AVS Forum banner
1 - 20 of 85 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
81 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Anybody else here think that the Apple TV would be a much more appealing device if it could play DVDs -- either with a built-in drive or streaming from a PC? The iTunes interface doesn't bother me so much, but I'm reluctant to buy a device that still requires me to own a separate DVD player... thereby ruining the convenience of the Apple TV interface...
 

· Registered
Joined
·
13,393 Posts
I agree. However I think their approach is to provide the player (at a low cost) so you'll buy content from iTunes. Basically it's a mini mac mini. Like cell phones before long they will give you the player if you subscribe to their service.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
520 Posts
Yep. I think it is a fatal flaw. That and the low resolution support for HDTV. I just bought a MVIX with a 300Gig Drive from newegg for $329. It says it will play MPEG2, Divx, Xvid and MPEG4. No need to get locked into Apples proprietory formats. I'll let you know what I think about it after I give it spin this weekend.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
191 Posts
I don't think it's that bad ...

The poor codec support and bitrates is what I find the most limiting. Then the small harddrive does'nt help either.

I can live without a DVD/CD player, I rather have a Oppo or something like that in my gear than a crappy ATV CD/DVD support for player.


Patrick S.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,519 Posts
I disagree. People who buy the product are probably people who enjoy watching video which means 99.9% of them will already own a DVD player. Why increase the cost of the device with something that won't be used often? I do agree the codec support is lame.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
81 Posts
Discussion Starter · #6 ·

Quote:
Originally Posted by bac522 /forum/post/0


I disagree. People who buy the product are probably people who enjoy watching video which means 99.9% of them will already own a DVD player. Why increase the cost of the device with something that won't be used often? I do agree the codec support is lame.

I think they're missing out on some potential customers (like myself) by forcing people to add another remote control and/or deal with universal remotes, add another device to their home theater, etc. The Apple TV could have been the one-stop entertainment center -- instead it's just another gadget... Codecs can be hacked, but a DVD player cannot...
 

· Registered
Joined
·
819 Posts
I think AppleTV's fatal flaw is hw limitation of max. 5Mbps H264 and 720p only.


True HD resolution and bitrates need much more.


Apple will certainly have more customers when it rolls out AppleTV 2.0 (or perhaps 3.0) in the future with all the HD support included.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
296 Posts
At first I thought the limited hard drive space and lack of a DVD player were flaws, then I started to think about it:


If you're getting this you're likely already on the iTunes bandwagon and this is just a natural extension of that. You probably already have a DVD player under your TV.


With little skill you can, if you like, convert your DVDs (Handbrake) to work on the Apple TV. You end up with a nice menu of movies and other content for you to enjoy without getting up. This makes your DVD collection as convenient as your CDs were made when you converted them to MP3s. My CDs (and DVDs) sat on the shelf for years simply because I didn't want to hassle with them to pull them out to play the odd songs. When I ripped them all I was suddenly listing to them everywhere, at home, car, walking around (iPod). The convenience really paid off.


I think this is where the DVD-ripping into Apple TV comes in. Also, there's little reason not to buy movies from Apple's iTunes. Sure, you could make the argument that "but then it's got DRM and I don't get to keep it forever or will have to rebuy it." The reality is that you're going to rebuy it anyway in some other (improved) format. People built huge collections of VHS movies so they'd never have to buy them again. They did the same with LDs and DVDs. DVDs were supposed to be the end. Now we've got HD-DVDs/Blueray on the horizon. The reality is that you rebuy content every 10 years or so or learn to live with what you've got. You'll never purchase the 'ultimate' reference disc/media.


That being said, I like the fact that my MP3s aren't lock into iTunes (they are the DRM'd proprietary iTunes format). I can take/play them anywhere. That's handy. The reality is that I don't take my DVDs anywhere. It really doesn't matter if they're locked in at home with some DRM issue. Worst case scenerio I can copy them to my iPod for a long flight.


Anyway, the area where Apple TV really shines (and I realize this won't work for everyone ) is in cable TV/DVR replacement. I can buy the few seasons of the shows I like, download them commercial-free, and watch them whenever I like and it'll cost me less than cable's digital package + the extra tier + the DVR / box fees + the taxes.


