Having recently put up the drywall, I decided to read up on how to do the next parts - acoustical treatments, fabric panels, and what not. I wound up reading the excellent
Bacon Race Theater thread only to realize that it was happening just a few miles away. Being thoroughly impressed with BIG's ability to knock that theater out so quickly, I decided to see if he could work his magic for me too. Turns out he lives just 20 minutes away and so was able to come over that very afternoon.
BIG's biggest concern was with the theater's cooling system. I had decided to go with the
Dead Vent approach - that is, to actively exchange air with adjacent basement rooms. I like this approach since it addresses the concern for sound getting into the house's HVAC system while being cheaper than installing a dedicated mini-split system.
Taking up the challenge, I reconfirmed my calcs that the inline fan I got (
Panasonic FV-30NLF1) is rated at 340 CFM, which will change the air in the room my size (2718 ft^3) about 7.5 times an hour, which exceeds the
recommended minimum of 4-6 times per hour. This fan has 6" and I used 6" acoustical flexiduct...so theoretically, it seemed good.
However, preferring empirical data, I decided to do a load test by wiring 8 100-watt light bulbs to simulate the heat given off by eight people. [Note: a person at rest gives off 350 BTUs (
ref), a 100w bulb gives off 341 BTUs (
ref)], plus the PJ and have lighting set as it would be for a movie and measure the temperature over time.
First, some pics of the room in it's test configuration. Note that I used blue-tape and plastic to seal the room as best I could. I also put down a carpet remnant to help insulate any effect the concrete floor might have...
Note the two rows of 4x 100w bulbs roughly simulates seating positions. There is a digital thermometer on top of the lamp in between the rows - it's a little above head-height to provide a worst-case scenario. I also have a thermal leak detector, which gives instantaneous temperature for anything I point it at. You may not be able to see them, but the exhaust vent is above where the PJ might be located and the supply vent is in the ceiling behind the screen.
My first test was invalid as I discovered it was pulling air from my HDMI conduit, the electrical panel, the door, and three outlets. The HDMI conduit was likely the worst infiltrator, as it was directly under the return, hence less room-air was being exchanged. I sealed all these points, but there must still be some breaches as the supply still doesn't seem to be as strong as the exhaust (more on this later)
The following results are with 8x 100w + 6x 60w bulbs (the sconces) + the rope-light:
| Minutes |
Intake |
Room |
Exhaust |
| 60 |
70.5 |
72 |
73.0 |
| 60 |
70.5 |
72 |
73.8 |
| 60 |
69.9 |
73 |
73.9 |
| 60 |
70.0 |
73 |
75.0 |
I thought this was OK, but not stellar. One thing I noticed was that within 30 seconds of my opening the door, the thermometer jumped from 73 to 75. My guess is that, with the door open, the fan was no longer pulling cool air across the thermometer. What this means is that having the theater's door closed was actually important to keeping the thermometer cool, but the room was even warmer.
Next I decided to try a slightly more accurate heat profile - as having 6x 60w bulbs on high is unrealistic. So I decided to dim the two sconces on the back wall (to simulate the PJ) and turn off the other four 60w bulbs. So, after turning off four 60w bulbs and dimming two 60w bulbs I got:
| Minutes |
Intake |
Room |
Exhaust |
| 30 |
70.7 |
73 |
75.0 |
| 30 |
71.2 |
73 |
75.2 |
| 30 |
70.5 |
75 |
75.2 |
| 30 |
70.7 |
75 |
75.3 |
Disturbing, even with less load, the room actually got warmer! It's as if a thermal mass was giving off heat - a quick check showed that the concrete was a cool 68, the carpet over the concrete read 71, but the drywall was hot - 75+. Note: the thermometer in the room doesn't display fractions, so the room could've been 75.3 at the end there...
Next I decided to try a "4-person" test by turning off four of the 100w bulbs in the rear:
| Minutes |
Intake |
Room |
Exhaust |
| 45 |
70.0 |
73 |
74.6 |
| 45 |
70.0 |
73 |
74.4 |
| 55 |
70.5 |
73 |
74.1 |
| 36 |
69.5 |
73 |
73.5 |
Definitely trending down - so it seems that 4 people should be OK indefinitely...
Next I turned off the last four 100w bulbs, but left the "PJ" bulbs, rope light and, of course, the fan on:
| Minutes |
Intake |
Room |
Exhaust |
| 30 |
70.5 |
72 |
73.0 |
Interesting that the room didn't get even cooler - like 70.5. I noticed that the drywall itself was still warm...
