AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Plasma Flat Panel Displays › I want to call Shenanigans on the Pioneer Kuro vs. Future Kuro pictures...
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

I want to call Shenanigans on the Pioneer Kuro vs. Future Kuro pictures...

post #1 of 207
Thread Starter 
I'm not really saying they arent real or anything like that.

but LOOK at this http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/...epBlack600.jpg

I dunno, i have little doubt that a future gen concept kuro would be impressively darker but i also know that the current gen Kuros do not look that bright. I mean, if you pictured just that 8th gen one alone it would still look weird.
post #2 of 207
it is because of the exposure time on the camera allows more light from the old kuros (and new kuros, but they don't emit essentially any light) to get into the lens
post #3 of 207
The camera was set up to try and capture more light. Thats why the flower in the middle of the screen is over blown and the original kuro is more gray. The fact that the new kuro is still black in this type of pic makes it all that more impressive.
post #4 of 207
Thread Starter 
yeah but i would like to see them under normal exposure, since that is of course how i'd watch them.
post #5 of 207
Quote:
Originally Posted by spincut View Post

yeah but i would like to see them under normal exposure, since that is of course how i'd watch them.

Why don't you visit CES and see for yourself.
post #6 of 207
Quote:
Originally Posted by terminatorbob View Post

The camera was set up to try and capture more light.

Did you take the picture? Sure, if the camera was set up to capture more light the suspicious results would be easy to explain, but what if it wasn't?
post #7 of 207
Quote:
Originally Posted by vtms View Post

Did you take the picture? Sure, if the camera was set up to capture more light the suspicious results would be easy to explain, but what if it wasn't?

do you think the kuro even looks that blue even if you jack the brightness... why would they mess with the tint of it???
post #8 of 207
Quote:
Originally Posted by vtms View Post

Did you take the picture? Sure, if the camera was set up to capture more light the suspicious results would be easy to explain, but what if it wasn't?

Well, I can't prove it obviously, but the fact that the flower is way over blown it tells me that the picture is probably over exposed. Then again the flower may actually look like that on the screen, but I doubt it.

I don't think the brightness was turned up on the original Kuro because the flowers look the same on both TV's. If the brightness or contrast was raised the flower would be even more over blown on the original Kuro.

Thats just my opinion. Maybe im wrong, I wasn't there to see it in person. But thats what it looks like to me.
post #9 of 207
Quote:
Originally Posted by terminatorbob View Post

Well, I can't prove it obviously, but the fact that the flower is way over blown it tells me that the picture is probably over exposed. Then again the flower may actually look like that on the screen, but I doubt it.

I don't think the brightness was turned up on the original Kuro because the flowers look the same on both TV's. If the brightness or contrast was raised the flower would be even more over blown on the original Kuro.

Thats just my opinion. Maybe im wrong, I wasn't there to see it in person. But thats what it looks like to me.

maybe that is a good thing, meaning that the new kuros are very much brighter as well
post #10 of 207
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by D-Nice View Post

Why don't you visit CES and see for yourself.

why dont you buy me a plane ticket and some time off?

i think our answers would be the same
post #11 of 207
You can prove it. The flower is all the proof you need. Its just a trick to make the difference between the two displays more impactful in a photograph.

And again... who cares. When it gets into the stores... that's a big deal.
'
post #12 of 207
Quote:
Originally Posted by spincut View Post

I'm not really saying they arent real or anything like that.

but LOOK at this http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/...epBlack600.jpg

I dunno, i have little doubt that a future gen concept kuro would be impressively darker but i also know that the current gen Kuros do not look that bright. I mean, if you pictured just that 8th gen one alone it would still look weird.

It's already discussed and explained in the Pioneer Extreme Contrast Concept thread:

http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=971342
post #13 of 207
Quote:
Originally Posted by D-Nice View Post

Why don't you visit CES and see for yourself.

Helpful.
post #14 of 207
Here's an example of what I mean... http://www.pocket-lint.co.uk/gallery...1bc040b1d6.jpg

W/o any enhancing... the current Kuro's glow is difficult to capture in this type of image. The slightest bit of highlights turns 0ire glow into an abyss of darkness.

I can't even tell the difference between the two displays on this website. Its very hard to capture the differences on film when you're talking about black levels that are really really dark.

With all lights out, and you actually 'being there', it would be a dramatic difference.
post #15 of 207
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnybrulez View Post

Here's an example of what I mean... http://www.pocket-lint.co.uk/gallery...1bc040b1d6.jpg

W/o any enhancing... the current Kuro's glow is difficult to capture in this type of image. The slightest bit of highlights turns 0ire glow into an abyss of darkness.

