Official JVC RS4500/Z1 Owner's Thread - Page 2 - AVS Forum | Home Theater Discussions And Reviews
Forum Jump: 
 2037Likes
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #31 of 3161 Old 01-30-2017, 05:29 PM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
roxiedog13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: North 48 °
Posts: 3,905
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2761 Post(s)
Liked: 1438
Quote:
Originally Posted by OzHDHT View Post
Sorry WHAT?? What part of my posts from just last in the other thread don't have me discussuing MY Z1 or even show it hanging in my HT? Or is that some kind of dig at me?

E-shift is more than fine, especially coming from the VW1100 - I A/B'd the 1100 vs RS600 with 4K Sony demo clips coming off a Sony FMP-X10 and the 1100 didn't walk away from the RS600, so I could no longer justify the resolution argument of native 4K in the Sony. For those who have issues with e-shift or should I say 'e-shift noise' that can be introduced, my advice is feed those projectors which use it a 4K signal, from an HTPC for example -mine would be used for a good 70-80% of normal viewing and presents a very pristine image. Otherwise don't utilise e-shift for native 1080p. Mind you I used it with high quality blurays(Force Awakens and Guardians of the Galaxy) the other night with my RS500 and had no issue with the results.



Not entirely sure at this stage. I may even consider the RS620 as that addresses my main concern with HDR on the 600.

I managed to get HDR descent on the RS600, I don't think the 620 will make it any better image wise . The VW675 is a little easier to plug and play but the results in the end are really not much different. The 600/620 struggles a little more with HDR just because it has that ability to dig deeper into the dark and
that is harder to control. Once dialed in though, not to bad at all . Still prefer SDR BT2020 though, I see it as the best mid way alternative.
Unless your screen is big there is nothing wrong with that RS600. I'm happy enough with it, I'm keeping what does not sell between the two. Hoping next year
to see some new and interesting product, if nothing exciting, I'm good for another year.

Dedicated Theater: Sony VPL VW 885ES , Panamorph DCR & ISCO III L Anamorphic Lens, Draper TecVision XT1800X Screen, 2.40:1 134" diagonal curved , Denon AVR-X8500 , 9.2.6 Atmos, Panasonic UB900, Oppo 203, Lumagen Pro 4440 , (3) Paradigm CI Elite E7-L+C+R fronts, , (2) CI Pro P80-IW Rear, (2) Paradigm SA-ADP In-wall Surround, (6) SIG-1.5R-30 v.3 In-Ceiling, Subwoofers: (2) SVS SB-16 Ultra , SVS PC13-Ultra .
roxiedog13 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #32 of 3161 Old 01-30-2017, 07:27 PM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
pennynike1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,277
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 624 Post(s)
Liked: 585
I saw the JVC 4500 in action at Cedia this year, and I must say it was my favorite thing at the show. The demo clips on the 16x9 screen were truly impressive! I was not expecting to see less than optimistic discussions of the projector in the thread, especially since I have been wondering to myself since buying my Epson 10500 what a true 4k laser projector can offer over my $8,000 Faux-K projector. At 4x the price of the Epson and twice the lumens capability, I would have to think that the JVC should be stunning with 4k content.

I was even considering buying a new JVC 4500 just to test out and compare with the Epson in order to satisfy my curiosity.
adidino likes this.

For sale: 4 Mackie c300z speakers, Tag Mclaren av32r preamplifier
pennynike1 is offline  
post #33 of 3161 Old 01-30-2017, 07:31 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Forum Special Member
 
adidino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 4,920
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 512 Post(s)
Liked: 356
Quote:
Originally Posted by pennynike1 View Post
I saw the JVC 4500 in action at Cedia this year, and I must say it was my favorite thing at the show. The demo clips on the 16x9 screen were truly impressive! I was not expecting to see less than optimistic discussions of the projector in the thread, especially since I have been wondering to myself since buying my Epson 10500 what a true 4k laser projector can offer over my $8,000 Faux-K projector. At 4x the price of the Epson and twice the lumens capability, I would have to think that the JVC should be stunning with 4k content.