TV viewership is down. Way down. I was paying close to $100/month to watch 2-3 shows per week (that get tossed anyway when I'm done watching them). To me, it makes more sense to just buy the shows cheaper via iTunes, download them, watch them when I want, and, if I toss them later, I'm still ahead of the game compared to paying for cable. Plus, if I choose, I can archive them which isn't possible with current cable boxes.


Now there's a question about formats. I know there are some who want to be able to toss every format they can think of at a box and it should just play. I really don't want to worry about it. I'm pretty happy converting the DVDs, playing them at will, and not worrying about it. If the Apple TV included a DVD player someone would undoubtedly complain that it's not an HD-DVD or Blueray player. Someone else would complain that it doesn't play VCDs. I'm sure you'd be able to find someone who'd say, "Well, it won't play my LDs, CDVs, CDIs, or Photo CDs - these are old technologies and it should at least be able to play them."


For the rest of us (the regular consumer-electronics folks) I think people will look at Apple TV and say, "Hey, I can listen to all of my music via this little box in my entertainment center? I can buy a movie without standing in line at Walmart?" and they'll be happy.


Some may even get that they can replace their cable with it but I still think that's a bit off. There's a certain security in having cable for most people (kind of like having a land-line phone). They've always had it and are unsure what they'd do if they didn't have it.


The hard-drive space is small if you're trying to synch everything to it. To me, it just stores photos and the box acts as a client to my server. I just store everything there and stream as needed. Works really well. I'm sure in 5-10 years we'll all be using something else but I think they got this one right.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
81 Posts
Discussion Starter · #9 ·
It's not just about DVDs you already own. With Apple TV, I can't rent a DVD and watch it using the same interface I use for the rest of my media. I'd have to use a separate remote control to switch video inputs on my TV, use that remote to control my DVD player, then switch back if I want to do anything else. That makes my HT arrangement more complex, not less complex. What can I say, I guess I'm all about simplicity.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
3,990 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by CrispyFish /forum/post/0


It's not just about DVDs you already own. With Apple TV, I can't rent a DVD and watch it using the same interface I use for the rest of my media. I'd have to use a separate remote control to switch video inputs on my TV, use that remote to control my DVD player, then switch back if I want to do anything else. That makes my HT arrangement more complex, not less complex. What can I say, I guess I'm all about simplicity.

You just need a good remote. The right remote can take any rig and turn it from a collection of components into a cohesive system. I have a Pronto* that my wife, our eight-year old and various guests have used flawlessly for a couple of years now.


Personally, I don't see the appeal of the Apple TV over any other media extender other than it's got the Apple name on it. If you've already bought into iTunes (which I think is awful on a Windows platform), you may want it, but I don't want to have to have a user logged into my server 24/7 to use it.


* Note that it took me about eighty hours of planning and programming to do this, though.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
296 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by GreySkies /forum/post/0


Personally, I don't see the appeal of the Apple TV over any other media extender other than it's got the Apple name on it. If you've already bought into iTunes (which I think is awful on a Windows platform), you may want it, but I don't want to have to have a user logged into my server 24/7 to use it.

I think the appeal is this: It already has iTunes at it's core. Everything else (outside of TiVo with Amazon's Unbox deal) leaves the average person thinking, "Ok, that box will get internet 'stuff' to my TV - How do I get it to my box."


With AppleTV people can make the connection of: "Oh, I'll just buy it on iTunes and then it's make it's way to the AppleTV like it does for my iPod."


Now, I'm sure there will be those that will say, "But all you have to do it set up bit-torrent, put some codecs on your machine, and then buy this less expensive box and run this small little service..."


Yeah, that's where you lose them. iTunes puts it in perspective of, "Want to watch Disney's Cars? Buy it now, watch in a few minutes."


I'll admit that the Handbrake conversion of DVDs is not what most people would do but they already have a DVD player there.


Also, there's the other consideration that if you put a DVD on the machine people will think, "How come I can just put a DVD in once and load up the AppleTV?"


My point to all of this isn't that AppleTV is made for the high-end techno-geeks. My point is that, for a mass-marketed device, I think it's got a good shot. The other media players you see at the stores come and go and most (except for the folks here) ignore them as weird little set-top boxes that they don't understand and have no use for. I think it's because of the lack of coupling the set-top box device with software that allows you to easily set it all up.


