Paladin DCR-C Pre-Order Program - AVS Forum | Home Theater Discussions And Reviews
Forum Jump: 
 29Likes
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 64 Old 02-19-2020, 08:25 PM - Thread Starter
 
Shawn Kelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,020
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 203 Post(s)
Liked: 157
Paladin DCR-C Pre-Order Program

MANY THANKS TO EVERYONE WHO PARTICIPATED! We will be taking down this thread in the near future since the pre-order program is now closed. Since the Paladin DCR-C is indeed a DCR lens, please post any follow-up comments in the Paladin DCR Owner's Thread.
OzHDHT and Craig Peer like this.

Shawn Kelly
Panamorph, Inc.
www.panamorph.com
[email protected]

Last edited by Shawn Kelly; 06-16-2020 at 07:09 AM.
Shawn Kelly is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 64 Old 02-20-2020, 06:10 AM
Member
 
rhbblb1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Greensboro, GA
Posts: 114
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 77 Post(s)
Liked: 31
I was in with the Phoenix DCR, but the Paladin-DCR has a throw distance that is too long for me. I have a JVC RS-2000 with a throw distance of 1.6.

Last edited by Shawn Kelly; 03-14-2020 at 07:03 AM.
rhbblb1 is offline  
post #3 of 64 Old 02-20-2020, 06:19 AM
Member
 
rhbblb1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Greensboro, GA
Posts: 114
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 77 Post(s)
Liked: 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhbblb1 View Post
I was in with the Phoenix DCR, but the Paladin-DCR has a throw distance that is too long for me. I have a JVC RS-2000 with a throw distance of 1.6.
I’m in if the new C-DCR can get me to 1.6:1 on my RS2000.
rhbblb1 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4 of 64 Old 02-20-2020, 06:24 AM - Thread Starter
 
Shawn Kelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,020
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 203 Post(s)
Liked: 157
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhbblb1 View Post
I’m in if the new C-DCR can get me to 1.6:1 on my RS2000.
That's possible. We're looking at some customizations of the C-DCR for some specific projectors including the RS2000 that can get it closer to the projector lens to support the lower ratio.

Shawn Kelly
Panamorph, Inc.
www.panamorph.com
[email protected]
Shawn Kelly is offline  
post #5 of 64 Old 02-20-2020, 06:37 PM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked: 0
I’m in if throw distance is not a problem with my setup. I’m getting a Sony vw295es.
ht2020 is offline  
post #6 of 64 Old 02-20-2020, 08:44 PM
Newbie
 
Jay_Fi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 0
I'm in.

Regards,
Joe
Jay_Fi is offline  
post #7 of 64 Old 02-22-2020, 06:32 AM
Advanced Member
 
12GAGE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 765
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 364 Post(s)
Liked: 409
I'm in for my vw 1100. I missed out on the DCR lens in the past. I should be about a 2.0 throw ratio. Will it handle a large lens like on the VW 1100 ?
12GAGE is online now  
post #8 of 64 Old 02-22-2020, 08:27 AM - Thread Starter
 
Shawn Kelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,020
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 203 Post(s)
Liked: 157
Quote:
Originally Posted by 12GAGE View Post
I'm in for my vw 1100. I missed out on the DCR lens in the past. I should be about a 2.0 throw ratio. Will it handle a large lens like on the VW 1100 ?
It's possible. As a minimum, you wouldn't be able to use the lens door - the C-DCR would need to get right up to the 1100 lens. At 2.0:1 TR your beam should be small enough. However, please fill your screen with a bright image, then put a piece of paper at the front of the lens and measure the beam spot height and width on the paper. That way we should be able to confirm compatibility.

Side note though - the 1100 doesn't have 4K anamorphic processing - only 1080. You'd need a Lumagen processor for full 4K/4096 anamorphic.

Shawn Kelly
Panamorph, Inc.
www.panamorph.com
[email protected]
Shawn Kelly is offline  
post #9 of 64 Old 02-22-2020, 11:24 AM
Advanced Member
 
12GAGE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 765
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 364 Post(s)
Liked: 409
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shawn Kelly View Post
It's possible. As a minimum, you wouldn't be able to use the lens door - the C-DCR would need to get right up to the 1100 lens. At 2.0:1 TR your beam should be small enough. However, please fill your screen with a bright image, then put a piece of paper at the front of the lens and measure the beam spot height and width on the paper. That way we should be able to confirm compatibility.

