Projector Mini-Shootout Thread - Page 464 - AVS Forum | Home Theater Discussions And Reviews
Forum Jump: 
 4910Likes
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #13891 of 19419 Old 02-09-2016, 04:56 PM
AVS Forum Addicted Member
 
R Harkness's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 15,123
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2755 Post(s)
Liked: 2659
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Garrett View Post
Do they happen to mention what kind of download speeds they have or what cables they are using? Seems at least half the time people have issues, the new piece of equipment gets the blame when it is the innocent party.
I don't remember mention of download speeds.
R Harkness is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #13892 of 19419 Old 02-09-2016, 04:56 PM
Toe
AVS Forum Addicted Member
 
Toe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 16,654
Mentioned: 80 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2663 Post(s)
Liked: 3400
Quote:
Originally Posted by RonF View Post
I love it. Hard core. And I do agree Pacific Rim in 3D is amazing. Pacific Rim 8' away from an 8' 5" wide 16x9 2.8 HP screen presentation, with the lamp on High and the iris down around -10 to -12 and DI on auto 1 = 3D you don't see anywhere because it's at even higher than the new reference levels of Dolby and IMAX FL coming off their screens..... with such high dynamic range from my RS500 and all the dark and mid level APL scenes and deep shadow detail mixed with brilliant highlights and bright colors that just pop in this movie.
I bet! Man, I would LOVE to see Pacific Rim in 3d on the RS500 with all that contrast, especially with your HP screen!
Toe is online now  
post #13893 of 19419 Old 02-09-2016, 08:50 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Forum Addicted Member
 
zombie10k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 12,716
Mentioned: 159 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5236 Post(s)
Liked: 5487
Quote:
Originally Posted by R Harkness View Post
I haven't done so because I watch very little TV (virtually none) and prefer Blu-Ray quality over streaming. Plus, I don't have an AV receiver or VP that can pass or switch 4K sources, meaning for now I can only have one 4K source sent to the remaining HDMI input of the JVC. So I can't do both the Roku for 4K and the Samsung.

Hence...I was really hoping the Samsung could also be a decent streaming/youtube access option for 4K as well.

The problems I've read so far in the Samsung owners thread is that people seem to be having a tough time actually streaming 4K, if the Samsung is compatible with lots of the youtube 4K encoding, or determining IF the stream is 4K
at all.

it looks like a few new reports from folks that were fine streaming 4K from Youtube. it should be here tomorrow, I should have a chance to check this out tomorrow night.

edit: I have a 50Mb FIOS connection
RonF and R Harkness like this.
zombie10k is online now  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #13894 of 19419 Old 02-09-2016, 10:30 PM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
Elix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Dungeon, Pillar of Eyes
Posts: 1,574
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 253 Post(s)
Liked: 106
Quote:
Originally Posted by zombie10k View Post
So who is lining up to pre-order one of those expensive upcoming BenQ or Optoma projectors?

They are really going to have to pull off a miracle here and improve the stagnant native contrast that has haunted DLP's. + the premiere of this new DLP panel is being hosted by 2 companies that have less than stellar track records in recent years
I predict 2000:1 native, 10000:1 dynamic (useful) contrast. There's no way they could reach 10000:1 native.
Elix is online now  
post #13895 of 19419 Old 02-10-2016, 08:28 AM - Thread Starter
AVS Forum Addicted Member
 
zombie10k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 12,716
Mentioned: 159 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5236 Post(s)
Liked: 5487
now I have to find movies. hopefully BB releases them early in store.

zombie10k is online now  
post #13896 of 19419 Old 02-10-2016, 08:39 AM
AVS Forum Addicted Member
 
R Harkness's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 15,123
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2755 Post(s)
Liked: 2659
zombie,

I'm very glad you were able to get a player this soon. Usually we have to wade through newbies who get anticipated new gear first "Well, I got the new X, I'm no expert and it looks good to me" kind of stuff. (I think the first person who got the Samsung UHD player in that thread didn't even have a 4K TV, only 1080p!).

