System Synergy, Fact or Fiction - AVS Forum | Home Theater Discussions And Reviews
Forum Jump: 
 90Likes
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 469 Old 02-26-2020, 03:12 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Forum Special Member
 
DreamWarrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Dirty South Jersey
Posts: 2,536
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1239 Post(s)
Liked: 752
System Synergy, Fact or Fiction

So, "synergy" in a system is another audiophile claim that I've heard a number of times. Recently, in the Monoprice HTP-1 thread, its sensitivity control setting has been generating some questions. These questions have led me back to questioning how important "synergy" is. Thus, first I want to speculate a bit (please correct me), then explain some signal chain items, give some examples, then turn it over to y'all to educate us.

Incoming speculation --

You know the age-old argument, "if you spend x on speakers you better spend y on amps and z on your pre-amp (and whatever other stupid number on cables, lol)". So, allow me to contend that I often perceive a trend among "boutique" expensive speakers which is that they tend to be very insensitive and hard to drive (have crappy, poorly engineered, impedance curves). If you take this for granted, then sure, to reach high output levels (or have lots of dynamics) you'll need a powerful amplifier (expensive, at least more than a less powerful amplifier) and (possibly) to drive that amplifier you may need more input voltage. Thus, this moves the goal-post up again to the pre-amp, which now needs beefier line drivers. Thus, if we contend that more expensive speakers require more powerful amplifiers and more powerful amplifiers require more input voltage and more input voltage can only be provided by more expensive pre-amps then...well...looks like the statement "works!"

Of course, if it all starts at the speakers, then this is a "problem" created by a cottage industry of boutique brands. Worse, this cottage industry tends, IMO, to be full of garage-educated "EEs" that often can't design their way around anything using actual math and physics, preferring instead their uneducated school of hard-knocks and unscientific design methods. Unfortunately, though, if I'm right, the cottage industry has created a problem which it then solves by "making" you spend more money -- the reasoning above tells you why you have to and some of us sip it right up and reproduce the dogma!

That said, I have "no idea" (I couldn't care less, honestly) if these "trends" are factual. I speculate only why the "cost synergy" argument could be made. However, it's not really "cost synergy" I'm here to discuss. I'd prefer to look at the actual numbers that mean something -- those things that may actually impact synergy in some meaningful way.

Ok, so now on to our signal chain --

For this example, I'll presume it all starts at the pre-amp (who cares the source, it's digital anyway, haha!). Now, in the Monoprice HTP-1 thread there were statements made regarding the performance degradation that would have been incurred if Monoprice decided to make their product produce an 12v max output vs. the 4v they settled on. Their supposition was that by settling on 4v, they could make it perform better for more people than had they chose 12v. However, since this specification is "up in the air" and "not adjustable" on just about all consumer gear, it's the first piece of our puzzle. It will determine how hard you can drive your amplifier. If it's "too much" then, if we take the Monoprice statements as fact, you may be giving up performance in the lower end of the volume control where you'll be relegated so as not to overdrive your amplifier. If it's "too little" you'll never drive your amplifier to its maximum output (which, if your speakers can't handle it, or you don't want those volume levels, or the music you listen to never demands it, then it won't matter).

Ok, so now the amplifier. Again, way too often consumer amplifiers have no (or little) adjustability (personally, I won't buy an amplifier with fixed settings, but that's me -- there's a reason pro-amps have controls, I can't say the design compromises that are made to include them, though). Regardless, the fixed input sensitivity and gain go hand in hand to determine the maximum voltage the amplifier can output. This voltage, combined with the amp's current capability and your speaker's impedance curve, will determine how "well" the amplifier can drive your speakers. Since these are all fixed, if your amplifier needs, say, 2v to reach 500W on a 8ohm load then if you have a pre-amp with an 8v output you're going to cook it (unless you keep your volume level down on the pre). If your pre-amp can't hit 2v (say it's a cheaper unit whose outputs can't reach above 1v) then you'll never get 500W into an 8ohm load.

And, finally, we reach our speakers; arguably the most important thing you can chose! There's a reason that many modern speakers have high sensitivity and are easier to drive -- science progresses. However, if you should chose a speaker that has low sensitivity or is hard to drive, then you best start looking at your amplifier selection and relating it to your listening habits. The speakers you chose will have the largest impact on your signal chain, IMO. Not just because they have the largest impact on what you hear, but because they set the goal-post that every piece of the equipment must reach if you want to produce the full dynamic range of the music you listen to!

Alright, so some examples -- note: here, I have to take the manufacturer's specs at face value...oh well.

First, let's say we have three pre-amps:
  • Pre-amp A can reach a modest 1v output
  • Pre-amp B a "better" 4v
  • Pre-amp C a whooping 8v.

Now let's pick a few amplifiers (honestly, this was harder than I thought, most amplifiers either don't list specs or list (or I compute) a 29dB gain):
  • Amplifier A; Emotiva XPA-DR1: 2.4v in -> 640W @ 8ohm (about 72v, they list gain as 29dB, every 6dB is a doubling, so can we do 2.4 * 2^(29/6) = 68v, about 72....).
  • Amplifier B; QSC GX-5: 1.2v in -> 500W @ 8ohm (about 63v), they list gain as 34.4dB, using the above that also works out around 63v).
  • Amplifier C; Boulder 3050: this is a BIG amp, it doesn't list the required input voltage, but it lists the gain, we'll have to assume their output power is accurate, so with 26dB gain (which, as you can see from the other amplifiers is NOT a lot, especially for such a big amplifier) to produce its (claimed) 2100W @ 8ohm (about 130v) with 26dB gain, you'll need x * 2^(26/6) = 130; x = 6.4v.

