AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › Official Classe SSP-800 thread.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Official Classe SSP-800 thread. - Page 14

post #391 of 5475
Quote:
So you are saying it is better to decode in a $300 blu Ray player rather than in the $8000 Classé SSP-800 when it is upgraded?

There will be no difference, digital is digital.

Quote:
What happened with Iron Man?

You need to run LPCM over HDMI or else a lot of the movies sounds will not work in the menus and other secondary places.
post #392 of 5475
Quote:
Originally Posted by DougWinsor View Post

There will be no difference, digital is digital.

You need to run LPCM over HDMI or else a lot of the movies sounds will not work in the menus and other secondary places.

I am only interested in the movie, I could care less about special features download and so on? So I want the best sound quality not feature quantity
post #393 of 5475
Quote:
Originally Posted by wse View Post

I am only interested in the movie, I could care less about special features download and so on? So I want the best sound quality not feature quantity

then you do what everyone has been telling you for months and not focus on the onboard decoding...
post #394 of 5475
Quote:
Originally Posted by sikoniko View Post

then you do what everyone has been telling you for months and not focus on the onboard decoding...

Yes I know but I still have a problem spending $8000 and now knowing when Classé will release the new chip to decode the new codec. I feel like I would be buying an out of date product sorry.

Integra Research, Lexicon, Krell and so on have all done it, you will be able to upgrade your system and then when time comes oh sorry just buy a new one!!!
Been there done that so no thanks I will just be patient and by then all the bugs will be ironed out
post #395 of 5475
Quote:
Originally Posted by wse View Post

Yes I know but I still have a problem spending $8000 and now knowing when Classé will release the new chip to decode the new codec. I feel like I would be buying an out of date product sorry.

Integra Research, Lexicon, Krell and so on have all done it, you will be able to upgrade your system and then when time comes oh sorry just buy a new one!!!
Been there done that so no thanks I will just be patient and by then all the bugs will be ironed out

according to Dave, they don't plan on adding additional features based on the DSP. so, in reality, you won't be getting anything after the dsp that you wouldnt have now.

b&w is looking into dsp speakers like meridian, and the ssp-800 will be the hub of that. that is the only feature i am aware of that will be dependent of the dual dsp board.
post #396 of 5475
Quote:
Originally Posted by sikoniko View Post

according to Dave, they don't plan on adding additional features based on the DSP. so, in reality, you won't be getting anything after the dsp that you wouldn't have now. B&W is looking into dsp speakers like meridian, and the ssp-800 will be the hub of that. that is the only feature i am aware of that will be dependent of the dual dsp board.

It will decode DTS Master Audio and Dolby Digital Tru HD which is what I want. Powered B&W that would be cool Linn has great speakers as well
post #397 of 5475
wse -

I don't understand your hestation to get the SSP-800 just because it doesn't decode DTSMA and DDMHD. You buy a piece like the SSP-800 for the sound quality, and as several other have stated before me, even if Classe doesn't come out with the upgrade board, you simply use a player that decodes those two formats (Sony PS3 or BDP-S550). This is not the same as the other brands you mention, which left you with no alternative when they decided not to provide the promissed upgrade. And to further beat a dead horse, doing the decoding in the player gives you the advantage of being able to use the special features on a BD disc.

You aren't missing out on anything, and you gian nothing by waiting. You can have everything you want right now, just not the way you want it to happen. I have no motivation to push you inot the purchase, but with all due respect, it's just that your rationale doesn't make sense.
post #398 of 5475
Quote:
Originally Posted by hifisponge View Post

wse - I don't understand your hestation to get the SSP-800 just because it doesn't decode DTSMA and DDMHD. You buy a piece like the SSP-800 for the sound quality, and as several other have stated before me, even if Classe doesn't come out with the upgrade board, you simply use a player that decodes those two formats (Sony PS3 or BDP-S550). This is not the same as the other brands you mention, which left you with no alternative when they decided not to provide the promissed upgrade. And to further beat a dead horse, doing the decoding in the player gives you the advantage of being able to use the special features on a BD disc.

