AVS › AVS Forum › Video Components › DVD Recorders (Standard Def) › Magnavox 537, 535, 533, 515, 513, 2160A, 2160, 2080 & Philips 3576, 3575
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Magnavox 537, 535, 533, 515, 513, 2160A, 2160, 2080 & Philips 3576, 3575 - Page 775

post #23221 of 23781
My latest experiences with the tuner on my 537 have become so bizarre, I don't even want to try to explain. But I will.

First, the easy: artwire suggested leaving the 537 tuner on 7.1 and then program it to record 7.1 a little later. He's right - with this method I can record the digital 7.1

Before I did any channel rescans since the last time I posted, I discovered, on the 537 - when changing "up" digital channels, the 24's are skipped over because 24.1 has nothing on it. However, when I enter 24.2, digital MTV is there, and likewise when I enter 24.3, digital USA is there, and so on for a few more 24's including digital Discovery which is next. So I can go to one of the channels by entering the numbers, but I can't go up or down to get the others. I have to plug in the numbers. Weird.

Even weirder is that I found for analog channels, suddenly (at least I thought it was ok previously) I can't get above analog channel 8 unless entered the digit(s). Going up would just wrap around (I now forget what going down did).

I played around a lot and went back and forth from digital to analog and was not having the occurrence of static for analog anymore.

Next I was going to do Ken.F's custom channel rescan suggestion. I see I didn't do it completely right but here's what I did: I scanned all channels with the coax off (I had earlier switched over to a cheapo thin coax that pulls on and off instead of screwing). So I wiped ALL the channels and then did another scan with the cable on but I pulled it exactly when it got to digital 1 and pushed in back on as soon as I saw digital 8. When it finished - it leaves itself in the channel setting mode which normally you would just exit it at that point. But I immediately when into manual channel set and there was channel 2.1, in its fully color glory, in the background and the channel setting box showed it was already added. So I channel up to 4 which is also seen in the background and it was already showing as added. Likewise for the rest when I scanned through them - 5, 6, 7, 8, ... So I exit and all the channels are there just as if I didn't pull the coax for 1 thru 8! And both channel 7.0 and 7.1 are likewise present, and with the same exact problem.

But here's the weirdest of the weird (if that wasn't weird enough): Starting from 2.1, I go up channels, 4.1, 4.2, I go through the three channel KTLA 5's (5.1, 5.2, 5.3 - the last two are "KTLA This") and hit a couple 6's (KCET and probably DW/international), with a blank channel or two in between (eventually the blank went away on their own), and then, still going up, the channel 5's appear again, and still going up, the channel 6's appear again, and finally 7. I went back down and the order was likewise strange (I don't know if it was exactly the same). I went all the way down probably to 2 and then back up - and again the 5's came again after the 6's and then the 6's again before arriving at the (sic) 7's.

But, .... after going up and down through 5, 6, 5, 6, twice each, it stopped doing it. Went back to normal ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8. Yep.

Previously the 537 was picking up a radio station on 6.1, but after this latest rescan it's gone. I didn't want it. Now my TV also has great trouble with the digital channels that Cox is sending over 6 (which seems to change once or twice a year). My very good quality Samsung LED TV (I came back to insert this in parens - I may be getting confused as it may be my 515 tuner I'm thinking of although the TV tuner has its own annoying quirks because of the difficult channel feed from Cox) at times gets multiple (different) channels with the same number and goes back and forth - made up example: 6-1, 6-2, 6-1, 6-2, 6-20, 6-2 (definitely not that but you get the idea). The TV used to get a whole lot of digital channels on 6 but lately it's only been getting about 4 or 5 and I have have all but two deleted on the TV's tuner right now. The two I kept for the TV are the two that I think the only two the 537 is now receiving (KCET - and maybe the other is that DW channel). Wow - lucky - no just weeeeeeird.