Side note though - the 1100 doesn't have 4K anamorphic processing - only 1080. You'd need a Lumagen processor for full 4K/4096 anamorphic.
Thanks Shawn. I will measure the height and width. I am using an HTPC and Jriver so the scaling is covered there.
12GAGE is online now  
post #10 of 64 Old 02-22-2020, 03:47 PM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
OzHDHT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: The Antipodes aka Oz
Posts: 3,388
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1320 Post(s)
Liked: 823
I'm in for my NX7. Who'd have thought I'd end up with two JVC projectors and two Paladin's .
Shawn Kelly likes this.
OzHDHT is offline  
post #11 of 64 Old 02-23-2020, 07:18 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
mkerdman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 3,202
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 132 Post(s)
Liked: 23
How is the Paladin-C DCR "Identical in use and performance to the standard Paladin DCR lens", and how does it differ?

Murray Kerdman
mkerdman is offline  
post #12 of 64 Old 02-23-2020, 08:51 AM - Thread Starter
 
Shawn Kelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,020
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 203 Post(s)
Liked: 157
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkerdman View Post
How is the Paladin-C DCR "Identical in use and performance to the standard Paladin DCR lens", and how does it differ?
Hi Murray. The only difference is that the Paladin-C DCR is a more compact version of the standard Paladin DCR. Because it is smaller it can only work with smaller beams that result from higher throw ratios. The Paladin DCR can go down to a throw ratio of 1.4:1 whereas the Paladin-C DCR can only go down to 1.6:1 for targeted Sony and JVC projectors, and a higher minimum throw ratio for other projectors. Other than that - it's the same technology, same performance - just smaller optics.

Shawn Kelly
Panamorph, Inc.
www.panamorph.com
[email protected]
Shawn Kelly is offline  
post #13 of 64 Old 02-23-2020, 06:03 PM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
mkerdman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 3,202
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 132 Post(s)
Liked: 23
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shawn Kelly View Post
Hi Murray. The only difference is that the Paladin-C DCR is a more compact version of the standard Paladin DCR. Because it is smaller it can only work with smaller beams that result from higher throw ratios. The Paladin DCR can go down to a throw ratio of 1.4:1 whereas the Paladin-C DCR can only go down to 1.6:1 for targeted Sony and JVC projectors, and a higher minimum throw ratio for other projectors. Other than that - it's the same technology, same performance - just smaller optics.
Shawn, thanks for the explantion.

Murray Kerdman
mkerdman is offline  
post #14 of 64 Old 02-25-2020, 07:37 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 139
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 116 Post(s)
Liked: 35
I am in for NX7.

Thanks.
Satya b
satyab is offline  
post #15 of 64 Old 02-25-2020, 11:59 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
asharma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,783
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2354 Post(s)
Liked: 868
NX7 Lens is back 14’5” from 115” wide screen...will that work?
asharma is online now  
post #16 of 64 Old 02-25-2020, 12:19 PM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
Killroy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Ninth Circle of Hell
Posts: 2,795
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 779 Post(s)
Liked: 763
So does that mean for the RS3000/NX9 you are limited to the 1.8:1 throw ratio?
Killroy is offline  
post #17 of 64 Old 02-25-2020, 12:49 PM
Advanced Member
 
Azekecse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 609
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 287 Post(s)
Liked: 304
I believe that puts you @ 1.5.1, which is also my minimum throw distance. Paladin says 1.6.1 minimum throw due to its compact design. You may have to go non-compact, I hope I'm incorrect and it can go @ 1.5.1, then I would probably purchase as well. I can't afford the non-compact model.

Peace and blessings,

Azeke
Azekecse is online now  
post #18 of 64 Old 02-25-2020, 09:05 PM - Thread Starter
 
Shawn Kelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,020
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 203 Post(s)
Liked: 157
Quote:
Originally Posted by Killroy View Post
So does that mean for the RS3000/NX9 you are limited to the 1.8:1 throw ratio?
Possibly higher because the RS3000 lens is so huge. I should have a better idea on that next week.

Shawn Kelly
Panamorph, Inc.
www.panamorph.com
[email protected]
Shawn Kelly is offline  
post #19 of 64 Old 02-25-2020, 09:05 PM - Thread Starter
 
Shawn Kelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,020
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 203 Post(s)
Liked: 157
Quote:
Originally Posted by asharma View Post
NX7 Lens is back 14’5” from 115” wide screen...will that work?
Indeed, unfortunately 1.5:1 is too low.

