AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › 2.35:1 Constant Image Height Chat › DIY Constant Height › 4-Way Acoustically Transparent Masking
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

4-Way Acoustically Transparent Masking - Page 12

post #331 of 829
Quote:
Originally Posted by R Harkness View Post

I had inquired about the SMX system. It actually isn't being made anymore (so I don't know why they keep using it in their AVS advertisement).


Hi Rich,

We are now back in production with the 4 way ProMask-Quad. The AVS banner is advertising our 2 way ProMask system hence the mask panels in the banner only coming in from the sides.

Ruben
post #332 of 829
Scott,

Got a coupler in the mail today. How did you remove the gear from the rotator motor ?

Ivan
post #333 of 829
Quote:
Originally Posted by SandmanX View Post

Hi Rich,

We are now back in production with the 4 way ProMask-Quad. The AVS banner is advertising our 2 way ProMask system hence the mask panels in the banner only coming in from the sides.

Ruben

Ah, got it. Thanks! (Last time I'd clicked that advertisement it took me straight to a page on your website advertising the 4 way pro-mask, hence my bafflement).
post #334 of 829
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by R Harkness View Post

Thanks Scott.

You and I have different uses for our masking. Why 4 way masking for me? I'd presumed I was going to end up with a CIH system. But after a long time of experimenting I decided CIH wasn't for me. I simply loved the flexibility of zooming the image to whatever size I wished. Sometimes I love a HUGE image for some movies and for some levels of source quality, other times smaller images look better. And I want the flexibility of having a much bigger 16:9 image than I'd get if I stayed strictly CIH...

I like your thinking. There is a lot of discussion about the benefits of CIH, but after having my setup for a while, I'm of the opinion that bigger is better, no matter what the aspect ratio. In my case, my room height was the limiting factor, but I could go about as wide as I wanted, so 2.35:1 made sense. In a room where the width is the limiting factor and you can go as tall as you want, then I agree that it makes since to go with a taller screen as you have done. That lets you get the biggest picture possible (if you choose), no matter what the native aspect ratio of the movie. I sit 10 feet from a screen that is a little over 10 feet wide in 2.35:1. I love it. When I watch a movie that is 16:9 or 4:3, I feel it is too small. In these situations it would be nice to have a bigger picture if I had a taller room.

In your case, a 4-way masking system is more important than ever and I think your plan of the Carada/Goelst system combo will work well. I like your mock up drawing. It looks very good. I agree with your plan that a bevel on the side masking that rides close to the screen is good idea. Overall I think you have a very good plan, and at a cost of $5,000, compared to $19,000, I would probably make the same decisions as you have made.

My humble attempt in this thread has been to try to show an option for people looking for ideas to do a DIY manual masking system in the $500 range. In my recent attempts to motorize my system, I have been hoping to keep the motorization below a couple hundred dollars. My system is pretty labor intense and I realize this is not an option for everyone.

In all honesty, I have not intensely looked into the commercial systems that are in the price range you are looking at. My off-the-cuff thought when I first read your post was that if I was spending $5,000 + on a system, I would not want to mix components from different manufacturers. However, if a complete solution is in the $19,000 range, then I completely understand your choice and think it is a very viable plan. Your drawing looks great.

Uh oh... Now I'm thinking about those 19" panels on each side of your screen.... If you ditched those, you could still have your 61" in height, but get a 2.40:1 screen that was 146" wide instead of only 124" wide.... ===> now you're talking big...

(Just playing with you... I like your plan, -- but I would take another look at the SMX option before making a final decision )

- Scott
post #335 of 829
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ifeliciano View Post

Got a coupler in the mail today. How did you remove the gear from the rotator motor ?

