Aeon Elite screen Cinegrey 3D - Page 6 - AVS Forum | Home Theater Discussions And Reviews
Forum Jump: 
 34Likes
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #151 of 282 Old 12-14-2016, 06:14 PM
Member
 
PW405's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 38
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Liked: 11
So after much procrastination, I finally finished my LED-back lit "Aeon" using the Cinegrey 3D designer cut I bought 5 months ago! It turned out better than I hoped. Planning to do a post about it. I haven't visited this board since my last post in June, but I find it very interesting that everybody took a unique approach!

I'm having trouble getting a good picture because my camera sucks, but this is the best one I've got so far:
dlynch34 and trbizwiz1 like this.
PW405 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #152 of 282 Old 12-16-2016, 10:15 AM
Senior Member
 
sddp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: LA, CA
Posts: 415
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 320 Post(s)
Liked: 128
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottj73 View Post
Yes the velvet was really easy. It comes as a roll about 30mm wide so I just split the difference and folded over the extra to sort of hide the side of the screen better. I think it took me about 45 minutes to build the entire screen. I do recommend having a helper that can hold the frame while you stretch the material at the corners because it is extremely tight. My thumbs were hurting by the time I was done.






You weren't kidding!
I just finished putting together a 150" and almost threw out my back. Did it alone & I STRONGLY recommend having a helper as well. Attaching the material in the A-B-C-D format is important but really difficult on a 150"

Last edited by sddp; 02-01-2017 at 07:08 PM.
sddp is offline  
post #153 of 282 Old 12-16-2016, 06:42 PM
Advanced Member
 
dlynch34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Winter Garden, FL
Posts: 649
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 331 Post(s)
Liked: 143
Quote:
Originally Posted by PW405 View Post
So after much procrastination, I finally finished my LED-back lit "Aeon" using the Cinegrey 3D designer cut I bought 5 months ago! It turned out better than I hoped. Planning to do a post about it. I haven't visited this board since my last post in June, but I find it very interesting that everybody took a unique approach!

I'm having trouble getting a good picture because my camera sucks, but this is the best one I've got so far:
great job!! I did a DIY with the cinegrey 3d as well and LOVE it!!
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20160916_190958.jpg
Views:	799
Size:	176.6 KB
ID:	1835377  
akka83 and PW405 like this.

Don
Anthem AVM-60,Sunfire Cinema Grand Signature Five-Channel Power Amplifier, Emotiva XPA-1l x2,Outlaw 5000. Rhythmik DIY 15inch x2, Plus, Magnapan 3.7i, Magnepan CC5,Magnepan MC1,JVC RS400, DIY 125" 2:35 Elite Screen cinegray 3d .
dlynch34 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #154 of 282 Old 12-20-2016, 06:22 PM
Member
 
akka83's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 100
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Liked: 45
Looks great! I'll be going the DIY route as well. Have the Screen and the frame materials at home now. Will do it on Thursday and post some pics if successful
akka83 is offline  
post #155 of 282 Old 01-24-2017, 09:38 PM
Senior Member
 
SXRDISBEST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Seattle Now, Phoenix Soon!
Posts: 312
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 119 Post(s)
Liked: 67
How does the 3d perform with light colored content? Is there a lot of sparkle? Im trying to replace my old Stewart Firehawk because it's really bad in the sparkly department.
SXRDISBEST is offline  
post #156 of 282 Old 01-31-2017, 08:08 PM
Member
 
tgsweat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 25
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Liked: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by SXRDISBEST View Post
How does the 3d perform with light colored content? Is there a lot of sparkle? Im trying to replace my old Stewart Firehawk because it's really bad in the sparkly department.
I notice no sparkling. Picture looks great with my benq ht2050 shooting from about 12'. No hot spots as well.
tgsweat is offline  
post #157 of 282 Old 02-01-2017, 04:57 AM
Member
 
m-fine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 45
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Liked: 35
I just picked up a roll of this material to test. I have it stretched across a 119"x67" frame with the seats and projector both 15 feet back, so right at 1.5 to 1 throw distance. The room is dark chocolate brown walls and carpet, medium brown ceiling, and heavy curtains, so I have good light control but not a fully blacked out theater. I wanted to try a more mild ALR vs the 5D, Carl's, and other 1.4+ gain options because I have pretty good light control and didn't want to have too many artifacts in exchange for the ALR feature.