We know you'll put this thing, and the new UHD BDs through their paces!

(And it looks like I'll be stuck relying on competent reports for quite a while, since my Samsung player has been delayed to to "not in stock" status).
R Harkness is offline  
post #13897 of 19419 Old 02-10-2016, 10:20 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
jkasanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,591
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 329 Post(s)
Liked: 124
@zombie10k Yeah, everyone is talking about UHD's but I'm more interested to hear how it performs as a streaming device (both local and internet content)? Appears to support a lot of formats but I haven't seen any reports on performance. Would love to hear your thoughts on if it's up to the task of replacing any of your current devices?
jkasanic is offline  
post #13898 of 19419 Old 02-10-2016, 10:23 AM
AVS Forum Addicted Member
 
stanger89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Marion, IA
Posts: 23,130
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4156 Post(s)
Liked: 2384
Well, I'll have a couple weeks to try all that out too. I wonder if Plex will work on it:
http://www.samsung.com/levant/smarth...apps_plex.html
stanger89 is offline  
post #13899 of 19419 Old 02-10-2016, 12:40 PM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
phisch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,836
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 63 Post(s)
Liked: 47
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toe View Post
I bet! Man, I would LOVE to see Pacific Rim in 3d on the RS500 with all that contrast, especially with your HP screen!
I watched Pacific Rim in 3d last night for the first time and it was amazing on the RS600. Probably the best 3d I've watched so far on the 600. I always watched it in 2d when I had my RS4810 because 3d was too dim on the size screen I am using with that projector. Plus 3d on the 4810 wasn't very good anyway, unlike the 600 which is excellent with 3d titles.
RonF and Toe like this.
phisch is offline  
post #13900 of 19419 Old 02-10-2016, 01:00 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Forum Addicted Member
 
zombie10k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 12,716
Mentioned: 159 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5236 Post(s)
Liked: 5487
it would be great if it could play my 2D and 3D MKV's. These are full 1:1 rips just with all the extras removed. That is the great thing about the mede8ter, it's very fast to play the movies and scrubs quickly through the timeline.

stanger how are you using it with your 4910, do you have one of those HDFury devices?

This is one of those times I'd like to compare the 4910 e-shift to the current gen to see if the UHD content looks any different.
zombie10k is online now  
post #13901 of 19419 Old 02-10-2016, 01:10 PM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
Steve Goff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Olympia, WA, USA
Posts: 2,026
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 440 Post(s)
Liked: 251
It acts like a regular Blue-ray player when hooked up to a non-2.0a device, and can even downrez to 1080p if the media allows it.

Steve Goff
Steve Goff is offline  
post #13902 of 19419 Old 02-10-2016, 01:42 PM
AVS Forum Addicted Member
 
stanger89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Marion, IA
Posts: 23,130
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4156 Post(s)
Liked: 2384
Quote:
Originally Posted by zombie10k View Post
stanger how are you using it with your 4910, do you have one of those HDFury devices?
Yup, I've got an Integral, I'm hoping the PQ curve/remastering/encoding will be a noticeable improvement over BD, guess we'll see.
stanger89 is offline  
post #13903 of 19419 Old 02-10-2016, 01:47 PM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
cardoski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Beyond The Wall.
Posts: 4,779
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2530 Post(s)
Liked: 2808
Quote:
Originally Posted by stanger89 View Post
Yup, I've got an Integral, I'm hoping the PQ curve/remastering/encoding will be a noticeable improvement over BD, guess we'll see.

I will be interested in your impression, have been contemplating grabbing an HDfury for my X500. Would like to hold off on upgrading for at least one more year, but still get some benefit from UHD players.

Listening with Focal Elex headphones, Topping DSD Dac, SENCUN-audio tube preamp with tone control and Little Dot hybrid tube amp with GE tubes.

