AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › CRT Projectors › TVONE Blending Info, General Q&A or just how to?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

TVONE Blending Info, General Q&A or just how to? - Page 25

post #721 of 870
Right mike, the curve moves very smoothly till i get to the one point 250 pixels where the curve bumps or jerks and then goes back to its normal position. The engineers say they think they found the issue and will fix it. Something in the software.
I also think that once they get the 256 Gamma adjustment software written it will make a hugh difference.

Does your browser support Quick Time? the video should play with Quicktime, or Flash media.

You can also download it from the web page, download button on top.

Athanasios
post #722 of 870
Ok I created a You Tube account. here is the video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=udBTj_U1BvU

and with the probe set to x10 you can see the curve alter at the 250 pixel blend size point much better.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rz1PX3_zi0Y

Nashou
post #723 of 870
The slope looks good but it's best to show the entire 100 IRE data while also showing the slope at either end of the window, which is how it goes into the PJ. When doing it that way, you'll be able to show where and how much of the blend zone in reference to the signal. But in this case, it's not really that important.

At some point the slope moved OK, but at other times it was difficult to understand what was going on. There's also a bit of distortion in the slolpe, that appears to show up as small ripples or zig-zags. The camera is not doing so well showing how clean the slope really is, so you'll have to be the judge on that end. But if there is a bit of distortion on the slope line, that is what you're seeing in the image that shows as banding or steps in the blend zone.

Most if not all processors and scaling today uses DSP (digital signal processing) chips, which means it's all done through clever programing and could therefore be corrected in software upgrades.

No question it's a great product, mainly because of all the other really neat features the unit has. And if they could put that much power in such an in-expensive blend-processor unit, I'm sure they can also improve on a blend zone problem if in fact one truly exist.

Hopefully your shots of the scope pattern would help them look at things. And since they seem to be very concerned about the product, all you're need is a bit of patience.

If only the people who made the Blendzilla unit was half as concerned.
post #724 of 870
The only time the major distortion occurs is when I adjust the blend zone size to the 250 pixel mark, at that point the Trace line jerks or flashes out for a split second. As I move forward and back in adjusting the blend zone size over the 250 pixel mark you see it best.

There is slight jaggies along the curve , I bet that is the serration's or lines i am seeing.
They said they are working on the fix and it should be done this week , hopefully.

Nashou
post #725 of 870
Quote:


There is slight jaggies along the curve , I bet that is the serration's or lines i am seeing.

I agree - Those jaggies would represent the serrations we are seeing. But what doesn't make sense to me is that as you moved the gamma adjustment up and down, it seemed to increase and decrease the size of the blend zone. I would have assumed that this would only change the shape?

BTW - You are not using any gamma boost from Moome are you?

Bob
post #726 of 870
Bob with regards to gamma adjustment, I thought about what you said and think about it. the trace live for the blend curve when the gamma is set low shows a nice smooth radius curve. it drawn with regards to the voltage level of the 100 IRE field I used, .7mv i would assume( i did not really pay attention) So as you adjust the blend it reduces the voltage on one end of the trace. When i had the gamma at mid point of .5 the curve went to a smooth 45 degree angle as I think it should, as you lower it the voltage level in the blend zone for the full 100 IRE would change as lowering gamma adds voltage. Since they do not have a gamma adjustment at different points they must use an average or put the added voltage at a certain point/s so you see the bumping of the curve in the middle as you lower it more(add voltage) the bump gets pushed up the curve to full voltage therefore eliminating the blend zone. As I approached .01 gamma
in the zone it disappears and I get the full and actually WTW in the blend zone. I have to do it again to verify.

Athanasios
post #727 of 870
Just got this from Richard:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard View Post

Hi Athanasios,

Any glitches during adjustment are perfectly normal and are not related to any of the other issues you've had.

As you change the blend width and gamma, new data is sent to the FPGA on our devices, and hence you're seeing the update happen. This is perfectly normal and not a fault.

Have you tried the 128 blend width yet? This is the one that should be nice and even.