Alrighty! So, now I'd love to pull out some real speakers and specs, but there are a lot of variables that are NOT listed for speakers (point me to a manufacturer provided impedance plot for any boutique speaker...). However, I can at least pick two at some extremes which have been measured by stereophile.
  • Speaker A; MBL 101E Mk.II: 81dB measured sensitivity, 3.3ohm measured minimum impedance, this thing isn't going to be an easy-to-drive speaker nor is it very sensitive ("wonderful" combo, lol). Unfortunately, I don't know how I'd compute in-room SPL with this speaker, it's omni-nature probably makes it fall off less than normal as distance increases. Regardless, it's at enough extreme to make a point.
  • Speaker B; GoldenEar Triton One.R: 91dB measured sensitivity, 3.1ohm measured minimum impedance, also not easy to drive, but it's pretty sensitive, so it'll require less power.

So, let's look at some combinations:

Pre-Amp A -> Amplifier C -> Speaker A -- This is not looking very good is it? This probably won't be able to get the MBLs moving none-the-less get any kind of dynamics out of them. The paltry voltage out of Amplifier C with Pre-Amp A's putrid .9v won't make much dent at, say, 40hz; don't try to play back EDM, lol.

Pre-Amp C -> Amplifer C -> Speaker A -- Much better!

Pre-Amp A -> Amplifier C -> Speaker B -- humm...well, Amplifier C is probably overkill for Speaker B, so...in this case, maybe the .9v limit isn't so bad? Or is it? I mean, Amplifier C can handle a lot of voltage, how well does it behave with .9v? What's its noise floor? If it has such low gain, how well does it handle lower signals? I can't answer any of that, but...this combination doesn't make a lot of sense, IMO.

Pre-Amp B -> Amplifier C -> Speaker B -- if the previous was overkill, this is too, right? But, at least we can put more voltage into the amplifier...we won't need it, though, unless we feel like watching Speaker B launch its cones across the room, lol.

Pre-Amp A -> Amplifier B -> Speaker B -- looks a bit better "matched".

And we can go on and on.

Now, the biggest question is, can all those signal chains be "matched" to provide the same levels of dynamics with some external devices? If so (and I presume so), are these devices hampering the overall signal-chain? Do we end up reducing the dynamic range of both systems to an equivalent level just to equalize our test?

Plus, there are amplifiers like: this Benchmark which can be set to have an 8v input sensitivity for 100W output!?! I don't know what the point of that is (I tried to make that point in the Monoprice thread), but...if it needs 8v to output 100W, what the heck is it going to do with the paltry .9v of pre-amp A into something like Speaker A? Of course, at least this amp is adjustable, so we can set it to a higher gain (which requires 2v) and use pre-amp B happily, but does it have the "heft" to drive Speaker A to "reference" given its "horrid" sensitivity?

Last edited by DreamWarrior; 02-26-2020 at 03:17 PM.
DreamWarrior is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 469 Old 02-26-2020, 05:57 PM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
A9X-308's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 8,537
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1915 Post(s)
Liked: 1636
Quote:
Originally Posted by DreamWarrior View Post
So, "synergy" in a system is another audiophile claim that I've heard a number of times.
It's audiophool mythology.
Muza, m. zillch and raistlin65 like this.

“You are not special. You are not a beautiful and unique snowflake.” Chuck Palahniuk
A9X-308 is offline  
post #3 of 469 Old 02-26-2020, 06:26 PM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
torii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 8,105
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4133 Post(s)
Liked: 2420
the problem is that we cant measure everything. I have used car stereo receivers from 2v outputs to 4v to 5v to 8v....just this simple change in output voltages changes everything when comparing. one thing that is really not known is how feedback/power sent back to an amplifier from the speaker works along with basic clipping which many say happens a whole helluva lot more when playing music than when testing static loads. also if something measures the same does it sound the same? let alone if it measures different obviously it wont perform/sound the same. the sciences dont even know what to measure for alot of what our brain processes. lots of unkowns...but if you are happy, be happy....if striving for better sound...try more gear. audioscience review site does a decent amount of tests but no debate is allowed...so the measurements are what they are and they are very different.

Power: Marantz sr7008, NAD C 275Bee x 2, Video: Oppo 103, Samsung 75un6300 LG oled c9 77
Speakers: Focal aria 948, Focal cc900, Klipsch synergy KSF 10.5, Magnepan LRS, Audioengine A2+
Subs: Rythmik FV25HP, Rythmik FV15HP, Velodyne HGS 12, Velodyne VA1512
torii is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4 of 469 Old 02-26-2020, 10:33 PM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
A9X-308's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 8,537
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1915 Post(s)
Liked: 1636
Quote:
Originally Posted by torii View Post
the problem is that we cant measure everything.
So, what is it exactly, that we can't measure?