I do not notice any sparkles and the off axis viewing is better than I had expected. When shooting a uniform color or solid white you can see the corners are darker than the center if you look for it. So far this has not bothered me with normal content, but it is most certainly an artifact that is present in this material. I think a longer throw ratio would help, as would a longer seating distance but neither are options for my room as it is currently configured.

This is no miracle fabric. Add light and the black levels are raised and the picture does get washed out a bit, just much less so than on my white screen. With minimal lights on, off axis, it does give a very viewable image for most TV, sports and gaming. I don't see myself ever watching movies that way, nor would I be satisfied with the image in a fully lit room or with curtains open. Neither is something I am interested in anyway. If I can have enough light on to see the remotes, my plate of snacks, and not trip over a black dog on a dark carpet while watching a bright and vibrant Super Bowl image I am good, and the Cinegrey 3D is good enough to deliver that.

The only other complaint I have is there are two visible vertical lines that I think were from the material being rolled up. The most visible is where it was closest to the tube and the second fainter one looks like it may have been one layer later. I am hoping they will stretch out over time but I see a number of others reporting this issue with the 3D and 5D material.
covsound1 and Ftoast like this.
m-fine is offline  
post #158 of 282 Old 02-01-2017, 06:23 AM
Member
 
covsound1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 164
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 94 Post(s)
Liked: 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by m-fine View Post
I just picked up a roll of this material to test. I have it stretched across a 119"x67" frame with the seats and projector both 15 feet back, so right at 1.5 to 1 throw distance. The room is dark chocolate brown walls and carpet, medium brown ceiling, and heavy curtains, so I have good light control but not a fully blacked out theater. I wanted to try a more mild ALR vs the 5D, Carl's, and other 1.4+ gain options because I have pretty good light control and didn't want to have too many artifacts in exchange for the ALR feature.

I do not notice any sparkles and the off axis viewing is better than I had expected. When shooting a uniform color or solid white you can see the corners are darker than the center if you look for it. So far this has not bothered me with normal content, but it is most certainly an artifact that is present in this material. I think a longer throw ratio would help, as would a longer seating distance but neither are options for my room as it is currently configured.

This is no miracle fabric. Add light and the black levels are raised and the picture does get washed out a bit, just much less so than on my white screen. With minimal lights on, off axis, it does give a very viewable image for most TV, sports and gaming. I don't see myself ever watching movies that way, nor would I be satisfied with the image in a fully lit room or with curtains open. Neither is something I am interested in anyway. If I can have enough light on to see the remotes, my plate of snacks, and not trip over a black dog on a dark carpet while watching a bright and vibrant Super Bowl image I am good, and the Cinegrey 3D is good enough to deliver that.

The only other complaint I have is there are two visible vertical lines that I think were from the material being rolled up. The most visible is where it was closest to the tube and the second fainter one looks like it may have been one layer later. I am hoping they will stretch out over time but I see a number of others reporting this issue with the 3D and 5D material.
i got a roll of 3d about two weeks ago. have not had the time to set up. i am using hp 2.8 screen now wanted something that could pull black a little more and not hurt me light output. i really like the hp but wanted to see what grey would bring. is your contrast better than what you had before with the 3d material?
covsound1 is offline  
post #159 of 282 Old 02-01-2017, 07:38 AM
Senior Member
 
SXRDISBEST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Seattle Now, Phoenix Soon!
Posts: 312
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 119 Post(s)
Liked: 67
Quote:
Originally Posted by m-fine View Post
I just picked up a roll of this material to test. I have it stretched across a 119"x67" frame with the seats and projector both 15 feet back, so right at 1.5 to 1 throw distance. The room is dark chocolate brown walls and carpet, medium brown ceiling, and heavy curtains, so I have good light control but not a fully blacked out theater. I wanted to try a more mild ALR vs the 5D, Carl's, and other 1.4+ gain options because I have pretty good light control and didn't want to have too many artifacts in exchange for the ALR feature.

