I’m also on Shaw cable. I’m pretty sure that the technology Shaw and Comcast both use is almost identical.
I have been using a Motorola DCX3400-M for almost 2 years. I purchased this 500 GB HDD box brand new directly from Shaw. In the two years I owned the box I had almost zero problems with the Motorola DCX3400-M.
I do not have an external HDD (PVR expander) hooked to my DCX3400-M but I have heard numerous complaints from other Shaw subscribers that have a PVR expander hooked up. My guess is that this is more of a software problem and has less to do with hardware.
As to the memory and HDD size , I just went into the hidden diagnosis screen and my DCX3400-M also has:
System RAM: 512 MB
Flash: 64 MB
HDD: 500 MB
I think it depends on how your cable co orders the boxes with memory and HDD size. Same with the ports being enabled or disabled its up to your cable co to decide witch ports it activates.
Hardware wise I’d say the DCX3510-M is a slightly better box due to having more advanced hardware. Shaw subscriber lorac wrote”
“Obviously things do differ somewhat from provider to provider, but on Shaw cable in Canada the DCX3510 is a POS. It is just so bug riddled that the opinion of most people is that the DCX3400 is still the better unit”
I have heard the exact same reports BUT I think the DCX3510-M complaints are due to Shaw putting out a completely new bug ridden software package including a new guide and I believe the bugs/complaints are due to the new software, not the DCX3510-M hardware.
For future-proofing reasons I would stay away from older boxes like the DCH6416 because they do not tune in mpeg-4 channels and most cable cos are adding more and more channels that use MPEG-4 AVC (H.264). There are other outdated things with the older boxes. Oh and the DCX3400-M will indeed pass through native 1080p content, it just won’t scale 720p or 1080i content to 1080p.
As to having a fan, I always prefer having a fan in any piece of gear with a HDD. As to the power supply, since I own my box, I would prefer an external PS like with the 3510 because it would be easier to DIY fix.
In conclusion I’m very happy with my DCX3400-M but with the current software I’d be weary of adding an external HDD PVR expander. I’m pretty sure that eventually the cable co will get rid of the bugs that plague the new software running the DCX3510-M and at that time they will switch over the DCX3400-M customers to the new software. At that time I’m willing to bet that the DCX3510-M will run smoother than the DCX3400-M. By the way the “M” stands for “MOCA” but Shaw has not activated MOCA-Mode with these boxes – you need the gateway with portals if you want multi-room DVR with my cable co.
I have been using a Motorola DCX3400-M for almost 2 years. I purchased this 500 GB HDD box brand new directly from Shaw. In the two years I owned the box I had almost zero problems with the Motorola DCX3400-M.
I do not have an external HDD (PVR expander) hooked to my DCX3400-M but I have heard numerous complaints from other Shaw subscribers that have a PVR expander hooked up. My guess is that this is more of a software problem and has less to do with hardware.
As to the memory and HDD size , I just went into the hidden diagnosis screen and my DCX3400-M also has:
System RAM: 512 MB
Flash: 64 MB
HDD: 500 MB
I think it depends on how your cable co orders the boxes with memory and HDD size. Same with the ports being enabled or disabled its up to your cable co to decide witch ports it activates.
Hardware wise I’d say the DCX3510-M is a slightly better box due to having more advanced hardware. Shaw subscriber lorac wrote”
“Obviously things do differ somewhat from provider to provider, but on Shaw cable in Canada the DCX3510 is a POS. It is just so bug riddled that the opinion of most people is that the DCX3400 is still the better unit”
I have heard the exact same reports BUT I think the DCX3510-M complaints are due to Shaw putting out a completely new bug ridden software package including a new guide and I believe the bugs/complaints are due to the new software, not the DCX3510-M hardware.
For future-proofing reasons I would stay away from older boxes like the DCH6416 because they do not tune in mpeg-4 channels and most cable cos are adding more and more channels that use MPEG-4 AVC (H.264). There are other outdated things with the older boxes. Oh and the DCX3400-M will indeed pass through native 1080p content, it just won’t scale 720p or 1080i content to 1080p.
As to having a fan, I always prefer having a fan in any piece of gear with a HDD. As to the power supply, since I own my box, I would prefer an external PS like with the 3510 because it would be easier to DIY fix.
In conclusion I’m very happy with my DCX3400-M but with the current software I’d be weary of adding an external HDD PVR expander. I’m pretty sure that eventually the cable co will get rid of the bugs that plague the new software running the DCX3510-M and at that time they will switch over the DCX3400-M customers to the new software. At that time I’m willing to bet that the DCX3510-M will run smoother than the DCX3400-M. By the way the “M” stands for “MOCA” but Shaw has not activated MOCA-Mode with these boxes – you need the gateway with portals if you want multi-room DVR with my cable co.


