Quote:
Originally Posted by torii View Post
I have used car stereo receivers from 2v outputs to 4v to 5v to 8v....just this simple change in output voltages changes everything when comparing.
For any representative and valid test, you need to adjust the levels of the DUTs so they are within 0.1dB. Something I've been saying for well over 2 decades.



Quote:
Originally Posted by torii View Post
one thing that is really not known is how feedback/power sent back to an amplifier from the speaker works
Sorry, but that is complete rubbish.



Quote:
Originally Posted by torii View Post
along with basic clipping which many say happens a whole helluva lot more when playing music than when testing static loads
Another point well known and easy to measure for years.



Quote:
Originally Posted by torii View Post
also if something measures the same does it sound the same? let alone if it measures different obviously it wont perform/sound the same.
Again, that comment lacks the basic premise that if the differences are outside of the human detection range that are functionally, and therefore sonically identical. For example, modern, modestly priced DACs will have a THD+N at -120dB or lower. How does any human hear this? Therefore, sonically identical.

“You are not special. You are not a beautiful and unique snowflake.” Chuck Palahniuk
A9X-308 is offline  
post #5 of 469 Old 02-26-2020, 11:43 PM
AVS Forum Addicted Member
 
m. zillch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 14,147
Mentioned: 65 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6202 Post(s)
Liked: 4441
Quote:
Originally Posted by DreamWarrior View Post
So, "synergy" in a system is another audiophile claim that I've heard a number of times.
Generally speaking, it's complete baloney, but there are key words and phrases which make people who believe in magic feel warm and fuzzy and releases their endorphins. You've found one of their big ones.


Running high voltage levels on preamp level signal outputs can sometimes improve SNR and reduce an overall system's background hiss, but that's it, (there are no other "magical" benefits) and if you don't notice any hiss from the get go it is a waste of time.

Designing gear to have an abnormally high output level can actually be bad if you want to integrate to other gear which can't take it: here you shoot yourself in the foot and have to turn it down to a much lower output level than its max, bringing its signal level much closer to the gear's own noise floor, and you actually end up increasing your overall system's background hiss.

Last edited by m. zillch; 02-27-2020 at 12:05 AM.
m. zillch is offline  
post #6 of 469 Old 02-27-2020, 03:51 AM
AVS Forum Addicted Member
 
Ratman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Collingswood, N.J.
Posts: 19,908
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2600 Post(s)
Liked: 2438
Oh my!





If you can’t explain it simply, you don’t understand it well enough – Albert Einstein
Ratman is offline  
post #7 of 469 Old 02-27-2020, 05:12 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
ClawAndTalon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Atlanta, GA.
Posts: 1,314
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 653 Post(s)
Liked: 491
Quote:
Originally Posted by A9X-308 View Post
So, what is it exactly, that we can't measure?



For any representative and valid test, you need to adjust the levels of the DUTs so they are within 0.1dB. Something I've been saying for well over 2 decades.



Sorry, but that is complete rubbish.



Another point well known and easy to measure for years.



Again, that comment lacks the basic premise that if the differences are outside of the human detection range that are functionally, and therefore sonically identical. For example, modern, modestly priced DACs will have a THD+N at -120dB or lower. How does any human hear this? Therefore, sonically identical.

Good response. That was a regular greatest hits of audiophile baloney. The first sentence, we can’t measure everything like an audible change is page one of the audiophoozel book.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk



"Most theories on audio and audio reproduction will be proven wrong only when the laws of physics change."
ClawAndTalon is offline  
post #8 of 469 Old 02-27-2020, 07:26 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
torii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 8,105
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4133 Post(s)
Liked: 2420
glad we have a large group of people that dont need to listen to amps as within certain made up parameters they will sound the same. at least we have other reasons to choose one amp over another.

Power: Marantz sr7008, NAD C 275Bee x 2, Video: Oppo 103, Samsung 75un6300 LG oled c9 77
Speakers: Focal aria 948, Focal cc900, Klipsch synergy KSF 10.5, Magnepan LRS, Audioengine A2+
Subs: Rythmik FV25HP, Rythmik FV15HP, Velodyne HGS 12, Velodyne VA1512
torii is offline  
post #9 of 469 Old 02-27-2020, 07:35 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
torii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 8,105
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4133 Post(s)
Liked: 2420
I will try and dig up some white papers for people to read if they want. just putting info out there. here is one. http://sanderssoundsystems.com/techn...mp-white-paper


http://www.dynamicaudio.jp/file/1101...WhitePaper.pdf


https://www.crownaudio.com/en/suppor...technicalpaper


https://balanced.com/BAT-Architecture

Power: Marantz sr7008, NAD C 275Bee x 2, Video: Oppo 103, Samsung 75un6300 LG oled c9 77
Speakers: Focal aria 948, Focal cc900, Klipsch synergy KSF 10.5, Magnepan LRS, Audioengine A2+
Subs: Rythmik FV25HP, Rythmik FV15HP, Velodyne HGS 12, Velodyne VA1512
torii is offline  
post #10 of 469 Old 02-27-2020, 07:41 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
torii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 8,105
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4133 Post(s)
Liked: 2420
this company developed a way for amp to change/match crtain approved speakers...synergy. https://www.devialet.com/media/pictu...xd_2018_en.pdf


https://www.theabsolutesound.com/art...ted-amplifier/

Power: Marantz sr7008, NAD C 275Bee x 2, Video: Oppo 103, Samsung 75un6300 LG oled c9 77
Speakers: Focal aria 948, Focal cc900, Klipsch synergy KSF 10.5, Magnepan LRS, Audioengine A2+
Subs: Rythmik FV25HP, Rythmik FV15HP, Velodyne HGS 12, Velodyne VA1512
torii is offline  
post #11 of 469 Old 02-27-2020, 07:44 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
torii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 8,105
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4133 Post(s)
Liked: 2420
and this article may add some light...https://www.audioholics.com/audio-am...f-an-amplifier