Thanks,

Richard

I replied that the smaller blend zone is smoother but that then Gamma becomes an issue where we can not get seamless blend at all IRE's.

Athanasios
post #728 of 870
Quote:


I replied that the smaller blend zone is smoother but that then Gamma becomes an issue where we can not get seamless blend at all IRE's.

Exactly, and that is why multipoint control is necessary. When we extend the blend zone area in pixels beyond the physical size of our blend area, the shape of the gamma curve within the physical blend area changes to one that is more suited to our actual needs. This means that there is no longer a trade-off between proper levels in dark areas or proper levels in bright areas. But - we have a sacrifice of pq in the areas just beyond the edges of the physical blend zone (not to be confused with the pixel blend area).

I hope this makes sense. This is why we need to add multi-point controls.

Draw the shape of the curve at some midpoint gamma adjustment with the blend zone width at your proper pixels, and then draw another curve that is formed when the width is extended to 100 pixels more. Now note the difference in the shape ONLY in the section that is common to both, as that is the actual physical common blend zone. Notice the difference in shape. Unfortunately, it is also effecting areas beyond that which is controlled by the proper pixel width.

Bob
post #729 of 870
I played some more just not calibrating as close As i could both PJ's using the Eye1, I think i need to have it re-calibrated already since its been in my Basement not sealed .

I used a smaller blend zone than the 208 i went asymmetrical as well, 190 and 200.
Also I got gamma as close As i could but the higher IRE's are suffering. And I decided to do this with no contrast modulation. I want to try using the Craig Rounds method for setting Contrast modulation by not using white or Primaries but using the secondaries of yellow and Cyan.

Athanasios
post #730 of 870
Quote:
Originally Posted by nashou66 View Post

I played some more just not calibrating as close As i could both PJ's using the Eye1, I think i need to have it re-calibrated already since its been in my Basement not sealed .

I used a smaller blend zone than the 208 i went asymmetrical as well, 190 and 200.
Also I got gamma as close As i could but the higher IRE's are suffering. And I decided to do this with no contrast modulation. I want to try using the Craig Rounds method for setting Contrast modulation by not using white or Primaries but using the secondaries of yellow and Cyan.

Athanasios

Are you using two separate units for blend processing?

I think I read somewhere that there's a blender out there that comes in two separate units.
post #731 of 870
Yes these are single units, although their dual processor unit can adjust blend zones independently also.

http://www.tvone.com/edgeblending.shtml

Athanasios
post #732 of 870
Quote:
Originally Posted by nashou66 View Post

Yes these are single units, although their dual processor unit can adjust blend zones independently also.

http://www.tvone.com/edgeblending.shtml

Athanasios

In that case, you'll do better using your scope to help adjust the blend zones.

You'll wnt to make sure you have all things first equal between the two projectors before doing the blend part, then from there be able to compare the two blend slopes for "proper" blending.

And based on what I saw in that video, it would be wise to look at those two slopes to make sure they are sloping equally.
post #733 of 870
Quote:


You'll wnt to make sure you have all things first equal between the two projectors before doing the blend part, then from there be able to compare the two blend slopes for "proper" blending.

And based on what I saw in that video, it would be wise to look at those two slopes to make sure they are sloping equally.

Mike - Thanks for your input. I have played with this for quite some time now, so have come to some conclusions that might not necessarily be correct, but please bear with me.

I have seen nothing to make me believe that given identical settings there is any difference in the two channels. I believe that our problem lies strictly in the fact that we are unable to calibrate our projectors such that they both have perfectly flat gamma curves at the proper value from 0 to 100 IRE.

I came to this conclusion just a few weeks ago. I had been using two separate gamma boost boxes that I scoped to make sure that they were at identical settings. Then I noticed from the screen shots from Athanasios that while he was having trouble in obtaining a perfect blend zone at both very high and very low IRE's at the same time, my situation was worse.

I then removed my two gamma boxes and recalibrated and found that it greatly reduced the anomaly such that it looked almost identical to Athanasios' situation.

Also, when we extend the size of the blend zone (pixels - not physical) it helps the situation because it changes the shape of the curves within the physical blend zone.