Ivan,
I think the gear must be glued on. Getting it off was tough. The best way would be to find a tiny gear puller, but I couldn't find anything that small. I ended up using an allen wrench as a pry bar. Using the largest allen wrench possible, I fit the short end of the allen wrench underneath the gear and then pried it up. The danger of doing it this way is that you could damage the motor. Fortunately my motor was fine after I got the gear off. - Scott
post #336 of 829
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScottJ0007 View Post

My off-the-cuff thought when I first read your post was that if I was spending $5,000 + on a system, I would not want to mix components from different manufacturers. However, if a complete solution is in the $19,000 range, then I completely understand your choice and think it is a very viable plan. Your drawing looks great.

The Goelst roller panel system has up to 6 pre-set stopping points, IR/RF remote controlled so even if I decided I didn't want the hassle of zooming all the time and wanted to stick with a simpler CIH idea, I could just pick a masked image height with the Carada and have pre-sets for various ARs with the Goelst side masking. The over-sized Carada screen would mean a bigger image was always available should I desire. But I know from my experience I'll be using the zooming librally and hence using the Carada masking quite a bit too.

The approximate $14,000 I save on going with a fully pre-built system (e.g. SMX/Stewart) is much needed given I'm renovating the entire room - new furniture/rugs/paint/dropping bulkheads on the ceiling/lighting/curtains etc.
Not to mention buying the projector!

But hey, I hardly have to convince you about the virtue of saving money on a design.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScottJ0007 View Post

Uh oh... Now I'm thinking about those 19" panels on each side of your screen.... If you ditched those, you could still have your 61" in height, but get a 2.40:1 screen that was 146" wide instead of only 124" wide.... ===> now you're talking big...

- Scott

I need the room on the sides for my L/R speakers anyway. I'm not doing an AT screen for several reasons: sound travel to the room upstairs, I wanted a wider choice of screen materials, and the room needed to also work as my 2 channel "audiophile" listening room too so I can pull the speakers out for maximum performance when I'm in music listening mode.

Besides, I've found 124" is almost overwhelmingly big from my seating distance. I don't have any urge to go bigger and in fact I'll often be watching a smaller 2:35:1 image. That's actually another benefit I think of varying the image size: one gets used to a big image quite fast and it doesn't feel as big as it used to. If I'm varying the image size, when I zoom out for some content to the full 124" it will still have the "wow that's huge" impact because I'm not watching it every time I throw on a scope movie.
At least, that is what I've experienced in zooming the image for the last 1 1/2 years on my wall.

Fingers crossed...

Thanks for this thread! It's actually where I was put on to the Goelst company!
post #337 of 829
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScottJ0007 View Post

Ivan,
I think the gear must be glued on. Getting it off was tough. The best way would be to find a tiny gear puller, but I couldn't find anything that small. I ended up using an allen wrench as a pry bar. Using the largest allen wrench possible, I fit the short end of the allen wrench underneath the gear and then pried it up. The danger of doing it this way is that you could damage the motor. Fortunately my motor was fine after I got the gear off. - Scott


Scott,

Here is a link to Hobby Engineering's web site & a gear puller they sell for ~$15, see if the size spindles match your need. Not sure if this a Tamiya product, I know they make one as well.

http://www.hobbyengineering.com/H1649.html

John
post #338 of 829
Quote:
Originally Posted by HDGTX View Post

Scott,

Here is a link to Hobby Engineering's web site & a gear puller they sell for ~$15, see if the size spindles match your need. Not sure if this a Tamiya product, I know they make one as well.

http://www.hobbyengineering.com/H1649.html

John

Decided to use my dremel tool and a cutting wheel attachement to cut the gear off. I'll wrap the motor before cutting so no metal shavings will get in the motor. I need to buy a better coupling. A Beam Coupler will work well. The flexibility of the coupler will help with any misalignment I might introduce when machining the motor mounts.

BTW..It was a no-go on using my "friends" mill ( )to do the pulleys I mentioned some posts back.
post #339 of 829
Thread Starter 
I finally got the rotator motor mounted to the shaft of my gear motor. I took the shaft of the gear motor to a local machine shop and had them bore a 1/8" hole in the end of the shaft. I bought a 1/8" shaft and some hub mounts from ServoCity.com and then pieced it all together. Here are some pics. Later today I will try hooking it all up to my masking system to see if it works...