I can't even tell the difference between the two displays on this website. Its very hard to capture the differences on film when you're talking about black levels that are really really dark.

With all lights out, and you actually 'being there', it would be a dramatic difference.

in that one, it looks as if the 5010 is very much darker... that website did not have good shots
post #16 of 207
Quote:
Originally Posted by D-Nice View Post

Why don't you visit CES and see for yourself.

I agree. You cannot really make a sound judgment based on a digital photo of the TV seen on my computer monitor. Best to view them in person with your own eyes.
post #17 of 207
Quote:
Originally Posted by D-Nice View Post

Why don't you visit CES and see for yourself.

Work, money, wife/GF/BF for some, going might mean delaying aquiring a tv another 2 months...

Plenty of reasons.

Thats why most of us rely on this forum and are thankful for it's many knowledgeable contributors (such as yourself).

Keep in mind also that we are all soooo excited about all of this great new technology, some of us can't help but be frustrated by the fact that none of it is being reliably and fully reviewed (yet). And I for one am excited about reading new threads with new questions and postulations about what the very near future may hold for all of us!!!

That was a rant, thanks for listening. Sorry OP.
post #18 of 207
Quote:
Originally Posted by Allen050 View Post

Work, money, wife/GF/BF for some, going might mean delaying aquiring a tv another 2 months...

Plenty of reasons.

Thats why most of us rely on this forum and are thankful for it's many knowledgeable contributors (such as yourself).

Keep in mind also that we are all soooo excited about all of this great new technology, some of us can't help but be frustrated by the fact that none of it is being reliably and fully reviewed (yet). And I for one am excited about reading new threads with new questions and postulations about what the very near future may hold for all of us!!!

That was a rant, thanks for listening. Sorry OP.

My comment was specific to spincut. He has had some very interesting comments lately and they ALL can easily be solved by him seeing things for himself instead of constantly asking someone to explain a photo when it's been explained 10 times already today per different members.
post #19 of 207
Quote:
Originally Posted by spincut View Post

why dont you buy me a plane ticket and some time off?

i think our answers would be the same

How you get there is your problem. However, no one is going to satsify your question (since others have already explained why the pictures are the way they are 10 times already) unless you see it for yourself.
post #20 of 207
Obviously the exposure time of the photo was long so as to show the difference better. Instead of complaining about it, appreciate the fact that a picture specifically taken to make the TVs' black levels look as awful as possible still shows the new concept as being absolutely pitch black. Not even the pitch black night sky can hold its black level like that with an overexposed photo. Stunning.
post #21 of 207
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by D-Nice View Post

How you get there is your problem. However, no one is going to satsify your question (since others have already explained why the pictures are the way they are 10 times already) unless you see it for yourself.

as someone else already said and the point of my comment made in response, "not helping".

and whats the deal anyway? you claim i've made "some very interesting comments lately", is there really a need to police my comments? if i want to ask something i beleive is pertinent then i'll ask it, there's no need to be blunt towards me about things, and the reason i asked it is because i'm not going to be going to CES and look for myself, hence no need to suggest i fly out to vegas just because of a quandry i have, here is where i'll be, if there was another situation where you feel i could have gone and looked at something for myself, i obviously feel differently.

and besides, i didnt ask about this 10 times as you seem to be implying, i made the thread because i didnt see any others about it pop up when i wrote in the subject, so i just posted it, sheesh.
post #22 of 207
Quote:
Originally Posted by spincut View Post

as someone else already said and the point of my comment made in response, "not helping".

and why are you teating me bluntly and hostile anyway? you claim i've made "some very interesting comments lately", is there really a need to police my comments? if i want to ask something i beleive is pertinent then i'll ask it, there's no need to be blunt towards me if you dont feel it necesary.

and besides, i didnt ask about this 10 times as you seem to be implying, i made the thread because i didnt see any others about it pop up when i wrote in the subject, so i just posted it, sheesh.

When I say very interesting, I mean interesting to the point where no one is going to be able satisfy your question. It's almost like your question are your personal facts and you want someone to prove you wrong. The simplest thing to do in those type of situations is to see things yourself and cut out the middle man. No offense was intendant.
post #23 of 207
Wow, I'm glad Omeletepants isnt in here!

If he offends, he means it!
post #24 of 207
Quote:
Originally Posted by spincut View Post

and besides, i didnt ask about this 10 times as you seem to be implying, i made the thread because i didnt see any others about it pop up when i wrote in the subject, so i just posted it, sheesh.

