The Blacker the Theater, The Better the Image - Page 3 - AVS Forum | Home Theater Discussions And Reviews
Forum Jump: 
 2678Likes
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #61 of 6147 Old 03-30-2013, 03:17 PM
AVS Forum Addicted Member
 
R Harkness's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 15,118
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2751 Post(s)
Liked: 2650
Quote:
Originally Posted by Craig Peer View Post

Rich, I have to give you credit - after just watching movies happily in our theater for the last 3 years, I ran across your theater build thread again here at AVS forum a couple of months ago. For some reason, it gave me the bug to start changing my theater to see if I could darken it enough ( without going to the " every square inch is black velvet " extreme and pissing off my wife ), to create an enviroment where a white screen worked as well or better than my Firehawk. When I reached the point where a StudioTek 130 G3 sample looked as good on really dark scenes as my Firehawk did, I decided to pull the trigger and replace my Firehawk. That required painting my ceiling very dark gray, painting my light gray walls darker gray, totally covering the beige carpet with a wall to wall black rug ( s ), and a few other tricks.

The new StudioTek 130 G3 screen looks absolutely outstanding ! Watched Flight on it Wed. night after installing it. It was almost like looking out a window at the real world. With the Lumis the picture is just top notch. Thank you for inspiring me to get back to work improving my theater. The payoff is more than worth the effort and expense !! Craig smile.gif

PS - the moral of the story is you don't necessarily have to go 100% black - depending on the room, very dark grey flat paint in various shades can work too ( with black velvet around your screen ). You can make a room work and have some WAF too!

Boy, that's gratifying to read Craig.

I was tormented when choosing a screen (as many of us have been) and had considered the Firehawk for quite a while. I'd seen it in action so many times and the way it kept such great contrast and black levels always amazed me. But I felt I needed a bit more brightness and ultimately I'm a stickler for even illumination/screen uniformity, lack of screen artifacts etc, so I went with the ST-130. The ST-130 immediately amazed me with the general quality of the image - the brightnes/"pop"/clarity/detail etc. But I have to admit it DID take some effort in room treatment to get where I felt I was getting both the benefits of the ST-130 and the high contrast/black levels I'd often see on Firehawk images. (Obviously, with all the caveats in there about variables of projectors/brightness/screen size etc determining these things). Now when I see a JVC projector on the Firehawk I am particularly aware of the screen texture, hot-spotting and slightly lower brightness. I feel I get more "wow" factor and closer to the whole shebang of image quality when I watch my projector/screen set up at home.

Do these observations jive with your own experience of life after the Firehawk?
R Harkness is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #62 of 6147 Old 03-30-2013, 03:52 PM
AVS Forum Addicted Member
 
Craig Peer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 15,552
Mentioned: 106 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6483 Post(s)
Liked: 7475
Quote:
Do these observations jive with your own experience of life after the Firehawk?

They do, however, it does take considerable effort on the room. The Firehawk still is a good screen and has its place. But if one can alter a room like you did - the ST 130 G3 can't be beat. My room is about 85% there.

Watched Skyfall last night - looked just stunning !! smile.gif
Craig Peer is online now  
post #63 of 6147 Old 03-31-2013, 06:43 PM
AVS Forum Addicted Member
 
mark haflich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Venice, Florida, USA
Posts: 21,464
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1418 Post(s)
Liked: 1014
One more business trip for your wife and you will be able to finish it. smile.gif

BTW If your screen is small enough or your projector is bright enough, the Stewart Snomatt 100 is vastly superior in image quality than the ST 130G3. I know, I made the switch .Dramatic improvement.
mark haflich is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #64 of 6147 Old 03-31-2013, 09:07 PM
AVS Forum Club Gold
 
joerod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: MIDWEST (just outside Chicago)
Posts: 23,724
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1113 Post(s)
Liked: 1184
I finished the project late Friday. My Wife and her sister were laughing playing the song "Black Velvet" on Saturday. We watched This is 40 and they all said it looked 10 times darker and better. The walls, floor and ceiling seemed to disappear. My new avatar shows the outcome but I may post a pic of it tomorrow. Total work time about 14 hours. Cost was around 150.00 (black velvet with 50% off coupons, big steps pads, spray adhesive). I plan to document the project on my site soon. Thanks again Sowk for the inspiration and ideas. smile.gif

4K HDR10- ignore the “rules” and trust your eyes!
joerod is offline  
post #65 of 6147 Old 04-01-2013, 12:11 AM
AVS Forum Addicted Member
 
DaGamePimp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 16,199
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 549 Post(s)
Liked: 583
I mean no offense to anyone but this is an unusual thread, I am reading and it feels like it was caught in a time warp or something, as if this was some new breakthrough idea that a black-out HT would deliver optimal viewing conditions. confused.gif

I was in a velvet treated (CRT based) HT some 12 years ago and it was impressive but even then the owner stated the designer had already been doing it for years (I wonder who that designer was/is, he must have been way ahead of his time).