I do not notice any sparkles and the off axis viewing is better than I had expected. When shooting a uniform color or solid white you can see the corners are darker than the center if you look for it. So far this has not bothered me with normal content, but it is most certainly an artifact that is present in this material. I think a longer throw ratio would help, as would a longer seating distance but neither are options for my room as it is currently configured.

This is no miracle fabric. Add light and the black levels are raised and the picture does get washed out a bit, just much less so than on my white screen. With minimal lights on, off axis, it does give a very viewable image for most TV, sports and gaming. I don't see myself ever watching movies that way, nor would I be satisfied with the image in a fully lit room or with curtains open. Neither is something I am interested in anyway. If I can have enough light on to see the remotes, my plate of snacks, and not trip over a black dog on a dark carpet while watching a bright and vibrant Super Bowl image I am good, and the Cinegrey 3D is good enough to deliver that.

The only other complaint I have is there are two visible vertical lines that I think were from the material being rolled up. The most visible is where it was closest to the tube and the second fainter one looks like it may have been one layer later. I am hoping they will stretch out over time but I see a number of others reporting this issue with the 3D and 5D material.
The streaks etc. on this material that people are complaining about is the one reason I'm considering Carl's instead. It seems like it's not packaged very well at all, especially the designer cut material. Do you know if the quality control is better with Carl's compared to Elite?
SXRDISBEST is offline  
post #160 of 282 Old 02-01-2017, 11:43 AM
Member
 
m-fine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 45
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Liked: 35
To answer the questions in the previous two posts.

The contrast is slightly improved in complete darkness, but I already had fairly good light control. As I increase the level of light in the room, the picture degrades much slower compared to the white screen so the improvement in contrast becomes fairly substantial. See the post below with a bad photo.

I have no first hand experience with any Carl's product. So I cannot comment on their QC or packaging. I chose to try the Elite 3D first because it seems to be a less aggressive ALR than the Carl's or 5D but I certainly have not ruled out testing some Carl's ALR material as it is not too expensive and shouldn't take too long to bungee it to an existing frame.
covsound1 likes this.

Last edited by m-fine; 02-01-2017 at 12:00 PM.
m-fine is offline  
post #161 of 282 Old 02-01-2017, 11:54 AM
Member
 
m-fine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 45
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Liked: 35
Here is a simple iPhone photo of the Cinegrey 3D taped to a portion of my white screen. For this shot, I opened the curtains on a window off to the right of the screen on a cloudy day. The image is the white on black grid from the projector's pixel alignment menu. You can see on the white screen things are much worse on the right than the left.

Overall, on my personal taste scale, the white screen in this light scenario rates "unwatchable" while the Cinegray rates between "tolerable" and "acceptable" for most gaming or sports. I can't imagine any situation where I wouldn't close the curtain before watching a movie on either screen.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4338.jpg
Views:	842
Size:	171.9 KB
ID:	1936793  
covsound1 and Ftoast like this.
m-fine is offline  
post #162 of 282 Old 02-07-2017, 04:20 AM
Member
 
m-fine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 45
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Liked: 35
So, having lived with this material for a bit, I can offer some updates.

Stretching the material more horizontally has all but eliminated the vertical lines. On the down side, watching more and different material, I do see some sparkles. With bright solid colors like in animation it can be quite noticeable, whereas in normal film images it is not very noticeable.

There are definitely some downsides and trade offs with this material that will bother some people more than others.
m-fine is offline  
post #163 of 282 Old 02-07-2017, 08:14 AM
Senior Member
 
SXRDISBEST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Seattle Now, Phoenix Soon!
Posts: 312
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 119 Post(s)
Liked: 67
Quote:
Originally Posted by m-fine View Post
So, having lived with this material for a bit, I can offer some updates.

