I chose the Lansonic to use both for my home theater and for my whole-house music distribution system. I had initially expected to go with AudioRequest, but the Lansonic unit's openness made the difference. Here are a few of the things I like best about the DAS-750-PRO unit, and a few things I have fixed.
The MusicLoader is a life saver. I'm recording in two formats, .wav and .mp3. I can put in a bunch of CD's and come back the next day and they are done (in one format only). The main problem is that the CD's are played in real-time. If they had a built-in CD-ROM drive, they could rip the CD's much faster. Since I have about 400 CD's, that would save a lot of time. A very rough estimate is that each CD takes an hour, so I have 800 hours of recording to do.
I decided to go with a small (30GB) internal disk and save the majority of my files on network attached storage. I have 280GB in a rack unit. Lansonic's ability to access these files across the network makes this possible. It also makes backup, mirroring, etc. easier. The problem I have found is that the unit won't keep up with writing a .wav file in real-time across the network. Lansonic has promised a fix for this soon. Therefore, I have to save to local disk and then move the files, and that takes nearly twice as long.
Another problem is that Lansonic decided to use the freedb database instead of the more complete cddb database for lookups. I fixed this by telnetting into the system and adding a cddb server to the list. This is easy if you know Unix. Now my unknown disc lookups go against the much better cddb database -- I had about 20% "unknowns" before. Lansonic also ships with a startup database, and all discs are looked up against that internal database before going on the net. I removed that just by renaming the directory where the database is stored, and now all lookups are against a live database.
I have yet to plug this into the production system since I'm still loading discs. All signs so far are that it will work well.