Originally Posted by Cam1977
^luckily for me I dont need you to remind me of how that works as I have LCDs and Oleds in my home. Provide facts rather than your opinion with your responses.
Umm, I have had many OLEDs and LCD's in my home as well, side by side. Currently I have an A1E and a Z9D and they have been placed side by side for comparison. The FACTS are simple. Some high-nit HDR scenes simply DO NOT HAVE BLACKS in them. They are daytime outdoor scenes where the sun is shining very bright. Since there are NO BLACKS in these scenes, there is NO BLOOMING to be seen on the LCDs. Yet the a high-nit capable LCD's show a greater dynamic range because they have a much higher nit capability and the color-volume is not diluted from an extra white subpixel.
I gave you an example. This beach scene from Miss Peregrine's Home for Peculiar Children looks noticeably better on my Z9D than it does on my OLEDs. Why do you think Vincent frequently uses this scene in his videos?
Vincent wouldn't go ga-ga over Sony's 10,000 nit demo monster and their nearly 4,000 nit Z9G if OLED always looked better with HDR scenes. OLED looks better than LCD on SOME
HDR scenes, but on others a top-performing LCD is better. What percentage of the time OLED looks better and what percentage of the time LCD looks better could never be measured, because it depends on what type of content one watches.
OLED's are still lacking when it comes to peak-brightness, and that is a FACT. Even if you prefer OLED to LCD (nothing wrong with that), OLED needs to improve brightness capability for HDR. It is not always superior to LCD in every way or in ever scene.
Certain OLED fanboys like to try to justify their display choice by telling themselves and others that HDR always looks better on their OLED anyway, so OLED always trounces LCD.
My only point is this. Even though I prefer my A1E a bit over my Z9D (they serve different purposes: the Z9D gets used as a monitor and the OLED would get burn-in if I used it this way), I can still acknowledge that in certain scenes of HDR the OLED is simply lacking compared to the LCD. Of course LCD cannot handle certain challenging black scenes in HDR like an OLED, so LCD's owner's have nothing to brag about either.
The reality is, those who own both OLED and a very high-end LED-LCD and set them side by side, can see that the OLED is not always better in HDR scenes, but could use some improvement.
So OLED shills should get off their high horse and quit pretending like their display always dominated LCD in HDR scenes. LCD owners already acknowledge that OLED is superior for SDR (except perhaps in bright room viewing) but that is not enough. Some OLED shills have to claim that their OLED perceptually beats LCD in HDR all the time too, because it has pixel-level control. Not the case. Certain HDR scenes just plain look better on LCD vs. OLED, and anyone who says otherwise is disingenuous and a liar.
As I said, if OLED always looked better, Vincent would not always be telling everyone how much of a nits-whore he is, and how impressed he is with high-nit LCDs.