Stretching the material more horizontally has all but eliminated the vertical lines. On the down side, watching more and different material, I do see some sparkles. With bright solid colors like in animation it can be quite noticeable, whereas in normal film images it is not very noticeable.

There are definitely some downsides and trade offs with this material that will bother some people more than others.
I received my sample last weekend and disappointingly, I noticed the sparkles too. I was set on either the 3D or Carl's ALR, but both show sparkles big time and will not work for me. I was hoping for a big improvement from my 10 year old Firehawk, but it was marginal at best. For those interested, Carl's ALR is quite a bit brighter than the 3D. Probably more comparable with the Cinegrey 5D but I hven't compared directly. I might be going with straight white fabric, as it is smooth as can be. I don't think the trade-offs of the ALR stuff are worth it for me unfortunately.
SXRDISBEST is offline  
post #164 of 282 Old 02-07-2017, 08:40 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
Ftoast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 6,752
Mentioned: 114 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2781 Post(s)
Liked: 934
Quote:
Originally Posted by SXRDISBEST View Post
I received my sample last weekend and disappointingly, I noticed the sparkles too. I was set on either the 3D or Carl's ALR, but both show sparkles big time and will not work for me. I was hoping for a big improvement from my 10 year old Firehawk, but it was marginal at best. For those interested, Carl's ALR is quite a bit brighter than the 3D. Probably more comparable with the Cinegrey 5D but I hven't compared directly. I might be going with straight white fabric, as it is smooth as can be. I don't think the trade-offs of the ALR stuff are worth it for me unfortunately.
Because this is the first time I can remember hearing someone describe Carl's ALR as noticeably brighter than Elite's CineGrey 3D, you're projecting onto the side without a label, right? The labelled side should be the back..and that back will be more glossy and higher-gain.

It could also just be the natural variance between productions, but I figured it couldn't hurt to ask and make sure.

Easy $25 DIY black (or any color) ALR paint +$40-$50sprayer screen mix smooth/clean and very easy to learn spraying with little/no mess.
Simple $25-40 DIY black/dark-grey ambient-light rejecting screen, grab two things from a local store..mix..roll..done.
Quick <$250 dedicated black-fabric theater room "A store that sells blinds can help your picture more than a store that sells projectors many times." -bud16415

Last edited by Ftoast; 02-07-2017 at 08:43 AM.
Ftoast is offline  
post #165 of 282 Old 02-07-2017, 09:07 AM
Senior Member
 
SXRDISBEST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Seattle Now, Phoenix Soon!
Posts: 312
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 119 Post(s)
Liked: 67
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ftoast View Post
Because this is the first time I can remember hearing someone describe Carl's ALR as noticeably brighter than Elite's CineGrey 3D, you're projecting onto the side without a label, right? The labelled side should be the back..and that back will be more glossy and higher-gain.

It could also just be the natural variance between productions, but I figured it couldn't hurt to ask and make sure.

Yes, I was definitely using the correct side. Without a doubt, Carl's ALR was in the ballpark of .3 gain higher than Cinegrey 3D on my samples! First of all, just laying the samples next to each other on my table, I could see that the 3D was darker. Then when an image was on the screen, Carl's as quite a bit brighter. My wife even noticed it! haha The 3D was almost identical in brightness (on axis) to the Carl's Flexiwhite 1.1 gain sample.

As tough as it is to make a judgement on hotspotting on such a small sample, it looked like Carl's hotspotted worse than the 3D. Just generally had a more reflective look to it. I now have more appreciation for what Stewart is doing with their materials, because they were essentially where these new materials are 12 years ago. And I also had a Firehawk G3 sample on hand to compare and of course, it performed the best. I think it's also like $1,200 for just the material on my 123" 16:9.