I was even considering buying a new JVC 4500 just to test out and compare with the Epson in order to satisfy my curiosity.

Some of us are expecting them to arrive this week. I'm hoping mine shows on Friday. Looking forward to getting it set up and share some impressions. I'm confident the projector will look excellent in my room.
Craig Peer and pennynike1 like this.
adidino is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #34 of 3161 Old 01-30-2017, 07:40 PM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
pennynike1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,277
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 624 Post(s)
Liked: 585
Sony 1100ES vs JVC 4500

Quote:
Originally Posted by adidino View Post
Some of us are expecting them to arrive this week. I'm hoping mine shows on Friday. Looking forward to getting it set up and share some impressions. I'm confident the projector will look excellent in my room.
Considering that you are coming from a Sony 1100, I will be very curious to know how you compare the JVC 4500 to it. I upgraded from a Sony HW40ES to an Epson 10500, which was a large leap in price for me, after initially considering going with the Sony 1100.

I went to Cedia and I was hooked on laser projectors, especially since I enjoy watching on my projector like I would a TV. Seeing a JVC light up a 16 foot x 9 foot screen was amazing to me, and was my inspiration for my wall-to-wall 159" wide 16x9 screen in my home theater. I still actually have dreams of my time at Cedia watching the JVC 4500.
adidino likes this.

For sale: 4 Mackie c300z speakers, Tag Mclaren av32r preamplifier
pennynike1 is offline  
post #35 of 3161 Old 01-30-2017, 09:09 PM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
ccool96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Panama City, FL
Posts: 1,502
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 784 Post(s)
Liked: 1117
Quote:
Originally Posted by OzHDHT View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by adidino View Post
Hey OZ. You have yours on hand already?

Actually, never mind. I recall some of your comments. Other than the measurements you were asked to provide, you seems satisfied with the image. Personally, I'm not buying into the measurements that are being posted until I see some professional feedback from members I feel will provide reliable, no biased feedback and test results. Kris Deering being an example.

Measurements aside, what issues are you experiencing?
The initial halo of having the unit so early in piece has faded quite a bit when I when I look at the issues of poor native contrast, dynamic dimming performing quite poorly compared to the VW5000, ridiculous level of light loss with the P3 filter (plus its total inaccuracy without calibration), the very significant noise level even in Mid laser. Really this projector is going to be extremely hard to justify for me having just taken down the RS600 I don't know all the guys who've reviewed the Z1/4500 that well, but apart from Kris, guys like Ekki I have total faith in what is reported here and on his review site.
Oz, would love to hear more of your comparisons to both the 5000ES and the RS600. I have both the 5000ES and the RS600. They both are fantastic projectors.

The RS600 throws an incredible image, especially with 4K content, considering the price. I use the RS600 on a much smaller screen than the 5000ES, but I agree that it would be very hard for most people to tell the difference between true 4K and Eshift 4K with real content.

The biggest limitation of the RS600 is its light output.

I have pre-ordered the RS4500, to compare to the 5000ES and the RS600, but I'm having second thought, based on the feedback so far.

I was also told today that Sony will have their 1100ES replacement, which will be a 4K Laser with 2500 lumens at $25k. It will be built using the new 4K Laser engine of their Ultra short throw VPL-VZ1000ES.

I was wondering how large your screen was again? Seems you have had plenty of units to compare the RS4500, and in a real home theater environment.

Thanks for sharing your experience. I look forward to hearing more.
Woof Woof likes this.
ccool96 is offline  
post #36 of 3161 Old 01-30-2017, 09:37 PM
AVS Forum Addicted Member
 
Craig Peer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 15,914
Mentioned: 110 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6706 Post(s)
Liked: 7830
Quote:
Originally Posted by ccool96 View Post
Oz, would love to hear more of your comparisons to both the 5000ES and the RS600. I have both the 5000ES and the RS600. They both are fantastic projectors.

The RS600 throws an incredible image, especially with 4K content, considering the price. I use the RS600 on a much smaller screen than the 5000ES, but I agree that it would be very hard for most people to tell the difference between true 4K and Eshift 4K with real content.

The biggest limitation of the RS600 is its light output.