Now the 537 does not pick up 18.1 which it did before (was probably some garbage anyway) but it goes right to 24.2 (up from 13.1 maybe), and then to 24.3, and so on. No longer is the blank 24.1 there and I can move "up" channels to and through the 24's (one at a time) which I couldn' t do before. This is working right now!

I go back to the lower channels and moving up from the digital 5's, the tuner went directly to 8! No 6 & 7! I went down from 8 and it went to 5! But finally, 6 and 7 came back and things went back to "normal" - ha ha ha ha.

I went into manual channel set and deleted channel 7. Exited and went back in and added 7 back. Except that it can't be re-added. I'm now assuming that you can't re-add digital channels manually after deleting them? Is this true? At least I can't on this 537. Initially, I thought you could because days ago I deleted digital 7 and I had thought I re-added it. But maybe I didn't and that's why, after deleting the analog 7 ( at wajo's suggestion) that digital 7 was just blank - maybe it was already gone - at the time I thought it wasn't though. Anyway, I can't delete and manually re-add digital channels on this 537 so hopefully (I guess) that's the way it works.

I switched back to analog and the static problem came back -- it hadn't happened in a good while - I think it wanted to say hi. Going back and forth digital - analog doesn't get analog back to normal. Only power off does.

I will be returning this 537. I want the Mag for sure but I probably won't get another 537 because of this witch. I somewhat expect the channel 7 problem with any other Mag now (with whatever garbage Cox is sending as I think it is) but maybe not. At least I'm fully conditioned for that one problem. eek.gif

Thanks and truly sorry to anyone who read this.
Edited by dweezil is in - 3/10/13 at 4:01am
post #23222 of 23781
DST transition observation.

I had a weekly recording that was scheduled for Sundays from 12:20AM till 2:AM on my 2160A. I changed the end time to 2:20AM so I could tell if the DST transition effected the recording. I happened to be up, and saw the whirling display when the recording ended at 2:00AM. The recorder shut off a minute later, and displayed 3:01AM.
The 2160A was set for Nov/Mar DST transition. I am reasonably confident that my 3175 and 3176 would have done the same thing.

Actually, I think this makes sense. With an old VCR, we programmed a start time and a duration. A DST transition should not effect a recording in progress for that programming style. These units use start and end times. In that case, it is reasonable for the recording to end when the clock reaches, or has passed, the scheduled end time. In the fall, it is not a big deal since it just adds an hour to a Sunday AM recording that spans 2AM. It does create an issue that needs to be accomodated in the spring (At least for the models I have.)
post #23223 of 23781
Quote:
Originally Posted by dweezil is in View Post

Previously the 537 was picking up a radio station on 6.1, but after this latest rescan it's gone.
FM radio is broadcast in the frequency range between TV channels 6 and 7. Maybe the root of your problem is strong OTA signals (TV and/or radio) leaking into your cable. Do you live near any transmitter towers or have an antenna connected to your TV cable system?
post #23224 of 23781
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken.F View Post

FM radio is broadcast in the frequency range between TV channels 6 and 7. Maybe the root of your problem is strong OTA signals (TV and/or radio) leaking into your cable. Do you live near any transmitter towers or have an antenna connected to your TV cable system?

The TV gets 6 or 7 or so radio channels and I'm pretty sure Cox just includes them in its mush pie (too bad they're scattered in crummy places so I wish they weren't there except once in a somewhat rare while, I do listen to KCRW on the TV). I think the 515 picks up two or three of them, I can't remember. It's nothing new. I have no antenna.
post #23225 of 23781
Quote:
Originally Posted by kenavs View Post

DST transition observation.

I had a weekly recording that was scheduled for Sundays from 12:20AM till 2:AM on my 2160A. I changed the end time to 2:20AM so I could tell if the DST transition effected the recording. I happened to be up, and saw the whirling display when the recording ended at 2:00AM. The recorder shut off a minute later, and displayed 3:01AM.
The 2160A was set for Nov/Mar DST transition. I am reasonably confident that my 3175 and 3176 would have done the same thing.