I may just go with Carl's Flexiwhite and continue to tame down reflections in my room. I really liked the look of the sample. Gotta love first world problems, right?
m-fine likes this.
SXRDISBEST is offline  
post #166 of 282 Old 02-07-2017, 05:55 PM
Member
 
m-fine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 45
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Liked: 35
The Carl's is supposed to be about 1.5 max gain vs 1.1-1.2 for the 3D. Based on the specs, I would have expected it to be brighter but with more severe hotspotting which is exactly why I chose to try the 3D first over the Carl's and 5D. So, SXRD is reporting what I would have expected.
m-fine is offline  
post #167 of 282 Old 02-07-2017, 08:34 PM
Senior Member
 
SXRDISBEST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Seattle Now, Phoenix Soon!
Posts: 312
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 119 Post(s)
Liked: 67
Quote:
Originally Posted by m-fine View Post
The Carl's is supposed to be about 1.5 max gain vs 1.1-1.2 for the 3D. Based on the specs, I would have expected it to be brighter but with more severe hotspotting which is exactly why I chose to try the 3D first over the Carl's and 5D. So, SXRD is reporting what I would have expected.
Yeah, I think the 3d is overall the better choice. I think you minimize the bad aspects of ALR, while maintaining some good light rejection. I would take a hit in the overall brightness for less hotspotting and just crank the brightness on my projector at the times when needed.
SXRDISBEST is offline  
post #168 of 282 Old 02-08-2017, 03:45 AM
Senior Member
 
jaychatbonneau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 472
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 308 Post(s)
Liked: 76
Quote:
Originally Posted by SXRDISBEST View Post
Yeah, I think the 3d is overall the better choice. I think you minimize the bad aspects of ALR, while maintaining some good light rejection. I would take a hit in the overall brightness for less hotspotting and just crank the brightness on my projector at the times when needed.
How well does Cinegrey 3D perform when used with a passive 3D set-up? Does anyone know the extinction ratio? Thanks.
jaychatbonneau is offline  
post #169 of 282 Old 02-08-2017, 07:51 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
Ftoast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 6,752
Mentioned: 114 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2781 Post(s)
Liked: 934
Quote:
Originally Posted by m-fine View Post
The Carl's is supposed to be about 1.5 max gain vs 1.1-1.2 for the 3D. Based on the specs, I would have expected it to be brighter but with more severe hotspotting which is exactly why I chose to try the 3D first over the Carl's and 5D. So, SXRD is reporting what I would have expected.
That all makes sense. It's just that my sample of Carl's is only just barely brighter than FlexiWhite at its brightest point (when viewed in a dark environment) and the previous example/s I've seen comparing Carl's next to the CineGrey 3D and 5D showed Carl's to be noticeably dimmer than 5D and basically indistinguishable from 3D (the user commented that Carl's was a touch dimmer than the 3D).
I wonder if Carl's had fairly drastic change from one roll to the next.. that's a bit worrying.

Easy $25 DIY black (or any color) ALR paint +$40-$50sprayer screen mix smooth/clean and very easy to learn spraying with little/no mess.
Simple $25-40 DIY black/dark-grey ambient-light rejecting screen, grab two things from a local store..mix..roll..done.
Quick <$250 dedicated black-fabric theater room "A store that sells blinds can help your picture more than a store that sells projectors many times." -bud16415
Ftoast is offline  
post #170 of 282 Old 03-10-2017, 08:03 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 20
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Liked: 3
About to order Elite Aeon CineGray3D 150" screen for Epson 5040 projector. Projector is not mounted yet and I have a little wiggle room. Should I go closer to 15' or closer to 17'? Would 17' be better to avoid hotspotting? I know 15' would give me a brighter image, but probably don't need it anyway since the 5040 is bright enough.
iastater09 is offline  
post #171 of 282 Old 03-10-2017, 09:42 AM
Senior Member
 
daWill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 281
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 170 Post(s)
Liked: 144
Quote:
Originally Posted by iastater09 View Post
About to order Elite Aeon CineGray3D 150" screen for Epson 5040 projector. Projector is not mounted yet and I have a little wiggle room. Should I go closer to 15' or closer to 17'? Would 17' be better to avoid hotspotting? I know 15' would give me a brighter image, but probably don't need it anyway since the 5040 is bright enough.
Elite specifically mentions you need 1.5x your screen width as minimum throw. I have a 15' throw and I literally just setup a 135" aeon cinegray 3d last night. I'm very pleased with the image. However, I'm just over the min spec. For 150" screen I would follow their guidelines and stick with 16.5' throw or more.