I have pre-ordered the RS4500, to compare to the 5000ES and the RS600, but I'm having second thought, based on the feedback so far.

I was also told today that Sony will have their 1100ES replacement, which will be a 4K Laser with 2500 lumens at $25k. It will be built using the new 4K Laser engine of their Ultra short throw VPL-VZ1000ES.

I was wondering how large your screen was again? Seems you have had plenty of units to compare the RS4500, and in a real home theater environment.

Thanks for sharing your experience. I look forward to hearing more.
I have an RS600, just sold a VW600, and hopefully later this week I'll have my RS4500. I'll chime in once I get everything set up on the new projctor.
Craig Peer is online now  
post #37 of 3161 Old 01-30-2017, 09:42 PM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
ccool96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Panama City, FL
Posts: 1,502
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 784 Post(s)
Liked: 1117
Quote:
Originally Posted by Craig Peer View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by ccool96 View Post
Oz, would love to hear more of your comparisons to both the 5000ES and the RS600. I have both the 5000ES and the RS600. They both are fantastic projectors.

The RS600 throws an incredible image, especially with 4K content, considering the price. I use the RS600 on a much smaller screen than the 5000ES, but I agree that it would be very hard for most people to tell the difference between true 4K and Eshift 4K with real content.

The biggest limitation of the RS600 is its light output.

I have pre-ordered the RS4500, to compare to the 5000ES and the RS600, but I'm having second thought, based on the feedback so far.

I was also told today that Sony will have their 1100ES replacement, which will be a 4K Laser with 2500 lumens at $25k. It will be built using the new 4K Laser engine of their Ultra short throw VPL-VZ1000ES.

I was wondering how large your screen was again? Seems you have had plenty of units to compare the RS4500, and in a real home theater environment.

Thanks for sharing your experience. I look forward to hearing more.
I have an RS600, just sold a VW600, and hopefully later this week I'll have my RS4500. I'll chime in once I get everything set up on the new projctor.

Would love to hear your thoughts a well Craig! Hopefully you and Mike and some other guys in the US will start to get hands on these units.
ccool96 is offline  
post #38 of 3161 Old 01-30-2017, 10:19 PM
AVS Forum Addicted Member
 
Craig Peer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 15,914
Mentioned: 110 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6706 Post(s)
Liked: 7830
Quote:
Originally Posted by ccool96 View Post
Would love to hear your thoughts a well Craig! Hopefully you and Mike and some other guys in the US will start to get hands on these units.
They took my money today, and I guess maybe mine will ship tomorrow. I should have it by Friday I hope, which gives me the weekend to install it. So by this time next week hopefully there will be more reports from more people on more units.
adidino likes this.
Craig Peer is online now  
post #39 of 3161 Old 01-30-2017, 11:42 PM
Member
 
Bremenfx1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Yokohama, Japan
Posts: 25
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by OzHDHT View Post
Did cross my mind re language. However, he was also pretty active in the other thread, so that's somewhat surprising, but not impossible of course.
I'm not a native English speaker so there might be lost in translation, but my question was very simple. Have you seen Z1 picture by yourself or your argument is totally based on opinions or numbers posted here.

Other thread is about how to calibrate Z1 in HDR and I'm not seeking any argument.
Bremenfx1 is offline  
post #40 of 3161 Old 01-31-2017, 01:06 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
Woof Woof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,020
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 460 Post(s)
Liked: 253
Quote:
Originally Posted by ccool96 View Post

I was also told today that Sony will have their 1100ES replacement, which will be a 4K Laser with 2500 lumens at $25k. It will be built using the new 4K Laser engine of their Ultra short throw VPL-VZ1000ES.


I heard the exact same thing but it seemed way out there and even posted a thread to see if anyone else heard anything.

Woof Woof is online now  
post #41 of 3161 Old 01-31-2017, 01:08 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
Woof Woof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,020
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 460 Post(s)
Liked: 253
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bremenfx1 View Post
I'm not a native English speaker so there might be lost in translation, but my question was very simple. Have you seen Z1 picture by yourself or your argument is totally based on opinions or numbers posted here.