Watching in a room ensconced in velvet.
cardoski is offline  
post #13904 of 19419 Old 02-10-2016, 03:13 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Forum Addicted Member
 
zombie10k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 12,716
Mentioned: 159 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5236 Post(s)
Liked: 5487
another member posted this in the JVC thread. There will be a quiz on this entire workflow, study up..


Dave Vaughn likes this.
zombie10k is online now  
post #13905 of 19419 Old 02-10-2016, 03:19 PM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
pgwalsh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: CO & NZ
Posts: 2,483
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 572 Post(s)
Liked: 418
Quote:
Originally Posted by zombie10k View Post
another member posted this in the JVC thread. There will be a quiz on this entire workflow, study up..


Am I missing something, but I don't see up convert HD -> UHD or is that implied?
pgwalsh is offline  
post #13906 of 19419 Old 02-11-2016, 12:36 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
Frank Derks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Region A,B,C
Posts: 2,487
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 539 Post(s)
Liked: 413
And this must work seamlessly over the hdmi interface.


Last edited by Frank Derks; 02-11-2016 at 01:03 PM. Reason: e
Frank Derks is offline  
post #13907 of 19419 Old 02-11-2016, 05:26 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Forum Addicted Member
 
zombie10k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 12,716
Mentioned: 159 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5236 Post(s)
Liked: 5487
zombie10k is online now  
post #13908 of 19419 Old 02-11-2016, 05:32 PM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
blee0120's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 4,864
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 840 Post(s)
Liked: 543
Quote:
Originally Posted by zombie10k View Post
fire up the coffee maker.

Can't wait to hear your thoughts.
Highjinx likes this.
blee0120 is offline  
post #13909 of 19419 Old 02-11-2016, 07:08 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Forum Addicted Member
 
zombie10k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 12,716
Mentioned: 159 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5236 Post(s)
Liked: 5487
zombie10k is online now  
post #13910 of 19419 Old 02-11-2016, 07:29 PM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
darrellh44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: North Dallas
Posts: 1,533
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1033 Post(s)
Liked: 499
Can't believe he's makiing us wait this long
Highjinx and Paul Sim like this.
darrellh44 is offline  
post #13911 of 19419 Old 02-11-2016, 08:58 PM
Advanced Member
 
Mr. Hatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 986
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 216 Post(s)
Liked: 137
This looks interesting: http://www.lighting.philips.com/main...echnology.html

I'm conducting the hype train,Chugga Chugga Choo Choooooooo!

Respectfully,
Mr. Hatcher

Mr. Hatcher's hybrid-HT
Mr. Hatcher is offline  
post #13912 of 19419 Old 02-11-2016, 09:05 PM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
RapalloAV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 4,322
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2203 Post(s)
Liked: 766
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Hatcher View Post
This looks interesting: http://www.lighting.philips.com/main...echnology.html

I'm conducting the hype train,Chugga Chugga Choo Choooooooo!

For projector screens up to 100", who has that anymore???

Murray Thompson
X Owner RapalloAV
Absolutly no connection with RapalloNZ
CinemascopE Home Cinema Build & 2014 rebuild, plus new LED ceiling install Christmas 2018
RapalloAV is offline  
post #13913 of 19419 Old 02-11-2016, 09:24 PM
Advanced Member
 
Mr. Hatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 986
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 216 Post(s)
Liked: 137
Quote:
Originally Posted by RapalloAV View Post
For projector screens up to 100", who has that anymore???
Bedroom, bathroom, kids room, etc... I mean the possibilities are endless here!

Really though, the LG ultra short throw pumps out ~1000 lumens and this is supposed to be 3x brighter, so color me intrigued. I would imagine you could move it a little further out from the wall and get 120"+ image that is still plenty bright. Either way, it's pretty interesting tech. I'm just ready to throw my last lamp in the garbage and be done worrying with it for 5+ years. I use two JVC lamps per year, that's lame, and pricey.

