JVC Reveals Details of DLA-Z1 4K Laser Projector at IFA 2016 - AVS Forum | Home Theater Discussions And Reviews
Forum Jump: 
 211Likes
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 63 Old 09-03-2016, 10:54 AM - Thread Starter
Mark Henninger
 
imagic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 16,244
Mentioned: 457 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9288 Post(s)
Liked: 16441
JVC Reveals Details of DLA-Z1 4K Laser Projector at IFA 2016

The projector many AV enthusiasts have been waiting for has been fully unveiled at IFA 2016 in Berlin, Germany. JVC's DLA-Z1 (25,000 euros) fulfils the wish-list of videophiles craving the high contrast offered by JVC's D-ILA technology in a true 4K projector. Past JVC projectors have used a technique the company calls e-shift to achieve pseudo-4K, whereas this new model brings true 4K D-ILA to the table, and pairs it with a 20,000-hour, 3000-lumen laser-phosphor light source.


JVC's native 4K laser-phosphor D-ILA projector, the DLA-Z1.


JVC says the DLA-Z1 can cover 100% of the DCI/P3 color space that's used in commercial cinemas, as well as Ultra HD Blu-ray titles, and other 4K HDR content. Furthermore, the projector covers 80% of the ultra-wide rec.2020 color space, which is also supported by HDR content.

The laser-phosphor light source allows the DLA-Z1 to achieve 120,000:1 native contrast—hope your theater is truly all-black! JVC then goes further by claiming infinite contrast when the light source is modulated on a scene-by-scene basis. That's quite a bold claim since there's nowhere to go from infinity, but it really just means the projector can shut off the light when a scene fades to black. Anyhow, that scene-by-scene dynamic light output adjustment is something the ultra-fast response of the laser-phosphor light source is said to help with; how the projector handles an ANSI contrast pattern remains to be seen.

According to an article in CE Pro Europe, the three D-ILA devices used in the DLA-Z1 (one per primary color) are the smallest-ever, in addition to offering native 4K. The pixel gap has also been reduced by 31% versus earlier D-ILA designs.

This new model comes with a 100mm zoom lens that offers 100% vertical lens shift and 43% horizontal lens shift. JVC says the lens is designed to minimize diffraction and chromatic aberration, even when the lens is significantly shifted. Some other notable features include auto-calibration, support for 3D, a low-latency mode for gamers, an RS-232 port for home automation, and a heavy-duty air filter.

I wonder if I'll get to see the projector—JVC's new flagship—at CEDIA 2016. I hope so because bright, native 4K, laser-phosphor-lit projection featuring JVC's famously high-contrast D-ILA tech will surely be something to behold.

Interested in taking a deep-dive into the ongoing AVS Forum discussion of the DLA-Z1? Follow this link: https://www.avsforum.com/forum/24-dig...l#post46474665

Mark Henninger
Editor, AVS Forum

Last edited by imagic; 09-04-2016 at 07:55 AM.
imagic is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 63 Old 09-03-2016, 10:58 AM
 
Seegs108's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 10,827
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5167 Post(s)
Liked: 2594
Join the conversation here:

https://www.avsforum.com/forum/24-dig...l#post46474665

We don't need two separate threads splitting up questions and information.
Highjinx, OzHDHT and DavidHir like this.
Seegs108 is offline  
post #3 of 63 Old 09-03-2016, 11:05 AM - Thread Starter
Mark Henninger
 
imagic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 16,244
Mentioned: 457 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9288 Post(s)
Liked: 16441
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seegs108 View Post
Join the conversation here:

https://www.avsforum.com/forum/24-dig...l#post46474665

We don't need two separate threads splitting up questions and information.
I understand your concern. Actually, I'd like to send more people to that conversation with this article. This post is actually for the homepage, it serves as a comments section for that post. I'm not looking to split the discussion, just to spread the word to a wider audience.

I could ask a mod to move it to the Latest Industry News section, if it proves too much of a distraction. For now, I added a link to the ongoing discussion in the OP, and I expect these posts of ours should be enough to redirect folks to the big discussion, if that's where they want to be.

