No, you just follow everything you would do for the normal HDR mode, but enable HGIG when complete. But that’s personal preference as some people prefer to use Dynamic Tone Mapping.So you tweak the 2 point high with HGIG engaged? I disabled all dynamic tone mapping for mine but enabled HGIG after. I haven't looked at any clipping slides to confirm if that was an issue.
Can i also use it for a 77 Inch Oled?FSI XM650U is the 65 inch while the FSI XM550U is the 55 inch. Both are using the 2018 LG WRGB panel glass.
When the LG Display produces a large panel glass sheet, they cut from the same sheet the 55 and 65 panels.
yip!Can i also use it for a 77 Inch Oled?
Are you amok4all?yip!
All LG OLED users can use it since the i1Display PRO is not coming with any EDR table for WRGB OLED.Can i also use it for a 77 Inch Oled?
DNICE told me that an awp is not necessary for my 77c9?All LG OLED users can use it since the i1Display PRO is not coming with any EDR table for WRGB OLED.
The OLED EDR of i1Display PRO is useful for broadcast Sony RGB OLED, not for any LG OLED.
I don’t want to discuss further because I’m not sitting in Germany with you, your display and your meter. I am not familiar with the i1pro 3 and Eizo so I don’t have the knowledge with those devices to properly assist you.DNICE told me that an awp is not necessary for my 77c9?
But for me it look awful with d65. But he don't want a discussion because he tried.
What do you think about it?
I don't have access to USA LG TVs to see what is happening.DNICE told me that an awp is not necessary for my 77c9?
But for me it look awful with d65. But he don't want a discussion because he tried.
What do you think about it?
Right. I’m just not comfortable giving detailed advise on items I have no experience with. I know how influential my posts are which require great responsibility.I don't have access to USA LG TVs to see what is happening.
But trust what D-Nice is saying.
The point of the posts about AWP is for OLED users to match the white of a reference plasma/crt.DNICE told me that an awp is not necessary for my 77c9?
But for me it look awful with d65. But he don't want a discussion because he tried.
What do you think about it?
As I stated above, the i1 Pro meters (being a 10nm Spectro) does not read white (the actual mixture of RGB) the same as a high end Spectro, not even on a Plasma display. So even if your monitor is a standard sRGB it may be very slightly off on that display too when compared to what a 5nm Spectro would read. When you add the fact that LG OLED uses a WRGB sub-pixel structure into the equation, that difference becomes amplified a little.So there are some options why is it the case.
1. I'm doing all wrong from the beginning
2. My measurement equippment is wrong
3. The 77C9 from Dnice (I think it's a US Model like Ted mentioned) is not like my EU Model?
That is all that matters. If you have found a white that looks correct to you after perceptually matching to a different display then that is what you should use. That is the point of perceptual matching and is why I initially suggested it to you in the first place.At the moment I'm satisfied with my and Ted's Ipro AWP coordinates.
The most logical explanation is pixel spacing, but there could be any number of reasons. The most important thing really is that you initially felt that D65 somehow "didn't look right" to you beforehand, but after matching to a display that you do feel looks correct you are now happy with your results.So one question makes me confusing:
Why does a 77 behave differently than a 65 or 55?
1. So an Ipro3 at the end is useless?As I stated above, the i1 Pro meters (being a 10nm Spectro) does not read white (the actual mixture of RGB) the same as a high end Spectro, not even on a Plasma display. So even if your monitor is a standard sRGB it may be very slightly off on that display too when compared to what a 5nm Spectro would read. When you add the fact that LG OLED uses a WRGB sub-pixel structure into the equation, that difference becomes amplified a little.
This is why I showed you the Spectra scan differences between and RGB additive display and a WRGB non-additive display in the other thread
![]()
Feedback on HCFR LG C8 OLED SDR Calibration
Have you verified that your meter profile is within NIST tolerance? For example, using this tool, with results evaluated like in this post? No i didn't verified with this tool. I didn't know it before. I will test it next week. But i thougt calman tells me if the profile is correct?www.avsforum.com
That is not suggesting your measurement equipment is wrong, just that it will not read as accurately as a higher end 5nm or better Spectroradiometer. This will most definitely be part of why you are seeing some differences in your measurements
The most logical explanation is pixel spacing, but there could be any number of reasons. The most important thing really is that you initially felt that D65 somehow "didn't look right" to you beforehand, but after matching to a display that you do feel looks correct you are now happy with your results.
No, I never said that.1. So an Ipro3 at the end is useless?
2. My previous Scrrens (Beamer) looks good to me at D65-
I really do wish there were others out there with 5nm spectros and owned a 77 and a smaller OLED to compare side by side. More data point, the better.As I stated above, the i1 Pro meters (being a 10nm Spectro) does not read white (the actual mixture of RGB) the same as a high end Spectro, not even on a Plasma display. So even if your monitor is a standard sRGB it may be very slightly off on that display too when compared to what a 5nm Spectro would read. When you add the fact that LG OLED uses a WRGB sub-pixel structure into the equation, that difference becomes amplified a little.
This is why I showed you the Spectra scan differences between and RGB additive display and a WRGB non-additive display in the other thread
![]()
Feedback on HCFR LG C8 OLED SDR Calibration
Have you verified that your meter profile is within NIST tolerance? For example, using this tool, with results evaluated like in this post? No i didn't verified with this tool. I didn't know it before. I will test it next week. But i thougt calman tells me if the profile is correct?www.avsforum.com
That is not suggesting your measurement equipment is wrong, just that it will not read as accurately as a higher end 5nm or better Spectroradiometer. This will most definitely be part of why you are seeing some differences in your measurements
That is all that matters. If you have found a white that looks correct to you after perceptually matching to a different display then that is what you should use. That is the point of perceptual matching and is why I initially suggested it to you in the first place.
The most logical explanation is pixel spacing, but there could be any number of reasons. The most important thing really is that you initially felt that D65 somehow "didn't look right" to you beforehand, but after matching to a display that you do feel looks correct you are now happy with your results.
The fact you also came to the same coordinates as I did (the AWP Ted provides for i1 Pro users) could just be coincidence or it could mean European 77" WOLED panels do indeed need an AWP too. Unless others are willing to experiment in the same way on more samples, I guess we'll never know.