That all being said, the image on this is pretty freaking good. I never bought it specifically for external ambient light, but I did buy it to increase my ansi contrast from light bouncing around my room. I have dark walls, but my room is multifunction and it has light carpet, white ceiling, and the "blackout" curtains glow during the day. It impossible to get the room completely dark except at night. I had a silver ticket 120" white screen for the past 2 years and I wasn't enjoying the picture at all. However my wife refused to allow me to treat the room further. I finally got the buy in for a new screen recently (I think she got sick of listening to me).

I've only had a few hours to demo it, but it's worth every penny. Honestly I think it might allow me to nurse my aging sony hw50es a little longer. I was a little concerned my projector would light it up enough (it's got over 1000hrs on current lamp), but it does quiet well. Surprisingly enough I can even disable the DI and it doesn't wash out the image like it did with the matte white screen. Sure I might lose some black level without the DI but the increased brightness and image pop makes it worth it for tv watching. For movies I just flip it back on and get a little bit better contrast at the cost of some brightness. Viewing angles are actually way better than I was expecting. There is a slight shift in the image brightness when you sit at an angle, further corner will be slightly darker, but its only noticeable on solid color screens. Watching a movie I was unable to perceive it. I only noticed it when I threw a solid white image up. Standing up, walking around my room I didn't notice much image shift. I would say it's comparable to my VA FALD 4k tv I have in my living room (JVC DM85UXR), but not as good as my LG IPS tv I have in my bedroom which has no saturation loss.

Aethsteticly I was also very surprised about how good the screen looks. It took me a little extra time to work out any waves, but I was totally going into this expecting to use the velvet border tape. After throwing it on the wall and having it almost disappear (I have dark grey walls), I decided to wait. After firing up the image and aligning everything as best as I could in ~15min, I was more than happy. Sure I can't get a perfect rectangle, but the slight border gap is barely noticeable, I forgot about it as soon as I started watching. Overspill though is very noticeable since the light is no longer squashed by velvet and it's hitting a textured wall. Overall I just think the tape would be way more of a distraction than leaving it clean and nude on the wall .

I'm sure there are better screens out there for living room environments, but if you have decent light control and are just fighting some indirect light bleeding into your room I can't imagine anything being that much better. If you want to pay thousands of dollars for other brands low gain ALR screen, I won't argue with you, but this cinegrey 3d is probably a better bang for your buck. I personally can't justify 1000's of dollars for a piece of fabric on the wall (probably why I have no interest in art).

Next up I need to upgrade my projector and really light this thing up with more lumens and better black levels than my hw50es is capable of.
iastater09 and Cramer86 like this.
daWill is offline  
post #172 of 282 Old 03-15-2017, 09:46 AM
Newbie
 
murof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Poolesville, MD
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by daWill View Post
Elite specifically mentions you need 1.5x your screen width as minimum throw. I have a 15' throw and I literally just setup a 135" aeon cinegray 3d last night. I'm very pleased with the image. However, I'm just over the min spec. For 150" screen I would follow their guidelines and stick with 16.5' throw or more.

That all being said, the image on this is pretty freaking good. I never bought it specifically for external ambient light, but I did buy it to increase my ansi contrast from light bouncing around my room. I have dark walls, but my room is multifunction and it has light carpet, white ceiling, and the "blackout" curtains glow during the day. It impossible to get the room completely dark except at night. I had a silver ticket 120" white screen for the past 2 years and I wasn't enjoying the picture at all. However my wife refused to allow me to treat the room further. I finally got the buy in for a new screen recently (I think she got sick of listening to me).