You aren't missing out on anything, and you gain nothing by waiting. You can have everything you want right now, just not the way you want it to happen. I have no motivation to push you inot the purchase, but with all due respect, it's just that your rationale doesn't make sense.

Well that is your opinion, I still read that there are a number of software issues with the SSP-800. So I will wait patiently, anyway there is a backlog of SSP-800. I might not have to wait for too long and if by Q1 2009 they have not release the new board to decode DTS MA and DD tru HD then we will know that they are not keeping their word
post #399 of 5475
Quote:
Originally Posted by wse View Post

Well that is your opinion, I still read that there are a number of software issues with the SSP-800. So I will wait patiently, anyway there is a backlog of SSP-800. I might not have to wait for too long and if by Q1 2009 they have not release the new board to decode DTS MA and DD tru HD then we will know that they are not keeping their word

Putting the subject of the SSP-800 upgrade to the side, are you waiting for a prepro that will decode HD audio because you don't have a player that will do it? I ask because even if you wait for the 800, you at least owe it to yourself to get a cheap player that does the decoding in the mean time.

I've been enjoying HD audio on BD since the war between HDDVD and BD ended through my PS3 because I didn't want to wait.
post #400 of 5475
give up on him AV. he is wettou on htguide... he just wants to complain about the dsp not being there. its like beating a dead horse.
post #401 of 5475
Quote:
Originally Posted by sikoniko View Post

give up on him AV. he is wettou on htguide... he just wants to complain about the dsp not being there. its like beating a dead horse.

Yeah, I figured it was the same guy. Even if he wants to wait for the upgraded 800, he should at least get his fix in the meantime with a player that decodes the hd audio formats.
post #402 of 5475
I'm sorry, but I have to agree with WSE. I've had (for longer than I care to think about) a stopgap Pio 94TXH I picked to get the new codecs up until SOME high end manufacturer came out with a quality Pre;/pro that would handle the latest codecs. If companies like Pio have had this for well over a year I don't disagree with the philosophy it's an incomplete product and am left wondering why a manufacturer would release a pro in this day and age without DTS MA and True HD bitstream processing.

To say just use the processing in a $300 player when you've paid 8g's is a cop out. I've played around with the LPCM outs of the Sony as well as others and they don't do justice to letting the decoding be done in the processor of the receiver. I don't subscribe that digital is digital, and, oh, by the way you have to buy 7 good interconnects that are an extra interface with an output stage between components before your pre even gets the signal and all the degradation that entails especially in players which are built to a price point with no high end aspirations whatsoever.

I really want to purchase the 800 NOW but am going to wait also until they deliver a complete product or companies like ARCAM deliver turnkey. Oh, and I do have a player that decodes, the Pioneer Elite 05 but can't imagine even that player can approach a high end DIGITAL solution like the Classe promises.
post #403 of 5475
Quote:
Originally Posted by owl1 View Post

I'm sorry, but I have to agree with WSE. I've had (for longer than I care to think about) a stopgap Pio 94TXH I picked to get the new codecs up until SOME high end manufacturer came out with a quality Pre;/pro that would handle the latest codecs. If companies like Pio have had this for well over a year I don't disagree with the philosophy it's an incomplete product and am left wondering why a manufacturer would release a pro in this day and age without DTS MA and True HD bitstream processing.

To say just use the processing in a $300 player when you've paid 8g's is a cop out. I've played around with the LPCM outs of the Sony as well as others and they don't do justice to letting the decoding be done in the processor of the receiver. I don't subscribe that digital is digital, and, oh, by the way you have to buy 7 good interconnects that are an extra interface with an output stage between components before your pre even gets the signal and all the degradation that entails especially in players which are built to a price point with no high end aspirations whatsoever.