Power: Marantz sr7008, NAD C 275Bee x 2, Video: Oppo 103, Samsung 75un6300 LG oled c9 77
Speakers: Focal aria 948, Focal cc900, Klipsch synergy KSF 10.5, Magnepan LRS, Audioengine A2+
Subs: Rythmik FV25HP, Rythmik FV15HP, Velodyne HGS 12, Velodyne VA1512
torii is offline  
post #12 of 469 Old 02-27-2020, 08:09 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
ClawAndTalon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Atlanta, GA.
Posts: 1,314
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 653 Post(s)
Liked: 491
System Synergy, Fact or Fiction

Quote:
Originally Posted by torii View Post

A whole bunch of links but you haven’t really stated a coherent point, nor by extension have you explained how these links would advance that point.

Keep in mind a manufacturer’s company white paper, while typically more in-depth than typical audio press marketing, is still marketing. It’s not subjected to any sort of independent scrutiny. In home audio, especially exotic audio, they are written with the intent to be used as filler for the audio press to review with.

Your last link, TAS, which is total garbage, does this a lot.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
m. zillch likes this.



"Most theories on audio and audio reproduction will be proven wrong only when the laws of physics change."

Last edited by ClawAndTalon; 02-27-2020 at 08:12 AM.
ClawAndTalon is offline  
post #13 of 469 Old 02-27-2020, 08:19 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
torii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 8,105
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4133 Post(s)
Liked: 2420
it doesnt matter I or anyone else say. science says they sound the same when parameters are used. end of story.

Power: Marantz sr7008, NAD C 275Bee x 2, Video: Oppo 103, Samsung 75un6300 LG oled c9 77
Speakers: Focal aria 948, Focal cc900, Klipsch synergy KSF 10.5, Magnepan LRS, Audioengine A2+
Subs: Rythmik FV25HP, Rythmik FV15HP, Velodyne HGS 12, Velodyne VA1512
torii is offline  
post #14 of 469 Old 02-27-2020, 08:26 AM
AVS Forum Addicted Member
 
Ratman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Collingswood, N.J.
Posts: 19,908
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2600 Post(s)
Liked: 2438
Quote:
Originally Posted by torii View Post
it doesnt matter I or anyone else say.
Totally agree.



If you can’t explain it simply, you don’t understand it well enough – Albert Einstein
Ratman is offline  
post #15 of 469 Old 02-27-2020, 08:42 AM
Advanced Member
 
Out-Of-Phase's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 519
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 393 Post(s)
Liked: 358
Quote:
Originally Posted by torii View Post
it doesnt matter I or anyone else say. science says they sound the same when parameters are used. end of story.
He's finally getting it.
m. zillch likes this.

Save your money.
Out-Of-Phase is offline  
post #16 of 469 Old 02-27-2020, 08:46 AM
AVS Forum Addicted Member
 
m. zillch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 14,147
Mentioned: 65 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6202 Post(s)
Liked: 4441
Quote:
Originally Posted by torii View Post
glad we have a large group of people that dont need to listen to amps as within certain made up parameters they will sound the same.
This repeated claim my camp doesn't use listening tests is baloney. We do, just, oh my gosh, at the same matching volume level and without knowing the identity of the amp so we have to judge the amp by . . . get this . . . the sound alone.

Last edited by m. zillch; 02-27-2020 at 09:36 AM.
m. zillch is offline  
post #17 of 469 Old 02-27-2020, 09:05 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
torii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 8,105
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4133 Post(s)
Liked: 2420
Quote:
Originally Posted by m. zillch View Post
This repeated claim my camp doesn't use listening tests is baloney. We do, just, oh my gosh, at the same matching volume level and without knowing the identity of the amp so we have to judge the amp by . . . get this. . . the sound alone.

Im not adding any parameters. enjoy your gear and music.

Power: Marantz sr7008, NAD C 275Bee x 2, Video: Oppo 103, Samsung 75un6300 LG oled c9 77
Speakers: Focal aria 948, Focal cc900, Klipsch synergy KSF 10.5, Magnepan LRS, Audioengine A2+
Subs: Rythmik FV25HP, Rythmik FV15HP, Velodyne HGS 12, Velodyne VA1512
torii is offline  
post #18 of 469 Old 02-27-2020, 09:34 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
ClawAndTalon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Atlanta, GA.
Posts: 1,314
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 653 Post(s)
Liked: 491
Quote:
Originally Posted by torii View Post
Im not adding any parameters. enjoy your gear and music.


glad we have a large group of people that dont need to listen to amps”

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/strawman

“as within certain made up parameters they will sound the same”

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/personal-incredulity

Do you consider proper controls “made up parameters?” Wow... would you like to know why level matching, simultaneous switching, unsighted are important?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk



"Most theories on audio and audio reproduction will be proven wrong only when the laws of physics change."
ClawAndTalon is offline  
post #19 of 469 Old 02-27-2020, 09:47 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
torii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 8,105
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4133 Post(s)
Liked: 2420
depends what your testing for? science is wonderful for testing. they made a standard, follow it. great. lets examine distortion/harmonics of an amp, do they need to be measured? can 1 amp have more enjoyable harmonics/distortion than another? I personally cant stand amps with virtually no distortion...it sucks any type of air/soundstage out of the room with my systems. I am also not a subject matter expert on the subject. the engineers that build the stuff obviously have no motivation to improve the sound on new designs.