Respectfully,
Mr. Hatcher

Mr. Hatcher's hybrid-HT
Mr. Hatcher is offline  
post #13914 of 19419 Old 02-12-2016, 08:19 PM
Member
 
lancenell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Spokane
Posts: 179
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 132 Post(s)
Liked: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Garrett View Post
If you go by use, then my go to display is a 52" TV. I certainly would not use that criteria to say that my TV is my best display. Rather than use that as a basis, I would use, what display do you use for critical viewing. It may be the same display, but I think that is a better judge.
Come on now. Give DejaVu a break. He's comparing Projectors, not PJ's (Apples) to TV's (Oranges).
lancenell is offline  
post #13915 of 19419 Old 02-13-2016, 07:17 PM
 
Seegs108's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 10,827
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5167 Post(s)
Liked: 2593
Sorry for the wall of text:

Today I traveled to western Massachusetts to visit a forum member whose dealer had an Epson LS10000 we could use for a fun little shootout. Bob (ultra 150 pilot on the forum) was nice enough to have me over for the afternoon and to use his theater for the shootout. I brought with me a JVC DLA-RS400 and JVC DLA-RS500. Unfortunately we didn't spend anywhere near as much time as we did last year doing side-by-side brightness matched comparisons when we compared the LS10000 to the JVC DLA-X500. We actually spent a decent amount of time measuring the LS10000 before and after the firmware update. Bob's dealer (who is also named Bob haha) received one of the first LS10000's in the country when they were released last year and as such it had a very old firmware on it. It was V114, which I believe was older than any other on the forum that I've seen mentioned thus far. A month or two ago there was a claim of a decent lumen increase after the firmware update from V115 to V130 so this is why we wanted to measured before and after the update. The projector was ceiling mounted and the lens itself was never changed (zoom) before and after the update. The update went smoothly (took about 3 minutes) and we went back and did the same brightness measurements. There was zero change in lumen output. Actually there was a TINY decrease in lumen output after the update. By tiny I mean 2-3% decrease in lumen out. This unit has 519 hours on it so the laser itself is well settled.

With that said I think I know where the claim that the lumen output increase comes from. I say this because the Epson sample we measured today was CONSIDERABLY brighter than any of the other early LS10000 reviews claim. These were the results with the lens at max zoom and the iris fully open and then closed:

Iris Closed: 17.9 ftL - 844 Lumens
Iris Open: 27.6 ftL - 1302 Lumens

For contrast with the iris open (max zoom) we measured a little under 15000:1

So these numbers do show that maybe the light source itself gets brighter after a few hundred hours of use. This is just my guess OR there might just be a ton of variability in lumen output between these units. I remember Kris Deering talking about how his sample unit was much brighter than the ~1000 lumens or so that many of the other reviews were claiming. But I think it's definitely fair to say that the firmware has NO bearing on the increase in lumen output with this machine. I think it's either luck of the draw or the laser/phosphor wheel gets 20-30% brighter after it has a decent amount of hours on it. I think it's the latter because I don't remember this unit being anywhere near this bright when we used it to compare it against the X500 last year. As far as e-shift goes I can't equivocally say anything. IIRC both Bob's took a hard look at the eshift performance before the update. Bob, the dealer, said it looked "a little better." But he also noted there was definitely still a soft, not-focused look to the image with eshift on. All three of us made the agreement with that. We would argue that unless you're watching 4K content it would be best to disable eshift. We didn't get a chance to compare it to the JVC's eshift performance but I've spent a great deal of time with generation 1-4 eshift on the JVC and all four of them beat the Epson'e implementation as far as that out-of-focus look the Epson has. You still get a less delineated pixel-free image with eshift on the JVC, but it doesn't have that out-of-focus look the Epson has.