This is the armature removed from my gear motor


This is the end of the shaft before being drilled


After being drilled


Here, I have inserted the 1/8" shafted into the end of the gear motor shaft


The new 1/8" shaft now protrudes out of the end of the motor housing


I used hub mounts to connect the small motor to the new 1/8" shaft


The infamous "hall sensor"...


Full view of the new setup
post #340 of 829
Nice job on the mounting Scott ! Are the two motors perfectly centered ? Did you energize the gear motor to see how much vibration is being introduced ?
post #341 of 829
Thread Starter 
Great news! I got the new motor hooked up. It works! The repeatability is very good. I won't say it is perfect, but it is certainly very acceptable.

I still have a couple of small issues that I will work on. First, I did not get the two motors exactly on center with each other and there is a little bit of vibration that is audible. Its not terrible, but it is noticeable to me. Secondly, I think I am going to use a smaller pulley on the cables so that my masking moves a little slower. This will also give me more precision in fine tuning the exact point that I want the masking to stop.

Overall, I am VERY encouraged!

- Scott
post #342 of 829
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScottJ0007 View Post

Great news! I got the new motor hooked up. It works! The repeatability is very good. I won't say it is perfect, but it is certainly very acceptable.

I still have a couple of small issues that I will work on. First, I did not get the two motors exactly on center with each other and there is a little bit of vibration that is audible. Its not terrible, but it is noticeable to me. Secondly, I think I am going to use a smaller pulley on the cables so that my masking moves a little slower. This will also give me more precision in fine tuning the exact point that I want the masking to stop.

Overall, I am VERY encouraged!

- Scott

Great to hear Scott. For the vibration, I think the coupling I link to on my prior post will help tremendously. Unless you have a mount machined perfectly, the motors aren't going to be centered correctly.
post #343 of 829
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ifeliciano View Post

Great to hear Scott. For the vibration, I think the coupling I link to on my prior post will help tremendously. Unless you have a mount machined perfectly, the motors aren't going to be centered correctly.

Yes, that coupling looks like it would help a lot. The other thing I am considering is to remove the hall sensor board from the rotator motor and removing the "donut" magnet from the shaft of the rotator motor and attaching them directly to the 1/8" shaft that I added to the gear motor. The rotator motor really isn't needed at all. I just need to figure out a way to mount the hall sensor board to the back of the gear motor and have it lined up with the donut magnet.
post #344 of 829
Scott,

Great photos man & great work as well !

Was there a way to leave the rotator motor out & just attach the Hall Effect encoder board onto your new 1/8" shaft ? I may have missed an explaination somewhere, just wondering.

Do you have some photos of how you mounted the motor to your masking pulley assembly ?

John
post #345 of 829
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by HDGTX View Post

Scott, Great photos man & great work as well !

Was there a way to leave the rotator motor out & just attach the Hall Effect encoder board onto your new 1/8" shaft ? I may have missed an explaination somewhere, just wondering.

Do you have some photos of how you mounted the motor to your masking pulley assembly?

Thanks John.

I think I might attempt to re-mount the encoder board directly to the new 1/8" shaft and leave the rotator motor out altogether. This will solve the problem with the vibration.

I don't have any new pictures of the motor mount, but it is the exact same as what I showed in the original video. Once I get the last few bugs worked out, I will post a complete set of new pictures and I might do another video as well. - Scott
post #346 of 829
Great Work Scott !!