I really want to purchase the 800 NOW but am going to wait also until they deliver a complete product or companies like ARCAM deliver turnkey. Oh, and I do have a player that decodes, the Pioneer Elite 05 but can't imagine even that player can approach a high end DIGITAL solution like the Classe promises.


you aren't hurting me any by not buying the SSP-800 now, or ever for that matter. for all I care, buy the arcam. your threats are stupid. noone cares. its you that has to live with it.
post #404 of 5475
Quote:
Originally Posted by owl1 View Post

I'm sorry, but I have to agree with WSE. I've had (for longer than I care to think about) a stopgap Pio 94TXH I picked to get the new codecs up until SOME high end manufacturer came out with a quality Pre;/pro that would handle the latest codecs. If companies like Pio have had this for well over a year I don't disagree with the philosophy it's an incomplete product and am left wondering why a manufacturer would release a pro in this day and age without DTS MA and True HD bitstream processing.

To say just use the processing in a $300 player when you've paid 8g's is a cop out. I've played around with the LPCM outs of the Sony as well as others and they don't do justice to letting the decoding be done in the processor of the receiver. I don't subscribe that digital is digital, and, oh, by the way you have to buy 7 good interconnects that are an extra interface with an output stage between components before your pre even gets the signal and all the degradation that entails especially in players which are built to a price point with no high end aspirations whatsoever.

I really want to purchase the 800 NOW but am going to wait also until they deliver a complete product or companies like ARCAM deliver turnkey. Oh, and I do have a player that decodes, the Pioneer Elite 05 but can't imagine even that player can approach a high end DIGITAL solution like the Classe promises.


So me being a real novice to this discussion. Feeding the SSP 800 via an analog passthrough from a sony 550 would not be any better than the sound quality pass through a SSP 300/600 or AVP +6 for that matter( for strictly HD movies)? Sorry if I sound ignorant. I always used a digital connection (DD,DTS) to my aging Proceed AVP for SD movies. Was listening to 2-channel for a while and now getting into all of this new HD BR movies.
post #405 of 5475
Quote:
Originally Posted by owl1 View Post

I'm sorry, but I have to agree with WSE. I've had (for longer than I care to think about) a stopgap Pio 94TXH I picked to get the new codecs up until SOME high end manufacturer came out with a quality Pre;/pro that would handle the latest codecs. If companies like Pio have had this for well over a year I don't disagree with the philosophy it's an incomplete product and am left wondering why a manufacturer would release a pro in this day and age without DTS MA and True HD bitstream processing.

To say just use the processing in a $300 player when you've paid 8g's is a cop out. I've played around with the LPCM outs of the Sony as well as others and they don't do justice to letting the decoding be done in the processor of the receiver. I don't subscribe that digital is digital, and, oh, by the way you have to buy 7 good interconnects that are an extra interface with an output stage between components before your pre even gets the signal and all the degradation that entails especially in players which are built to a price point with no high end aspirations whatsoever.

I really want to purchase the 800 NOW but am going to wait also until they deliver a complete product or companies like ARCAM deliver turnkey. Oh, and I do have a player that decodes, the Pioneer Elite 05 but can't imagine even that player can approach a high end DIGITAL solution like the Classe promises.

Of course using the analog outputs of a cheap BD player will not sound as good as having the SSP-800 doing the decoding, and that is not what sikoniko or I are recommending.

We are saying to use the *HDMI digital connection* from the BD player to the SSP-800, which is a completely different matter.

With an HDMI digital connection between the BD player and the SSP-800, the SSP-800 does all of the bass management, time alignment, volume control, and digital to analog conversion-- all the things you would want a high-end processor to do. The only thing the SSP-800 isn't doing, is unpacking the HD digital signal.
post #406 of 5475
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aerialsound View Post

So me being a real novice to this discussion. Feeding the SSP 800 via an analog passthrough from a sony 550 would not be any better than the sound quality pass through a SSP 300/600 or AVP +6 for that matter( for strictly HD movies)? Sorry if I sound ignorant. I always used a digital connection (DD,DTS) to my aging Proceed AVP for SD movies. Was listening to 2-channel for a while and now getting into all of this new HD BR movies.

