like I remembered on the Indra from the brass standpoint, which is a big kudos to the Crossover. The brass sounded like a small group of players rather than a speaker. Twice in one day. I moved on to Nick Drake's "From the Morning" and immediately noticed how intimate these speakers can get. This is off "Pink Moon" and was recorded by Drake in a friend's personal studio shortly before his suicide. If you know the track I think it is quite poignant. The Salk/AVA system brilliantly captured the intimacy of a basement recording. The soundstage was appropriately smaller than on previous tracks. I moved from that back into brass territory with "Life in a Glass House" by Radiohead. I have always described this as a New Orleans funeral dirge and I think that is probably a common desciptor. Soundstage immediately opened back up and had all the depth you could ask for with layers of texture and some beautiful brass and clarinet to top it off. Impressive that a system in this price range is so able. I was finding less to be concerned about, and more to be excited about. It never gave the kick to the chest bass that I like, but everything else was nearly as good as I could ask for. We moved back to Abbey Road and the midrange was still a little hot, but FAR more under control than before. This second appearance of Abbey sounded like I think it should on "You Never Give me Your Money". Paul's voice had bite to it without feeling like he was biting my brain.

I will say that these have to be about the best new speakers you can buy at their price. I would further posit that not many speakers that sell used for what you can get these for new would be a significant improvement. I have not heard any 10-12K loudspeaker so far that produces a better soundstage that also seems to recreate the recorded environment, which for the record, is my personal idea of what "air" means. The recreating of the air space a recording took place in, be it a garage or concert hall. Studio recordings can do all kinds of cool things through good speakers that can pull this trick off. Radiohead was decidedly big and expansive on the Glass House and on "Nude" whereas I found "Last Goodbye" to be slightly less surround-sounding. And the Salk HT3 ROCKED OUT on Cheb I Sabbah!

Berlioz's "Symphonie Fantastique, Mvmt IV - March to the Scaffold" was the classical that came along for these auditions. I think this piece has some nice moments in it with some wonderfully bombastic instant dynamics. I was really impressed with how well the HT3 and AVA setup dealt with the instant demands put on it by this piece. I never once thought it sounded like it couldn't deal with a bit more volume had I wanted any more. This is a hugely dynamic system, moreso than several others far more expensive have been.


Anyway, that is all for now.
-Michael
post #2079 of 8730
Great review Michael! Thank you for posting that.

Also, great music choices. You seem to have very similar tastes in music than I do. You wouldn't by chance also like Grandaddy (my brother's band when they were together)? Or maybe Virgil Shaw (super nice guy and an incredible artist)? Just throwing those out because they are 2 bands not many people know about, but I'm very familiar with...and if you know them I know we listen to the same stuff.
post #2080 of 8730
I do like Grandaddy, but I have not listened to Virgil Shaw. One thing that I have loved about this experience has been exposure to more music. I heard the Massey Hall recording in Indianapolis when I auditioned the Wilson WATT/Puppy 8. I fell in love instantly. I will definitely check out Shaw.

-Michael
post #2081 of 8730
Michael,

Thanks so much for the 'honest' review. While us Salk owners are very loyal to the brand we love so much, I think it's good to get a dose of reality and realize that these speakers are not the end all be all From your review it does sound like that compared to speakers costing many times their price they still hold up VERY favorably, but they are not perfect. That is actually sobering and a good thing to hear. I'd never want to assume that Salk makes the best speaker on the planet, but I do feel good knowing these speakers were designed as 'music-first' and am glad Jim has brought his offerings to the internet market. I'm even more pleased that I was able to find such a great company to work with. The woodworking is absolutely stellar, and it's a custom product which is even cooler I bought my speakers for me, and when people ask what I have I love telling them I have custom built speakers out of Michigan.

Thanks so much for reminding us Salk owners that our speakers have limitations as well as strengths for their dollar.

-Chad
post #2082 of 8730
Chad -
Huge strength for the dollar. I dare anyone to find another new speaker at the same price which equals the HT3. You would have a tough assignment. That being said, I like to think an audiophile owner will typically take care of a speaker north or 10 thousand dollars. That belief and my willingness to buy used are all that will keep me looking for awhile. I honestly don't know if I will find anything that perfectly balances detail and musicality at a price I can afford. If not, I have listened to a speaker that comes close with the HT3.

Again, this is probably my third favorite speaker I have listened to out of about 20, most of them retailing at or above 5 grand. The two I found to be better were 20 and 25.