Odd too that it has sparked the fire for some of the more enthusiastic enthusiasts.

Jason

HT = Sony HW45ES @133" / Lumagen Radiance / Denon x5200 7.3.4 Atmos / B&K 5000 II amp / Boston VR2/VR12/CR67 speakers / Rythmik 12" subs x2 / CV 15" sub / Sony x800 / Toshiba HD-A3
Media Room = Sony 65x930e / Denon x3300 /Klipsch speakers /Velodyne subs /Sony x700 /PS4 Pro + PSVR/WiiU/PS3/360/Wii/ 2080 TI game PC / Multi-Arcade / Virtual Pinball TRE45ON
DaGamePimp is offline  
post #66 of 6147 Old 04-01-2013, 04:47 AM - Thread Starter
Home Theater Enthusiast
 
SOWK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: WI
Posts: 5,644
Mentioned: 117 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1251 Post(s)
Liked: 1821
Joerod, you are welcome. Also around your screen is even darker then mine now. smile.gif

Wisconsin Home Theater Enthusiasts Meet: Main Thread l Gear For Sale
SOWK Home Theater
SOWK is online now  
post #67 of 6147 Old 04-01-2013, 05:14 AM
Member
 
Ian13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 138
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked: 11
Great job guys

I have a question not regarding the light absorbency of the black velvet fabric but its acoustic transparency.
I am wanting to use Fidelio Black Velvet fabric on false walls (front, sides and rear) which will be in front of the existing walls which have all my acoustic treatments and speakers attached, so my question is:

Is the Fidelio Velvet acoustically transparent enough to be able to use it for my application or would i need to stick with something like GOM FR701?

I'm needing the light absorbency as well as the acoustical transparency.

appreciate your feedback
Ian13 is offline  
post #68 of 6147 Old 04-01-2013, 06:15 AM
AVS Forum Club Gold
 
joerod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: MIDWEST (just outside Chicago)
Posts: 23,724
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1113 Post(s)
Liked: 1184


Very happy with the "black out" results. This Black Velvet came from Joanne Fabrics. It was their stretch type which really worked well. I was able to pull it super tight towards the edges so it seemed like a second skin. Only two in my area had it in stock. Well worth the drive to get it. It is even darker than my Carada Masquerade. Maybe I should cover it. biggrin.gif Just kidding. Seriously though the walls seem to disappear during a movie now. When I had it painted flat black you could see the light reflection. Not now. smile.gif

Oh, last night I put a piece over my corner sub and now you can't even see it anymore either. eek.gif

4K HDR10- ignore the “rules” and trust your eyes!
joerod is offline  
post #69 of 6147 Old 04-01-2013, 06:44 AM
AVS Forum Addicted Member
 
R Harkness's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 15,118
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2751 Post(s)
Liked: 2650
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian13 View Post

Great job guys

I have a question not regarding the light absorbency of the black velvet fabric but its acoustic transparency.
I am wanting to use Fidelio Black Velvet fabric on false walls (front, sides and rear) which will be in front of the existing walls which have all my acoustic treatments and speakers attached, so my question is:

Is the Fidelio Velvet acoustically transparent enough to be able to use it for my application or would i need to stick with something like GOM FR701?

I'm needing the light absorbency as well as the acoustical transparency.

appreciate your feedback

The Fidelio is thick and heavily backed. It is not acoustically transparent and won't serve the needs you described. GOM type fabric will be best in terms of acoustic transparency. If you want a sort of in between solution there is this velvet:

Silk/Viscose Velvet Black (Devore)

http://www.whaleys-bradford.ltd.uk/product.htm?productID=124

It is both one of the darkest, most light absorbing velvets you can buy, and also happens to be (mostly) acoustically transparent. Many of the guys on the UK AVforum use it. For a bit more detailed description of it's characteristics and how I used it, see my recent post on this material on my build thread:

https://www.avsforum.com/t/1254505/rich-hs-variable-image-size-home-theater-build-thread-completed/180#post_23146092
guptown likes this.
R Harkness is offline  
post #70 of 6147 Old 04-01-2013, 06:59 AM
AVS Forum Addicted Member
 