Power: Marantz sr7008, NAD C 275Bee x 2, Video: Oppo 103, Samsung 75un6300 LG oled c9 77
Speakers: Focal aria 948, Focal cc900, Klipsch synergy KSF 10.5, Magnepan LRS, Audioengine A2+
Subs: Rythmik FV25HP, Rythmik FV15HP, Velodyne HGS 12, Velodyne VA1512
torii is offline  
post #20 of 469 Old 02-27-2020, 09:52 AM
AVS Forum Addicted Member
 
m. zillch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 14,147
Mentioned: 65 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6202 Post(s)
Liked: 4441
Quote:
Originally Posted by torii View Post
lets examine distortion/harmonics of an amp, do they need to be measured? can 1 amp have more enjoyable harmonics/distortion than another? I personally cant stand amps with virtually no distortion...it sucks any type of air/soundstage out of the room with my systems
Then why do you own that NAD in your signature which has a impressively* low "< .008%" , according to the maker?

Rated THD (250mW to rated power, CCIF IMD, DIM 100) <0.008% (ref. 20Hz – 20kHz)

*impressive from the perspective of my camp which believes distortion is bad. It is antithetical to high fidelity.

Last edited by m. zillch; 02-27-2020 at 10:00 AM.
m. zillch is offline  
post #21 of 469 Old 02-27-2020, 10:03 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
torii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 8,105
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4133 Post(s)
Liked: 2420
Quote:
Originally Posted by m. zillch View Post
Then why do you own that NAD in your signature which has a vanishingly low "< .008%" , according to the maker?

Rated THD (250mW to rated power, CCIF IMD, DIM 100) <0.008% (ref. 20Hz – 20kHz)

its complicated. https://www.analog.com/en/analog-dia...ion-specs.html


I chose the nads on price and concept of using them as surround amps once I decide on a front 3 channel amp. they are pretty sweet amps tho, liked them alot more than nads highly acclaimed master series amps which measure even lower.

Power: Marantz sr7008, NAD C 275Bee x 2, Video: Oppo 103, Samsung 75un6300 LG oled c9 77
Speakers: Focal aria 948, Focal cc900, Klipsch synergy KSF 10.5, Magnepan LRS, Audioengine A2+
Subs: Rythmik FV25HP, Rythmik FV15HP, Velodyne HGS 12, Velodyne VA1512
torii is offline  
post #22 of 469 Old 02-27-2020, 10:07 AM
AVS Forum Addicted Member
 
m. zillch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 14,147
Mentioned: 65 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6202 Post(s)
Liked: 4441
Quote:
Originally Posted by torii View Post
Your link says nothing to support your original claim:

Quote:
Originally Posted by torii View Post
amps with virtually no distortion...it sucks any type of air/soundstage out of the room. . .
and instead supports my camp's view that distortion is always undesirable.

Last edited by m. zillch; 02-27-2020 at 10:12 AM.
m. zillch is offline  
post #23 of 469 Old 02-27-2020, 10:10 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
torii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 8,105
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4133 Post(s)
Liked: 2420
Quote:
Originally Posted by m. zillch View Post
Your link says nothing to support your original claim and instead supports my camp's view that distortion is always undesirable.

the link is to show how complicated the design and weakness of measuring technique.

Power: Marantz sr7008, NAD C 275Bee x 2, Video: Oppo 103, Samsung 75un6300 LG oled c9 77
Speakers: Focal aria 948, Focal cc900, Klipsch synergy KSF 10.5, Magnepan LRS, Audioengine A2+
Subs: Rythmik FV25HP, Rythmik FV15HP, Velodyne HGS 12, Velodyne VA1512
torii is offline  
post #24 of 469 Old 02-27-2020, 10:16 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
torii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 8,105
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4133 Post(s)
Liked: 2420
I have read many accounts of class d having alot of 3rd level harmonics which the human ear doesnt enjoy. the ear loves 2nd order harmonics tho. so the science is designing new class d with tubes in some cases because tubes are rich in 2nd order harmonics. all this science above my paygrade and I cant explain the best. if everyone is fine with amps sounding same, I dont lose any sleep. Im just trying to share my views however flawed they are to others I guess.

Power: Marantz sr7008, NAD C 275Bee x 2, Video: Oppo 103, Samsung 75un6300 LG oled c9 77
Speakers: Focal aria 948, Focal cc900, Klipsch synergy KSF 10.5, Magnepan LRS, Audioengine A2+
Subs: Rythmik FV25HP, Rythmik FV15HP, Velodyne HGS 12, Velodyne VA1512
torii is offline  
post #25 of 469 Old 02-27-2020, 10:24 AM
AVS Forum Addicted Member
 
m. zillch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 14,147
Mentioned: 65 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6202 Post(s)
Liked: 4441
Quote:
Originally Posted by torii View Post
I have read many accounts of. . .
I've read many accounts that homeopathic medicine works. It doesn't.