Basically, most people aren't as educated as you are in the HD/Home Theater/Streaming realm and they don't want to be. This device gets them in the game.


It could be argued, though, that the average person/family that this is aimed at will already have a cable-box/DVR and some movies floating around on DVD so this would just be another cost/format/expense.


I'm using it to replace cable which should pay for itself fairly quickly. A family who are alll watching different things, may look at it as a $300 *thing* + cost/program that they have to muck with. It could very well turn out to be (like other Apple products) simple enough for the masses - priced for the elite.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
3,990 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brad Bishop /forum/post/0


Yeah, that's where you lose them. iTunes puts it in perspective of, "Want to watch Disney's Cars? Buy it now, watch in a few minutes."

...

Also, there's the other consideration that if you put a DVD on the machine people will think, "How come I can just put a DVD in once and load up the AppleTV?"


My point to all of this isn't that AppleTV is made for the high-end techno-geeks.

...

It could be argued, though, that the average person/family that this is aimed at will already have a cable-box/DVR and some movies floating around on DVD so this would just be another cost/format/expense.

I think your last paragraph is the key. The Apple TV is competing with the DVR, not other media extenders. The question there becomes, is it going to make people give up their Tivo? I don't think so.


And watching movies via downloading via iTunes is competing with DVD. If the question is, "want to watch Disney's Cars," with a DVD, it's stop at the video store on the way home, put in the DVD, watch the movie. With the Apple TV, one must go to the PC in the other room, load up iTunes, buy the movie, wait for it to significantly buffer/download so it can be watched, go back to the family room, start up the Apple TV, manuever to the film, and finally watch the movie. And, as Scoble (who's a converted fan) discovered, at 5mbps max, that 720p resolution looks worse than DVD. And if you're trying to wirelessly stream, you must deal with the inevitable stutters and complaints from other viewers (notably the wife).


I wrote elsewhere that I think media extenders are at least ten years away from being as ubiquitous as DVD players. I don't think that the Apple TV is going to change that. I think it's still a geek device-- just an Apple-geek device.


Recently, in another thread, someone wrote that he thinks that the Apple TV is great for streaming music from iTunes to the home entertainment center, and that's where Apple's focus should be with the device. And I fully agree-- as I do with other video media centers. They're great for navigating music, fun for watching home movies, ok for tv shows, and disappointing for commercial movies/dvd replacement.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
296 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by GreySkies /forum/post/0


I think your last paragraph is the key. The Apple TV is competing with the DVR, not other media extenders. The question there becomes, is it going to make people give up their Tivo? I don't think so.

I think the love-affair with TiVo is dying down but, TiVo or other DVR, people have become used to the idea of DVRs. As a side note it's kind of sad to see TiVo go from the 'doing it right' category and into the afterthought category. If anyone asks me, "What should I get for a DVR?" I just tell them, "Go to the cable company and get one. It'll just work and you'll be set. Not as prettier as a TiVo but cheaper / less risk.

Quote:
And watching movies via downloading via iTunes is competing with DVD. If the question is, "want to watch Disney's Cars," with a DVD, it's stop at the video store on the way home, put in the DVD, watch the movie. With the Apple TV, one must go to the PC in the other room, load up iTunes, buy the movie, wait for it to significantly buffer/download so it can be watched, go back to the family room, start up the Apple TV, manuever to the film, and finally watch the movie. And, as Scoble (who's a converted fan) discovered, at 5mbps max, that 720p resolution looks worse than DVD. And if you're trying to wirelessly stream, you must deal with the inevitable stutters and complaints from other viewers (notably the wife).

Well, that's a bit of a stretch. It's far easier to go to the other room and download it than stop at the video store on the way home. It's kind of like me countering with something like: And then you have to stop and get gas for the car, buckle everyone in, etc.


It probably depends on your starting point and mindset. If you're in the mindset of stopping by the video store on the way home, then that's just what you do. I think there is a shift into PPV/On Demand so that you just push a button on your cable box and you're watching the movie (often for less than you would be at the video store). I could see, for kids who typically will watch movies over and over again, having it downloaded to AppleTV or having the DVD ripped so that it's just there for them to watch and you don't have to deal with physical media (keeping up with it, storing it, watching out for scratches/smudges from the little ones).