Like we discussed before, the ideal thing would be to mount the board on the new motor. The potential problem is the 'Ring Magnet'. These are very brittle and a little force
will break them. Found a source for ring magnets that might work in case the magnet gets damaged. These magnets have to be 'DIAMETRICALLY MAGNETIZED'. Also it will make a difference how many poles they have.

http://www.kjmagnetics.com/proddetail.asp?prod=R424DIA

Another option is to use timing pulleys on each shaft and connect them with a timing belt.

http://www.econobelt.com/e-store/Pulleys.htm
post #347 of 829
Thread Starter 
TeeCue, Thanks for the magnet link. I order a couple this evening. I've started work on mounting the hall effect sensor directly to the new gear motor. Yesterday I disassemble to old motor and got the hall sensor encoder board and the ring magnet off the old shaft. I had considered taking my 1/8" shaft back to the machine shop to reduce the end of it to 2.5mm to fit the ring magnet, but I decided to order a new magnet from the link you gave instead. Thanks! - Scott
post #348 of 829
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScottJ0007 View Post

TeeCue, Thanks for the magnet link. I order a couple this evening. I've started work on mounting the hall effect sensor directly to the new gear motor. Yesterday I disassemble to old motor and got the hall sensor encoder board and the ring magnet off the old shaft. I had considered taking my 1/8" shaft back to the machine shop to reduce the end of it to 2.5mm to fit the ring magnet, but I decided to order a new magnet from the link you gave instead. Thanks! - Scott

You are welcome.

I have one concern and that is regarding the number of poles in the magnets. These diametrically magnetized ring magnets can have different number of poles which trigger the sensors. See picture below. I guess the only way to see if the new one works is to try it.

Probably an easier option would be to use a flexible coupler as ifeleciano recomended. Here is another link:
https://sdp-si.com/eStore/Direct.asp?GroupID=200
LL
post #349 of 829
Scott,

On a totally different issue, what flash bounce set up did you use to take the picture of the armature? Its just a fantastic photo.

The moderators may say this is off topic so you can PM me when you can.

Thanks.
post #350 of 829
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by TeeCue View Post

On a totally different issue, what flash bounce set up did you use to take the picture of the armature? Its just a fantastic photo.

No flash. It is just the room light overhead. Color balance set to "auto". I'm using a little Canon Digital Elph SD600. It takes great close-up pictures, especially in "digital macro" mode. I have a more expensive full sized Canon, but it doesn't match the close-up quality of the little Elph.

(Not off topic at all! I think good pictures help make a good thread. )
post #351 of 829
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottj0007 View Post

no flash. It is just the room light overhead. Color balance set to "auto". I'm using a little canon digital elph sd600. It takes great close-up pictures, especially in "digital macro" mode. I have a more expensive full sized canon, but it doesn't match the close-up quality of the little elph.

(not off topic at all! I think good pictures help make a good thread. :d)

absolutely
post #352 of 829
Quote:
Originally Posted by TeeCue View Post

Scott,

The moderators may say this is off topic so you can PM me when you can.

Thanks.

I don't think they're that strict. Photography is part of A/V, IMO.
post #353 of 829
Thread Starter 
MOTORIZATION SUCCESS!!!!!

It worked! I mounted the hall sensor encoder directly to the motor. It works perfectly!

First, I had to remove the hall sensor board from the small rotator motor. I wanted to keep the plastic mounting piece that was part of the old motor. I had a hard time figuring out how to dismantle the old motor so I did it the ugly way... I took a hack saw to it. Here is a picture of the armature and hall sensor board of the rotator motor after I removed the motor housing.


I used the hack saw again to cut the armature off (I know, there is probably a better way, but...). Here is the encoder board and the original ring magnet.


Here is the underside of the plastic mounting piece. This picture does not show it, but I clipped off the two small motor brushes and also bent back the motor connections so they wouldn't be in the way when mounted onto the new motor. I also drilled out the shaft hole to fit the 1/8" shaft extension that I put on the new motor.


I bought a new diametrically magnetized ring magnet (the silver one in the picture) from www.kjmagnetics.com (thanks TeeCue for the link!!!). The new magnet has a 1/8" bore, which is a perfect fit for the new motor shaft extension. This is a neodymium magnet which is an amazingly strong magnet. It is a little smaller in diameter than the original magnet, but WAY more powerful. Both magnets have a single north and south pole. The new magnet works perfectly.