Other thread is about how to calibrate Z1 in HDR and I'm not seeking any argument.


Oz is one of the first if not THE FIRST in Australia to own one. And he's had a lot of projectors through his room.

I know you've had no issues with yours either being one of the first in the world to own it - in Japan.

I am guessing the guys who are happy with the Z1 are somehow placing the projector in a sweet spot and using the settings that somehow makes the deficiencies less noticeable.
Woof Woof is online now  
post #42 of 3161 Old 01-31-2017, 01:55 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
ccool96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Panama City, FL
Posts: 1,502
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 784 Post(s)
Liked: 1117
Quote:
Originally Posted by Woof Woof View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by ccool96 View Post

I was also told today that Sony will have their 1100ES replacement, which will be a 4K Laser with 2500 lumens at $25k. It will be built using the new 4K Laser engine of their Ultra short throw VPL-VZ1000ES.
I heard the exact same thing but it seemed way out there and even posted a thread to see if anyone else heard anything.

[/QUOTE]

Being that the new short throw version is shipping in in April, I have no doubt the standard projector version will be ready for shipment just shortly after Cedia.

From what I understand the specs are identical and that the light engine is basically the same. All it needs is basically a new chassis and standard lens, and it's good to go!
Woof Woof likes this.
ccool96 is offline  
post #43 of 3161 Old 01-31-2017, 04:47 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
roxiedog13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: North 48 °
Posts: 3,905
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2761 Post(s)
Liked: 1438
Quote:
Originally Posted by ccool96 View Post
Oz, would love to hear more of your comparisons to both the 5000ES and the RS600. I have both the 5000ES and the RS600. They both are fantastic projectors.

The RS600 throws an incredible image, especially with 4K content, considering the price. I use the RS600 on a much smaller screen than the 5000ES, but I agree that it would be very hard for most people to tell the difference between true 4K and Eshift 4K with real content.

The biggest limitation of the RS600 is its light output.

I have pre-ordered the RS4500, to compare to the 5000ES and the RS600, but I'm having second thought, based on the feedback so far.

I was also told today that Sony will have their 1100ES replacement, which will be a 4K Laser with 2500 lumens at $25k. It will be built using the new 4K Laser engine of their Ultra short throw VPL-VZ1000ES.

I was wondering how large your screen was again? Seems you have had plenty of units to compare the RS4500, and in a real home theater environment.

Thanks for sharing your experience. I look forward to hearing more.
I didn't know a 1100ES replacement was in the works and in the $25 bracket , fantastic! If they can get this calibrated around the 2000lumen mark, add FI at 4K and keep the price in that range, it will certainly be on my radar .
I'd expect modest increases in contrast since this is a much lower lumen output projector than the VW5000 and they already have a proven platform . I'm not hung up on the laser though, both JVC and Sony are doing
very well with a lamp. Either bumping the JVC RS series with a more powerful lamp or laser is the only necessary change with that platform, why mess with that which works extremely well . Obviously 4K and the WGP or JVC
processing is not a match made in heaven, it just blows my mind they did not figure that out before bringing this Z1 to market .

Dedicated Theater: Sony VPL VW 885ES , Panamorph DCR & ISCO III L Anamorphic Lens, Draper TecVision XT1800X Screen, 2.40:1 134" diagonal curved , Denon AVR-X8500 , 9.2.6 Atmos, Panasonic UB900, Oppo 203, Lumagen Pro 4440 , (3) Paradigm CI Elite E7-L+C+R fronts, , (2) CI Pro P80-IW Rear, (2) Paradigm SA-ADP In-wall Surround, (6) SIG-1.5R-30 v.3 In-Ceiling, Subwoofers: (2) SVS SB-16 Ultra , SVS PC13-Ultra .
roxiedog13 is offline  
post #44 of 3161 Old 01-31-2017, 04:56 AM - Thread Starter
AVS Forum Special Member
 
adidino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 4,920
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 512 Post(s)
Liked: 356
Quote:
Originally Posted by Craig Peer View Post
They took my money today, and I guess maybe mine will ship tomorrow. I should have it by Friday I hope, which gives me the weekend to install it. So by this time next week hopefully there will be more reports from more people on more units.
Awesome. Hopefully they will run my card in the next day or so. Excited to get this bad boy up and running.
adidino is offline  
post #45 of 3161 Old 01-31-2017, 05:21 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
ccool96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Panama City, FL
Posts: 1,502
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 784 Post(s)
Liked: 1117
Quote:
Originally Posted by roxiedog13 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by ccool96 View Post
Oz, would love to hear more of your comparisons to both the 5000ES and the RS600. I have both the 5000ES and the RS600. They both are fantastic projectors.

