AVS Forum banner
1 - 20 of 21 Posts

· Premium Member
Joined
·
9,340 Posts
We can, but only if we get the 1394 design group involved with the area. The HDMI camp came to us and this the area was born seeing they will be taking part directly. It is not just an area to have an area, it is somewhere for the industry to come in and take part.


Get them to contact us and pledge to take part and we can consider it.


Thanks
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
9,340 Posts
Got an e-mail today, but was not able to contact them based on the issues with the site. I will look into it come Monday.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
9,340 Posts
Have not heard from them Kipp after my reply. So nothing is taking place currently.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
11 Posts
AVS Forum, count me in. It may take me a few days to track down answers, but I will do what I can. Bear with me if I seem to disappear for a week or two. I hit periods of heavy travel, but I will get back to you as soon as I return.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
9,340 Posts
Thanks James...Please be aware that the direct contact from people involved in 1394 that would make the area work. Without attention, where weeks can go by without answers, that really is not the intent. Deeper involvement would need to play a part by the 1394 group.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
27 Posts
I have no problem joining a public FireWire / 1394 forum. Count me in ...


Here is my usual rant:


I do hope you won't get too wrapped around the "1394" axle. IMOP this naming convention is one of the reasons that FireWire has never taken off in the consumer arena = lack of name recognition for what it really is: Apple's original and at the time, unique packet switching, double duplex, peer to peer data transport for external devices and systems. Sony adopted the iLink scenario shortly after Apple's introduction in order to get digital images out of their cameras and into desktop systems ... The combination of Apple's FireWire and Sony's iLink is the adopted IEEE 1394a subset.


Yes folks, there is a very healthy FireWire /1394 universe, composed mostly of professional audio (analog to digital mixing, recording & playback), professional CGI movie graphics (high resolution graphics rendering), industrial machine vision (robot eyes, process monitor & control, home land security) and secure high performance peer to peer networking. FireWire 400 (1394a) is faster and has more bandwidth than either USB2.0 or GigaBit Ethernet for streaming audio or video, FireWire 800 (1394b) is more than twice as fast as GigaBit Ethernet. FireWire audio has better latency and much, much less jitter problems than USB1.1 or USB 2.0. ... Optically transported FireWire 400 DV video can stream four feeds at a time out to a quarter of a mile, USB 2.0 can nominally handle one stream to a maximum of about 150 feet.


My link is: FireWireStuff ... online with FireWire / iLink / IEEE 1394a/b parts and accessories since 1997.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
27 Posts
" ... 1394 may be withering consumer-wise, but industrially speaking, it's not only surviving, but thriving nicely. ..."


" ... is there a reason that there is a decline in consumer 1394 is it cost or politics.[?] ..."


There was a serious effort by Cypress Technology to infiltrate and undermine FireWire 1394 market position. Cypress Technology are makers of excellent and universally compatible USB chip sets, best of the best USB, IMOP. But Cypress marketing & management took a tack several years ago that FireWire was somehow "the competition" and thus overtly and covertly took it upon themselves to shoot down FireWire 1394 in the engineering marketplace.


Fortunately, there were and are several significant technical advantages that FireWire 400 (IEEE 1394a) has over USB 2.0:


* FireWire is faster than USB 2.0 (even with a slower processor clock rate).

* FireWire is "peer to peer" making it more stable and closer to true "plug and play".

* FireWire actually is cheaper to produce than USB 2.0, primarily because it is less complicated.

* Although FireWire cabling is slightly more expensive to produce, it more redily conforms to radio noise polution requirements of the FCC ... and to common sense.

...


(Mercenary announcement: I work for usbstuff and firewirestuff ... online with both for more than 10 years.)
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
5,726 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Bott /forum/post/9848701


Thanks James...Please be aware that the direct contact from people involved in 1394 that would make the area work. Without attention, where weeks can go by without answers, that really is not the intent. Deeper involvement would need to play a part by the 1394 group.

Hi David,


I dont see any involvement from the 1394TA aside from the Cable box thread which is linked with thier own agenda. Is there any point in keeping this forum open?
 

· Registered
Joined
·
27 Posts
There is another FireWire forum at Apple's Developers' Forums ... but I thought you folks wanted to have a public one here ... I'm willing to continue to contribute if anyone a willingness to do so as well ...
 

· Registered
Joined
·
873 Posts
My interest in IEEE1394 is strictly MPEG-2-TS, the only digital format which is used as both inputs and outputs on only D-VHS components so far to my knowledge.


Since D-VHS is the only way to record HD (so far) and TS is the only way to interface with D-VHS or HTPC's, then this TS format is a critical link and of great importance.


On thing of interest is OTA tuners. What will be their output? HDMI I would think, but will they also have TS? If not, that will basically eliminate the ability to record HD since TS is required to do so.


When the Toshiba HD-DVD w/HDD is finally released to this market, it will be interesting to see what it will have as inputs.

___________________________


What I find confusing is the i.Link does not imply anything regarding TS operability.

___________________________


With SD, demodulated RF resulted in a VIDEO signal. Now with HD, is there such a thing as the "VIDEO" signal? Component is almost an "RF" version of a digital signal so that is definitely not a standard. Is MPEG-2-TS the "VIDEO" signal? Is HDMI the encrypted "VIDEO" signal? is it encrypted MPEG-2-TS? (I don't even want to talk about DVI at this point.)
 
1 - 20 of 21 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top