R Harkness's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 15,118
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2751 Post(s)
Liked: 2650
Looks awesome Joerod. A perfect black box. No equipment lights or reflections around the image. The ideal.
R Harkness is offline  
post #71 of 6147 Old 04-01-2013, 07:00 AM
AVS Forum Club Gold
 
joerod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: MIDWEST (just outside Chicago)
Posts: 23,724
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1113 Post(s)
Liked: 1184


Last pic, I promise. biggrin.gif

I had a few people ask me about the floor so I added this close up showing how dark it really is. With lights on it can sometimes look lighter but once the lights are dimmed all bets are off. It is like walking into the black hole.

4K HDR10- ignore the “rules” and trust your eyes!
joerod is offline  
post #72 of 6147 Old 04-01-2013, 07:03 AM
AVS Forum Club Gold
 
joerod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: MIDWEST (just outside Chicago)
Posts: 23,724
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1113 Post(s)
Liked: 1184
Quote:
Originally Posted by R Harkness View Post

Looks awesome Joerod. A perfect black box. No equipment lights or reflections around the image. The ideal.

Thanks. smile.gif

4K HDR10- ignore the “rules” and trust your eyes!
joerod is offline  
post #73 of 6147 Old 04-01-2013, 07:07 AM
AVS Forum Addicted Member
 
R Harkness's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 15,118
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2751 Post(s)
Liked: 2650
Quote:
Originally Posted by joerod View Post



Last pic, I promise. biggrin.gif

I had a few people ask me about the floor so I added this close up showing how dark it really is. With lights on it can sometimes look lighter but once the lights are dimmed all bets are off. It is like walking into the black hole.

We did the same thing for the floor area, it seems. I extended the black velvet out a few feet (covered boards) on the floor. What I like about doing this is not only does it make the floor near the screen disappear, but it provides a more cohesive, designed look. The little black "stage" area provides a natural demarcated point in which L/C/R speakers can sit, separated from the rest of the room. Without this area
you get more of the "i put up a big screen and placed some speakers on the floor near the screen"...a more "equipment thrown together" look, which I personally would like to avoid. Covering my speakers with black velvet further increased the coherence of the screen area.
R Harkness is offline  
post #74 of 6147 Old 04-01-2013, 07:11 AM
AVS Forum Addicted Member
 
R Harkness's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 15,118
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2751 Post(s)
Liked: 2650
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaGamePimp View Post

I mean no offense to anyone but this is an unusual thread, I am reading and it feels like it was caught in a time warp or something, as if this was some new breakthrough idea that a black-out HT would deliver optimal viewing conditions. confused.gif

I was in a velvet treated (CRT based) HT some 12 years ago and it was impressive but even then the owner stated the designer had already been doing it for years (I wonder who that designer was/is, he must have been way ahead of his time).

Odd too that it has sparked the fire for some of the more enthusiastic enthusiasts.

Jason

I can understand some of that sentiment. I was blacking out around my plasma since 2001 or so, and even though when I moved to projection I didn't have the luxury of a dedicated room, it was an absolute requirement for me to black around the image at least, and cut reflections in general. I can understand the problem of treating non-dedicated rooms (that's what I had to deal with) and why therefore the decor can be sub-optimal for projection. But when it comes to dedicated home theaters, all the work that goes into them (and/or all the money if you are paying a pro), I'm often surprised at the light decor choices I see in people's dedicated theaters. (Funny enough, the images of pro-installs I see in AV magazines are at least as guilty and I have to presume they were following some sort of aesthetic orders of the client vs doing what was best for the image).
R Harkness is offline  
post #75 of 6147 Old 04-01-2013, 08:54 AM
Senior Member
 
KRGM1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 282
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 82 Post(s)
Liked: 37
I think a lot of people build their theaters for social purposes rather than to get the best picture. In a really dark room it can be a problem just to see to get in and out.

My theater is very dark. I used Black GOM on all acoustic panels and painted the walls and ceiling black. The walls behind my acoustic panels are also black. I used Rosco paint which has been discussed extensively in this forum(https://www.avsforum.com/t/1218000/the-blackest-most-flat-paint-period). I compromised a bit on my carpet in front of the screen using a gold and black pattern but it is still fairly dark. I used velvet around the screen and on the stage.