Last edited by m. zillch; 02-27-2020 at 10:31 AM.
m. zillch is offline  
post #26 of 469 Old 02-27-2020, 11:32 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
ClawAndTalon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Atlanta, GA.
Posts: 1,314
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 653 Post(s)
Liked: 491
Quote:
Originally Posted by torii View Post
I have read many accounts of class d having alot of 3rd level harmonics which the human ear doesnt enjoy. the ear loves 2nd order harmonics tho. so the science is designing new class d with tubes in some cases because tubes are rich in 2nd order harmonics. all this science above my paygrade and I cant explain the best. if everyone is fine with amps sounding same, I dont lose any sleep. Im just trying to share my views however flawed they are to others I guess.

“depends what your testing for? science is wonderful for testing. they made a standard, follow it. great.”

Science is a problem solving paradigm. It’s opposite is superstition. The reasons those controls are considered necessary is that unusual results happen when they aren’t followed. Such as people believing there is a difference between the exact same thing.

Benchmarking an amp’s distortion characteristics are old hat. Determining the level of THD, or individual harmonics is not hard to do with the most basic test equipment. But if you are testing THD there’s scientifically accepted ways of doing that. If distortion characteristics are important those can be measured.

“lets examine distortion/harmonics of an amp, do they need to be measured?”

Examining distortion is a key measurable beanchmark. This absolutely needs to be measured at some point.

“can 1 amp have more enjoyable harmonics/distortion than another?”

Do you think so? Why? Do you have an amp that does so, and measures as such? It appears the one you have doesn’t do so at all.

“I personally cant stand amps with virtually no distortion...”

Please send me that Nad you can’t stand. So your expectation bias are amps with perceived distortion that you only guess exists since measurements are crap?

“it sucks any type of air/soundstage out of the room with my systems.”

Air and soundstage are two real words in audio production that have been hijacked by audiophoozels. Air refers to sound at high frequency above 15khz, but the best way to toggle that is with an EQ. Soundstage (and imaging) are created during mastering and mixing. Typically an engineer is taking the sound from multiple, like 10, mics and has to mix that into two channels to make a coherent proper sound stage.

Here’s the problem, there is no standard to this process. Floyd Toole calls this the circle of confusion. Studio speakers can be of questionable quality. The mixing room could be of questionable treatment. Their overall approach could be questionable. All of those things can be, well anything. Yet you’re saying that added distortion fixes that? Please. Assuming it did, how would it universally fix all mastering/mixing approaches?

“I am also not a subject matter expert on the subject.”

Indeed

“the engineers that build the stuff obviously have no motivation to improve the sound on new designs.”

Improve past transparency is impossible. Marketing “improvements” to gullible audiophiles is easy.

“I have read many accounts of class d having alot of 3rd level harmonics which the human ear doesnt enjoy.”

Citation needed

“the ear loves 2nd order harmonics tho.”

At production we do like 2nd order harmonics of a fundamental, but at reproduction all of the sound you hear is now considered fundamental; production recorded second order fundamentals that you liked, which at replay are fundamentals. Did they not add enough? Go tell Clapton he needs a new amp. We also like a certain blend of 2nd and 3rd, so it’s way too chumpy to say you want more second at playback.

“so the science is designing new class d with tubes in some cases”

This would be dumb, and only done to market it as audio jewelry to gullible audiophoozels. Transistors would do the job, but don’t look like a Rolex.

“because tubes are rich in 2nd order harmonics.”

Citation needed

“all this science above my paygrade and I cant explain the best.”

Indeed

“if everyone is fine with amps sounding same, I dont lose any sleep.”

Fallback on that old strawman. Bad habits are hard to break.

“Im just trying to share my views however flawed they are to others I guess.”

Flawed indeed

“the link is to show how complicated the design and weakness of measuring technique.”

No, it doesn’t, it shows the challenge in measuring. If anything it discusses why most stated specs for THD are too abridged to be useful. Which is totally true. Stop cherry picking things you think support your view, use that time to actually learn. I’m certain 90% of that paper made your eyes glaze over.






Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk



"Most theories on audio and audio reproduction will be proven wrong only when the laws of physics change."
ClawAndTalon is offline  
post #27 of 469 Old 02-27-2020, 12:02 PM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
torii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 8,105
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4133 Post(s)
Liked: 2420
Quote:
Originally Posted by ClawAndTalon View Post
“depends what your testing for? science is wonderful for testing. they made a standard, follow it. great.”

Science is a problem solving paradigm. It’s opposite is superstition. The reasons those controls are considered necessary is that unusual results happen when they aren’t followed. Such as people believing there is a difference between the exact same thing.

Benchmarking an amp’s distortion characteristics are old hat. Determining the level of THD, or individual harmonics is not hard to do with the most basic test equipment. But if you are testing THD there’s scientifically accepted ways of doing that. If distortion characteristics are important those can be measured.

“lets examine distortion/harmonics of an amp, do they need to be measured?”

Examining distortion is a key measurable beanchmark. This absolutely needs to be measured at some point.