Aerial -

Similar to what I just said to the OWL1, you *do not* want to use the analog outputs of something like the Sony BDP-S550 if you want to retain the quality of signal processing and DA conversion afforded by the SSP-800. Use the HDMI digital connection from the S550 to the 800 and you should have close to, if not the same, performance of having the SSP-800 doing the decoding.
post #407 of 5475
hifisponge, when I was reading their posts about LPCM and analog outputs I then understood why these posters would think that way and worry about the new SSP-800 upgrade. I don't know where these posters read the information that they are posting but it is so wrong it is funny.

Quote:
I don't subscribe that digital is digital

Well maybe if you use a digital connection you would then understand better.
post #408 of 5475
Quote:
Originally Posted by DougWinsor View Post


Well maybe if you use a digital connection you would then understand better.

Hey Doug, if you actually read my post I indicated that I used LPCM out of the PS3 and bitstream and there was no comparison. The only way to do that is with HDMI fyi! Bitstream was far more detailed, transparent and dynamic. The only way to go in my opinion. Have you done these comparisons yourself or do you just like jumping on here and saying things like digital is digital? It would take any moron 5 seconds to hear the difference - it's NOT subtle. BTW when you say digital is digital does that mean 1 bit is the same as 16 bit is the same as 24 bit at any and all sampling frequencies and all codecs are the same? Also, have you made the listening comparisons firsthand and heard bitstream vs lpcm with the latest codecs yourself? I'm also curious as to what processor you used for this critical listening. Hey, I may be wrong as a I haven't tried the latest generation of players doing lpcm, but I know what I heard out of the sony ps3 and seriously doubt the other players are doing it any differently. I would venture the differences may be in the software.
post #409 of 5475
Quote:
Originally Posted by hifisponge View Post

Yeah, I figured it was the same guy. Even if he wants to wait for the upgraded 800, he should at least get his fix in the meantime with a player that decodes the hd audio formats.

I want to upgrade my pre/pro once for the next seven years and be done with it. So thank you for your considerations, I will just wait patiently for the SSP-800 with the new codec
post #410 of 5475
Quote:
Originally Posted by hifisponge View Post

Aerial -

Similar to what I just said to the OWL1, you *do not* want to use the analog outputs of something like the Sony BDP-S550 if you want to retain the quality of signal processing and DA conversion afforded by the SSP-800. Use the HDMI digital connection from the S550 to the 800 and you should have close to, if not the same, performance of having the SSP-800 doing the decoding.

So would it be more cost effective to purchase a Denon 3800BD and a Classe 300(pass through)...or better 550 and have the Classe 800(HDMI) handle the processing.

My wife and I seem to be moving more(90%) toward movies and away from 2 channel listening
post #411 of 5475
Can someone comment on the quality of the HDMI video switching in the 800 and how it may compare to the very high quality HDMI switching solutions? I don't care about upscaling, only how it switches HDMI video and if there is ANY degradation that is noticeable. Also, any glitches with 24fps sources?
post #412 of 5475
Quote:
Originally Posted by owl1 View Post

Can someone comment on the quality of the HDMI video switching in the 800 and how it may compare to the very high quality HDMI switching solutions? I don't care about upscaling, only how it switches HDMI video and if there is ANY degradation that is noticeable. Also, any glitches with 24fps sources?

The HDMI switcher is just a repeater (no scaler). There should be no degridation. I don't have 1080p/24 at home, but I have seen the SSP-800 with an expensive runco projector and I don't believe there was any video degredation. I was there when the runco guy was setting it up and he was happy with the picture.
post #413 of 5475
Quote:


Hey Doug, if you actually read my post I indicated that I used LPCM out of the PS3 and bitstream and there was no comparison.

I assume you used something else for bitstreaming since the PS3 can not bitstream lossless codecs.

Quote:


Bitstream was far more detailed, transparent and dynamic. The only way to go in my opinion. Have you done these comparisons yourself or do you just like jumping on here and saying things like digital is digital? It would take any moron 5 seconds to hear the difference - it's NOT subtle.

Are you then saying that the DSP of a processor can change the way something sounds when decoding it either LPCM or bitstream?

Quote:


BTW when you say digital is digital does that mean 1 bit is the same as 16 bit is the same as 24 bit at any and all sampling frequencies and all codecs are the same?