Hey folks, if you want to dive deep into the big JVC D-ILA 4K discussion, follow this link and go from there: https://www.avsforum.com/forum/24-dig...l#post46474665

Mark Henninger
Editor, AVS Forum

Last edited by imagic; 09-03-2016 at 01:10 PM.
imagic is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4 of 63 Old 09-03-2016, 01:06 PM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
javanpohl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,284
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 867 Post(s)
Liked: 539
drooooool.

Not too shabby of a price either
javanpohl is offline  
post #5 of 63 Old 09-03-2016, 01:26 PM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
aaranddeeman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lover's State
Posts: 4,080
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1874 Post(s)
Liked: 678
Quote:
Originally Posted by javanpohl View Post
drooooool.

Not too shabby of a price either
Way too heavy, on my wallet and ceiling. I will pass..
aaranddeeman is offline  
post #6 of 63 Old 09-03-2016, 01:36 PM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
javanpohl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,284
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 867 Post(s)
Liked: 539
Quote:
Originally Posted by aaranddeeman View Post
Way too heavy, on my wallet and ceiling. I will pass..
Hey, I'm not saying that I can easily afford it or anything, but it's a lot better than the $60,000 for the Sony equivalent. Hopefully this means we'll see ~$10,000 4K laser projectors in another year or so.
cardoski and antonw like this.
javanpohl is offline  
post #7 of 63 Old 09-03-2016, 06:07 PM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
stef2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: China
Posts: 1,320
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 519 Post(s)
Liked: 310
Preordered
Javs likes this.
stef2 is online now  
post #8 of 63 Old 09-03-2016, 08:23 PM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
Reddig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Central U.S.
Posts: 2,996
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 568 Post(s)
Liked: 1098
Very interesting. Looking forward to some testimony on this projector.

JBL Pro/JTR/JVC/Denon/Oppo/Monoprice/Elite Screens/Furman/Seatcraft/Acoustimac/AudioQuest/Roku
Reddig is online now  
post #9 of 63 Old 09-03-2016, 10:58 PM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
audioguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Not far from Atlanta - but far enough!
Posts: 9,938
Mentioned: 106 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5233 Post(s)
Liked: 4145
Quote:
Originally Posted by javanpohl View Post
Hopefully this means we'll see ~$10,000 4K laser projectors in another year or so.
~$10,000 in the reasonably near future? Yes! In a year or so? I highly doubt it
audioguy is offline  
post #10 of 63 Old 09-03-2016, 11:56 PM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
erkq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,707
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 746 Post(s)
Liked: 515
Quote:
Originally Posted by javanpohl View Post
Hey, I'm not saying that I can easily afford it or anything, but it's a lot better than the $60,000 for the Sony equivalent. Hopefully this means we'll see ~$10,000 4K laser projectors in another year or so.
I'm not sure the $60k Sony is equivalent.
erkq is offline  
post #11 of 63 Old 09-04-2016, 12:11 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
Javs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 8,063
Mentioned: 501 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6937 Post(s)
Liked: 6649
So, basically there is now two identical threads for this projector... questions are going to be asked in here which have been discussed and answered in the other thread... Can I suggest the other thread is merged into this one or vice versa?
Highjinx likes this.

JVC X9500 (RS620) | 120" 16:9 | Marantz AV7702 MkII | Emotiva XPA-7 | DIY Modular Towers | DIY TPL-150 Surrounds | DIY Atmos | DIY 18" Subs
-
MadVR Settings | UHD Waveform Analysis | Arve Tool Instructions + V3 Javs Curves
Javs is online now  
post #12 of 63 Old 09-04-2016, 04:25 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
Ruined's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,849
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2638 Post(s)
Liked: 1265
If only AVSCIENCE offered Reverse Mortgage financing...
cardoski likes this.
Ruined is offline  
post #13 of 63 Old 09-04-2016, 04:58 AM
Member
 