I would love to see a Stewart Snomatt 100 screen in my theater but I don't think my projector is bright enough to use a neutral gain screen( I have an AT Stewart ST130 G3).
KRGM1 is offline  
post #76 of 6147 Old 04-01-2013, 08:54 AM
AVS Forum Addicted Member
 
Craig Peer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 15,552
Mentioned: 106 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6483 Post(s)
Liked: 7475
Quote:
I mean no offense to anyone but this is an unusual thread, I am reading and it feels like it was caught in a time warp or something, as if this was some new breakthrough idea that a black-out HT would deliver optimal viewing conditions.

I was in a velvet treated (CRT based) HT some 12 years ago and it was impressive but even then the owner stated the designer had already been doing it for years (I wonder who that designer was/is, he must have been way ahead of his time).

Odd too that it has sparked the fire for some of the more enthusiastic enthusiasts.

Jason

Jason, you have to remember that there are always new people here on the forum, asking whether to get a white or grey screen for their gloss white home theater. So these subjects need to be re-visited over the years.

As far as "sparking the fire for some of the more enthusiastic enthusiasts ", I just got busy rock climbing, collecting vintage wine, learning white water kayaking and learning / training to do winter biathlon the last couple of years. But now I'm back into " the messing with the home theater " phase again. When I finish doing a few more improvements to our theater, I'll be back to just watching movies for awhile.......................and so it goes ! smile.gif

Quote:
One more business trip for your wife and you will be able to finish it.

Ha ha - Mark, you are reading my mind.....................cool.gif
Craig Peer is online now  
post #77 of 6147 Old 04-01-2013, 01:10 PM
Member
 
Ian13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 138
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by R Harkness View Post

The Fidelio is thick and heavily backed. It is not acoustically transparent and won't serve the needs you described. GOM type fabric will be best in terms of acoustic transparency. If you want a sort of in between solution there is this velvet:

Silk/Viscose Velvet Black (Devore)

http://www.whaleys-bradford.ltd.uk/product.htm?productID=124

It is both one of the darkest, most light absorbing velvets you can buy, and also happens to be (mostly) acoustically transparent. Many of the guys on the UK AVforum use it. For a bit more detailed description of it's characteristics and how I used it, see my recent post on this material on my build thread:

https://www.avsforum.com/t/1254505/rich-hs-variable-image-size-home-theater-build-thread-completed/180#post_23146092

Thanks for the detailed reply- much appreciated.

I apologise upfront for i should have mentioned in my post that i am able to get the Fidelio Velvet without any backing on it - would this help enough to consider it?
I will definetly check out the velvet you have mentioned and have a read of your build thread.

cheers
Ian13 is offline  
post #78 of 6147 Old 04-01-2013, 01:22 PM
AVS Forum Addicted Member
 
R Harkness's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 15,118
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2751 Post(s)
Liked: 2650
I haven't seen the Fidelio without backing, so I couldn't help you. Sorry.
R Harkness is offline  
post #79 of 6147 Old 04-01-2013, 10:26 PM
Senior Member
 
Jim Cutter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
Posts: 480
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 173 Post(s)
Liked: 182
Quote:
Originally Posted by joerod View Post



Very happy with the "black out" results. This Black Velvet came from Joanne Fabrics. It was their stretch type which really worked well. I was able to pull it super tight towards the edges so it seemed like a second skin. Only two in my area had it in stock. Well worth the drive to get it. It is even darker than my Carada Masquerade. Maybe I should cover it. biggrin.gif Just kidding. Seriously though the walls seem to disappear during a movie now. When I had it painted flat black you could see the light reflection. Not now. smile.gif

Oh, last night I put a piece over my corner sub and now you can't even see it anymore either. eek.gif

Looks great around the screen but does all the light wood, posters & equipment add any distractions while viewing a movie in any way? I've always thought that you should never put the equipment on the front wall with your screen. How big is the screen? It looks so small for the space. eek.gif Either that or that is one huge room! smile.gif

Theater Room - JVC RS2000, Dalite 148" Scope, Pioneer SC-65, Panasonic UB820, Energy APS 5+2(2), Energy AC 300(1), Energy CR-3(4), PSA 15"Sub(2)
Sports Room - JVC RS4810, Dalite 106" 16:9, Onkyo TX-SR875, Oppo BDP-103, Energy C-7(2) w/Energy S8.2(2), Energy C-C3(1) w/Energy S10.2(1), Energy CR-3(3), Energy S12.3
Jim Cutter is offline  
post #80 of 6147 Old 04-02-2013, 04:27 PM
AVS Forum Club Gold
 
joerod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: MIDWEST (just outside Chicago)
Posts: 23,724
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1113 Post(s)
Liked: 1184
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Cutter View Post

