Originally Posted by Cine4Home
Please be carefull with your accusations.
For these results we have like 3 Dozen witnesses (it was a public event) and even Mori can confirm this. Also this happens, when pictures get taken (here from a FB discussion) without notifying me and without the important context: The NX9 is indeed razor sharp. These macro pictures are not about optical sharpness of the NX9, these pictures just show the difference in White / Black contrast and their influence on sharpness perception.
Also I added several times, that the differences can not(!) be seen in normal viewing distances with movie content.
And I added, that with bright font on black background, the NX9 is as sharp as the VW870.
It is these incompetent and agressive discussions, mainly coming from people with special interest in pushing JVC, why I am not coming here anymore. Just sad...
Firstly, thank you Ekki for confirming that "The NX9 is indeed razor sharp"
Whilst we have you...
For the record, here's the offending photo:
This was posted onto your facebook page by you and even has your company's website stamped on it.
Firstly, why is the JVC image is blurred, including the physical screen and screen perforations, whereas in the SONY image the the physical screen and screen perforations are razor sharp? Because "these results"
that have been and are being inferred from this are in fact (understandably) that the SONY is considerably sharper than the JVC.
So thank you for confirming that is not the case and that your photos are by no means representative of what is the actual comparative performances of these projectors in this regard.
Please can you kindly confirm how exactly are you measuring 80,000:1 ON/OFF contrast with respect to an accurately calibrated SONY 885/760ES? And also similarly 50,000:1 ON/OFF Contrast performance with the SONY 995/870ES? Because no other video professional that I know of is able to replicate these measurements? Furthermore, there are a number of individuals, including Mori (since you mention him) who have cited these measurements of yours on more than one occasion on this forum.
It is extremely easy for me to visit Germany, and I am offering an award of £1,000 cash to anyone who is able to demonstrate to me that an accurately calibrated SONY 885/760ES is capable of measuring as such and the same applies with respect to the SONY 995/870ES; regarding which you are also claiming that you have measured a dynamic contrast multiplier of x2.5, something which also nobody else seems to be able to replicate.
I would therefore like to fly to Germany (at my expense) and for you to demonstrate to me that an accurately calibrated SONY 885/760ES measures 80,000:1 ON/OFF contrast and an accurately calibrated SONY 885/760ES measures 50,000:1 ON/OFF contrast, with a dynamic contrast multiplier of x2.5
In fact, I am going to offer to pay you £5,000 cash as well as post a public apology to you on this forum if you are able to do so
So, what dates are you free? Let's book a date in the diary. Since you are a busy chap I am very happy to fit in with whenever suits you