Protan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Atl
Posts: 58
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Liked: 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by javanpohl View Post
Hey, I'm not saying that I can easily afford it or anything, but it's a lot better than the $60,000 for the Sony equivalent. Hopefully this means we'll see ~$10,000 4K laser projectors in another year or so.
$40000.00 not worth it.5 to 10 years before affordable laser projector, maybe epson in 3 to 4 years true 4K, right now Sony is king, 665es, 365es,
Protan is offline  
post #14 of 63 Old 09-04-2016, 05:37 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
audioguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Not far from Atlanta - but far enough!
Posts: 9,938
Mentioned: 106 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5233 Post(s)
Liked: 4145
Quote:
Originally Posted by Protan View Post
Sony is king, 665es, 365es,
Once this new JVC product is available, why will Sony be king? (I am a a Sony 600ES owner).

I've owned many JVC's and may again. What in this new JVC piece makes is less "kingish" than the Sony 5000? (other than the price)
audioguy is offline  
post #15 of 63 Old 09-04-2016, 06:55 AM - Thread Starter
Mark Henninger
 
imagic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 16,244
Mentioned: 457 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9288 Post(s)
Liked: 16441
Quote:
Originally Posted by Javs View Post
So, basically there is now two identical threads for this projector... questions are going to be asked in here which have been discussed and answered in the other thread... Can I suggest the other thread is merged into this one or vice versa?
Can't do that. See post number 3. This thread serves as the comment section for an AVS homepage post. The other thread is not appropriate for that, its title does not include the model name, and there are many hundreds of comments that are speculative in nature that a a reader (as opposed to an AVS Forum regular) would not necessarily be interested in.

I am happy the other thread has all the comment section action. That is why I have encouraged folks to go to that thread if they want to get deep into the conversation. I included a direct link. But this thread must also exist.

The other thing is, that thread has so many comments already, people are bound to ask the same question more than once. But, experience has shown that not everyone is going to read all those comments before posting their question over there, or succeed at using the search function. Additionally, if someone wants to answer a question asked in this thread, one that's already been answered in that other thread, they can do so with a link to the appropriate comment, which will bring the questioner into that conversation. So far, there have been no such questions here.

Mark Henninger
Editor, AVS Forum

Last edited by imagic; 09-04-2016 at 07:55 AM.
imagic is offline  
post #16 of 63 Old 09-04-2016, 09:23 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
erkq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,707
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 746 Post(s)
Liked: 515
Quote:
Originally Posted by Protan View Post
...right now Sony is king, 665es, 365es,

I don't think that's true. If they upped their contrast game and were able to show full DCI P3 and had a fix for their panel degradation and lowered their price... maybe.
audioguy likes this.
erkq is offline  
post #17 of 63 Old 09-04-2016, 09:28 AM
Member
 
Protan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Atl
Posts: 58
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Liked: 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by audioguy View Post
Once this new JVC product is available, why will Sony be king? (I am a a Sony 600ES owner).

I've owned many JVC's and may again. What in this new JVC piece makes is less "kingish" than the Sony 5000? (other than the price)
The fact that it's around $40000, that's what makes Sony king to get true 4K starting at $8000.00, there is no way the jvc is $32000.00 better, and so from a business standpoint the Sony is king and they have been doing 4K longer.
joerod likes this.
Protan is offline  
post #18 of 63 Old 09-04-2016, 09:37 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
javanpohl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,284
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 867 Post(s)
Liked: 539
Quote:
Originally Posted by erkq View Post
I'm not sure the $60k Sony is equivalent.
Because it's better or worse?
javanpohl is offline  
post #19 of 63 Old 09-04-2016, 09:37 AM
Advanced Member
 
TheSony4KRises's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 558
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 417 Post(s)
Liked: 211
Quote:
Originally Posted by Protan View Post
The fact that it's around $40000, that's what makes Sony king to get true 4K starting at $8000.00, there is no way the jvc is $32000.00 better, and so from a business standpoint the Sony is king and they have been doing 4K longer.
http://www.hdtvtest.co.uk/news/jvc-z1-201609044357.htm
TheSony4KRises is offline  
post #20 of 63 Old 09-04-2016, 09:46 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
erkq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,707
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 746 Post(s)
Liked: 515
Quote:
Originally Posted by javanpohl View Post
Because it's better or worse?
Just different. "Better" or "worse" all depends on what you're after. The Sony is significantly brighter. I think it's pretty certain the JVC will maintain it's contrast dominance.
erkq is offline  
post #21 of 63 Old 09-04-2016, 09:48 AM
 
