AVS Forum banner
  • Get an exclusive sneak peek into our new project. >>> Click Here

720p or 1080i OUTPUT to 1080p Set?

992 Views 11 Replies 9 Participants Last post by  John Mason
Which have you found looks the best for movies? For action/sports?


I initially set my cable box to output 1080i, but thought "Why make the set deinterlace 1080 rather than upconvert the 720p?" I found that SD signals seemed much sharper in 720p on my JVC HD56FH96.


Which will be sharper? Which will produce the least SSE?


Any input?
Status
Not open for further replies.
1 - 12 of 12 Posts
Most HD content is 1080i, so I would recommend using that as your output. Otherwise you are converting 1080i -> 720p on the cable box, then the JVC converts 720p -> 1080p. Better to just output the native 1080i and let the JVC deinterlace it.


I have DirecTV and it has a real easy way to switch modes. I leave it in 1080i unless I am watching ESPN, ABC, or FOX, which are in 720p.


I don't notice a difference in SD content in 1080i vs 720p.
No doubt. Deinterlacing a 1080i signal is a no brainer.

I have extensive experience running all kinds of tests in this realm

from the days of my 1080p Toshiba 57HLX82.

You don't even need fancy calibration equipment to measure the difference.

Running a set-top box at 1080i should look light years better than running it at 720p,

even to an untrained eye.
My suggestion: Switch the HDTV box to 720p for 720p shows (Fox, etc.) and switch it back to 1080i for 1080i shows.


>>> De-interlacing 1080i is a no-brainer...

I beg to differ, but after you buy a 1080p TV with just 1080i input you are stuck with whatever de-interlacing came with it.


Video hints:
http://members.aol.com/ajaynejr/hdtvnot.htm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Allan Jayne
>>> De-interlacing 1080i is a no-brainer...

I beg to differ, but after you buy a 1080p TV with just 1080i input you are stuck with whatever de-interlacing came with it.
Yes, but when you buy that set with 1080p input, you are still stuck with all STBs outputting 1080i. There is no quick solution to this situation. 1080i on a 1080p looks best in my opinion.
Certainly a 1080p set will do a better job of de-interlacing and appllying motion copensation to an incoming 1080i signal than having a STB descale a 1080i program to 720p and sending it to the 1080p TV for upscaling to 1080p. IF you have a SA cable STB you would want to use "Pass through" mode so that the STB does not scaling and the TV does it all. With a Motorola Cable STB unless you watch a heck a lot of ABC, FOX and ESPN-HD compared to all else I would suggest the you send the 1080p TV 1080i instead of 720p since you have to choose one or the other. For a particular show or sporting event on

ABC, FOX, or ESPN-HD you might want to switch and then switch back afterwords.
You probably shouldn't even lock yourself to one resolution and let the signal pass through. Less scaling is better. I know I enjoy letting my set do all the scaling to whatever is sent to it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ogbuehi
You probably shouldn't even lock yourself to one resolution and let the signal pass through. Less scaling is better. I know I enjoy letting my set do all the scaling to whatever is sent to it.
Not all cable boxes have the pass-through option (mine does not).
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillP
Not all cable boxes have the pass-through option (mine does not).
Nor does my Comcast HD/DVR, unless I just cannot find it... :confused: Anyone know how to access passthrough with a Motorola DCT 6412 III from Comcast?
I've been hearing that some cable boxes don't have this pass through option. My friend recently purchased (past 2 days or so) a 50" plasma screen and a hd cable box. I was over watching and the HD was not that great. Seeing as the cable box was set to 1080i I figured there had to be a way to set it to 720p. I figured 720p would clear up the fuzziness and overly soft pictures. Navigating through the box I couldn't find the option to change the output resolution of the box but stumbled across the pass-through option behind a menu that I thought had nothing to do with video output. Needless to say the HD signal now looks like a true HD signal. I mean it looks worlds different. Bottom line: cable boxes suck when it comes to scaling to a particular resolution. If you are absolutely sure there is no pass-through, toss the box and get cable card if that is an option. If you are stuck with box scaling everything to one resolution or another, you probably are missing a potentially even better viewing experience. I will go back to her house tonight to see if I can get the model number and what menu option I found it under.
See less See more
I can set the Motorola cable box to output 720p or 1080i, but there is no pass through option. Cable card is also not an option for me (my DLP is >2 years old). My only options are to just have it set to 720p, the native resolution of my DLP (which is what I am currently doing), or to manually toggle it between 720p or 1080i, depending on the channel.
In the current poll trbarry is running in the hardware forum, there seems to be mixed results whether 1080p owners see differences between 720p or 1080i feeds on their 1080p displays.


As far back as I've read AVS, there are many posts--well before the 1080p era--from HD viewers saying 1080i appears sharper than 720p. Most earlier/current displays, of course, can't quite resolve the finest detail delivered via 1080i. And lots of 1080i programming, such as films, still falls short of 1080i's often-mentioned resolvable-detail 'maximum' (without oversampling/downconversion) of roughly 1450 lines.


Seems surprising, after these earlier typical results of 1080i/720p comparison, that 1080p display owners wouldn't continue noticing sharper HD images from 1080i sources. But, as always, there are lots of variables: As the recent C-NET 1080p shootout found, at least one 1080p DLP model (a Mits) only resolved ~1440 lines with a signal generator, presumably gradually blurring lines up to that point. And as Greg Merson's deinterlacing test showed, some 1080ps reduce vertical resolution too much with continuous 540p bobbing. Some displays lacking 1080i inverse telecine (24p frame extraction) wouldn't be showing film or 24p tape to best advantage. But it seems like bad news if displays that are finally capable of full 19020X1080 resolvable detail--never delivered, except for test patterns--have arrived and owners can't see 720p versus 1080i differences.


The often-reported contrasts between the two formats are live crowd scenes at sports events, or distant shots of players. In the past, most say 1080i delivers more detailed images, as you'd expect, primarily given the differences in the limiting resolution of the two main HD formats.


BTW, some 720p programming boosts this limiting resolution close to the full format (1280X720p) by downconverting 1080/24p master tapes (telecined films) or using newer TV cameras or systems that downconvert 1080/60p to 720/60p. That would narrow the perception gap of fine details between 720p and 1080i/p, although for some scenes such as distant live crowds, or fine scenic details (1080/60i travelogues or documentaries) captured with HDCAMs, 1080i/p, logically at least, should still have the sharper images. -- John
See less See more
1 - 12 of 12 Posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top