Why HDR400 support is always misunderstood? - AVS Forum | Home Theater Discussions And Reviews
Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 2 Old 12-17-2019, 04:07 AM - Thread Starter
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 22
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Liked: 0
Why HDR400 support is always misunderstood?

Why people continue to bash HDR400 monitors?

It's clear that HDR400 monitors aren't that good in doing HDR due to the low brightness, generally no FALD and so on...
... but I think that every Wide Gamut monitors should now support HDR because only with the HDR support
wide gamut monitors can "manage the color space" inside the HDR contents.

Most of the games/films looks too much oversaturated on Wide Gamut panels, this is completely solved by using HDR on both monitor and content.
Basically using HDR on contents like film or games is like enabling "color management".

So for me, HDR support is really important on every wide gamut monitors, even if the monitor is HDR400 only.
Davide Perini is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 2 Old 01-20-2020, 05:15 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 24
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Liked: 2
jonpais is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply High Dynamic Range (HDR) & Wide Color Gamut (WCG)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off