-Michael
post #2083 of 8730
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grenamc View Post

Chad -
Huge strength for the dollar. I dare anyone to find another new speaker at the same price which equals the HT3. You would have a tough assignment. That being said, I like to think an audiophile owner will typically take care of a speaker north or 10 thousand dollars. That belief and my willingness to buy used are all that will keep me looking for awhile. I honestly don't know if I will find anything that perfectly balances detail and musicality at a price I can afford. If not, I have listened to a speaker that comes close with the HT3.

Again, this is probably my third favorite speaker I have listened to out of about 20, most of them retailing at or above 5 grand. The two I found to be better were 20 and 25.

-Michael

I know the idea has been kicked around by Dennis and Jim before to top the HT3, but I wonder what these two could do with a higher budget than the HT3 (maybe $10,000/pair give or take $2,000)? The thought is pretty exciting as I believe they both have amazing talents. Jim at woodworking, and Dennis at crossover design that's second to few single individuals on the planet I'd imagine. That thought will always linger. I also need to listen to HT3's sometime as I haven't gotten the opportunity to do so.

Michael, speaking of high end speakers have you had a chance to audition Vandersteen 5A's? These seem to be speakers which few disagree top the HT3. I wonder if you could find a pair of these on the used market? They would certainly be worthy of an audition in your quest. Especially considering their retail price of $14,000 one would imagine a used pair to go for $6-8k.

-Chad
post #2084 of 8730
Thread Starter 
^ The 5A's now retail for $17,000. YIKES! But yeah, they are amazing.

Great review, Michael. You da man!
post #2085 of 8730
Quote:
Originally Posted by thirdeye11 View Post

I know the idea has been kicked around by Dennis and Jim before to top the HT3, but I wonder what these two could do with a higher budget than the HT3 (maybe $10,000/pair give or take $2,000)? The thought is pretty exciting as I believe they both have amazing talents. Jim at woodworking, and Dennis at crossover design that's second to few single individuals on the planet I'd imagine. That thought will always linger. I also need to listen to HT3's sometime as I haven't gotten the opportunity to do so.

Michael, speaking of high end speakers have you had a chance to audition Vandersteen 5A's? These seem to be speakers which few disagree top the HT3. I wonder if you could find a pair of these on the used market? They would certainly be worthy of an audition in your quest. Especially considering their retail price of $14,000 one would imagine a used pair to go for $6-8k.

-Chad

I do believe that we will have a speaker, potentially labeled HT4 in the future. I have spoken to both Jim and Dennis about this project and they both are extremely excited about its possibilities. They both are working towards the goal of making it a world class speaker.( world class is the terminology i will use after talking to them about their expectations. I am not sure how they would categorize them as they are both very humble individuals) Their dedication in making this a reality is enough proof for me to believe there is something very special in the making, enough so i have already talked to Jim about the possibility of purchasing the 1st pair. Pricing will be determined closer to an actual production but Jim has warned me that they will not be inexpensive and will most likely top the $10,000 mark. If every thing goes as planned we might see word of them in the spring of 09. Very exciting times at Salk Sound.
post #2086 of 8730
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by greenhouseman View Post

I do believe that we will have a speaker, potentially labeled HT4 in the future. I have spoken to both Jim and Dennis about this project and they both are extremely excited about its possibilities. They both are working towards the goal of making it a world class speaker.( world class is the terminology i will use after talking to them about their expectations. I am not sure how they would categorize them as they are both very humble individuals) Their dedication in making this a reality is enough proof for me to believe there is something very special in the making, enough so i have already talked to Jim about the possibility of purchasing the 1st pair. Pricing will be determined closer to an actual production but Jim has warned me that they will not be inexpensive and will most likely top the $10,000 mark. If every thing goes as planned we might see word of them in the spring of 09. Very exciting times at Salk Sound.

AWESOME!
post #2087 of 8730
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nuance View Post

^ The 5A's now retail for $17,000. YIKES! But yeah, they are amazing.

Great review, Michael. You da man!

I didn't realize they had increased so much, but then again EVERYTHING is up in cost these days it seems. Just as one small example I'm not surprised to see EVERY brand of bread over $2/loaf at my grocery store these days when brand names were $1.50 even a 2-3 years back.

I looked on Audiogon and there are 2 pairs over there in near mint condition, but both are over $10,000 right now. Neither are 'standard' pairs though so the asking prices are somewhat reasonable given their age and condition.

