Originally Posted by hernanu
So 324 megapixels @ 90 degrees or 576 megapixels @ 120 degrees is really just a gross simplification of what we can actually see. Even that is ten times what 8K can deliver. We can probably see much more.
So when we get 80-90K displays, then we're talking!
Of course with the way my eyes are going these days, none of this will matter soon.....
Originally Posted by erkq
It depends on your angle of view.
Do you mean point of view, or literally viewing angle....?
Originally Posted by mtbdudex
When the cow is milked dry, you have to find another cow to milk ...
Look, the AV industry mid-long term plans, 5-8 years, shows diminished ROI because new sales/conquests are rightly so ending as things mature, so of course they are planting seeds for "the next best thing" now....
Sorry, but I won't drink the 8k Kool-aid for HT usage.
But I guess the question is, why wouldn't
it be the next best thing, the next evolution? I'd imagine a lot of folks said the same thing about 4K, and many still saying it. But drink the Koolaid or not, ultimately it seems like we don't have a choice as the industry makes standards and tech. obsolete - unless you detach from the hobby altogether!
I totally get your point. Kinda like smart phones - "they" do a great job of combining incremental improvements with sly marketing, and the next thing you know, you have a new iPhone of Galaxy at least every other year!