The RS600 throws an incredible image, especially with 4K content, considering the price. I use the RS600 on a much smaller screen than the 5000ES, but I agree that it would be very hard for most people to tell the difference between true 4K and Eshift 4K with real content.

The biggest limitation of the RS600 is its light output.

I have pre-ordered the RS4500, to compare to the 5000ES and the RS600, but I'm having second thought, based on the feedback so far.

I was also told today that Sony will have their 1100ES replacement, which will be a 4K Laser with 2500 lumens at $25k. It will be built using the new 4K Laser engine of their Ultra short throw VPL-VZ1000ES.

I was wondering how large your screen was again? Seems you have had plenty of units to compare the RS4500, and in a real home theater environment.

Thanks for sharing your experience. I look forward to hearing more.
I didn't know a 1100ES replacement was in the works and in the $25 bracket , fantastic! If they can get this calibrated around the 2000lumen mark, add FI at 4K and keep the price in that range, it will certainly be on my radar .
I'd expect modest increases in contrast since this is a much lower lumen output projector than the VW5000 and they already have a proven platform . I'm not hung up on the laser though, both JVC and Sony are doing
very well with a lamp. Either bumping the JVC RS series with a more powerful lamp or laser is the only necessary change with that platform, why mess with that which works extremely well . Obviously 4K and the WGP or JVC
processing is not a match made in heaven, it just blows my mind they did not figure that out before bringing this Z1 to market .
Agree with what you said in regards to adding a Laser to the RS series. I think that would take those projectors to new heights! The RS series is already fantastic and Eshift works incredibly well with 4K content
ccool96 is offline  
post #46 of 3161 Old 01-31-2017, 06:35 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
audioguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Not far from Atlanta - but far enough!
Posts: 9,256
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4718 Post(s)
Liked: 3500
I, too, saw the RS4500 at CEDIA and while I thought it threw an incredible picture, compared to an RS500/600, it didn't blow me away. I have seen the Sony 5000 as well (in a couple of dealers and at multiple venues in CEDIA 2016) and it also did not blow me away, and, in fact, I much prefer my RS500 for my screen size (120" width) compared to the 5000.

I suppose if I had a much larger screen, (maybe 14 feet wide), I might have more interest in the technology. I have owned a number of projectors, starting with a Sony 1251 in the early 90's, Runco 980, the original JVC digital (hated it), Marquis 9500 (LOVED it - except for constant tweeting), RS2, RS55, Sony 600ES and now the RS500. This RS500 has brought more to the enjoyment of my theater and it is the only time I have not had any desire to have whatever is considered better. And just as importantly, my wife actually noticed the huge improvement this PJ offered over our previous one.

Eventually the JVC laser technology will get both much more affordable and much better but until then, the RS500/600 is the absolute steal in value of home theater projectors - at least to my eyes.
COACH2369 likes this.
audioguy is offline  
post #47 of 3161 Old 01-31-2017, 06:45 AM
AVS Forum Addicted Member
 
Mike Garrett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 25,803
Mentioned: 234 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11991 Post(s)
Liked: 9504
Send a message via Skype™ to Mike Garrett
Quote:
Originally Posted by pennynike1 View Post
Considering that you are coming from a Sony 1100, I will be very curious to know how you compare the JVC 4500 to it. I upgraded from a Sony HW40ES to an Epson 10500, which was a large leap in price for me, after initially considering going with the Sony 1100.