Actually, I think this makes sense. With an old VCR, we programmed a start time and a duration. A DST transition should not effect a recording in progress for that programming style. These units use start and end times. In that case, it is reasonable for the recording to end when the clock reaches, or has passed, the scheduled end time. In the fall, it is not a big deal since it just adds an hour to a Sunday AM recording that spans 2AM. It does create an issue that needs to be accomodated in the spring (At least for the models I have.)

My results are in also: last night I set the recording from 1:30am to 4:15am (again I wanted to record for 1hr 45 minutes) to be safe; DST ON; this morning I checked and found that the recording is 1hr 45 minutes (and the clock time was adjusted for DST). So, the DST change does affect the recording interval. This is with the 515 model.
post #23226 of 23781
Quote:
Originally Posted by dweezil is in View Post

... And the result: 7.0 got recorded instead (which is an inferior digital broadcast) so apparently, until 7.0 is stopped being fed in (by Cox I guess), I can't record 7.1 with my 537..

The problem is not Cox..it's the bad software design of the tuners in the units..whoever designed this tuner/software implementation lacks some basic understanding of how US digital cable works.Similar issues here with Time-Warner and perfectly good QAM's that other Tv's and DVD Tuner-Recorders have no problem with. In defense of Funai, they are just like the rest of us..staff doing multiple jobs, handling the demands of multiple departments and projects, with no time or resources to go back and fix anything. And don't even mention the engineering staff budget... with that said, I would not look for a fix, tho it would be nice especially having 5 of these.

Attached grab of how TWC uses analog 11 plus digital 11.0 . It works fine on these units.

.
post #23227 of 23781
Quote:
Originally Posted by bdfox18doe View Post

The problem is not Cox..it's the bad software design of the tuners in the units..whoever designed this tuner/software implementation lacks some basic understanding of how US digital cable works.Similar issues here with Time-Warner and perfectly good QAM's that other Tv's and DVD Tuner-Recorders have no problem with. In defense of Funai, they are just like the rest of us..staff doing multiple jobs, handling the demands of multiple departments and projects, with no time or resources to go back and fix anything. And don't even mention the engineering staff budget... with that said, I would not look for a fix, tho it would be nice especially having 5 of these.

Attached grab of how TWC uses analog 11 plus digital 11.0 . It works fine on these units.

.

hi folks...

perhaps ( really perhaps ) the 537 has later firmware for the tuner than its predecessors, with the latest being some attempt to make the tuners memorize better ( and ended up making it worse ).

i only offer this because several folks had tried to explain to 234 the tuner memory and programming issues in the past... it would be interesting to see if someone with dweezil's same service has similar results using the older MDR51x or Philips 357x series boxes. this might indicate some attempt on funai's part to address the tuner programming issues...

smile.gif

rgds,
ron g
post #23228 of 23781
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkg22 View Post

Philips 357x series boxes. this might indicate some attempt on funai's part to address the tuner programming issues...smile.gif rgds, ron g

The Philips,Panny, LG and Sony I have works fine.
Edited by bdfox18doe - 3/10/13 at 8:50am
post #23229 of 23781
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken.F View Post

Check your cooling fan.
And how exactly do I do that?
post #23230 of 23781
Quote:
Originally Posted by poweranimals View Post

And how exactly do I do that?
Easy, but I'm sure I will be dumped on for this. With unit off, insert a toothpick halfway into the fan. Turn on unit and see if the noise is there. If so, it's not the fan. Pull toothpick and if the noise starts again, it's the fan. Obviously you don't want to take more than 30 seconds to perform this test. BTW, Funai sells the fans.
post #23231 of 23781
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeKustra View Post

Easy, but I'm sure I will be dumped on for this. With unit off, insert a toothpick halfway into the fan. Turn on unit and see if the noise is there. If so, it's not the fan. Pull toothpick and if the noise starts again, it's the fan. Obviously you don't want to take more than 30 seconds to perform this test. BTW, Funai sells the fans.