In our present setups (please jump in if you disagree, Athanasios) we can adjust the blend zone gamma settings such that we can have a nice seamless blend either at the high end or the low end, but never at the same time!

Therefore, I believe that if our projectors were perectly calibrated so that they had a near ruler flat gamma, the problem, would go away.

That is why I feel that if TVOne were to add full CMS, the problem would be solved.

Since all of TVOne's extensive scaler product lineup uses thir Corio2 system, I would imagine their entire product lineup would also benefit with a CMS at the same time, but this is pure speculation.

Does any of this not make sense to you?


Thanks,
Bob
post #734 of 870
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boilermaker View Post


I have seen nothing to make me believe that given identical settings there is any difference in the two channels. I believe that our problem lies strictly in the fact that we are unable to calibrate our projectors such that they both have perfectly flat gamma curves at the proper value from 0 to 100 IRE.

How are you testing for these "perfect gamma curves" ?

You may recall that I posted to this somewhere earlier to Athanasios, that one of the most important rules to blending is to make sure the top and bottom IRE's are properly calibrated in the projector before starting. Blending can be done a number of ways with you eventually getting fairly good results, but there's only one way to do it in respect to maintaining good or equal IRE levels from low to high.

I think the people who made these units intended for them to be able to match any two display devices. That's good for a lot of setups, but when dealing with High Performance Hometheater setups, you'll need to make sure things are very precise before you start with blending. When the setup is done right before blending, the blending is EASY. And not a task that could takes days to make happen, and after that tedious task, you'll have terrible gamma results.

First, you'll have to disable ANY gamma correcting devices at the projector, or after the blend device. If you're thinking you're going to tweak a matching gamma using two devices pre projector, forgot about it - it ain't gonna happen. It actually further screws things up

Next, the best way to check and confirm your pre-blending levels would be to use the various IRE windows (DVE). Choose any 6 of them and go through them one at a time to see how well your gamma is tracking between the two projectors. At this point, you're not using any gamma or blend settings. Only making sure you have properly matched both projectors.



Quote:


I came to this conclusion just a few weeks ago. I had been using two separate gamma boost boxes that I scoped to make sure that they were at identical settings. Then I noticed from the screen shots from Athanasios that while he was having trouble in obtaining a perfect blend zone at both very high and very low IRE's at the same time, my situation was worse.

I then removed my two gamma boxes and recalibrated and found that it greatly reduced the anomaly such that it looked almost identical to Athanasios' situation.

Yep - as mentioned previously, won't work.



Quote:


In our present setups (please jump in if you disagree, Athanasios) we can adjust the blend zone gamma settings such that we can have a nice seamless blend either at the high end or the low end, but never at the same time!

You'll have to make sure you setup both projectors first matching the low end IRE and then the top end IRE (100). But in doing this, it's very important to make sure that both projectors are set at the same lumens levels. In other words, you'll have to measure the light output at the low setup and then at the high setup. They both need to match with light leveled results. When that is done right, everything in between should follow. And the test for that would be the 6 or more IRE windows mentioned above.

If the top and bottom are properly calibrated, all should be well, but do remember that any gamma adjustments done at this point would have to be equal and would have to be an adjustment that exist for both outputs. The idea of having dual gamma adjustments sounds like a good idea, but only makes sense if using two different makes or model projectors.

Blending is really easy once you properly match the two projectors levels. From there, there's really no need for those sophisticated adjustments they add to some blend units. You should only need to tweak the blend zones for matching.



Quote:


Therefore, I believe that if our projectors were perectly calibrated so that they had a near ruler flat gamma, the problem, would go away.

Ah, you're on this thing man..

Instead of ruler flat gamma. Go for an even IRE matching (6 or more IRE windows matching). Stay away from the word gamma, unless you've finished your setup and blending and it's time to tweak for low end gamma.



Quote:


That is why I feel that if TVOne were to add full CMS, the problem would be solved.

Since all of TVOne's extensive scaler product lineup uses thir Corio2 system, I would imagine their entire product lineup would also benefit with a CMS at the same time, but this is pure speculation.

Does any of this not make sense to you?

