OFFICIAL "HELP ME CHOOSE A PLAYER" THREAD: Can't decide? Start HERE. - Page 492

Originally Posted by mkotik 

How about LG BP620?

Originally Posted by nakenergy 

Sony S790 was a great surprise; quick, pristine blu ray, SACD, 4k upscaling (future proof) and the biggest surprise being it is really better than the Oppo 83 for upscaling DVDs. With 2 HDMI out it can also go with an older receiver. The player also has a ton of apps and streaming.

one can get 2 S790s for one Oppo.

Originally Posted by charlie310 

Can anyone recommend some good players for me? I don't need 3D, or internet connectivity. I just want a player that isn't too loud, doesn't break or glitch, and has great picture/sound. I've already replaced most of my DVDs w/blu-rays, so I wouldn't be playing many DVDs on it. I saw the LG BP125 for $48, but I'm guessing it's a crap player. I wish they would get $200 players and take the 3D, wifi, and other junk off and sell it for $100.

Originally Posted by TXSTYLE 

Decided on and ordered a Panny BDT 500.


BigMarcus ~ EVO 4G LTE

Originally Posted by BillP 

If you feel that strongly about not having 3D (you don't have to use it), there is the Sony 390 .

Originally Posted by mdavej 

You should go for the Sony 185. It's similar to the 390 but also lacks wifi. Bottom of the barrel feature-wise but still decent picture. Panasonic has a similar model the 87.

Even though I don't use wifi or 3D either, I get higher end, feature rich models anyway because they generally perform better, only cost a few dollars more on sale (maybe $5 more), and have much higher resale value.

Originally Posted by canuckerfan 

Hi everyone, looking for a player that has several features:

1) can play mkv files over SMB shares
2) can play divx/xvid files over SMB shares
3) can play mp3 files over SMB shares
4) can play flac files over SMB shares
5) sd card support
6) ntfs support on the usb (this is reaching a bit, so I don't really expect to get this one)

After a bit of searching, I've found only some of the Panasonics which fit the above criteria. Any thoughts?

Originally Posted by wmcclain 

Price range? The current OPPOs have this except for (5) but start at $499.

There are SD to USB adapters that would be worth trying to get you wider compatibility for that.

-Bill

Originally Posted by rickas47 

I'm looking for a player to work with my Panasonic TC-P55VT50. Is there an advantage to stick with the same manufacturer? Seems like the Panasonic BDT220 is highly regarded and very reasonably priced. Anything else out there at a similar price point that might have an advantage over the 220? Is there any point to wait a few weeks for the BDT230 to be released? Thanx.

Originally Posted by rickas47 

I'm looking for a player to work with my Panasonic TC-P55VT50. Is there an advantage to stick with the same manufacturer? Seems like the Panasonic BDT220 is highly regarded and very reasonably priced. Anything else out there at a similar price point that might have an advantage over the 220? Is there any point to wait a few weeks for the BDT230 to be released? Thanx.

Originally Posted by charlie310 

Yea, my point exactly. I think it's stupid how I'm forced to pay extra for features I'd never use. Why would I stream videos on a crappy slow Blu-Ray when I can do it on a XBox (essentially a computer)? I also think 3D is lame unless you're using it on a 60"+ HDTV.

Anyways, thanks for the suggestions. I'll be looking up the models mentioned to find my new player.

Originally Posted by Vampidemic 

I have trouble relating. I don't use 3D or Wi-Fi myself, but these players pack a lot of bang for there buck. Players with this feature set sold for around twice as much a few years ago and much less than a decent VCR sold for 20 years ago.

Wi-Fi is considered a basic feature these days as many users simply aren't equipped to use the network features without it. I have to think there is very little if any cost saving to remove 3D support.

Also, the Sony players can stream more video formats than the Xbox, they're quiet and they use less electricity. The streaming features are very compelling for users that don't already have a game console. See the glass as half full! :-)

Originally Posted by charlie310 

Since you don't understand, I'll explain it to you. 3D and/or Wi-Fi blu-ray players sell for more money than non-3D Wi-Fi Blu-ray players. Hell, adding a wireless-n card to a laptop costs at least $20. I imagine adding 3D support would be just as expensive, if not more. Yes, wi-fi is a basic feature on laptops. That doesn't mean it doesn't cost money.

So, paying retail for a $1,000 laptop is a great deal because it would have cost you $3K two years ago? Using your logic, I should pay more than $1K for extra features I will never use just because it used to cost $4K.

Xbox has more streaming content (you do realize they've been doing it for much longer & therefore have more license agreements). The Xbox is quiet too (at least the new ones which I have). Who the hell cares about electricity (what, it's gonna cost $1 more per month?).

Obviously, a wi-fi blu-ray player is extremely useful for people who don't have game consoles. It doesn't take a genius to know that. Obviously, my whole point is that people who don't use wi-fi or 3D shouldn't have to pay extra for it just to get a decent blu-ray player.

Originally Posted by charlie310 

Since you don't understand, I'll explain it to you. 3D and/or Wi-Fi blu-ray players sell for more money than non-3D Wi-Fi Blu-ray players. Hell, adding a wireless-n card to a laptop costs at least $20. I imagine adding 3D support would be just as expensive, if not more. Yes, wi-fi is a basic feature on laptops. That doesn't mean it doesn't cost money.

So, paying retail for a $1,000 laptop is a great deal because it would have cost you $3K two years ago? Using your logic, I should pay more than $1K for extra features I will never use just because it used to cost $4K.

Xbox has more streaming content (you do realize they've been doing it for much longer & therefore have more license agreements). The Xbox is quiet too (at least the new ones which I have). Who the hell cares about electricity (what, it's gonna cost $1 more per month?).

Obviously, a wi-fi blu-ray player is extremely useful for people who don't have game consoles. It doesn't take a genius to know that. Obviously, my whole point is that people who don't use wi-fi or 3D shouldn't have to pay extra for it just to get a decent blu-ray player.

Originally Posted by XclusiveTN 

So if I've narrowed my choices to the Panasonic 220 or Sony 590, is either that much better than the other considering they are about the same price or wold I be better off waiting for the newer models this year?

Originally Posted by bokes 

Can anyone give the Pioneer 150 a thumbs up?
A local dealer has them for $130.
I'm replacing a Pioneer 51 that suffered a dead laser.

Originally Posted by apw2607 

I'm sorry, but the Xbox 360 is a bag of nails for streaming support. The Netflix client is only able to stream 720p content. It also requires xbox live subscription. Shocking.

A $80 Sony BD player is more capable.

Originally Posted by apw2607 

I'm sorry, but the Xbox 360 is a bag of nails for streaming support. The Netflix client is only able to stream 720p content. It also requires xbox live subscription. Shocking.

A $80 Sony BD player is more capable.