The only side-by-side comparison we did was with the Epson and RS400. For me, at least, I thought the JVC was the clear winner with the content we watched Much greater image depth due to the far higher native contrast. The image simply popped quite a bit more. We looked at the RS500 alone with the same content and the amount of contrast was even greater. I will say the Epson did show more shadow detail compared to the JVCs but I'd chalk that up to not having the projector properly tweaked for his room/screen. We simply did not have time to calibrate all 5 projectors we looked at over the course of the day. The Epson looked "cleaner" with some content. With that said all three of us remember the X500 comparison and the JVC RS400/RS500 definitely lack some of the image noise that the X500 had in it's image. These new JVCs don't add image noise to the video. I have no way to prove it, but I think the video processing in the Epson has some sort of noise filter built into it. Because we I showed Bob and Bob a static image with my HTPC there was literally no noise visible within the image. This was something you could easily see in the image up close with older JVCs. Not so anymore.

I don't think we needed to spend as much time doing some of the A/B tests we did last year. From what I've seen JVC has widened the gap ever further this year so it kind of made those same comparisons superfluous. In my opinion the Epson doesn't really stand a chance when you consider the contrast gap with basically everything else being equal or better on the JVC. That's not to say that the Epson looks bad. It doesn't and is by far their greatest projector to date in terms of overall PQ. We actually spent quite a bit of time today discussing how this forum nit-picks far too much. I agree and am definitely one of those people. Anyone without the context we nit-pickers posses would be satisfied with any one of these units. But in terms of value we all agreed the RS400 is by far the best deal. Bob, the host, said several times he loves what the laser offers (long life consistent calibration and lumen output and no need to worry about how many times you turn it on or off) but just doesn't see the value proposition at it's current price point. The street price being so high is the main reason he chooses not to own it even though it's the unit he'd prefer to own. He realizes the performance might be a little less on the Epson compared to the JVC, but the quality of the laser is something that appeals to him very much. That slightly cleaner look on the Epson was also something he preferred over the JVC. I tried to make the argument that the Epson seems to be taking some detail out by removing image noise, but to Bob it's something he'd prefer to give him the type of image he wants. For me, if it's there in the source I want to see it and with how quickly I go through units, the laser offers me little, so it's not something I'd want to pay a hefty premium for. In a couple years we might see these light source altogether replace bulbs in the $3000+ market and then we probably won't see such a premium for it.

And while the three of us didn't get to A/B all three units we did spend a ton of time with LS10000 up on screen and I'm very familiar with the image of my RS500. I'm still partial to the RS500's image. We enabled the "fast" DI mode on the Epson to see how it handled the beginning of Star Wars Episode 3. I'm just not a fan of how it works with fade to blacks. It's too obvious in it's operation for me and with the crawling text the dynamic gamma was changing the color of the text from yellow to orange. Yuck. I really like how you can set a manual iris setting on the JVC and obtain better contrast (and brightness if you choose) than the Epson can do dynamically and NEVER worry about the image looking wonky. I told Bob that why I appreciate the JVCs so much. There's no need to manipulate the image to get an amazing looking image.
mishari84 likes this.
Seegs108 is offline  
post #13916 of 19419 Old 02-13-2016, 07:17 PM
 
Seegs108's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 10,827
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5167 Post(s)
Liked: 2593
Sorry for the wall of text:

Today I traveled to western Massachusetts to visit a forum member whose dealer had an Epson LS10000 we could use for a fun little shootout. Bob (ultra 150 pilot on the forum) was nice enough to have me over for the afternoon and to use his theater for the shootout. I brought with me a JVC DLA-RS400 and JVC DLA-RS500. Unfortunately this time we didn't spend anywhere near as much time as we did last year doing side-by-side brightness matched comparisons when we compared the LS10000 to the JVC DLA-X500. We actually spent a decent amount of time measuring the LS10000 before and after the firmware update. Bob's dealer (who is also named Bob haha) received one of the first LS10000's in the country when they were released last year and as such it had a very old firmware on it. It was V114, which I believe was older than any other on the forum that I've seen mentioned thus far. A month or two ago there was a claim of a decent lumen increase after the firmware update from V115 to V130 so this is why we wanted to measured before and after the update. The projector was ceiling mounted and the lens itself was never changed (zoom) before and after the update. The update went smoothly (took about 3 minutes) and we went back and did the same brightness measurements. There was zero change in lumen output. Actually there was a TINY decrease in lumen output after the update. By tiny I mean 2-3% decrease in lumen out. This unit has 519 hours on it so the laser itself is well settled.