“can 1 amp have more enjoyable harmonics/distortion than another?”

Do you think so? Why? Do you have an amp that does so, and measures as such? It appears the one you have doesn’t do so at all.

“I personally cant stand amps with virtually no distortion...”

Please send me that Nad you can’t stand. So your expectation bias are amps with perceived distortion that you only guess exists since measurements are crap?

“it sucks any type of air/soundstage out of the room with my systems.”

Air and soundstage are two real words in audio production that have been hijacked by audiophoozels. Air refers to sound at high frequency above 15khz, but the best way to toggle that is with an EQ. Soundstage (and imaging) are created during mastering and mixing. Typically an engineer is taking the sound from multiple, like 10, mics and has to mix that into two channels to make a coherent proper sound stage.

Here’s the problem, there is no standard to this process. Floyd Toole calls this the circle of confusion. Studio speakers can be of questionable quality. The mixing room could be of questionable treatment. Their overall approach could be questionable. All of those things can be, well anything. Yet you’re saying that added distortion fixes that? Please. Assuming it did, how would it universally fix all mastering/mixing approaches?

“I am also not a subject matter expert on the subject.”

Indeed

“the engineers that build the stuff obviously have no motivation to improve the sound on new designs.”

Improve past transparency is impossible. Marketing “improvements” to gullible audiophiles is easy.

“I have read many accounts of class d having alot of 3rd level harmonics which the human ear doesnt enjoy.”

Citation needed

“the ear loves 2nd order harmonics tho.”

At production we do like 2nd order harmonics of a fundamental, but at reproduction all of the sound you hear is now considered fundamental; production recorded second order fundamentals that you liked, which at replay are fundamentals. Did they not add enough? Go tell Clapton he needs a new amp. We also like a certain blend of 2nd and 3rd, so it’s way too chumpy to say you want more second at playback.

“so the science is designing new class d with tubes in some cases”

This would be dumb, and only done to market it as audio jewelry to gullible audiophoozels. Transistors would do the job, but don’t look like a Rolex.

“because tubes are rich in 2nd order harmonics.”

Citation needed

“all this science above my paygrade and I cant explain the best.”

Indeed

“if everyone is fine with amps sounding same, I dont lose any sleep.”

Fallback on that old strawman. Bad habits are hard to break.

“Im just trying to share my views however flawed they are to others I guess.”

Flawed indeed

“the link is to show how complicated the design and weakness of measuring technique.”

No, it doesn’t, it shows the challenge in measuring. If anything it discusses why most stated specs for THD are too abridged to be useful. Which is totally true. Stop cherry picking things you think support your view, use that time to actually learn. I’m certain 90% of that paper made your eyes glaze over.






Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

parsing my every post is kinda anal. not much to discuss playing this game.

Power: Marantz sr7008, NAD C 275Bee x 2, Video: Oppo 103, Samsung 75un6300 LG oled c9 77
Speakers: Focal aria 948, Focal cc900, Klipsch synergy KSF 10.5, Magnepan LRS, Audioengine A2+
Subs: Rythmik FV25HP, Rythmik FV15HP, Velodyne HGS 12, Velodyne VA1512
torii is offline  
post #28 of 469 Old 02-27-2020, 12:02 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Forum Special Member
 
DreamWarrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Dirty South Jersey
Posts: 2,536
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1239 Post(s)
Liked: 752
Quote:
Originally Posted by A9X-308 View Post
It's audiophool mythology.
That doesn't help, and I'm inclined to agree with you. However, you really can't tell me that the examples I give above will all work similarly! At a certain limited volume range, maybe. However, then there's noise floors and everything else to consider.

Of course, as I mentioned right from the start, if one picks "better" speakers, they have a higher chance that none of this matters.
Quote:
Originally Posted by torii View Post
the problem is that we cant measure everything. I have used car stereo receivers from 2v outputs to 4v to 5v to 8v....just this simple change in output voltages changes everything when comparing. one thing that is really not known is how feedback/power sent back to an amplifier from the speaker works along with basic clipping which many say happens a whole helluva lot more when playing music than when testing static loads. also if something measures the same does it sound the same? let alone if it measures different obviously it wont perform/sound the same. the sciences dont even know what to measure for alot of what our brain processes. lots of unkowns...but if you are happy, be happy....if striving for better sound...try more gear. audioscience review site does a decent amount of tests but no debate is allowed...so the measurements are what they are and they are very different.
A few things:

1) High voltages in car applications are typically due simply to signal noise interference. A car's electrical system is noisy! If you've dealt with car installs, I'd bet you remember every single install where you had to diagnose alternator whine. High voltage balanced signals (I used to use Zapco's Symbilink products) are helpful in eliminating that. Fortunately, most car audio amplifiers are more like pro-amps with configuration (gain) to optimize the signal chain. You just need enough voltage out of the pre to rid yourself of noise.