Next I turned off everything and opened the door:
| Minutes |
Intake |
Room |
Exhaust |
| 25 |
71.0 |
70 |
72.6 |
So the room finally let go the heat, though I think it was still storing some as I vaguely recall it was 68 when I very first started the tests...
The next morning I decided to try the 4-person test again. The room started at 66 degrees (our thermostats are set low at night)
| Minutes |
Intake |
Room |
Exhaust |
| 30 |
70.5 |
72 |
72.5 |
| 60 |
70.1 |
72 |
71.8 |
So it got to 72 again pretty quickly. Combined with the above test, if I do nothing, it really does seem that 4-people could stay in this room indefinitely. But the room is for 8 people, this problem needs to be solved.
My hypothesis was that something is wrong with the supply line - that it might be constricted somewhere along its path. It just doesn't make sense to me that the air velocity isn't more like what I feel coming out of the exhaust. The air should take the path of least resistance and a 6" hole should be pretty attractive in an "sealed" room (within the limits of what I could achieve with painter's tape, plastic sheets, and towels). Yet the room fights hard to find other paths - for instance, I can feel some air turbulence near the door and pin-hole size air-streams from a couple outlets. It would be fascinating to have a air-pressure reader, as I imagine that it's more than normal. While air coming from the door or outlets would be cooler than the room's, I can't help but thinking it's not as good as if the supply didn't seem constricted.
I wanted to see if the supply was constricted, but I couldn't get my fishing tape very far without it kinking up inside the duct, from either side of the duct. To protect the duct, I had attached a bulbulous test tube thingy from a kid's toy to the fishing tape. I think it's because my fishing tape is the nylon-type - a metal one would likely get further, though I question if it would make it around some of the crazy bends the duct takes.
BIG suggested checking for a constriction by pulling a balloon with a string, which could be fished through by attaching it to a plastic grocery bag and sucking it through with a leaf-blower. The leaf-blower pulled the grocery bag through in a blink (wow!). Then I pulled a 5" balloon through without much trouble. I pulled it both directions several times. 5" was a good fit for the 6" duct - the balloon was snug. I'm satisfied that there isn't a serious constriction of any sort in the duct line.
My next thought was that maybe the duct line had too much static pressure in it, with all the twists and turns it takes. I decided to test this by simply pushing the supply line out of the way - that is, to let the supply air come directly from the joist bays above the ceiling. I could do this because the DD+GG boxes I built around the duct boots weren't attached to the ceiling yet (though they make a fairly tight seal). Doing this, I definitely felt more air-velocity - it's really hard to say how much more - somewhere between 25% and 100% more. I know that's a broad range but, like I said, it's pretty hard to feel the difference (a flow-hood device could measure it, but they cost way too much (2-3 thousand $) and it didn't seem worth it to have an HVAC company come out with one (~$75).
I started another "8-person" test with the supply vent opened up (i.e. 8x 100w + 6x 60w + rope-light). The room started at 66 degrees:
| Minutes |
Intake |
Room |
Exhaust |
| 90 |
68.5 |
70 |
71.7 |
| 180 |
69.0 |
72 |
71.6 |
These numbers are slightly better than the last time I ran the 8-person test, for which after 3-hours I had (69, 73, 73.9). But, more importantly, the room felt less stuffy when I walked into it and the walls weren't warm. So, the culprit appears to be that there is too much static pressure in the supply line.
I called a local HVAC company and got really lucky to speak with their lead tech for about 45 minutes. I explained my situation and he said that he's not surprised that the supply wasn't providing enough air. That there would be a lot of head in it with all its twists and turns. He said that I could feel pinhole air-streams coming though outlets indicated that. He said that solution was to put in inline fan into the supply line as well - actually, he was a bit surprised that there wasn't one already. He was like "of course we commonly do that". He also mentioned having a bigger supply line (6" --> 8"), but that would require me ripping open the theater's ceiling, and I'm skeptical if there would be enough space for an 8" duct, so putting an inline fan in the supply line seems to be in my future.
BTW, I should mention that this is a surprising discovery for me. Never in my reading up on how to do this did I read that the supply had to either be active or oversized. Anyone else have experience with this?
Wrapping this up, BIG's concern for the room's ability to cool itself was spot on. Fortunately, the splicing of an inline fan into the supply line can be done outside the theater room, where it connects to the adjacent basement room. This means that we can move forward with trimming out the theater room in parallel, the main reason I reached out to BIG is the first place...
Whew - long post. Obviously I've skipped over everything I've done in the last couple years - including the rest of the basement, which is nearly done. The good news is that now, with BIG's involvement, this isn't going to take that much more time to wrap up, which has my wife smiling even more than me
Stay tuned!