Dude, you're almost at a point of helping them (TV One) make these device better. So far, you've giving them a lot to think about. especially since all the makers of these devices seem to not understand some of the things we both have raised here. It seems that they're selling the device with commercial application in mind, but somehow have included all the really neat features for HT. For HT blending, it's a whole different world.

For commercial applications, the goal is to put enough tweaks in the device to be able to blend any two display devices...

For HT, the goal is to precisely calibrate each mirrored (same make and model) projector to a properly functioning blend processor.


When the blend is done right, the colors should match at equal lumens at almost every IRE reading. That means it would be able to do the very complex pastel colors as well. When that happens, It's blended!
post #735 of 870
Mike - I could not possibly agree more with everything you just said!

However: Reaching this goal would be SOOOO easy with a full CMS setup for each projector and while every scaler on the market has the potential for this capability, only Lumagen has done it. I don't have the faintest idea of how long it would take for TVOne (or anyone else) to program this feature set into their products.

Another problem is that the sensors I have used all crap out at anything below about 20IRE, so from there on down, its all an eye judgement call.

I recently read a thread in the Calibration section about some new company that will hopefully soon have a standalone CMS box for less than $1K. Looks interesting, but I'd rather get it for free with some programming from TVOne.


Thanks,
Bob
post #736 of 870
Ok you both make good points but Bon here i do agree with mike about getting both PJ's to have the EXACT same Color/Greyscale tracking. Use no gamma at all while calibrating.
But like mike says you need at least 6 IRE's of exact greyscale matching. I have the mids almost perfect 40,50,60 in those ires it is perfectly seamless. above and below it gets worse but then at about 15 and lower its seamless again due to how dark it is. but from 15-40 and then 60-100 you can see the blend zone and also color tints in the blend zone that is only noticeable when both PJ's are on if I shut off one the certain color tint goes away and or changes to a different color tint. this is what Mike is talking about getting the pastels or secondaries correct. On the thread that Illias posted about color uniformity with his g70 craig explains how he does the zone adjustments using the secondaries by eye. I think I need to try this method.

And Bob, when talking about Gamma i know you mean only in the blend zone, i want to clarify this for Mike. we need the 256 point adjustment more for the blend zone more than anywhere else right now, we can use a VP like the lumagen for the over all image gamma before the Tv-ones.

But Andres is doing some work for Marquee guys that I thin will make things a lot easier, i wish i was more of a Computer nerd to use his method.

here is an email i got today from him, I want to do what he's doing bad!!!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andre View Post

Athanasios,

I do have the G2/DRIVE software almost ready. Therequirement listis somehow steep and not really plug & play... but still you may be interested in testing it if you feel like it! I'll get the Blue done tonight (family allowing) and after that I'll focus in automatic color uniformity correction (i.e. adjusting CCM from the computer& DSLR automatically). The UI right now is a command-line application running on Windows and it doesn't hurt to run it from within Visual Studio! :-(

I find that the process of color correction is highly iterative and furthermore the marquee works with 12 bits for G2 adjustments and 8-bits for drive adjustments, that granularity is difficult to control from the IR remote (i.e. I am not sure how many steps a click on the remote while adjusting G2 represents but for DRIVE which ranges 0-100 you get more resolution in those adjustments via RS232 commands than with the IR remote - the same holds true for almost all Marquee controls, which internally are either 8-bit or more but get normalized to 0-100 in many user-exposed settings). The other benefit of the approach is that interestingly a digital camera can read very very low light readings with long exposure times (e.g. 1 second) - that means that G2 calibration in the low-end is possible at 10 IRE or even lower, which I find critical to get right so that the blend zone is not visible in super-dark scenes.

I find that w/o this automatic approach I'd be lost - and it turns out I'm learning and enjoying it a lot while writing this crazy software! :-)



I really want to do this, I think I may visit Spain to see it action first hand and have him teach me the method. Sorry bob its only for Marquee's right now

Athanasios
post #737 of 870
Quote:


i do agree with mike about getting both PJ's to have the EXACT same Color/Greyscale tracking.