No dump here. You beat me to saying the same thing.

I had to replace the fan in one of mine. The trick in replacing is not to do it by taking off the top cover, but instead the back panel, because the connector inside is tricky to get to otherwise.
post #23232 of 23781
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkg22 View Post

hi folks...

perhaps ( really perhaps ) the 537 has later firmware for the tuner than its predecessors, with the latest being some attempt to make the tuners memorize better ( and ended up making it worse ).
rgds,
ron g
I don't have the same service but I do have a physical digital 26.0 which the 515H handles by moving the 26.x block of 10 SD channels up by one. Same with the 2160A. My Sony TV and DVR just ignore the channel. The TV indicates a scrambled channel. Both Sonys have a valid 26.1 as does my older Sanyo TV that also has a TV/DTV button.

I do agree with bd that there could be either a better tuner or better software used with the existing tuner. I have not bought a 535H since I don't need this problem.
Edited by JoeKustra - 3/10/13 at 3:08pm
post #23233 of 23781
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkg22 View Post

hi folks...

perhaps ( really perhaps ) the 537 has later firmware for the tuner than its predecessors, with the latest being some attempt to make the tuners memorize better ( and ended up making it worse ).

i only offer this because several folks had tried to explain to 234 the tuner memory and programming issues in the past... it would be interesting to see if someone with dweezil's same service has similar results using the older MDR51x or Philips 357x series boxes. this might indicate some attempt on funai's part to address the tuner programming issues...

smile.gif

rgds,
ron g

I think bdfox18doe and you are on target. I have a 515 and a 3575. The 515 does not have a problem with channel 7.1 but I haven't rescanned channels in awhile. Still, there is no reason why anything should have changed with the broadcast of ABC. Many things are under constant change - there is some good in that though - the number of digital channels coming through is always on the slow increase. USA (I record heavily) and Discovery (I used to record but don't like hardly anything they produce anymore) are fairly recent adds to the digital realm. My 3575 does not get 2.1 through 13.1 (all network primary digital channels) and many others. It does get the radio station on its 6.1 and a couple of the broadcasts coming over on 6.x. The first year I had the 3575 I did not have a digital TV so I accepted the broken digital tuner on it. However, the 3575 has been a workhorse and I continue to rely on it heavily. My 515 does everything I need, just not enough of it.

If anyone else in Orange County, California (or Cox anywhere) can comment on the 53x's tuner in this regard it would be appreciated. I am also looking for someone else's comparison of pictures between the 53x and 51x as I have found my 515 has an ever so slightly better picture when viewing some HD broadcasts because of better dark colors.
post #23234 of 23781
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeKustra View Post

Easy, but I'm sure I will be dumped on for this. With unit off, insert a toothpick halfway into the fan. Turn on unit and see if the noise is there. If so, it's not the fan. Pull toothpick and if the noise starts again, it's the fan. Obviously you don't want to take more than 30 seconds to perform this test. BTW, Funai sells the fans.
Another thing you could do is rule out a loose chassis or uneven feet, by pushing your hand firmly on top of the unit. If the top cover is vibrating due to it being loosely connected, or the whole unit is not sitting flush on the surface, pushing your hand on top of it should reduce or remove the noise.
post #23235 of 23781
Quote:
Originally Posted by dweezil is in View Post

I think bdfox18doe and you are on target. I have a 515 and a 3575. The 515 does not have a problem with channel 7.1 but I haven't rescanned channels in awhile. Still, there is no reason why anything should have changed with the broadcast of ABC. Many things are under constant change - there is some good in that though - the number of digital channels coming through is always on the slow increase. USA (I record heavily) and Discovery (I used to record but don't like hardly anything they produce anymore) are fairly recent adds to the digital realm. My 3575 does not get 2.1 through 13.1 (all network primary digital channels) and many others. It does get the radio station on its 6.1 and a couple of the broadcasts coming over on 6.x. The first year I had the 3575 I did not have a digital TV so I accepted the broken digital tuner on it. However, the 3575 has been a workhorse and I continue to rely on it heavily. My 515 does everything I need, just not enough of it.

