Quote:
I find that very hard to believe. Most people pay a lot more than $3 for xbox live gold, especially after new customer deals run out. And xbox only had around 35 video streaming services last time I checked. Sony has far more than that (at least 60), and they're free. And why would anyone pay for 720 content when they can get 1080 for free. It makes no sense. I have 3 xboxes and 3 sony BD players, and besides cable tv, I do all my streaming on my sony players. And streaming content aside, the IR response on xbox stinks, so navigating with a normal remote is a pain unless you're directly in front of it and fairly close.Originally Posted by charlie310 
I'm sorry, but like I said XBOX 360 HAS MORE STREAMING CONTENT. End of story. BTW, an xbox live gold subscription is only $3.33 a month if you get it on sale. I love how people with 42" HDTVs will ignorantly talk crap about 720p when they wouldn't be able to tell the difference. Hell, I have a hard time telling the difference on 55" plasmas.

I'm sorry, but like I said XBOX 360 HAS MORE STREAMING CONTENT. End of story. BTW, an xbox live gold subscription is only $3.33 a month if you get it on sale. I love how people with 42" HDTVs will ignorantly talk crap about 720p when they wouldn't be able to tell the difference. Hell, I have a hard time telling the difference on 55" plasmas.
Having said all that, I think counting who has the most content is useless. Most of it is complete crap. Whether I use sony, xbox or roku, I still use only the major 3 or 4 streaming apps that just about everybody has. If there's something special like MLB or HBO, then I agree that something like xbox is a better option, although an expensive one. Even $40/year is expensive compared to free. That's my entire annual disc rental budget.
Edited by mdavej - 2/10/13 at 12:05pm

























). but I am still doubting because I noticed that some forums tell about a picture quality difference.