As far as quality goes. Everything I've seen so far looks pretty good. I bought Lost Worlds online and there were some sections where it hosed up a bit in the video but I'm just buying it to watch the show, not keep it forever. Comparing Apple TV to DVDs for quality is a bit like comparing the iPod/MP3s to CDs. There's a greater function of convenience that wins out.

Quote:
I wrote elsewhere that I think media extenders are at least ten years away from being as ubiquitous as DVD players. I don't think that the Apple TV is going to change that. I think it's still a geek device-- just an Apple-geek device.

Yeah, you're probably right. I looked at media streamers a while back to stream music and content and they all seemed ill-equiped to do it. Everything was cumbersome from the interface to the software you had to run on your PC. Granted, I'm running iTunes on my PC now to serve my Apple TV and iPod but it at least feels like a real application (I wish it looked more Windows-like than Mac-like but that's a style thing). Anyway, everything I've seen so far looked like some goofy contraption that tried to do everything - poorly.


For me, though, AppleTV works out well because I live alone, really don't watch a huge amount of TV (to where I think that the Apple TV will save me money, long term, over cable bills) and it's the first one I've seen so far that I think gets it right. I don't see me going back to cable TV, high fees for countless channels with reruns and a ton of commercials. That being said, I could definitely see that this would be hard to sell to others (wives). Telling someone, "Maybe it's time you thought about getting rid of cable TV," is like telling someone it's time to get rid of their land line. Even if they don't use their land line there's this weird security aspect of it of, "but what if I need it..." I think the same thing is there for the current generation of cable-watchers. We all grew up with it (well, most of us at this point) and telling someone, "maybe it's time to get rid of it...," makes them recoil with, "but what if there's something I want to watch next month..." (incidentally, that's what killed me for cable, I was basically always buying it with the hopes of 'next month will be better' (be it HBO, regular cable, etc.)).

Quote:
Recently, in another thread, someone wrote that he thinks that the Apple TV is great for streaming music from iTunes to the home entertainment center, and that's where Apple's focus should be with the device. And I fully agree-- as I do with other video media centers. They're great for navigating music, fun for watching home movies, ok for tv shows, and disappointing for commercial movies/dvd replacement.

This is one thing I think it doesn't do as well as other devices. I have a Roku Soundbridge for music. It works great. No need to have the TV on and the navigation is perfect. Most importanly, I can queue up songs. With Apple TV, I can find/play an album (though navigating to it isn't as easy as the Soundbridge) but I can't queue up a bunch of different songs.


I'd say, if you're just looking for this thing to play your music, you might be happier with getting a Soundbridge. The only thing Apple TV really offers you is the pretty display showing the album cover. I'd rather have my TV off while listening to music, though.


It'll be interesting to see what happens. TiVo was pretty close with all of this stuff but they never put everything I wanted into one box. The media-center features always felt like an after-thought. It's about time for their annual, "We'll be finally be profitable by the end of the year," announcement, though. TiVo *should* be standard in most every cable/satellite box there is at this point - somehow they missed the boat. I think it was kind of dumb for Motorola / Scientific Atlanta to go try to make their own (crappy) software during that same time when they probably could have just bought TiVo licenses off the shelf. It just seems dumb from both ends.


One thing that does sort of stink about Apple TV (well, in my use of it): I bought Battlestar Gallactica (1st Season - the new one) online because a friend of mine was raving about it. I watched the first episode last night. Ugh - It's like a whole bunch of "nothing I care about" is happening. I hope it gets better. If things keep going like they are, I'll likely be rooting for the Cylons by the 3rd episode. Anyway, with my 'no cable plan' I've got to be a little more careful with my purchases.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
3,990 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brad Bishop /forum/post/0


Well, that's a bit of a stretch. It's far easier to go to the other room and download it than stop at the video store on the way home. It's kind of like me countering with something like: And then you have to stop and get gas for the car, buckle everyone in, etc.

That's a valid point. But it's easier still to have it just show up via Netflix. Wait-- you have to walk out to the mail box, open the envelope ...



If Apple had put the ability to purchase from the TV, I think that would be a huge advantage over other media extenders and might make it a true killer device. Of course, I'm not the first to say that, and other, lesser-backed VOD devices have already failed.


