RS1 vs RS50 - AVS Forum | Home Theater Discussions And Reviews
Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 2 Old 09-11-2012, 06:08 PM - Thread Starter
Member
 
mrvegas1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Columbia, Md.
Posts: 150
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked: 10
I have had my RS1 for about 4 years and I have a chance to get a really good deal on an RS50 with about 50 hours on it. I spend about 50% of my time watching NFL football and basketball and about 50% watching movies (action, drama, etc). I have a dedicated home theater with great light control and a 110" Stewart screen.

Quick comments on what the pluses would be from upgrading?
mrvegas1 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 2 Old 09-11-2012, 08:16 PM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
RonF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Sunny SoCal
Posts: 2,091
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 307 Post(s)
Liked: 272
I currently have the RS50 and have owned the RS1. If you know that the RS50 has decent to good convergence and a lens that is showing well defined pixels over the entire screen surface, it should be a sharper picture for you. It has an on board CMS which has some quirks about it but an experienced calibrator with good gear should be able to get much better color accuracy than with your RS1. You may even be able to playing by yourself get to more decent and not as oversaturated colors as the RS1 has.

Motion is better for sports and I like to use the CMD (clear motion drive frame interpolation) on either Mode 3 or 4 with them. Seems to help motion some more to me and also give a bit more roundness to players and shapes. Just my feeling with it. With a Darblet a good RS50 can look really good.

If your RS1 has bright corners as mine did chances are you will not have any with the RS50, or they will be very faint if there at all. It's capable of (much?) better black level and contrast in your light controlled room. If the price is attractive you likely would consider it quite an upgrade with the quality of the picture overall.

Though prone to ghosting on difficult titles, movies such as Avatar and other CGI blockbusters with a new lamp can look really good with 3D or in 2D with the Darblet. Although you would be better served with at that size a high power screen. If 3D not important don't sweat it.

Downside is this was the first year after the RS20 and following year RS25 with the not centered lens arrangements, where they went back to the lens in the center and you must have read by now a new series of very crappy lamps that most of them are at half brightness by 400 or so hours and often outright super dimming and failure shortly thereafter. They have gone through several batches of those (China) with no improvement, but possibly the lamp now being supplied with this little flap or fin thingy in the case that is visible may be an improvement. But even with a brand new lamp it has less lumens than what you had with a new lamp with your RS1. Once the lamp is past a hundred hours or so most people can't get enough light for 3D without the high gain screens. If you have a long throw with your zoom lens you are going to lose even more of that light from the get go.

Hope this helps.....good luck with your decision. smile.gif
RonF is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply Digital Hi-End Projectors - $3,000+ USD MSRP

Tags
Jvc Rs50u

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off