Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Mississauga, Ontario
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 200 Post(s)
Originally Posted by woofer
Originally Posted by SED <--- Rules
So the X9900 is outclassed by how much compared to the NX9? Is the NX9 10% better? 30%? 50%?
So in your setup there is no contrast difference between the two?
Thats so subjective...... for me the margin is large..
Obviously the X9900 fairs a little better contrast wise......but there is not much in it.. On a small screen and a short throw, it may well be a completely different outcome? Only commenting on what myself and others see on my setup.
I have had 6 people view both the X9900 and the NX9... all chose the NX9 as preference.[IMG class=inlineimg]/forum/images/smilies/smile.gif[/IMG]
If the x9900 is visually better in contrast between the NX9. I’m guessing the drop in contrast on the NX7 will be too big... the NX9 is out of my budget range and I would love a 4k panel on my 135” CinemaScope from 8.5-9 feet away.
But if the contrast will be that drastic, will everything else make up for it I wonder?
JVC DLA-NX9 | Paladin Anamorphic Lens | Panasonic UB820 | Denon AVR-X6400H | Rotel RB 993 Amp | 135" 2:35:1 Elunevision Aurora NanoEdge Ambient Light Blocking Screen | Paradigm Monitor 11 v7, Monitor Center 3 v7, Monitor Surround 3 v7, CI Pro P65-R |