With that said I think I know where the claim that the lumen output increase comes from. I say this because the Epson sample we measured today was CONSIDERABLY brighter than any of the other early LS10000 reviews claim. These were the results with the lens at max zoom and the iris fully open and then closed:

Iris Closed: 17.9 ftL - 844 Lumens
Iris Open: 27.6 ftL - 1302 Lumens

For contrast with the iris open (max zoom) we measured a little under 15000:1

So these numbers do show that maybe the light source itself gets brighter after a few hundred hours of use. This is just my guess OR there might just be a ton of variability in lumen output between these units. I remember Kris Deering talking about how his sample unit was much brighter than the ~1000 lumens or so that many of the other reviews were claiming. But I think it's definitely fair to say that the firmware has NO bearing on the increase in lumen output with this machine. I think it's either luck of the draw or the laser/phosphor wheel gets 20-30% brighter after it has a decent amount of hours on it. I think it's the latter because I don't remember this unit being anywhere near this bright when we used it to compare it against the X500 last year. As far as e-shift goes I can't unequivocally say anything. IIRC both Bob's took a hard look at the eshift performance before the update. Bob, the dealer, said it looked "a little better." But he also noted there was definitely still a soft, not-focused look to the image with eshift on. All three of us made the agreement with that. We would argue that unless you're watching 4K content it would be best to disable eshift. We didn't get a chance to compare it to the JVC's eshift performance but I've spent a great deal of time with generation 1-4 eshift on the JVC and all four of them beat the Epson'e implementation as far as that out-of-focus look the Epson has goes. You still get a less delineated pixel-free image with eshift on the JVC, but it doesn't have that out-of-focus look the Epson has.

The only side-by-side comparison we did was with the Epson and RS400. For me, at least, I thought the JVC was the clear winner with the content we watched Much greater image depth due to the far higher native contrast. The image simply popped quite a bit more. We looked at the RS500 alone with the same content and the amount of contrast was even greater. That's really all the RS500 has over the RS400 in terms of raw image quality potential. I will say the Epson did show more shadow detail compared to the JVCs but I'd chalk that up to not having the projector properly tweaked for his room/screen. We simply did not have time to calibrate all 5 projectors we looked at over the course of the day. The Epson looked "cleaner" with some content. With that said all three of us remember the X500 comparison and the JVC RS400/RS500 definitely lack some of the image noise that the X500 had in it's image. These new JVCs don't add image noise to the video. I have no way to prove it, but I think the video processing in the Epson has some sort of noise filter built into it. Because when I showed Bob and Bob a static image with my HTPC there was literally no noise visible within the image. It appeared perfectly clean and stable. So unless the JVC is somehow selectively choosing when to add noise I don't think the JVC is ever adding any and rather the Epson is simply muting some of it.

I don't think we needed to spend as much time doing some of the A/B tests we did last year. From what I've seen JVC has widened the gap ever further this year so it kind of made those same comparisons superfluous. In my opinion the Epson doesn't really stand a chance when you consider the contrast gap with basically everything else being equal or better on the JVC. That's not to say that the Epson looks bad. It doesn't and is by far their greatest projector to date in terms of overall PQ. We actually spent quite a bit of time today discussing how this forum nit-picks far too much. I agree and am definitely one of those people. Anyone without the context we nit-pickers posses would be satisfied with any one of these units. But in terms of value we all agreed the RS400 is by far the best deal. Bob, the host, said several times he loves what the laser offers (long life consistent calibration and lumen output and no need to worry about how many times you turn it on or off) but just doesn't see the value proposition at it's current price point. The street price being so high is the main reason he chooses not to own it even though it's the unit he'd prefer to own. He realizes the performance might be a little less on the Epson compared to the JVC, but the quality of the laser is something that appeals to him very much. That slightly cleaner look on the Epson was also something he preferred over the JVC. I tried to make the argument that the Epson seems to be taking some detail out by removing image noise, but to Bob it's something he'd prefer to give him the type of image he wants. For me, if it's there in the source I want to see it and with how quickly I go through units, the laser offers me little, so it's not something I'd want to pay a hefty premium for. In a couple years we might see this light source altogether replace bulbs in the $3000+ market and then we probably won't see such a premium for it.

