Quote:
Originally Posted by Elix /forum/post/22047921
Give me a 2D picture quality to match that passive 3D and I'm sold. The LGs which are currently the top choice for passive 3D are inferior sets when it comes to things which make a great 2D TV: blacks, contrast, color accuracy, motion resolution.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jscott70 /forum/post/22047849
I second that sentiment...probably not with as large of a body of work in testing or research as you but in my limited experience, passive is hands down MY PERSONAL preference. Let's see how many "active 3d" trolls show up to shout us down...LOL
Quote:
Originally Posted by wonka702 /forum/post/22049279
I love threads like this. Cant resist putting my opinion in. I love 3d. I feel fortunate to get to enjoy my 3dtv.
If you like it view it, if you don't like it don't watch 3d (that is what most people do).
Lets start trying to get the studios to give us what they promised us when we invested in these sets, GOOD 3D content. That is all I want. And I want it at a good price. It was nice going out this weekend and purchasing some $16.99 blu ray 3d's. I don't want the next time im getting that price to be because they aren't going to produce more content. Be happy with what you have not what you want. And don't try to justify your tech to satisfy your ego.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lee Stewart /forum/post/0
It would be very helpful for the adoption of 3D-TV to have more content. I can't remember the last time Comcast added new 3D content. Depending solely on 3D BD for 3D content doesn't cut it iMO.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank /forum/post/0
I don't have a shortage of 3D content as I have been producing my own for over three years.
I've probably deleted more 3D content then the vast majority of you have watched.![]()
Lately I've been doing my 3D editing and watching on a passive monitor and have come to love it.
When trying to view 3D with any of my active displays I get fatigued almost immediately.
My wife can't stand active either and began to twist my arm about getting rid of them a while ago and finally I've seen the light.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lee Stewart /forum/post/22049353
It would be very helpful for the adoption of 3D-TV to have more content. I can't remember the last time Comcast added new 3D content. Depending solely on 3D BD for 3D content doesn't cut it iMO.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank /forum/post/22050735
Now the task is to replace my three remaining active 3D televisions with passive.
The 63" samsung plasma in the living room will be replaced with either a 65" Vizio or LG. I'm leaning toward Vizio as I use a 42" as my main computer monitor and I like it fine.
Even though I rarely use the televisions 3D mode I am offended by the LG use of the 3D warning that can not be bypassed.
99 percent of my 3D viewing is via computer using either line interleaved of checkerboard so the 3D warning might never show up except in the rare cases where I watch ESPN 3D in the living room.
I'm going to replace the Samsung UN40C7000 on my treadmill with the same VIZIO I use as my desktop monitor.
I'm still not sure about what to do in my theater room.
I have an idea but it's quite expensive.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jscott70 /forum/post/22052120
I own one of the 2012 models (65LM6200) and there is no 3d warning, only a mode selection dialog but you can just hit select because unless you're viewing SBS or checkerboard, it is always on 2d>3d mode and 3d Blu-ray auto detects and seemlessly transitions into native 3d mode. The 2d>3d mode is actually quite useful and pretty effective on most types of content. Talk shows and some movies don't see much effect. Basketball games have been awesome to watch in 2d>3d and many movies, especially those authored in 3d but showing in HD (e.g. Cars 2) work very well. There is a lot of depth but not any pop-out. I find the IMAX movies/documentaries to be the best for popout. 3d Blu-ray obviously is the best 3d experience. LG's Smart TV 3d World has some nice 3d content as well. I would definitely take a look at both Vizio and LG in person before making your final decision. Good luck in your replacement endeavors!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank /forum/post/0
Now the task is to replace my three remaining active 3D televisions with passive.
The 63" samsung plasma in the living room will be replaced with either a 65" Vizio or LG. I'm leaning toward Vizio as I use a 42" as my main computer monitor and I like it fine.
Even though I rarely use the televisions 3D mode I am offended by the LG use of the 3D warning that can not be bypassed.
99 percent of my 3D viewing is via computer using either line interleaved of checkerboard so the 3D warning might never show up except in the rare cases where I watch ESPN 3D in the living room.
I'm going to replace the Samsung UN40C7000 on my treadmill with the same VIZIO I use as my desktop monitor.
I'm still not sure about what to do in my theater room.
I have an idea but it's quite expensive.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jscott70 /forum/post/22047849
I second that sentiment...probably not with as large of a body of work in testing or research as you but in my limited experience, passive is hands down MY PERSONAL preference. Let's see how many "active 3d" trolls show up to shout us down...LOL