I never said you did ask 10 times. However, the pictures have been explained 10 times in all of the current 2008+ Pioneer threads.
post #25 of 207
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by D-Nice View Post

I never said you did ask 10 times. However, the pictures have been explained 10 times in all of the current 2008+ Pioneer threads.

as i hope you understand by now, i really cant follow that many threads, it gets a little exhausting, so if i dont see a subject just about that then i went ahead with it.

as for your explanation of what me being interesting i have no idea, but wheni made the thead it definetly was not the intent that i had "personal facts that i wanted to be proven wrong". I just wanted to make a post it on it and barring following multiple growing mega threads i didnt see any discussion of it anywhere else. usually though the subject search function when posting is a little more reliable.
post #26 of 207
Quote:
Originally Posted by spincut View Post

as i hope you understand by now, i really cant follow that many threads, it gets a little exhausting, so if i dont see a subject just about that then i went ahead with it.

as for your explanation of what me being interesting i have no idea, but wheni made the thead it definetly was not the intent that i had "personal facts that i wanted to be proven wrong". I just wanted to make a post it on it and barring following multiple growing mega threads i didnt see any discussion of it anywhere else. usually though the subject search function when posting is a little more reliable.

Understood.
post #27 of 207
Quote:
Originally Posted by NathanC View Post

Not even the pitch black night sky can hold its black level like that with an overexposed photo.

Fill the kuro with stars and it would be a close call. Otherwise thats not a fair test.

Quote:


Stunning.

Real world tests are better. I could set up my DSLR to capture light that the naked eye can't see, what does it matter for watching TV? Surely if we can manufacture a TV with a black level so low that no one can see the emmitted light in a dark room then no manufacturer has anything to gain by going 'even darker'.

To be fair, I do see *some* light in a completely dark room coming from my 5080...but not very much.
post #28 of 207
The best thing is that the Engadget photos still had the EXIF information embedded in them.



This photo was shot with a Nikon D40. It was a 6 second exposure at ISO1600 with an aperture of f/3.5




This is a photo of my CRT showing a black screen when it has been set up so that it doesn't crush shadow details. Now my camera isn't as flexible, so the closest I can get is 5 seconds at ISO1600 with an aperture of f/3.7 anyone that knows anything about photography knows that this is a darker exposure than the one used above.

And yet, the new Pioneer still looks darker!

Not only that, but if you actually had a high contrast image on the screen like that, the CRT's blacks would be nowhere near that dark, as the bright fireworks would raise the black level fairly significantly.



To my eyes, the current Kuros have a terrible black level that lights up the room. The CRT doesn't light up the room, but I can still see a glow. It looks like these new Pioneers finally surpass that and may not have any perceptible glow at all with a black screen.
post #29 of 207
Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewfee View Post

The best thing is that the Engadget photos still had the EXIF information embedded in them.



This photo was shot with a Nikon D40. It was a 6 second exposure at ISO1600 with an aperture of f/3.5




This is a photo of my CRT showing a black screen when it has been set up so that it doesn't crush shadow details. Now my camera isn't as flexible, so the closest I can get is 5 seconds at ISO1600 with an aperture of f/3.7 anyone that knows anything about photography knows that this is a darker exposure than the one used above.

And yet, the new Pioneer still looks darker!

Not only that, but if you actually had a high contrast image on the screen like that, the CRT's blacks would be nowhere near that dark, as the bright fireworks would raise the black level fairly significantly.



To my eyes, the current Kuros have a terrible black level that lights up the room. The CRT doesn't light up the room, but I can still see a glow. It looks like these new Pioneers finally surpass that and may not have any perceptible glow at all with a black screen.

This post pretty much wraps up this convo and fortifies what has already been said in the other threads.....this pictures look that way due to the exposure.
post #30 of 207
Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewfee View Post

The best thing is that the Engadget photos still had the EXIF information embedded in them.



This photo was shot with a Nikon D40. It was a 6 second exposure at ISO1600 with an aperture of f/3.5




This is a photo of my CRT showing a black screen when it has been set up so that it doesn't crush shadow details. Now my camera isn't as flexible, so the closest I can get is 5 seconds at ISO1600 with an aperture of f/3.7 anyone that knows anything about photography knows that this is a darker exposure than the one used above.

And yet, the new Pioneer still looks darker!

Not only that, but if you actually had a high contrast image on the screen like that, the CRT's blacks would be nowhere near that dark, as the bright fireworks would raise the black level fairly significantly.



To my eyes, the current Kuros have a terrible black level that lights up the room. The CRT doesn't light up the room, but I can still see a glow. It looks like these new Pioneers finally surpass that and may not have any perceptible glow at all with a black screen.

good comparison... all you pesky CRTers can finally give up
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Plasma Flat Panel Displays
AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Plasma Flat Panel Displays › I want to call Shenanigans on the Pioneer Kuro vs. Future Kuro pictures...