And while the three of us didn't get to A/B all three units we did spend a ton of time with LS10000 up on screen and I'm very familiar with the image of my RS500. I'm still partial to the RS500's image. We enabled the "fast" DI mode on the Epson to see how it handled the beginning of Star Wars Episode 3. I chose this because there's a few fade to blacks and it's nice and contrasty I'm just not a fan of how it works with fade to blacks. It's too obvious in it's operation for me. The light would pop in and out of existence (which was obvious to me) and with the crawling text the dynamic gamma was changing the color of the text from yellow to orange. Yuck. It's just not for me. I really like how you can set a manual iris setting on the JVC and obtain better contrast (and brightness if you choose) than the Epson can do dynamically and NEVER worry about the image looking wonky. I told Bob that why I appreciate the JVCs so much. There's no need to manipulate the image to get an amazing looking image.

Last edited by Seegs108; 02-13-2016 at 07:31 PM.
Seegs108 is offline  
post #13917 of 19419 Old 02-13-2016, 09:21 PM
Senior Member
 
Paul Sim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 259
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 166 Post(s)
Liked: 150
Hello Seegs,

Well, your write up is actually rather balanced and thoughtful and I enjoyed reading the review which is a bonus. As an LS10000 owner I wish you liked its performance more but you have given your reasons and that's OK with me. Your findings regarding the light output are in line with my own which is refreshing. It seems that e-shift is one of those things one either likes or dislikes on the LS10000. As for the dynamic laser, a good friend of mine feels similarly to you, that it is gimmicky. Whereas I love its operation. The normal setting might be more acceptable to some and I think this is a personal choice at the end of the day. Oddly I am not getting the gamma colour shifts you describe. I havn't see it at all on Star Wars episode 3 but I'll have another look. It was obviously occurring on your unit. My unit is a good 14 months older so just maybe something has changed but I'll report back for completeness.

One thing I do agree on is the incredible value of the RS400. I still have no idea how JVC packed so much in to such a reasonably priced projector. A contender for the bargain of the century for sure.
Paul Sim is offline  
post #13918 of 19419 Old 02-14-2016, 01:51 AM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked: 3
Regarding the 4K enhancement settings on the Epson LS10000, as we know, some reviewers do comment that they think the 4K enhancement makes the image look softer and advise not using it.

My opinion after watching nearly 50 movies on the Epson so far is that for most high quality blu-rays its better ON at level 4K-1. For me, it adds an analogue/filmic look to the image with no loss of detail. For additional sharpness you can of course use 4K-2 to 5.

A good example is "The Adventures of TinTin". With 4K enhancement OFF, yes, it looks razor sharp and very satisfying, however, with 4K enhancement ON it looks even better.
Other standout examples I can think of are "The Equaliser", "Hancock", "Lone Survivor", "The Last Stand".
MovieAddictUk is offline  
post #13919 of 19419 Old 02-14-2016, 08:47 AM
 
Seegs108's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 10,827
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5167 Post(s)
Liked: 2593
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Sim View Post
Hello Seegs,

Well, your write up is actually rather balanced and thoughtful and I enjoyed reading the review which is a bonus. As an LS10000 owner I wish you liked its performance more but you have given your reasons and that's OK with me. Your findings regarding the light output are in line with my own which is refreshing. It seems that e-shift is one of those things one either likes or dislikes on the LS10000. As for the dynamic laser, a good friend of mine feels similarly to you, that it is gimmicky. Whereas I love its operation. The normal setting might be more acceptable to some and I think this is a personal choice at the end of the day. Oddly I am not getting the gamma colour shifts you describe. I havn't see it at all on Star Wars episode 3 but I'll have another look. It was obviously occurring on your unit. My unit is a good 14 months older so just maybe something has changed but I'll report back for completeness.