Seegs108's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 10,827
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5167 Post(s)
Liked: 2594
Quote:
Originally Posted by Protan View Post
The fact that it's around $40000, that's what makes Sony king to get true 4K starting at $8000.00, there is no way the jvc is $32000.00 better, and so from a business standpoint the Sony is king and they have been doing 4K longer.
This is incorrect. JVC had a 4K DiLA device before Sony did. They demonstrated it in the fall of 2000. They then refined it again in September 2004. So JVC had a 4K DiLA device four years before Sony did. You might then say Sony was first in the 4K home theater projector market, but you'd be wrong there again. JVC sold the DLA-RS4000 in 2009, which was a 4K projector one could buy for consumer home theater use. This was two full years before Sony released their first consumer home theater 4K projector; the 1000ES.

I would also say Sony's consumer 4K models are plagued with some major issues. Some of the bigger ones being massive contrast loss due to SXRD panel degredation over short periods of time (see here for more info) and a lack of appropriate color bit depth displayed on screen due to a substandard panel driver not being able to provide the SXRD panel with enough color information resulting in posterization and banding within the image (see here to see what it looks like).

So I'm sorry if I don't agree with you that Sony is "king". I've had a 1000ES, 1100ES, and a 665ES here among several other 1080p SXRD projectors and I'm still using my JVC DLA-RS500. None of them in my opinion are better overall. Mabye once Sony fixes those major issues I'll have a Sony here to stay, but until then, no, I don't think they're "king".
dreamer, Willie, ImaStar and 4 others like this.
Seegs108 is offline  
post #22 of 63 Old 09-04-2016, 10:08 AM
AVS Forum Club Gold
 
joerod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: MIDWEST (just outside Chicago)
Posts: 23,851
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1216 Post(s)
Liked: 1338
how many people actually bought a jvc 4K projector back in the day? Raise your hand. That's what I thought. Sony started with "affordable" 4K home theater first. That I am sure most would agree on. What's their cheapest 4K home cinema model? What's JVC's?

I have an amazing 995ES for sale. Send me a PM. :)
joerod is offline  
post #23 of 63 Old 09-04-2016, 10:10 AM
 
Seegs108's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 10,827
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5167 Post(s)
Liked: 2594
Quote:
Originally Posted by joerod View Post
how many people actually bought a jvc 4K projector back in the day? Raise your hand. That's what I thought. Sony started with "affordable" 4K home theater first. That I am sure most would agree on. What's their cheapest 4K home cinema model? What's JVC's?
Go away. This is not the place for the Sony vs JVC argument. Unless you have anything to say about the Z1, move on.
Ted99 and Ænz like this.
Seegs108 is offline  
post #24 of 63 Old 09-04-2016, 10:16 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
erkq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,707
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 746 Post(s)
Liked: 515
Quote:
Originally Posted by joerod View Post
how many people actually bought a jvc 4K projector back in the day? Raise your hand. That's what I thought. Sony started with "affordable" 4K home theater first. That I am sure most would agree on. What's their cheapest 4K home cinema model? What's JVC's?
I really don't care what Sony's cheapest 4K projector is. I wouldn't buy it with those degrading panels and really poor contrast performance. It's a lot of compromise to get a benefit you have to freeze-frame and pixel- peep from 2 feet to see.
erkq is offline  
post #25 of 63 Old 09-04-2016, 10:17 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
erkq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,707
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 746 Post(s)
Liked: 515
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seegs108 View Post
Go away. This is not the place for the Sony vs JVC argument. Unless you have anything to say about the Z1, move on.
Sorry, Seegs. Point taken.
Ted99 likes this.
erkq is offline  
post #26 of 63 Old 09-04-2016, 10:24 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
audioguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Not far from Atlanta - but far enough!
Posts: 9,938
Mentioned: 106 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5233 Post(s)
Liked: 4145
Quote:
Originally Posted by Protan View Post
The fact that it's around $40000, that's what makes Sony king to get true 4K starting at $8000.00, there is no way the jvc is $32000.00 better, and so from a business standpoint the Sony is king and they have been doing 4K longer.
Doing 4K longer does not mean they are king. And to compare the $30,000 JVC PJ to an $8000 Sony is Apples and Planets. Which $8000 Sony has a 20,000-hour, 3000-lumen laser-phosphor light source, a 120,000:1 native contrast, can cover 100% of the DCI/P3 color space, and covers 80% of the ultra-wide rec.2020 color space.