If anyone else in Orange County, California (or Cox anywhere) can comment on the 53x's tuner in this regard it would be appreciated. I am also looking for someone else's comparison of pictures between the 53x and 51x as I have found my 515 has an ever so slightly better picture when viewing some HD broadcasts because of better dark colors.

right... all of these guys have their anomolies... turned up by usage with various cable suppliers and ota markets...

my 3576's and 513's work well OTA here in las vegas, and both also have the same anomolies regarding storage of channels that are in the wrong sequence, eg 5.1 on a higher RF channel than 5.2 ...

both have trouble with this due to COX's placement of the ' PSIP ' channel 5's on 2 separate RF channels and in upside down sequence...

so maybe Funai made some attempt to improve their channel storage method and inadvertantly screwed things up moreso.... who knows...

on video quality, i know this has been discussed, but my 2 cents = lousy blacks on both 357x and 513 boxes... badly crushed blacks when using CATV and internal DVR tuner, perhaps a bit better OTA, but still not great.. much better when feeding video directly, so i do believe Funai has goofed on reference levels somewhere. sure wish there was some sort of hardware strapping on the chassis or in the tuner to control this, but i'm guessing that this is all wrapped up in firmware somewhere. also i'm guessing that this happenes AFTER the tuner and in conversion sections as someone mentioned earlier elsewhere. then again, who knows... while this is a major nuisance, i can live with it in light of the other useful features of these boxes...

i'm hoping funai will continue development and improve their conversion stuff...

rgds,
ron g

======
post #23236 of 23781
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkg22 View Post

right... all of these guys have their anomolies... turned up by usage with various cable suppliers and ota markets...

my 3576's and 513's work well OTA here in las vegas, and both also have the same anomolies regarding storage of channels that are in the wrong sequence, eg 5.1 on a higher RF channel than 5.2 ...

both have trouble with this due to COX's placement of the ' PSIP ' channel 5's on 2 separate RF channels and in upside down sequence...

so maybe Funai made some attempt to improve their channel storage method and inadvertantly screwed things up moreso.... who knows...

on video quality, i know this has been discussed, but my 2 cents = lousy blacks on both 357x and 513 boxes... badly crushed blacks when using CATV and internal DVR tuner, perhaps a bit better OTA, but still not great.. much better when feeding video directly, so i do believe Funai has goofed on reference levels somewhere. sure wish there was some sort of hardware strapping on the chassis or in the tuner to control this, but i'm guessing that this is all wrapped up in firmware somewhere. also i'm guessing that this happenes AFTER the tuner and in conversion sections as someone mentioned earlier elsewhere. then again, who knows... while this is a major nuisance, i can live with it in light of the other useful features of these boxes...

i'm hoping funai will continue development and improve their conversion stuff...

rgds,
ron g

======

Ron - You have helped clarify these things greatly for me - excellent analysis of the situation.

I'm with you and obviously an awful lot of others in hoping that Funai keeps this thing going. Clearly, Funai has to at least make an investment in correcting firmware or better yet replacing the entire guts of the video processing hardware and software. Maybe even add cable card capability to ensure it would be a huge seller. Technology is changing the way we watch TV and the biggest changes are yet to come. Nevertheless, I think there will be a healthy market for this type of recorder, with updated technology, for a long time yet.
post #23237 of 23781
Quote:
Originally Posted by dweezil is in View Post

Ron - You have helped clarify these things greatly for me - excellent analysis of the situation.