One thing I do agree on is the incredible value of the RS400. I still have no idea how JVC packed so much in to such a reasonably priced projector. A contender for the bargain of the century for sure.
I can understand why people find the LS10000's image appealing. The host of the meet really likes what the laser light source offers. To him it makes up for the lesser performance attributes it has compared to the JVCs and then some. He said if it were priced a little more aggressively with the JVCs he'd buy one. I'd imagine that sentiment applies to many people looking into the Epson.

As far as the gamma goes, that's inherent in how most dynamic irises function. Including the Epson's implementation. Along with modulating the light that goes through the light engine, there is a software portion of the dynamic contrast system that modulates the gamma curve to compensate for the light loss. Without the dynamic gamma system the image would simply look darker. You may just not be sensitive to it's workings. The JVC also has visible dynamic gamma changes when there are large changes in APL which force a large change in the dynamic contrast system.

Last edited by Seegs108; 02-14-2016 at 10:31 AM.
Seegs108 is offline  
post #13920 of 19419 Old 02-14-2016, 10:28 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
Deja Vu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: great white north
Posts: 5,522
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 997 Post(s)
Liked: 1041
Where I live both Epson and JVC price their projectors very, very aggressively -- not so the new 4K Sony. Where I am both the Epson and JVC projectors are the same list price as they are in the States. The new Samsung 4K BD player is $600 compared to $400 in the U.S. and this gives you an idea of the value the Epson and JVC projectors offer.


Seegs, you got a good taste of individual differences -- your host still preferred the LS10000 as I do based on his personal preferences even though you debated with him why he should not. Different strokes for different folks.


I've been saying for some time that the RS400 was a best buy among projectors at the moment and your shootout helps to confirm this. I'll go out on a limb and say that I think the RS600 is by far the worst buy among what JVC offers. I'll be very surprised (I may be wrong) if the RS600 offers much of anything beyond what the RS500 does, yet it costs 158% more than the RS500 and 238% more than the RS400. Personally I don't find any image differences between the RS400 and the RS500 except for fades. the RS500 has better native contrast but you'd be hard pressed to complain about how the RS400 handles low APL scenes especially if you use the DI. So, just how much better is the RS600 than the RS500? Just what do you get for the significant increase in price?


I think it's time for someone to do an unbiased comparison of the RS500 vs. the RS600.


Nice little shootout Seegs -- I have these three projectors stacked right now in my HT -- I don't have to travel or make any arrangements to see them. Too bad you didn't have an RS600 to throw into the mix. When it comes to value propositions that's the one I'd like to see put under the microscope.
DavidHir likes this.

Last edited by Deja Vu; 02-14-2016 at 10:34 AM.
Deja Vu is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply Digital Hi-End Projectors - $3,000+ USD MSRP

Tags
Benq W7000 Home Projection System , Jvc Dla Rs55 Bundle , Jvc Dla Rs45 Home Theater Projector 1080p Hdmi , Epson V11h502020 Powerlite Home Cinema 3020e 2d And 3d 1080p Wireless Home Theater Projector , Sony Vpl Hw50es 3d Projector , Epson 5010 Powerlite Home Cinema 3d Front Projector , Epson Powerlite Home Cinema 3010 2d And 3d Projector V11h421020 , Panasonic Ptae8000u Hd Projector , Mitsubishi Hc7900dw Home Theater 3d Projector , Mitsubishi Hc8000dbl Dlp 3d Home Theater Projector With Spare Lamp 1300 Ansi 12 6 Lbs , Darbeevision Darblet Hdmi Video Processor , Epson 5020ub Powerlite Home Cinema 3d Front Projector

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off