Looks great around the screen but does all the light wood, posters & equipment add any distractions while viewing a movie in any way? I've always thought that you should never put the equipment on the front wall with your screen. How big is the screen? It looks so small for the space. eek.gif Either that or that is one huge room! smile.gif

It's actually 120" screen. I took that pic from 24 feet away (over half of my basement is dedicated to my theater). The screen was also closed in 2.35:1 (Carada Masquerade). With the lights off you dont see posters or the rack way off to the right. You get completely immersed with the screen area. It works very well and I only wish I did it sooner. Oh and it is actually a darker shade of brown. That is camera flash making it look light.

smile.gif

4K HDR10- ignore the “rules” and trust your eyes!
joerod is offline  
post #81 of 6147 Old 04-02-2013, 10:14 PM
Senior Member
 
Jim Cutter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
Posts: 480
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 173 Post(s)
Liked: 182
Quote:
Originally Posted by joerod View Post

It's actually 120" screen. I took that pic from 24 feet away (over half of my basement is dedicated to my theater). The screen was also closed in 2.35:1 (Carada Masquerade). With the lights off you dont see posters or the rack way off to the right. You get completely immersed with the screen area. It works very well and I only wish I did it sooner. Oh and it is actually a darker shade of brown. That is camera flash making it look light.

smile.gif

That makes more sense! Hard to get the scale of the size & color with the flash. Thanks for the explanation. smile.gif

Theater Room - JVC RS2000, Dalite 148" Scope, Pioneer SC-65, Panasonic UB820, Energy APS 5+2(2), Energy AC 300(1), Energy CR-3(4), PSA 15"Sub(2)
Sports Room - JVC RS4810, Dalite 106" 16:9, Onkyo TX-SR875, Oppo BDP-103, Energy C-7(2) w/Energy S8.2(2), Energy C-C3(1) w/Energy S10.2(1), Energy CR-3(3), Energy S12.3
Jim Cutter is offline  
post #82 of 6147 Old 04-03-2013, 04:23 AM
AVS Forum Club Gold
 
joerod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: MIDWEST (just outside Chicago)
Posts: 23,724
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1113 Post(s)
Liked: 1184
No worries. smile.gif

I should do a close up shot.

4K HDR10- ignore the “rules” and trust your eyes!
joerod is offline  
post #83 of 6147 Old 04-04-2013, 02:32 PM
Advanced Member
 
avsform1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 608
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 77 Post(s)
Liked: 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by Craig Peer View Post

They do, however, it does take considerable effort on the room. The Firehawk still is a good screen and has its place. But if one can alter a room like you did - the ST 130 G3 can't be beat. My room is about 85% there.

Watched Skyfall last night - looked just stunning !! smile.gif


Craig,

Why didn't you select the Studio Tek 100? I would think that a 1.3 gain would not be necessary in a really dark room.
avsform1 is offline  
post #84 of 6147 Old 04-04-2013, 04:15 PM
AVS Forum Addicted Member
 
Craig Peer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 15,552
Mentioned: 106 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6483 Post(s)
Liked: 7475
Quote:
Craig,

Why didn't you select the Studio Tek 100? I would think that a 1.3 gain would not be necessary in a really dark room.

Three reasons.

A - my room isn't a completely black velvet lined pit. It's dark, but not to that extreme. So the ST 100 could wash out more *.

B - I am only using the StudioTek 130 G3 for my 2.35:1 screen. I don't use an anamorphic lens - I have too short a throw distance. So I use a 1.1 or 1 gain screen for the 16:9 screen, and by using a 1.3 gain screen for the 2.35:1 screen, it pretty much matches the brightness of the 16:9 screen even with the light lost from blanking part of the chip for 2.35:1. .
C - I like a bright picture - 20 foot lamberts ( or at least 18 foot lamberts ). cool.gif

I am planning on replacing my current 16:9 gain screen too in the near future.