I went to Cedia and I was hooked on laser projectors, especially since I enjoy watching on my projector like I would a TV. Seeing a JVC light up a 16 foot x 9 foot screen was amazing to me, and was my inspiration for my wall-to-wall 159" wide 16x9 screen in my home theater. I still actually have dreams of my time at Cedia watching the JVC 4500.
Mark H went from a 1100 to the 4500. Said it was a big improvement.
Mike Garrett is offline  
post #48 of 3161 Old 01-31-2017, 06:53 AM - Thread Starter
AVS Forum Special Member
 
adidino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 4,920
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 512 Post(s)
Liked: 356
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Garrett View Post
Mark H went from a 1100 to the 4500. Said it was a big improvement.
That says a lot to me. I loved the 1100.
adidino is offline  
post #49 of 3161 Old 01-31-2017, 07:00 AM - Thread Starter
AVS Forum Special Member
 
adidino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 4,920
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 512 Post(s)
Liked: 356
Quote:
Originally Posted by audioguy View Post
I, too, saw the RS4500 at CEDIA and while I thought it threw an incredible picture, compared to an RS500/600, it didn't blow me away. I have seen the Sony 5000 as well (in a couple of dealers and at multiple venues in CEDIA 2016) and it also did not blow me away, and, in fact, I much prefer my RS500 for my screen size (120" width) compared to the 5000.

I suppose if I had a much larger screen, (maybe 14 feet wide), I might have more interest in the technology. I have owned a number of projectors, starting with a Sony 1251 in the early 90's, Runco 980, the original JVC digital (hated it), Marquis 9500 (LOVED it - except for constant tweeting), RS2, RS55, Sony 600ES and now the RS500. This RS500 has brought more to the enjoyment of my theater and it is the only time I have not had any desire to have whatever is considered better. And just as importantly, my wife actually noticed the huge improvement this PJ offered over our previous one.

Eventually the JVC laser technology will get both much more affordable and much better but until then, the RS500/600 is the absolute steal in value of home theater projectors - at least to my eyes.
Possible the Sony 5000 is not appropriate for smaller screens and throws out too much light making the image looked slightly washed out compared to your RS500.
Kris Deering likes this.
adidino is offline  
post #50 of 3161 Old 01-31-2017, 07:16 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
thrang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 7,148
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2530 Post(s)
Liked: 2049
Quote:
Originally Posted by adidino View Post
Possible the Sony 5000 is not appropriate for smaller screens and throws out too much light making the image looked slightly washed out compared to your RS500.
Well, even in the realm of wide ranging, differing opinions, its really difficult to understand the preference of the RS500 vs the 5000. The 500 does not have the lens, true 4k panels, stable image, and light output among other differences. Different prices, different capabilities.

adidino - you've seen the 5000 in my theater, an 11 foot wide screen. Every lumen available is necessary for true P3/HDR. I think this is the thing that many are forgetting. There was nothing washed out with Pacific Rim UHD

I owned the RS600 before the 5000. They are different projectors in so many ways, a comparison is a thought experiment, not a real-world one.

UPDATED 4/29/17 Thrang's Home Theater (for now...)
Sony VPL-VW5000es • Panamorph Paladin DCR • Trinnov Altitude 16 • Crown DCIn amplifiers • JBL M2 (LCR-LW-RW) • JBL S2S-EX subwoofers x2 • JBL SCL-4 (side/rear surrounds) • JBL SCS12 (x4) SCS8 (x2) TH/RH/TM • Lumagen Radiance Pro • Panasonic UB820 • Apple TV 4k • Synology RAID (45 TB total storage) • RTI control system
thrang is offline  
post #51 of 3161 Old 01-31-2017, 07:18 AM - Thread Starter
AVS Forum Special Member
 
adidino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 4,920
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 512 Post(s)
Liked: 356
Quote:
Originally Posted by thrang View Post
Well, even in the realm of wide ranging, differing opinions, its really difficult to understand the preference of the RS500 vs the 5000. The 500 does not have the lens, true 4k panels, stable image, and light output among other differences. Different prices, different capabilities.

adidino - you've seen the 5000 in my theater, an 11 foot wide screen. Every lumen available is necessary for true P3/HDR. I think this is the thing that many are forgetting. There was nothing washed out with Pacific Rim UHD

I owned the RS600 before the 5000. They are different projectors in so many ways, a comparison is a thought experiment, not a real-world one.
Hello? Who is this?
adidino is offline  
post #52 of 3161 Old 01-31-2017, 07:19 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
thrang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 7,148
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2530 Post(s)
Liked: 2049
Quote:
Originally Posted by adidino View Post
Hello? Who is this?
LOL! What an artful response....