Either way if you could find the right 'older' pair of 5A's they would be worth an audition and potential purchase if trying to get performance equivalent to value better than the HT3's.
post #2088 of 8730
Vandy 5A? I listened to it many times but it is arguable whether it beats the HT3. I think if you find that the HT3 is too 'bright' to your taste, you may like the Vandy 5A. On the other hand, if you find that the Vandy 5A is too 'dull' and 'unexciting', then the HT3 may suit you better.

A nice feature of the Vandy 5A is that the bass woofer has its own amplifier, and you have the flexibility of tuning the bass response.

I have 3 friends who own Vandy 5A. Two of them thought the 5A was the best speaker on earth when they first bought it. Both has since sold the 5A after owning it for less than a year. One of them bought an Usher Be-20 and thought that the Usher Be-20 is a better speakers than the Vandy 5A.

Now I have another good friend in Houston who owns the Usher Be-20, he's driving it with all BAT top of the lines electronics, BAT-REX, BAT VK-150 monoblocks and EMM-LAB CDSA. He was happy with his system, until the day when he visited my house listening to the HT3. Now he's wondering how he's going to sell off his entire system and buy the exact same thing that I have.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Nuance View Post

^ The 5A's now retail for $17,000. YIKES! But yeah, they are amazing.

Great review, Michael. You da man!
post #2089 of 8730
Quote:
Originally Posted by 95bcwh View Post

Vandy 5A? I listened to it many times but it is arguable whether it beats the HT3. I think if you find that the HT3 is too 'bright' to your taste, you may like the Vandy 5A. On the other hand, if you find that the Vandy 5A is too 'dull' and 'unexciting', then the HT3 may suit you better.

A nice feature of the Vandy 5A is that the bass woofer has its own amplifier, and you have the flexibility of tuning the bass response.

I have 3 friends who own Vandy 5A. Two of them thought the 5A was the best speaker on earth when they first bought it. Both has since sold the 5A after owning it for less than a year. One of them bought an Usher Be-20 and thought that the Usher Be-20 is a better speakers than the Vandy 5A.

Now I have another good friend in Houston who owns the Usher Be-20, he's driving it with all BAT top of the lines electronics, BAT-REX, BAT VK-150 monoblocks and EMM-LAB CDSA. He was happy with his system, until the day when he visited my house listening to the HT3. Now he's wondering how he's going to sell off his entire system and buy the exact same thing that I have.

I did say that few will disagree that the Vandy 5A is better than the HT3. That's the beauty of audio though. There are no right or wrong answers, but there are plenty of options to make a speaker search a life long quest
post #2090 of 8730
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by thirdeye11 View Post

I didn't realize they had increased so much, but then again EVERYTHING is up in cost these days it seems. Just as one small example I'm not surprised to see EVERY brand of bread over $2/loaf at my grocery store these days when brand names were $1.50 even a 2-3 years back.

I looked on Audiogon and there are 2 pairs over there in near mint condition, but both are over $10,000 right now. Neither are 'standard' pairs though so the asking prices are somewhat reasonable given their age and condition.

Either way if you could find the right 'older' pair of 5A's they would be worth an audition and potential purchase if trying to get performance equivalent to value better than the HT3's.

Absolutely. I agree.

Inflation is killing us these days. It would be nice if we all got raises for the cost of living increase...or maybe I am the only one that doesn't.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 95bcwh View Post

Vandy 5A? I listened to it many times but it is arguable whether it beats the HT3. I think if you find that the HT3 is too 'bright' to your taste, you may like the Vandy 5A. On the other hand, if you find that the Vandy 5A is too 'dull' and 'unexciting', then the HT3 may suit you better.

A nice feature of the Vandy 5A is that the bass woofer has its own amplifier, and you have the flexibility of tuning the bass response.

I have 3 friends who own Vandy 5A. Two of them thought the 5A was the best speaker on earth when they first bought it. Both has since sold the 5A after owning it for less than a year. One of them bought an Usher Be-20 and thought that the Usher Be-20 is a better speakers than the Vandy 5A.

Now I have another good friend in Houston who owns the Usher Be-20, he's driving it with all BAT top of the lines electronics, BAT-REX, BAT VK-150 monoblocks and EMM-LAB CDSA. He was happy with his system, until the day when he visited my house listening to the HT3. Now he's wondering how he's going to sell off his entire system and buy the exact same thing that I have.