I've only had a few hours to demo it, but it's worth every penny. Honestly I think it might allow me to nurse my aging sony hw50es a little longer. I was a little concerned my projector would light it up enough (it's got over 1000hrs on current lamp), but it does quiet well. Surprisingly enough I can even disable the DI and it doesn't wash out the image like it did with the matte white screen. Sure I might lose some black level without the DI but the increased brightness and image pop makes it worth it for tv watching. For movies I just flip it back on and get a little bit better contrast at the cost of some brightness. Viewing angles are actually way better than I was expecting. There is a slight shift in the image brightness when you sit at an angle, further corner will be slightly darker, but its only noticeable on solid color screens. Watching a movie I was unable to perceive it. I only noticed it when I threw a solid white image up. Standing up, walking around my room I didn't notice much image shift. I would say it's comparable to my VA FALD 4k tv I have in my living room (JVC DM85UXR), but not as good as my LG IPS tv I have in my bedroom which has no saturation loss.

Aethsteticly I was also very surprised about how good the screen looks. It took me a little extra time to work out any waves, but I was totally going into this expecting to use the velvet border tape. After throwing it on the wall and having it almost disappear (I have dark grey walls), I decided to wait. After firing up the image and aligning everything as best as I could in ~15min, I was more than happy. Sure I can't get a perfect rectangle, but the slight border gap is barely noticeable, I forgot about it as soon as I started watching. Overspill though is very noticeable since the light is no longer squashed by velvet and it's hitting a textured wall. Overall I just think the tape would be way more of a distraction than leaving it clean and nude on the wall .

I'm sure there are better screens out there for living room environments, but if you have decent light control and are just fighting some indirect light bleeding into your room I can't imagine anything being that much better. If you want to pay thousands of dollars for other brands low gain ALR screen, I won't argue with you, but this cinegrey 3d is probably a better bang for your buck. I personally can't justify 1000's of dollars for a piece of fabric on the wall (probably why I have no interest in art).

Next up I need to upgrade my projector and really light this thing up with more lumens and better black levels than my hw50es is capable of.
Thanks, this really helped me decide to get this screen. I have been agonizing over which screen and how much to spend. I think your conditions are very similar to mine.
murof is offline  
post #173 of 282 Old 03-15-2017, 04:28 PM
Senior Member
 
RigorousXChris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 289
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 157 Post(s)
Liked: 62
Quote:
Originally Posted by dlynch34 View Post
great job!! I did a DIY with the cinegrey 3d as well and LOVE it!!
Do LEDs around the screen helped with perceived contrast?

JVC RS540 | Pioneer SC-95 | Panamax MB1500 x2
Klipsch RF-83 | RC-64 | RP-280FA | RS-62 | RP-140SA | R-115SW x2
4k MadVR HTPC | Panasonic DMP-UB900 | PS4 Pro | DirecTV Genie
RigorousXChris is offline  
post #174 of 282 Old 03-15-2017, 07:32 PM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Mississauga, ON, Canada
Posts: 8,144
Mentioned: 173 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5852 Post(s)
Liked: 2355
Quote:
Originally Posted by daWill View Post
That all being said, the image on this is pretty freaking good. I never bought it specifically for external ambient light, but I did buy it to increase my ansi contrast from light bouncing around my room.
I'm in a similar situation. I have a Silvler Ticket matte white screen, and can notice the bounced light from my walls even though they are already dark ccoloured. I will likely just change the screen material, currently trying to decide between the Cinegrey 3D and Cinegrey 5D.

Did you compare the two before settling on the 3D?
Dominic Chan is online now  
post #175 of 282 Old 03-15-2017, 07:38 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 20
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Liked: 3
Follow up to my earlier post....

Need some advice here:
Have a 5040ub with a elite aeon cinegray3d 150" screen. I need advice on where to mount the projector. The screen is a 1.2 gain ALR screen so advises 1.5 times screen width which would be close to 16' 5". I have a stud at 16'5" but then the lens would be closer than that. The outlet and HDMI passthrough are next to this stud. I could also go one stud back and mount at 17' 7" (yes 14" difference) but electrical and HDMI will be at 16' 5".