Shawn Kelly
Panamorph, Inc.
www.panamorph.com
[email protected]
Shawn Kelly is offline  
post #20 of 64 Old 02-26-2020, 05:17 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
Clark Burk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Baltimore,MD.USA
Posts: 2,053
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 761 Post(s)
Liked: 697
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shawn Kelly View Post
Indeed, unfortunately 1.5:1 is too low.
So 1.6 throw ratio minimum for NX5, NX7, RS1000, and RS2000. Any restrictions as far as mounting ceiling vs shelf mount or inverted as far as placement in relation to the screen? Looking at the pictures the plate mounts to the bottom or the side with the feet. Is there enough adjustability to provide for above screen mounting if close to the 1.6 ratio?
I'm guessing the lens is going to have to be placed very close to the lens on the projector. I was thinking this might reduce some of the mounting possibilities in relation to the screen due to the limited adjustability because of the compactness of the lens. In other words is shelf mounting at close to the minimum throw going to limit my placement to dead center of the screen and how much flexibility is there in the placement at minimum throw?

Clark
Clark Burk is offline  
post #21 of 64 Old 02-26-2020, 05:50 AM - Thread Starter
 
Shawn Kelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,020
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 203 Post(s)
Liked: 157
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clark Burk View Post
So 1.6 throw ratio minimum for NX5, NX7, RS1000, and RS2000. Any restrictions as far as mounting ceiling vs shelf mount or inverted as far as placement in relation to the screen? Looking at the pictures the plate mounts to the bottom or the side with the feet. Is there enough adjustability to provide for above screen mounting if close to the 1.6 ratio?
I'm guessing the lens is going to have to be placed very close to the lens on the projector. I was thinking this might reduce some of the mounting possibilities in relation to the screen due to the limited adjustability because of the compactness of the lens. In other words is shelf mounting at close to the minimum throw going to limit my placement to dead center of the screen and how much flexibility is there in the placement at minimum throw?
That's a great question! We do indeed take into account that projectors are typically vertically mounted at or above the screen top, and that the farther above, the more the beam comes out of the lower section of the projector lens. So yes, the C-CDR will work at the 1.6:1 ratio from at or above the screen top (perhaps up to 10") and will also work with the projector either shelf or ceiling mounted.
Tom Bley likes this.

Shawn Kelly
Panamorph, Inc.
www.panamorph.com
[email protected]

Last edited by Shawn Kelly; 02-26-2020 at 06:02 AM.
Shawn Kelly is offline  
post #22 of 64 Old 02-26-2020, 08:37 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
Tom Bley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: IL. USA
Posts: 3,486
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 979 Post(s)
Liked: 957
Shawn,

I just wanted to confirm. I have a JVC RS-2000. 122" width image. 19ft from screen. lens about 6" above top of screen. I am calculating a 1.87 ratio so, I should be good to go, yes?

Also, It reads Paladin-C DCR approximatley 43% brighter. The standard Paladin DCR I thought was at 38%? Why is this different if it's just a more compact lens? Marketing? lol

Thanks.


"2.6 million pixels and roughly 43% higher brightness compared to the standard letterbox image"
Tom Bley is online now  
post #23 of 64 Old 02-26-2020, 09:05 AM - Thread Starter
 
Shawn Kelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,020
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 203 Post(s)
Liked: 157
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Bley View Post
Shawn,

I just wanted to confirm. I have a JVC RS-2000. 122" width image. 19ft from screen. lens about 6" above top of screen. I am calculating a 1.87 ratio so, I should be good to go, yes?

Also, It reads Paladin-C DCR approximatley 43% brighter. The standard Paladin DCR I thought was at 38%? Why is this different if it's just a more compact lens? Marketing? lol

Thanks.


"2.6 million pixels and roughly 43% higher brightness compared to the standard letterbox image"
Hi Tom,

Yes, your theater is good to go.

We always like to qualify our enhancement numbers by "compared to what?" If the projector is in normal letterbox mode then the enhancement is 2.6 million more pixels. If you compare the anamorphic setup to the "Zoom" non-anamorphic setting in the projector that can take letterbox to 4096 wide then the enhancement is 1.7 million more pixels.
Tom Bley likes this.

Shawn Kelly
Panamorph, Inc.
www.panamorph.com
[email protected]
Shawn Kelly is offline  
post #24 of 64 Old 02-26-2020, 09:30 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
nonstopdoc1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 1,263
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 931 Post(s)
Liked: 402
Here is my current setup
Projector - JVC X790R
Current Projector to Screen distance - 19' 5"
Screen width - 133" (2.39:1)
Throw Ratio - 1.75

I am thinking of waiting till CEDIA to see if JVC releases a successor to NX7.

Will this len maintain compatibility with future JVC lineup or is there no way to confirm that at this time?