UPDATED 4/29/17 Thrang's Home Theater (for now...)
Sony VPL-VW5000es • Panamorph Paladin DCR • Trinnov Altitude 16 • Crown DCIn amplifiers • JBL M2 (LCR-LW-RW) • JBL S2S-EX subwoofers x2 • JBL SCL-4 (side/rear surrounds) • JBL SCS12 (x4) SCS8 (x2) TH/RH/TM • Lumagen Radiance Pro • Panasonic UB820 • Apple TV 4k • Synology RAID (45 TB total storage) • RTI control system
thrang is offline  
post #53 of 3161 Old 01-31-2017, 07:19 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
audioguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Not far from Atlanta - but far enough!
Posts: 9,256
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4718 Post(s)
Liked: 3500
Quote:
Originally Posted by adidino View Post
Possible the Sony 5000 is not appropriate for smaller screens and throws out too much light making the image looked slightly washed out compared to your RS500.
I first saw the Sony 5000 on a 196" screen and then again on some larger screens at CEDIA. I am not suggesting that the 5000 is not a super projector but at $60,000 and for us mere mortals, it does not provide any real benefit (to me).
audioguy is offline  
post #54 of 3161 Old 01-31-2017, 07:22 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
thrang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 7,148
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2530 Post(s)
Liked: 2049
Quote:
Originally Posted by audioguy View Post
I first saw the Sony 5000 on a 196" screen and then again on some larger screens at CEDIA. I am not suggesting that the 5000 is not a super projector but at $60,000 and for us mere mortals, it does not provide any real benefit (to me).
But cost and affordability, important factors for sure, are not relevant when describing objective differences is capabilities and performance. They come at the end, when determining if there is a worth/capability to purchase on an individual basis.

UPDATED 4/29/17 Thrang's Home Theater (for now...)
Sony VPL-VW5000es • Panamorph Paladin DCR • Trinnov Altitude 16 • Crown DCIn amplifiers • JBL M2 (LCR-LW-RW) • JBL S2S-EX subwoofers x2 • JBL SCL-4 (side/rear surrounds) • JBL SCS12 (x4) SCS8 (x2) TH/RH/TM • Lumagen Radiance Pro • Panasonic UB820 • Apple TV 4k • Synology RAID (45 TB total storage) • RTI control system
thrang is offline  
post #55 of 3161 Old 01-31-2017, 07:28 AM - Thread Starter
AVS Forum Special Member
 
adidino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 4,920
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 512 Post(s)
Liked: 356
Quote:
Originally Posted by thrang View Post
Well, even in the realm of wide ranging, differing opinions, its really difficult to understand the preference of the RS500 vs the 5000. The 500 does not have the lens, true 4k panels, stable image, and light output among other differences. Different prices, different capabilities.

adidino - you've seen the 5000 in my theater, an 11 foot wide screen. Every lumen available is necessary for true P3/HDR. I think this is the thing that many are forgetting. There was nothing washed out with Pacific Rim UHD

I owned the RS600 before the 5000. They are different projectors in so many ways, a comparison is a thought experiment, not a real-world one.

Me checking out the 5000 at Thrang's place.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	hqdefault.jpg
Views:	231
Size:	7.2 KB
ID:	1933713  
thrang likes this.
adidino is offline  
post #56 of 3161 Old 01-31-2017, 07:34 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
audioguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Not far from Atlanta - but far enough!
Posts: 9,256
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4718 Post(s)
Liked: 3500
Quote:
Originally Posted by thrang View Post
But cost and affordability, important factors for sure, are not relevant when describing objective differences is capabilities and performance. They come at the end, when determining if there is a worth/capability to purchase on an individual basis.
Correct. BUT, price (and lumens) not withstanding, at least in the 3 or 4 venues I have seen the 5000, it did not push any of MY buttons.