Trust me, when you watch a Lumis with a new lamp on a 118" wide 2.35:1 ST 130 G3 at 20 FL - it isn't a very dark room any more.......... eek.gif



Quote:
*
The StudioTek 100 is a professional screen primarily intended for use in post-production and optical lab scenarios. It will perform best in a black, non-reflective room environment. Stewart Filmscreen normally does not recommend that this screen material be used for home theater, since most consumers do not have the black walls, floors and ceiling required to eliminate reflected light for the screen's optimum performance.
Craig Peer is online now  
post #85 of 6147 Old 04-04-2013, 05:54 PM
Senior Member
 
Jim Cutter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
Posts: 480
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 173 Post(s)
Liked: 182
So I'm trying to figure out the best way to cover the wall around the screen & about 60" of the side walls & ceiling. Did most people just cover the walls & ceiling directly or cover something smaller & cover the area in pieces instead? I'm putting up my screen now & just ordered my projector so I want to get on this project soon. biggrin.gif

Theater Room - JVC RS2000, Dalite 148" Scope, Pioneer SC-65, Panasonic UB820, Energy APS 5+2(2), Energy AC 300(1), Energy CR-3(4), PSA 15"Sub(2)
Sports Room - JVC RS4810, Dalite 106" 16:9, Onkyo TX-SR875, Oppo BDP-103, Energy C-7(2) w/Energy S8.2(2), Energy C-C3(1) w/Energy S10.2(1), Energy CR-3(3), Energy S12.3
Jim Cutter is offline  
post #86 of 6147 Old 04-04-2013, 06:20 PM
AVS Forum Addicted Member
 
Craig Peer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 15,552
Mentioned: 106 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6483 Post(s)
Liked: 7475
Sort of depends on the size of the area you are covering. Black velvet drapes ( from Amazon ) were perfect in my theater behind the screen. Flat black paint above and black rugs below.
Craig Peer is online now  
post #87 of 6147 Old 04-04-2013, 07:02 PM
AVS Forum Addicted Member
 
millerwill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 12,082
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 608 Post(s)
Liked: 378
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Cutter View Post

So I'm trying to figure out the best way to cover the wall around the screen & about 60" of the side walls & ceiling. Did most people just cover the walls & ceiling directly or cover something smaller & cover the area in pieces instead? I'm putting up my screen now & just ordered my projector so I want to get on this project soon. biggrin.gif

I use black velvet on the side walls (and also around the screen on the screen wall) and protostar material on the ceiling out about 8 ft from the screen wall (attached to the ceiling with pushpins). I couldn't find a simple way to attach the velvet material to the ceiling without it sagging.
millerwill is offline  
post #88 of 6147 Old 04-04-2013, 07:54 PM
Advanced Member
 
avsform1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 608
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 77 Post(s)
Liked: 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by Craig Peer View Post

Three reasons.

A - my room isn't a completely black velvet lined pit. It's dark, but not to that extreme. So the ST 100 could wash out more *.

B - I am only using the StudioTek 130 G3 for my 2.35:1 screen. I don't use an anamorphic lens - I have too short a throw distance. So I use a 1.1 or 1 gain screen for the 16:9 screen, and by using a 1.3 gain screen for the 2.35:1 screen, it pretty much matches the brightness of the 16:9 screen even with the light lost from blanking part of the chip for 2.35:1. .
C - I like a bright picture - 20 foot lamberts ( or at least 18 foot lamberts ). cool.gif

I am planning on replacing my current 16:9 gain screen too in the near future.

Trust me, when you watch a Lumis with a new lamp on a 118" wide 2.35:1 ST 130 G3 at 20 FL - it isn't a very dark room any more.......... eek.gif

Without the lens are zooming or using VP to scale it?
avsform1 is offline  
post #89 of 6147 Old 04-04-2013, 08:01 PM
AVS Forum Addicted Member
 
Craig Peer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 15,552
Mentioned: 106 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6483 Post(s)
Liked: 7475
Quote:
Without the lens are zooming or using VP to scale it?

Zooming. 2.35:1 screen - 118" x 50.2" x 128.2" diagonal. 41.1 square feet

16:9 screen - 59.6" x 106" x 121.6" diagonal. 43.8 square feet.

The best of both worlds.....! smile.gif
Craig Peer is online now  
post #90 of 6147 Old 04-04-2013, 08:37 PM
Toe
AVS Forum Addicted Member
 
Toe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 16,622
Mentioned: 80 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2638 Post(s)
Liked: 3358
Quote:
Originally Posted by Craig Peer View Post

Zooming. 2.35:1 screen - 118" x 50.2" x 128.2" diagonal. 41.1 square feet

16:9 screen - 59.6" x 106" x 121.6" diagonal. 43.8 square feet.

The best of both worlds.....! smile.gif

Nice Craig! I like it. cool.gif
Toe is online now  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply Digital Hi-End Projectors - $3,000+ USD MSRP

Tags
Epson 5020ub Powerlite Home Cinema 3d Front Projector , Mitsubishi , Panasonic Blu Ray Disc Player Dmp Bd30k

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off