HT - Seymour Centerstage XD 2.39:1 133" W| JVC X790R | JBL SDP-55 | Nord NC500 | ATI AT528NC | Procella P8/P5V | Revel C763L | Monolith 12" x4
Living Room - LG OLED 65" | Denon X4400H | Monolith 3x200 | KEF Q900 L/R | Paradigm Millenia 20 CC | Polk Surrounds | Rythmik FV15HP x2
nonstopdoc1 is offline  
post #25 of 64 Old 02-26-2020, 09:47 AM - Thread Starter
 
Shawn Kelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,020
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 203 Post(s)
Liked: 157
Quote:
Originally Posted by nonstopdoc1 View Post
Here is my current setup
Projector - JVC X790R
Current Projector to Screen distance - 19' 5"
Screen width - 133" (2.39:1)
Throw Ratio - 1.75

I am thinking of waiting till CEDIA to see if JVC releases a successor to NX7.

Will this len maintain compatibility with future JVC lineup or is there no way to confirm that at this time?
No way to absolutely confirm at this time. I doubt they would go away from 4096/4K resolution or a substantially different projector/lens design that would make the C-DCR not work (for example, extremely recessed) but that's only a guess.

Shawn Kelly
Panamorph, Inc.
www.panamorph.com
[email protected]
Shawn Kelly is offline  
post #26 of 64 Old 02-26-2020, 10:36 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
brazensol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
Posts: 1,763
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 826 Post(s)
Liked: 690
Any idea when the next "B" stock sale will come along?

Denali Cinema
JVC-RS540, 124" Wide 2.40:1 DIY Screen, Denon 8500H, Denon 6200W, Panasonic UB820 UHD Player, (3) iNuke 6000DSP; (2) iNuke NX3000D; (3) HTM-12; (14) RSL C34e surrounds; (2) 18" DA RSS460HO-4 Subwoofers; (1) DA UM18-22 18" Ultimax Subwoofer; (4) DA RSS390HO-4 15" Reference HO Subwoofers; BOSS Platform - (12) 12" Subwoofers
brazensol is offline  
post #27 of 64 Old 02-26-2020, 10:41 AM - Thread Starter
 
Shawn Kelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,020
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 203 Post(s)
Liked: 157
Quote:
Originally Posted by brazensol View Post
Any idea when the next "B" stock sale will come along?
On the regular Paladin DCR? If at all this year it would be perhaps August. B-Stock DCRs are extremely rare.
brazensol likes this.

Shawn Kelly
Panamorph, Inc.
www.panamorph.com
[email protected]
Shawn Kelly is offline  
post #28 of 64 Old 02-28-2020, 11:44 AM
AVS Forum Addicted Member
 
beastaudio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Western NC
Posts: 14,806
Mentioned: 413 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5810 Post(s)
Liked: 5669
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shawn Kelly View Post
That's a great question! We do indeed take into account that projectors are typically vertically mounted at or above the screen top, and that the farther above, the more the beam comes out of the lower section of the projector lens. So yes, the C-CDR will work at the 1.6:1 ratio from at or above the screen top (perhaps up to 10") and will also work with the projector either shelf or ceiling mounted.
How big of a difference are we talking with a throw distance on an rs2000 1.8 vs 1.6 Shawn? Noticeable?

European Models do not accept banana plugs
Belly of the Beast: Bass Bunker Theater
beastaudio is offline  
post #29 of 64 Old 02-28-2020, 12:17 PM - Thread Starter
 
Shawn Kelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,020
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 203 Post(s)
Liked: 157
Quote:
Originally Posted by beastaudio View Post
How big of a difference are we talking with a throw distance on an rs2000 1.8 vs 1.6 Shawn? Noticeable?
The only perhaps noticeable difference between 1.6:1 and 1.8:1 would be slightly less distortion towards the image edge at the 1.8:1 but even at 1.6:1 that will be hard to see once masked with the screen border.
beastaudio likes this.

Shawn Kelly
Panamorph, Inc.
www.panamorph.com
[email protected]
Shawn Kelly is offline  
post #30 of 64 Old 03-02-2020, 07:26 PM - Thread Starter
 
Shawn Kelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,020
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 203 Post(s)
Liked: 157
Update: The pre-order price will increase from $3,495 to $4,495 on Friday, March 13, 2020.

Shawn Kelly
Panamorph, Inc.
www.panamorph.com
[email protected]

Last edited by Shawn Kelly; 03-10-2020 at 06:59 AM.
Shawn Kelly is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply Panamorph 4K UltraWide Cinema

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off