Would I get hotspots if I mount at 16'5" (then the lens would be closer than the recommended 1.5 screen width)?

Or should mount on the 17'7" stud to make sure I follow the screen recommendation? I could then run the HDMI and power to where they are located near 16'5".

Thanks in advance. Will be mounting Friday. Appreciate the input.
iastater09 is offline  
post #176 of 282 Old 03-16-2017, 05:44 AM
Senior Member
 
daWill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 281
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 170 Post(s)
Liked: 144
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dominic Chan View Post
I'm in a similar situation. I have a Silvler Ticket matte white screen, and can notice the bounced light from my walls even though they are already dark ccoloured. I will likely just change the screen material, currently trying to decide between the Cinegrey 3D and Cinegrey 5D.

Did you compare the two before settling on the 3D?
I have samples for both, but honestly, I couldn't tell much from the little samples they sent. I made my decision mostly from reviews on this forum. I bought from Amazon, so I figured if it didn't work I would just return it. The reasons I went with 3d over 5d is the extra gain wasn't needed and I was concerned about hot spotting, sparkles and viewing angles. Based on everything I've read, the 3d had better behavior in all those areas.
daWill is offline  
post #177 of 282 Old 03-16-2017, 06:22 PM
Senior Member
 
toomanytvstosee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 494
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 300 Post(s)
Liked: 114
Want to build one for me

Quote:
Originally Posted by dlynch34 View Post
great job!! I did a DIY with the cinegrey 3d as well and LOVE it!!
Dlynch, I am in Orlando. Want to build one for me and I will pay you?
toomanytvstosee is offline  
post #178 of 282 Old 03-20-2017, 05:40 AM
Advanced Member
 
dlynch34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Winter Garden, FL
Posts: 649
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 331 Post(s)
Liked: 143
Quote:
Originally Posted by toomanytvstosee View Post
Dlynch, I am in Orlando. Want to build one for me and I will pay you?
hey wherabouts in Orlando are you?

What size and aspect are you looking at?

Don
Anthem AVM-60,Sunfire Cinema Grand Signature Five-Channel Power Amplifier, Emotiva XPA-1l x2,Outlaw 5000. Rhythmik DIY 15inch x2, Plus, Magnapan 3.7i, Magnepan CC5,Magnepan MC1,JVC RS400, DIY 125" 2:35 Elite Screen cinegray 3d .
dlynch34 is offline  
post #179 of 282 Old 03-22-2017, 10:36 AM
Member
 
carlkpro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 66
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Liked: 12
Anyone using edge free Elite Aeon screen can tell me how this works for projecting image that does not fill the entire screen? Will outside bands look weird or you don't notice it much? I'm thinking of installing an oversized screen that I could use for 16:9 TV viewing at a reduced size and for occasional 2.35:1 movie viewing. I can live with the later but want to be sure that extra outside bands when watching TV most times won't be bothering me. Thanks,
carlkpro is offline  
post #180 of 282 Old 03-23-2017, 08:28 AM
Senior Member
 
daWill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 281
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 170 Post(s)
Liked: 144
Quote:
Originally Posted by carlkpro View Post
Anyone using edge free Elite Aeon screen can tell me how this works for projecting image that does not fill the entire screen? Will outside bands look weird or you don't notice it much? I'm thinking of installing an oversized screen that I could use for 16:9 TV viewing at a reduced size and for occasional 2.35:1 movie viewing. I can live with the later but want to be sure that extra outside bands when watching TV most times won't be bothering me. Thanks,
I don't have the patience to get a perfect fill. Nor do I necessarily think quality control on these screens is high enough to get a perfect 16:9 ratio. Even just a tiny bit off gets magnified by the projectors throw.

Now all that being said I can't tell it's not filling up the whole screen unless I look for it. Playing games or watching movies it's a non issue. I prefer the clean look much better w/o the black tape and the screen is dark enough grey to not be distracting with any underfill. Underfill on my previous matte white screen was very annoying to me and I tried to get the overspill just minimal on the velvet to avoid it.
daWill is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply Screens

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off