Here is the hall sensor board and new ring magnet mounted to the new motor. I used super glue to mount the board to the motor housing.




Finally, here is a VIDEO OF THE NEW SYSTEM IN USE.



TeeCue, ifeliciano, HDGTX, thank you guys so much for your help! I could not have done it without you.

I am also going to motorize my horizontal masking and program everything into my Harmony One universal remote so that everything, including the projector aspect ratio and the Prismasonic anamorphic lens, is all automated with the push of a single button. I'll post more details and more pictures when I get everything finished. For now, I just wanted to get something up quick to let you know that IT WORKED!

Thanks again. You guys are great!

- Scott
post #354 of 829
WOW Success...!!! Congratulations Scott and hopefully this will help a lot of us that want to build an affordable electric masking system.
post #355 of 829
Just saw the video - very impressive!
Congrats Scott!

Now if someone found a way to offer this as an affordable DIY kit I would be extremely interested....
____
Axel
post #356 of 829
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Axel View Post

Just saw the video - very impressive!
Congrats Scott!

Now if someone found a way to offer this as an affordable DIY kit I would be extremely interested....

Axel,

Thank you. My original goal was to be able to simply buy the rotator for about $80, make a few minor modifications, and have an extremely easy DIY solution that anyone could implement. The cost has turned out to be closer to $200 and it is a little more involved than a plug-n-play solution, but it really is not that difficult. I realize that this thread may have made it seem complicated because there were many set-backs and alternatives that we explored. However, if you are handy and can solder, it is not a difficult project.

I will build at least three more of these. One will be for my horizontal masking, and I will use many of the same concepts when I build a lift for my projector. I am also going to build a projector lift for a friend of mine.

I expect I will do some more fine-tuning while I build the rest of the motor controllers for my projects. At that point I plan on putting together a parts list with step-by-step instructions. (Maybe even a step-by-step video).

I'm hoping that this can be motorization solution that many of the DIY'ers on this forum can implement. It is not as slick as some of the commercial systems, but with 99 easily programmable set points, learnable IR control, nonvolatile memory, and extremely accurate repeatability, it is very functional.

- Scott
post #357 of 829
Awesome !!!!
post #358 of 829
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScottJ0007 View Post

..... At that point I plan on putting together a parts list with step-by-step instructions. (Maybe even a step-by-step video).

I'm hoping that this can be motorization solution that many of the DIY'ers on this forum can implement. It is not as slick as some of the commercial systems, but with 99 easily programmable set points, learnable IR control, nonvolatile memory, and extremely accurate repeatability, it is very functional.

- Scott



Scott;
YES, please do so. This is something that a lot of us have been looking for.

I made a few attempts (stepper motor) myself and failed. At one point I also tried to purchase a semi-custom build one from another member - that eventually did not work out either...

... and there is no need for you to be modest, YOUR SYSTEM IS SLICK! Congrats again!
_____
Axel
post #359 of 829
FANTASTIC

This not a success just for you but a success for all the TRUE DIYERS out there. I am glad to be a part of this project. Your persistence was the key to your success. This is a testament to this forum also, encouraging us to help each other solve different problems.


The next phase, like you said, would be to intergrate everything and to be able to control it with one remote. I looked up Harmony One, it has delay and macro capabilities and we should be able to send a specific signal to a specific receiver. I have some ideas on how to that and we will discuss it here when you reach that stage.
post #360 of 829
Hi Scott, you really should be proud of what you have done. Have you considered commercialising your masking system and selling it as an aftermarket option? I have a Screen Research 120" TheaterCurve and unfortunately, wasn't aware until after the sale, that ScreenResearch don't sell the masking after market - needs to be purchased as one screen at the initial sale. I'm sure I wouldn't be the only person in this position.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: DIY Constant Height
AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › 2.35:1 Constant Image Height Chat › DIY Constant Height › 4-Way Acoustically Transparent Masking