I think you do not understand what a digital signal is.

Quote:


Also, have you made the listening comparisons firsthand and heard bitstream vs lpcm with the latest codecs yourself? I'm also curious as to what processor you used for this critical listening. Hey, I may be wrong as a I haven't tried the latest generation of players doing lpcm, but I know what I heard out of the sony ps3 and seriously doubt the other players are doing it any differently. I would venture the differences may be in the software.

How can LPCM be any different coming out of different players?
post #414 of 5475
its not until a signal hits an ADC or a DAC (or combination of them) that it can be manipulated. Digital is digital.
post #415 of 5475
I guess I'm asking on the wrong forum for comparisons of handling of the lpcm vs. the bitstream signal, since the 800 can't do bitstream on the lossless codecs but so you know I did first try it on my Panasonic BD30 then my Pioneer 95BFD and now the Pioneer 05. There shouldn't be a difference theoretically but there were clearly audible improvements utilizing the bitstream signal being over lpcm. I know digital, having owned at least a couple dozen different DACs and players and I know what to listen for and know what I heard and it was not subtle. Perhaps it's an anomaly of the pio 94txh procesor, or perhaps something else that's why I asked if anyone has done an a/b (on any other processors) or may have another theory as to the results.

Good to hear some reports that the video side of the 800 is up to snuff. I have heard reports that the Denon AVP degrades the video signal somewhat from a friend who has one which turned me off from considering that prepro. He uses a very high end projector so perhaps it's a matter of having the right microscope for the job...
post #416 of 5475
The new update is being made in the next few months. This will be for Master DTS and True HD. Your technician will come to your home and do the install, it should take less then 30 mins.
As far as the unit changing, it wont happen. The only thing that will happen is pricing is going up, the 8k price is not leaving enough margin for Classe or its dealers, so count on 10-12k for the SSp-800 by this time next year.

My unit is flawless after almost a week of use.
I would bet any amount of money that most people have no clue what they are listening to and have no idea what True HD is or if they even have it. I have gone through a slew of BD players that were True HD out of the box, only to find out they didn't support the codec.
PCM is the only choice for a couple more months.

Is there a difference between allowing your proc. to decode or your BD player to decode? Probably, but until the codecs are released it doesn't matter, you got live with what you got.
post #417 of 5475
Control 4 runs my entire home, alarm, HVAC, lights, camera, action. I have large Control 4 remotes in every room in the home and they need to be reprogrammed in the theater for the new proc.
In terms of looks, the Classe unit looks cool, but I dont buy things because they look neat. Its just above my Mc amps in the rack and they seem to get all the attention from those visiting.
post #418 of 5475
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alembicjeff View Post

If you could post a couple of pictures of your system, that would be welcome as well.

Jeff.

I will get some photos up this week.
post #419 of 5475
Quote:
Originally Posted by hifisponge View Post

Of course using the analog outputs of a cheap BD player will not sound as good as having the SSP-800 doing the decoding, and that is not what sikoniko or I are recommending.

We are saying to use the *HDMI digital connection* from the BD player to the SSP-800, which is a completely different matter.

With an HDMI digital connection between the BD player and the SSP-800, the SSP-800 does all of the bass management, time alignment, volume control, and digital to analog conversion-- all the things you would want a high-end processor to do. The only thing the SSP-800 isn't doing, is unpacking the HD digital signal.

Correct, just no bitstream codecs for True HD, DTS Master yet!
This is the best way to go and probably the only way to go.
post #420 of 5475
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kuma JofZ View Post

The new update is being made in the next few months. This will be for Master DTS and True HD. Your technician will come to your home and do the install, it should take less then 30 mins.
As far as the unit changing, it wont happen. The only thing that will happen is pricing is going up, the 8k price is not leaving enough margin for Classe or its dealers, so count on 10-12k for the SSp-800 by this time next year.

While I wouldn't be surprised, where do you get this info from? I asked Dave this question specifically in June and he said not to expect a price increase.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Receivers, Amps, and Processors
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › Official Classe SSP-800 thread.