As I said, I love my Sony PJ. But just as in history, kings don't get to stay king forever.

While I have yet to see this PJ (hope to in Dallas at CEDIA), if the specs show up like I suspect they will, you and I will get to agree to disagree.
audioguy is offline  
post #27 of 63 Old 09-04-2016, 10:26 AM
AVS Forum Club Gold
 
joerod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: MIDWEST (just outside Chicago)
Posts: 23,851
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1216 Post(s)
Liked: 1338
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seegs108 View Post
Go away. This is not the place for the Sony vs JVC argument. Unless you have anything to say about the Z1, move on.
Exact response I expected from you Dylan. How many times have you posted about the Z1 in the 5000 thread?
studlygoorite, telem and KRGM1 like this.

I have an amazing 995ES for sale. Send me a PM. :)
joerod is offline  
post #28 of 63 Old 09-04-2016, 10:31 AM
 
Seegs108's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 10,827
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5167 Post(s)
Liked: 2594
Quote:
Originally Posted by joerod View Post
Exact response I expected from you Dylan. How many times have you posted about the Z1 in the 5000 thread?
The difference is that my posts weren't nonsense simply to start an argument. I posted objective information pertaining to the differences between both units when other people were also talking about both units and answered questions. Are you helpful in those threads? And don't call me by my name, we aren't friends.
Ted99 likes this.

Last edited by Seegs108; 09-04-2016 at 10:41 AM.
Seegs108 is offline  
post #29 of 63 Old 09-04-2016, 10:51 AM
AVS Forum Club Gold
 
joerod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: MIDWEST (just outside Chicago)
Posts: 23,851
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1216 Post(s)
Liked: 1338
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seegs108 View Post
The difference is that my posts weren't nonsense simply to start an argument. I posted objective information pertaining to the differences between both units when other people were also talking about both units and answered questions. Are you helpful in those threads? And don't call me by my name, we aren't friends.
When I compare both projectors I will do the same here with actual hands on experience instead of reading specs. Once again raise your hand if you own a 5000. Raise your hand if you actually plan to get a Z1 to compare them. And as much as you have followed me in the Sony threads over the past 4 years or so I thought we were friends Dylan? I usually get along great with 27 year olds...


I have an amazing 995ES for sale. Send me a PM. :)
joerod is offline  
post #30 of 63 Old 09-04-2016, 10:59 AM
 
Seegs108's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 10,827
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5167 Post(s)
Liked: 2594
Quote:
Originally Posted by joerod View Post
When I compare both projectors I will do the same here with actual hands on experience instead of reading specs. Once again raise your hand if you own a 5000. Raise your hand if you actually plan to get a Z1 to compare them. And as much as you have followed me in the Sony threads over the past 4 years or so I thought we were friends Dylan? I usually get along great with 27 year olds...

Personally I don't care what you write about either projector. If anything, our 4 years of "friendship" have taught me not to consider anything you write. Often when I get to see a projector you've also "reviewed" I tend to see things quite a bit differently. Based on that experience I wouldn't trust any subjective comments made by you until I see the unit for myself. Anyways, enjoy your 5000ES, I'm sure it was money well spent. I just personally couldn't handle the large drop in contrast from the 665ES and 1100ES prior to it on top of issues with posterization in the image. Both of these areas are going to look remarkably better on the Z1 and at around half the cost.
Kris Deering and ARROW-AV like this.
Seegs108 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply Latest Industry News

Tags
dla-z1 , Jvc

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off