Confession: "Perfect" audio is far, far more important to me than "perfect" video and is much higher on the scale of things that pull me into a movie and provide a more immersive experience. While I was willing spend $25,000 on a surround processor, I would never consider doing that for a projector with what is available on the market today [got close when I purchased the Marquee 9500]. Or, maybe a better way to say it as it relates to this thread, "the JVC RS500 is more than 'good enough' for me given all of the projector options currently available".
audioguy is offline  
post #57 of 3161 Old 01-31-2017, 07:44 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
thrang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 7,148
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2530 Post(s)
Liked: 2049
Quote:
Originally Posted by audioguy View Post
Correct. BUT, price (and lumens) not withstanding, at least in the 3 or 4 venues I have seen the 5000, it did not push any of MY buttons.

Confession: "Perfect" audio is far, far more important to me than "perfect" video and is much higher on the scale of things that pull me into a movie and provide a more immersive experience. While I was willing spend $25,000 on a surround processor, I would never consider doing that for a projector with what is available on the market today [got close when I purchased the Marquee 9500]. Or, maybe a better way to say it as it relates to this thread, "the JVC RS500 is more than 'good enough' for me given all of the projector options currently available".
I think the thing is that with the advent of UHD/HDR, the value of video has increased, its just the price to leverage it is generally high right now.

UPDATED 4/29/17 Thrang's Home Theater (for now...)
Sony VPL-VW5000es • Panamorph Paladin DCR • Trinnov Altitude 16 • Crown DCIn amplifiers • JBL M2 (LCR-LW-RW) • JBL S2S-EX subwoofers x2 • JBL SCL-4 (side/rear surrounds) • JBL SCS12 (x4) SCS8 (x2) TH/RH/TM • Lumagen Radiance Pro • Panasonic UB820 • Apple TV 4k • Synology RAID (45 TB total storage) • RTI control system
thrang is offline  
post #58 of 3161 Old 01-31-2017, 08:19 AM
AVS Forum Addicted Member
 
Craig Peer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 15,914
Mentioned: 110 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6706 Post(s)
Liked: 7830
Quote:
Originally Posted by ccool96 View Post
Agree with what you said in regards to adding a Laser to the RS series. I think that would take those projectors to new heights! The RS series is already fantastic and Eshift works incredibly well with 4K content
JVC already has laser eshift in their simulation projectors. Only 1000 lumens though.
Craig Peer is online now  
post #59 of 3161 Old 01-31-2017, 08:35 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
ccool96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Panama City, FL
Posts: 1,502
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 784 Post(s)
Liked: 1117
Quote:
Originally Posted by Craig Peer View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by ccool96 View Post
Agree with what you said in regards to adding a Laser to the RS series. I think that would take those projectors to new heights! The RS series is already fantastic and Eshift works incredibly well with 4K content
JVC already has laser eshift in their simulation projectors. Only 1000 lumens though.
I don't consider that anywhere near the same, as that was designed for a specialty market.

There is no reason we can't or won't see an RS600 with Laser that has as much or more light output along with HDR and WCG.

Sony is getting ready to have a 4K Laser in a smaller chassis so I'm sure JVC should be able to accomplish the same, without sacrificing the excellent native contrast of their lastest Eshift panels
ccool96 is offline  
post #60 of 3161 Old 01-31-2017, 09:51 AM
AVS Forum Addicted Member
 
Craig Peer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 15,914
Mentioned: 110 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6706 Post(s)
Liked: 7830
Quote:
Originally Posted by ccool96 View Post
I don't consider that anywhere near the same, as that was designed for a specialty market.

There is no reason we can't or won't see an RS600 with Laser that has as much or more light output along with HDR and WCG.

Sony is getting ready to have a 4K Laser in a smaller chassis so I'm sure JVC should be able to accomplish the same, without sacrificing the excellent native contrast of their lastest Eshift panels
They've been getting that ready for 3 years. Not sure what the hold up is.
Craig Peer is online now  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply Ultra Hi-End HT Gear ($20,000+)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off