2) I am not sure there are things that science can't measure regarding audio. However, I am sure that things like SPICE exist and that we can drop an amplifier circuit into it and simulate it. I also know there are programs that exist to simulate speakers (subwoofers for sure). I wouldn't be at all surprised if we could connect a SPICE simulated amp to a SPICE simulated crossover to some other simulation that would approximate a speaker's T/S parameters (and box where applicable). Then one could playback a PCM file through the entire simulation chain to read-off the excursion of every speaker at every sample! This would be super sick, and I'm sure it could be done with some level of accuracy should it be desired and someone (anyone want to work with me?) knew the math and had the programming chops to implement it!
Quote:
Originally Posted by m. zillch View Post
Generally speaking, it's complete baloney, but there are key words and phrases which make people who believe in magic feel warm and fuzzy and releases their endorphins. You've found one of their big ones.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aocZo3oeNxw

Running high voltage levels on preamp level signal outputs can sometimes improve SNR and reduce an overall system's background hiss, but that's it, (there are no other "magical" benefits) and if you don't notice any hiss from the get go it is a waste of time.

Designing gear to have an abnormally high output level can actually be bad if you want to integrate to other gear which can't take it: here you shoot yourself in the foot and have to turn it down to a much lower output level than its max, bringing its signal level much closer to the gear's own noise floor, and you actually end up increasing your overall system's background hiss.
While I agree there aren't "magical benefits", how do I drive an amplifier to its maximum power without being able to provide the required input voltage? Obviously I can't (without another amplifier in between). So, if you need that power (Speaker A is pretty inefficient, do you dispute that someone may actually need a lot of power for it?) and can't get it, then you need a different pre (or another device to compensate). If you don't call that "synergy" then fine, but that's what I mean here.

Moreover, if all a pre-amp can provide is a max of .9v at best, then it must provide significantly less if, say, it has 120dB of dynamic range. So, a quiet piece being played back at a low level will be providing even less voltage into the amplifier, which will then be providing even less voltage into a speaker, and quite possibly that speaker "barely moves" (which means it may hardly overcome the noise floor of your room or the Fletcher Munson curve of your ear depending on the content). Thus, you may be relegated to using that .9v pre at its max volume all the time. That doesn't sound "synergistic".

Of course, this is all under a presumption that some sort of minimum voltage level must be present (all the way back to the pre) in order for a speaker to "react" in an audible way (and I'd certainly be inclined to believe that how much it must "react" to be audible has something to do with the environment it's in and the listener's ears). Once you reach that minimum voltage, I suppose you're out of the (for lack of a better term, or maybe it is the right term) "noise floor" of the system, then from that point forward I suppose you're good. I wonder if the minimum voltage required changes based on parameters of the speaker itself? Possibly not its inductance, but may it have something to do with the speaker's frequency response and, again, Fletcher Munson curves? So, do we create a situation where upon playing back a quiet piece at a low level, due to the whole system (signal chain, speaker, room, listener), it audibly sounds like we're coming in and out of the "noise floor" in a way that "pumps" oddly?

Having said all that, I certainly realize that all of this can be mitigated by other electronics in the chain (even better by using electronics that are configurable and can be easily mated to various signal chains...like most pro-gear). Certainly I can add gain via another amplifier between my pre and my power amp. Certainly I can add a resistor as well. But, most people won't go to that level of "trouble". If they don't, however, they may end up with a system that has a sub-optimal signal-chain...and I'd call that "lacking synergy".

Moreover, if one simply replaces amplifier A with amplifier C and does nothing else to their signal chain, they may find themselves unable to conduct a viable blind test (which they weren't doing anyway, lol) but may also find themselves unable to spin the volume of the pre-amp to a level that makes both amps sound "the same" (as they should, providing the signal chain allows it and the amp is transparent to begin with).

edit -- this post (I hope) helps show the "audiophiles" why amps (which may otherwise be designed for (and tested as having) transparency) can sound different in different signal chains even when level matched (i.e., there are more variables in the signal chain to control and if you don't things sound different...but maybe not for the reasons you were "taught" by a cottage industry designed to fleece you).

Last edited by DreamWarrior; 02-27-2020 at 12:36 PM.
DreamWarrior is offline  
post #29 of 469 Old 02-27-2020, 12:08 PM
AVS Forum Addicted Member
 
m. zillch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 14,147
Mentioned: 65 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6202 Post(s)
Liked: 4441
I'm sorry I wasn't clear. I wasn't talking about what you are calling synergy but rather what the placebophiles call synergy: "This speaker works best with this speaker wire and this interconnect because it gives you the best imaging" sort of stuff. Their foolishness is the magic they cling too because they hate judging audio by just their ears; they insist on using their eyes too.
ClawAndTalon likes this.
m. zillch is offline  
post #30 of 469 Old 02-27-2020, 12:20 PM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
torii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 8,105
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4133 Post(s)
Liked: 2420
these 2 headphone amps sound so different its silly to think they wouldnt. its really enjoyable to be able to swap in/out multiple headphones and listen to different music very quickly and with minimal effort. the red amp is chifi under 100bux and the black amp is the thxaaa789 which many regard as the best in the world for 350bux
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	20190912_212252.jpg
Views:	35
Size:	551.1 KB
ID:	2690928  

Power: Marantz sr7008, NAD C 275Bee x 2, Video: Oppo 103, Samsung 75un6300 LG oled c9 77
Speakers: Focal aria 948, Focal cc900, Klipsch synergy KSF 10.5, Magnepan LRS, Audioengine A2+
Subs: Rythmik FV25HP, Rythmik FV15HP, Velodyne HGS 12, Velodyne VA1512
torii is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply Audio Theory, Setup, and Chat

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off