I'm with you and obviously an awful lot of others in hoping that Funai keeps this thing going. Clearly, Funai has to at least make an investment in correcting firmware or better yet replacing the entire guts of the video processing hardware and software. Maybe even add cable card capability to ensure it would be a huge seller. Technology is changing the way we watch TV and the biggest changes are yet to come. Nevertheless, I think there will be a healthy market for this type of recorder, with updated technology, for a long time yet.

No they don't. I wouldn't. If they invested the time and money and end up with a $600 or even a $400 unit, can they sell it at Walmart? Some people think everyone, cable & OTA will need a STB in the next few years. I don't, but I can see how much money that would save and how it would drive more viewers to internet only access.

Maybe I'm just too old and cynical, but the future ain't what it used to be. I wonder how much TV the head of the FCC or my congress people watch. Climate change now gets more media coverage than television. Maybe we need a Sandy-like event to get things moving.
post #23238 of 23781
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeKustra View Post

Some people think everyone, cable & OTA will need a STB in the next few years. I don't, but I can see how much money that would save and how it would drive more viewers to internet only access.
Why would anyone need a STB for OTA? How does a STB for OTA save anyone money?
post #23239 of 23781
Quote:
Originally Posted by dweezil is in View Post

The TV gets 6 or 7 or so radio channels and I'm pretty sure Cox just includes them in its mush pie (too bad they're scattered in crummy places so I wish they weren't there except once in a somewhat rare while, I do listen to KCRW on the TV). I think the 515 picks up two or three of them, I can't remember. It's nothing new. I have no antenna.
I didn't realize Cox was putting radio stations in on purpose. Did you get a chance to run auto channel preset for only digital channels 8 and higher?
post #23240 of 23781
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken.F View Post

Why would anyone need a STB for OTA? How does a STB for OTA save anyone money?
I can't answer the first question until OTA can be scrambled. For cable, if everyone was required to have a STB (with or without a DVR), the cable company would never need to roll a truck to control your service or level of service. Lower carbon footprint. It's their major argument right now since it's politically correct.

I'm not saying it will happen, just that it could.

Forgot: cable box for OTA opens up the PPV market - more money.
post #23241 of 23781
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeKustra View Post

I can't answer the first question until OTA can be scrambled. For cable, if everyone was required to have a STB (with or without a DVR), the cable company would never need to roll a truck to control your service or level of service. Lower carbon footprint. It's their major argument right now since it's politically correct. I'm not saying it will happen, just that it could.

Forgot: cable box for OTA opens up the PPV market - more money.
I understand the new ruling for cable, I'm talking about OTA with an antenna, not locals carried by your cable company. Just imagine for a minute that you didn't live so far out in the boonies they have to pipe in light, and you get your TV service with a $30 antenna. Would you rent a STB from your cable company for PPV or would you just buy a $50 Roku box?

Edit:
Joe, it probably looks like I'm angry (and I am) but it's not with you. I have very strong feelings about anyone trying to take away free access to OTA broadcasts. It's nothing more than stealing from the poor so a few CEOs can put more money in their pockets. I had a few rough years not too long ago and I relied on OTA for TV. I'm back on my feet now but it's an experience I won't forget any time soon. If they try to take away OTA I'll do anything to fight it. I know my congressman's name. I guarantee he'll also know mine.
Edited by Ken.F - 3/11/13 at 6:33am
post #23242 of 23781
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken.F View Post

I understand the new ruling for cable, I'm talking about OTA with an antenna, not locals carried by your cable company. Just imagine for a minute that you didn't live so far out in the boonies they have to pipe in light, and you get your TV service with a $30 antenna. Would you rent a STB from your cable company for PPV or would you just buy a $50 Roku box?