We ALL agree on this - The problem is actually doing it! I also have no problem with anything until it starts getting at about 70IRE as long as I set the gamma to do well in the dark areas. Just think how easy this would be with full CMS!!!


Quote:


we can use a VP like the lumagen for the over all image gamma before the Tv-ones.

Unfortunately the DVDO VP50Pro with HDSDI that I am using can't do this. I was stupid enough to believe that they would add this to their feature set like they promised!?!?


Quote:


But Andres is doing some work for Marquee guys that I thin will make things a lot easier,

I have followed his posts on this - This is super cool!

Quote:


On the thread that Illias posted about color uniformity with his g70 craig explains how he does the zone adjustments using the secondaries by eye. I think I need to try this method.

I missed this one - can you direct me to it?


Bottom line is that when I get the time I will make yet another attempt at a more linear grayscale/gamma calibration. Each time I do it I get a little closer. Hopefully TVOne will add the software and then I can make it perfect! Perhaps that little CMS box will actually come to life, and I'll get a couple of them.
In the meantime, I'm really enjoying some movies at 98%!!

Bob
post #738 of 870
Here is craig method for doing Contrast modulation on the edges of the screen for a G70, i think the same can be done with a marquee as pressing the color button while in Contrast Zone adjustments can cycle through all primaries and secondaries so you can cycle trough them all while in one zone. here is Craig's statement:

Quote:
Originally Posted by CIR-Engineering View Post

Go into the G70 service menu. Locate the "Uniformity" menu. There are options for "color uniformity" and for "brightness uniformity." Adjust these to taste and to fix the problem.

Try both of these options on "Standard" first and see how it looks. If these is still bad uniformity, select "Manual" and this will bring you to a new menu. Mute the BLUE tube and adjust the horizontal RED (H-Red) to even out the yellow field. Then mute the RED tube and adjust the H-Blue to even out the cyan field. Finally, look at all white again to see how you did with color uniformity.

If your corners or sides are discolored, adjust the blue focus at theses points to even out the field further. You will loose some blue focus at the edges this way, but you will get an even field uniformity.

craigr

Quote:


Perhaps that little CMS box will actually come to life, and I'll get a couple of them.

You mean this?

http://www.curtpalme.com/forum/viewt...asc&highlight=

Athanasios
post #739 of 870
Thanks for the info from craigr. There are two similar sounding controls on the XG that I have played with - This should help me use them properly! Maybe I'll get closer!!!


Yes - Looks pretty cool doesn't it. I'll have to also get a couple of D/A converters, unfortunately.

Thanks,
Bob
post #740 of 870
On second thought - I won't need separate D/A converters if I install the Spectracal boxes before the TVOne's. Do you guys see anything wrong with that?

I guess that if TVOne doesn't offer full CMS by the time Spectracal is shipping, I'll order a pair of them.

Bob
post #741 of 870
I did a little Zone contrast modulation, still not perfect but getting closer. Bob you have to do that craig method works nicely, I found out the Marquee mutes the right colors for doing this by pressing certain commands on the remote.
by pressing color and getting to the yellow field i then press tint and it swaps between red and green , Nice!!!

Also when i was looking into the lens with the 4 grey bars on DVE witht he blend on you can see the clear distinct lines or steps while looking in the tubes,its definitely something software related. If i can take a pic of it i will.








On this pattern I made you can see the slight lines and the Bars in the middle of each half of the screen. that is an anomaly of those lines.



Athanasios
post #742 of 870
Quote:


Bob you have to do that craig method works nicely,

Yes, I'm going to try it tomorrow morning before the games start.


Quote:


Also when i was looking into the lens with the 4 grey bars on DVE witht he blend on you can see the clear distinct lines or steps while looking in the tubes,its definitely something software related.

I see the same thing - There is no doubt about the problem, but I'm now confident that they will get it fixed.

Are those shots in your last post with the extended zone, or with the proper size?


Bob
post #743 of 870
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boilermaker View Post

Yes, I'm going to try it tomorrow morning before the games start.




I see the same thing - There is no doubt about the problem, but I'm now confident that they will get it fixed.