Different strokes for different folks. This hobby is so subjective. But you know what's funny? I know people who would rather purchase speakers based on measurements rather than hearing them with their own ears. I'll never get that...
post #2091 of 8730
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nuance View Post

Absolutely. I agree.

Inflation is killing us these days. It would be nice if we all got raises for the cost of living increase...or maybe I am the only one that doesn't.


Different strokes for different folks. This hobby is so subjective. But you know what's funny? I know people who would rather purchase speakers based on measurements rather than hearing them with their own ears. I'll never get that...

Raises, thats a term used in the 90's right.
post #2092 of 8730
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by greenhouseman View Post

Raises, thats a term used in the 90's right.

lol!
post #2093 of 8730
Quote:
Originally Posted by greenhouseman View Post

Raises, thats a term used in the 90's right.

I have gotten 3 double digit percentage raises since starting at my company in May 2006, but I fear I'm near the top of the pay scale in my current position.
post #2094 of 8730
Quote:
Originally Posted by thirdeye11 View Post

I have gotten 3 double digit percentage raises since starting at my company in May 2006, but I fear I'm near the top of the pay scale in my current position.

ExxonMobil exec.?. Anyways congrats on being good at what do you do and being justly compensated. Not the typical situation any longer.
post #2095 of 8730
Quote:
Originally Posted by greenhouseman View Post

ExxonMobil exec.?. Anyways congrats on being good at what do you do and being justly compensated. Not the typical situation any longer.

I wish I'm no fat cat. I started at a 4 man IT shop that outsources IT departments for small businesses. I started as customer care and worked my way up to Operations Manager. Second in command basically these days I like reporting directly to the owner as he's a really cool guy. There is something to be said about liking where you work.

Oh wait were we supposed to be talking about Salk speakers?

I'm curious to know more about the sealed or front ported version of the SongCenter. Let us know when you find more out about that.
post #2096 of 8730
Quote:
Originally Posted by thirdeye11 View Post

I wish I'm no fat cat. I started at a 4 man IT shop that outsources IT departments for small businesses. I started as customer care and worked my way up to Operations Manager. Second in command basically these days I like reporting directly to the owner as he's a really cool guy. There is something to be said about liking where you work.

Oh wait were we supposed to be talking about Salk speakers?

I'm curious to know more about the sealed or front ported version of the SongCenter. Let us know when you find more out about that.

I am also curious about the front ported center channerl speaker as I have no choice but to any center channel speaker in a cabinet under my KURO. There is no other option in my case.
post #2097 of 8730
Quote:
Originally Posted by greenhouseman View Post

I do believe that we will have a speaker, potentially labeled HT4 in the future. I have spoken to both Jim and Dennis about this project and they both are extremely excited about its possibilities. They both are working towards the goal of making it a world class speaker.( world class is the terminology i will use after talking to them about their expectations. I am not sure how they would categorize them as they are both very humble individuals) Their dedication in making this a reality is enough proof for me to believe there is something very special in the making, enough so i have already talked to Jim about the possibility of purchasing the 1st pair. Pricing will be determined closer to an actual production but Jim has warned me that they will not be inexpensive and will most likely top the $10,000 mark. If every thing goes as planned we might see word of them in the spring of 09. Very exciting times at Salk Sound.

Very exciting! I always wondered what could be done beyond the HT3 by Jim and Dennis, and assuming this comes to fruition, I would definitely be interested in getting a pair (assuming I actually graduate college and make money ).
post #2098 of 8730
I decided to kill my home theater set up and chose to go 2 channel and these are my latest gear driving my Song Towers
LL
LL
post #2099 of 8730
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by evan1 View Post

I decided to kill my home theater set up and chose to go 2 channel and these are my latest gear driving my Song Towers

Wow...that's awesome! How do you like the tube gear?
post #2100 of 8730
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nuance View Post

I am sorry, but anyone who knows John Petrucci knows his solos can stop your heart and practically bring you to tears. To put him at 98 out of 100 is an insult IMO.

That whole list made me laugh. What a joke. Petrucci is good but take it a step further with Michael Romeo.

Quote:
Originally Posted by evan1 View Post

I decided to kill my home theater set up and chose to go 2 channel and these are my latest gear driving my Song Towers

Which Marantz is that?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Speakers
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Speakers › The Official Salk Sound Owner's And Discussion Thread