I don't know. I do know somebody must pay for things like extras that only come via satellite and cable. If I did live in a metro area with an antenna and there was a small box that would give me USA or SyFy without cable or HSI I would jump on it.
post #23243 of 23781
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeKustra View Post

I don't know. I do know somebody must pay for things like extras that only come via satellite and cable. If I did live in a metro area with an antenna and there was a small box that would give me USA or SyFy without cable or HSI I would jump on it.
You would need at least 1.5 Mbps for Hulu. That's beyond the capability of dialup but DSL would work.

SyFy
USA
post #23244 of 23781
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken.F View Post

You would need at least 1.5 Mbps for Hulu. That's beyond the capability of dialup but DSL would work.

SyFy
USA
Thanks for the research, but I already have 5Mbs cable and 1Mbs DSL. My TV, Blu-ray and TiVo all have Hulu+ as an option. Since I live where light needs to be piped in, OTA is not an option and I get everything in HD cable and the TiVo is my STB. I used to have faster internet, but I found I would spend too much on Amazon movies. I think we moved a bit off thread a little too. I guess I have too much optimism or I'm just dreaming, but I keep waiting for an HD product from Funai. I'll keep waiting.
post #23245 of 23781
I had a friend who was interested in one of these machines and he asked me an interesting question I could not answer him or find in any previous post. He asked if he got one of the smaller drive units say the 320 GB then filled it up or it fails ,then since it's the same basic shell as the larger units, is the software(firmware) the same so that he could put a1 TB HD in to the 320's shell and would it work ok with out having to get some software updated or changed?
post #23246 of 23781
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeKustra View Post

I don't know. I do know somebody must pay for things like extras that only come via satellite and cable. If I did live in a metro area with an antenna and there was a small box that would give me USA or SyFy without cable or HSI I would jump on it.
Joe, that "small box" might just be here now. It's called the Roku 3.

It's rumored Roku and Time Warner (TWC) have made a deal wherein most TWC cable content will soon be available, online.
post #23247 of 23781
Quote:
Originally Posted by mwg1 View Post

I had a friend who was interested in one of these machines and he asked me an interesting question I could not answer him or find in any previous post. He asked if he got one of the smaller drive units say the 320 GB then filled it up or it fails ,then since it's the same basic shell as the larger units, is the software(firmware) the same so that he could put a1 TB HD in to the 320's shell and would it work ok with out having to get some software updated or changed?
Perhaps you could be more specific on "these machines" since there are 10 listed in the title.
post #23248 of 23781
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by mwg1 View Post

I had a friend who was interested in one of these machines and he asked me an interesting question I could not answer him or find in any previous post. He asked if he got one of the smaller drive units say the 320 GB then filled it up or it fails ,then since it's the same basic shell as the larger units, is the software(firmware) the same so that he could put a1 TB HD in to the 320's shell and would it work ok with out having to get some software updated or changed?

 

Yes, the FW in the 53x Series units accepts virtually *any* SATA HDD up to 1TB capacity. These units can also be configured with an external dock-and-play system, as described in this help file.

post #23249 of 23781
Haven't heard any scuttlebut lately as to the quality and decrypting ability of the HDMI-to-composite devices available at Monoprice and Amazon. A while back Wajo had mentioned that there were counterfeit versions of these running around. Does anyone have any experience with how these work with, say, Netflix streaming?

Jim
post #23250 of 23781
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimLely View Post

Haven't heard any scuttlebut lately as to the quality and decrypting ability of the HDMI-to-composite devices available at Monoprice and Amazon. A while back Wajo had mentioned that there were counterfeit versions of these running around. Does anyone have any experience with how these work with, say, Netflix streaming?

Jim

 

Apparently, Monoprice stopped selling its Monoprice-branded HDMI>Composite/S-Video converter so I had to modify the help file, as described here.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: DVD Recorders (Standard Def)
AVS › AVS Forum › Video Components › DVD Recorders (Standard Def) › Magnavox 537, 535, 533, 515, 513, 2160A, 2160, 2080 & Philips 3576, 3575