Are those shots in your last post with the extended zone, or with the proper size?


Bob

To tell ya the truth, i don't know ! I just concentrated on the zone modulation. I still do not have both Grayscale's or colors matching either.
But i Know for a fact each time I get closer to both PJ's looking the same the more the blend zone fades while watching real content. Horizontal pans are what bring it out the most as a solid color moves from one Pj to the other.

Also you can see the Hard edge of the beginning of the blend zone in the Horizontal Grey pattern, they need to work on that,have it feather edge also not only the end of the zone is feathered . That is what the DiVentix does better.

we'll get there Bob, slowly but surely. And if not then I'll have to give Craig Rounds or Ken Whitcomb a call

Nashou
post #744 of 870
I'm sure the links were posted earlier in this thread but I can't be bothered flipping through 25 pages to find the answers.

1. Is there an online link to a setup manual for blending these?
2. Is there a download link for firmware updates?
3. Are these now compatible with HDCP or do I still need to use my moome external first to strip the HDCP?
4. Do I need to purchase a special cable to connect the two boxes together or they operate independantly?

Looks like I'll finally have time to play with them this week.
post #745 of 870
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gino AUS View Post

I'm sure the links were posted earlier in this thread but I can't be bothered flipping through 25 pages to find the answers.

1. Is there an online link to a setup manual for blending these?
2. Is there a download link for firmware updates?
3. Are these now compatible with HDCP or do I still need to use my moome external first to strip the HDCP?
4. Do I need to purchase a special cable to connect the two boxes together or they operate independantly?

Looks like I'll finally have time to play with them this week.

Hi Gino, here are the links to manuals , firmware, and programs. You might have to do a search for the res editor. I'll try to link it when i find it, its buried in there some where.

http://www.tvone.co.uk/tech_support.shtml

these are HDCP compliant but i still use the moome MUX as a splitter, works so why use something else?

No cable is needed, they work independently, in the source menu try using the 1:1 pixel mapping instead of using the windows menu Zoom function.

let me know when your going to do this maybe we can set up a phone call so i can walk you through it.

One thing you'll notice is the lines in the blend zone. but the Tv-one guys at the moment suggest using 128 blend zone till they work out the kinks. Right now i'm watching the foo fighters and it looks great!!! I did the contrast zone modulation that craig mentioned ant it helped out a lot!

Athanasios
post #746 of 870
Ok here is the resolution editor to make custom resolutions. I found it better to only make the resolutions you will be using. So i made the input resolutions like 1080p@24 and then the output res( 1064x800 as an example) there are other program also, i just notice a C2 messenger, its a rs 232 control!! I need to get this to andre to write some communication software to use with his project!

http://tvone.CRMdesk.com/image.aspx?mode=file&id=385

nashou
post #747 of 870
thanks athanasios!

i'll hopefully get around to trying it out tomorrow, and then will tweak it over the next few nights and report my progress as I go. my brother is visiting on friday so this is what finally got my butt in gear! lol
post #748 of 870
Gino - Good to have you back into it!

The only difference in my setup from Athanasios is I use a little Monoprice DVI splitter out of my VP50pro. The only disadvantage I can see with Moome's wonderful MUX is that you lose the lossless audio codecs unless you go through your audio pre/pro first which adds another handshake.

Can't wait to hear your impressions! Keep us posted.

Bob
post #749 of 870
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boilermaker View Post

Gino - Good to have you back into it!

The only difference in my setup from Athanasios is I use a little Monoprice DVI splitter out of my VP50pro. The only disadvantage I can see with Moome's wonderful MUX is that you lose the lossless audio codecs unless you go through your audio pre/pro first which adds another handshake.

Can't wait to hear your impressions! Keep us posted.

Bob

Bob I'm also not using the Lumagen HDQ. straight to the C2-2250.

Athanasios
post #750 of 870
Did a few tweaks, still not a perfect match on both PJ's but close enough to enjoy some Foo Fighters !!!










Athanasios
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: CRT Projectors
AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › CRT Projectors › TVONE Blending Info, General Q&A or just how to?