Quote:
Originally Posted by holl_ands 
We need more info re your antenna...what does it look like? How about a photo?
UHF performance is currently very important for digital channels.
In Feb2009, analog channels 2, 4 & 5 will simply go away, leaving the currently
operating digital channels in the UHF band....are these difficult to receive now???
Most stations avoided Ch2-6 due to need for a HUGE antenna and impulse noise problems.
Digital operations currently in UHF band will replace analog on channels 7, 11 & 13.
Ch7 & 13 should improve....but Ch11 WPIX-DT will suffer co-channel interference from WWLP-DT.
Ch58 PBS should improve by moving to Ch8. The remainder stay in UHF band.
With the general shutdown of full power analog channels (and low power later), interference
will be reduced throughout both VHF and UHF bands. Many stations are now operating at
reduced power due to interference problems, esp. in dense metro areas.
Some Broadcast antennas will be repositioned to optimize digital vice analog operations.
So check back in February.....
PS: The FCC never intended for viewers to receive "out-of-market" signals.
This could become impossible if the so-called "White Space Devices" are ever approved....

We need more info re your antenna...what does it look like? How about a photo?
UHF performance is currently very important for digital channels.
In Feb2009, analog channels 2, 4 & 5 will simply go away, leaving the currently
operating digital channels in the UHF band....are these difficult to receive now???
Most stations avoided Ch2-6 due to need for a HUGE antenna and impulse noise problems.
Digital operations currently in UHF band will replace analog on channels 7, 11 & 13.
Ch7 & 13 should improve....but Ch11 WPIX-DT will suffer co-channel interference from WWLP-DT.
Ch58 PBS should improve by moving to Ch8. The remainder stay in UHF band.
With the general shutdown of full power analog channels (and low power later), interference
will be reduced throughout both VHF and UHF bands. Many stations are now operating at
reduced power due to interference problems, esp. in dense metro areas.
Some Broadcast antennas will be repositioned to optimize digital vice analog operations.
So check back in February.....
PS: The FCC never intended for viewers to receive "out-of-market" signals.
This could become impossible if the so-called "White Space Devices" are ever approved....
Quote:
Originally Posted by pestocat 
Dark Ages,
You have to forget receiving any of the New York stations. The signal level is just too low for your location. Make sure you have good UHF reception. In analog can you get WCTX with a very clear picture? This is channel 59 and you can sort of use that as a test for UHF. I suggest adding an amplifier and put it as close to the antenna as possible. Channel Master has an outdoor amplifier that can be put right at the antenna, but even at the base of your rotor is OK. The amplifier is powered through the coax cable. The will boost the signal. The main problem with viewing the New York stations is that the noise margin for you is 16 dB lower for DTV compared to analog. 16 dB is a factor of 40. This means the New York stations DTV signals are only 1/40 of the analog and this won't improve very much after the transition. Your best bet for reception is to point the antenna to 293 and 344 degrees magnetic. Check out for your reception details. There is a parameter in their display NM(dB) that is the noise margin. You need this value to be greater than 0. At least 10 would or should be a minimum. Keep us informed on how or what you do.

Dark Ages,
You have to forget receiving any of the New York stations. The signal level is just too low for your location. Make sure you have good UHF reception. In analog can you get WCTX with a very clear picture? This is channel 59 and you can sort of use that as a test for UHF. I suggest adding an amplifier and put it as close to the antenna as possible. Channel Master has an outdoor amplifier that can be put right at the antenna, but even at the base of your rotor is OK. The amplifier is powered through the coax cable. The will boost the signal. The main problem with viewing the New York stations is that the noise margin for you is 16 dB lower for DTV compared to analog. 16 dB is a factor of 40. This means the New York stations DTV signals are only 1/40 of the analog and this won't improve very much after the transition. Your best bet for reception is to point the antenna to 293 and 344 degrees magnetic. Check out for your reception details. There is a parameter in their display NM(dB) that is the noise margin. You need this value to be greater than 0. At least 10 would or should be a minimum. Keep us informed on how or what you do.
OK, but when I first had the Craig box hooked up, I was getting several NY stations - WNBC (4), WNYW (5), WWOR (9), WLIW (21) WNYE (25) have all made appearances in digital - but only WLIW is still there now that the temperatures are dropping. 5 and 9 are each other's sub channel, and for a time were perfect - I'm talking hours on end they were strong. If 2-6 are disappearing completely, then why are they already broadcasting digital on those channels?
I'm not ready to give up on NY channels yet. Just as I'm pretty sure parts of Long Island and New Jersey won't want to give up on the NY stations that are just as far from them as they are from me. GAH!!! when do all the stations stream all programming online, this is impossible. By the end of February I'll be curled in a fetal position.
I don't even know WWLP( wait - was that 22 in Springfield, MA in analog? Haven't seen them in a decade!) - and if the unknown 58 takes over 8, we will lose the only station that is even close to consistant. And whether or not out of market viewing was meant to be there, they have been my mainstay channels for nearly 30 years. Local channels are a joke, especially the news.
WCTX is windblown and freezes and pixelates. (Urp Orp snip wap - that's what the audio sounds like and then it catches and holds a tone that rings or echoes. Hello narrow-casting, broadcasting is dead.) WTNH is our strongest signal in digital, but even it disappears - those two stations are in the same building, but you'd never know it.
There are already 2 amplifiers on our antenna - one on the roof near the rotor and one inside the house near the box. Would we be able to use another amp on that or would it blow it out? I saw a flat panel antenna with an optional amp that's supposed to boost the signal, but I'm afraid it would blow the amps we already have. We've always had very good UHF reception getting about 15 stations in that frequency range.
Are there any converter boxes that are better at pulling in signals? I've tried to find either and RCA 800B1 or the Zenith 901 that seem to be well reviewed, but no one sells them around here.
It just galls me that I will no longer be able to turn on the TV and enjoy. And trust me, without my New York stations, I will not enjoy TV anymore.












.........