As someone who's struggled with WAF, I can honestly say that there's a barrier to putting an additional box on the stack of equipment in the family room. There's even an issue with DVDs being different from each other w/re to how menus and previews load/autoplay ("I just want to put it in and have the movie play").


For cable replacement, that'd never go over in my house (wife and esp. child). I'd be interested to see how your cable-replacement experiment is going over time. Are you blogging about it somewhere?
 

· Registered
Joined
·
451 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by GreySkies /forum/post/0


That's a valid point. But it's easier still to have it just show up via Netflix. Wait-- you have to walk out to the mail box, open the envelope ...



If Apple had put the ability to purchase from the TV, I think that would be a huge advantage over other media extenders and might make it a true killer device. Of course, I'm not the first to say that, and other, lesser-backed VOD devices have already failed.


As someone who's struggled with WAF, I can honestly say that there's a barrier to putting an additional box on the stack of equipment in the family room. There's even an issue with DVDs being different from each other w/re to how menus and previews load/autoplay ("I just want to put it in and have the movie play").


For cable replacement, that'd never go over in my house (wife and esp. child). I'd be interested to see how your cable-replacement experiment is going over time. Are you blogging about it somewhere?

WAF in my household is paramount and to that end I did add another box to the stack of electronics positioned around the TV...it was a Linkplayer2...a network media player. It quickly became a hit and for nearly two years now I have been thanked numerous times by my wife and family for doing it.


Why did she accept it and embrace it you ask? She can now watch what she wants when she wants and it is all free of commercials and all she had to do was get used to a few buttons on a remote. Yes I have to spend 20-40secs per recording confirming commercial cuts but in the end it is well worth it.


I recently finished archiving our commercial DVDs and that has become a hit as well.


We watch both SD and HD ts files. I do not waste time and resources re-encoding to DivX or Xvid. Added HDDs as required plus we mostly watch and delete.


Apple TV is too restrictive and is ultimately playing directly into the hands of the media industry....complete control of the media. Also, IMO the picture quality of downloaded video is no where near acceptable. I did not purchase a large screen HDTV to watch low quality video downloaded from the internet.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
3,990 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by digitalkid2 /forum/post/0


WAF in my household is paramount and to that end I did add another box to the stack of electronics positioned around the TV...it was a Linkplayer2...a network media player.

Yep-- I'm probably putting another media player in. I've got one in my bar (no worries about WAF there-- it's my space
), and I'm planning on putting another in my family room.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
3,990 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by CrispyFish /forum/post/0


Wow, so for an extra $300 and 80 hours of programming, I too can have a "simple" setup???

It sounds brutal, and I was rolling my eyes before I finally took the plunge, but it was easily the best addition to my gear. It was tough to spend the money, as it's the only piece of gear that you don't hear or see, but the gain in usability was immeasurable. My wife didn't think it'd be worth it, but she wouldn't give it up now.


I've got a Harmony in my media room, which is also nice, but not at the same level as the Pronto.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
191 Posts
The Linkplayer looks like a pretty good piece of hardware ... My main concern is that it is still a sigma based device, which in the end, looks and feel a lot like other Sigma based device.


Im wondering if it is on par with the Ziova/Zensonic which also looks nice ?

The TViX seems above average with movies, but for pictures and mostly music, it just doesn't cut it. I want to see cover art, tagged browsing and internet radio ...


Since my Roku HD1000 died, I've been searching desperately for a replacement. Where the ATV shines is where all the other players fails and vice versa. The biggest advantage I see from the ATV for me is that it seems pretty close to a Xbox for 'hackability'.


Patrick S.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
296 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by GreySkies /forum/post/0


That's a valid point. But it's easier still to have it just show up via Netflix. Wait-- you have to walk out to the mail box, open the envelope ...

You have to go all the way out to the mailbox... It may as well be in China.


Quote:
If Apple had put the ability to purchase from the TV, I think that would be a huge advantage over other media extenders and might make it a true killer device. Of course, I'm not the first to say that, and other, lesser-backed VOD devices have already failed.

Yep - I agree there. I keep hearing references to it doing that on TWiT and Leo Laporte's other podcasts/shows and I keep thinking, "It doesn't do that - it'd be nice if it did, but it doesn't". It'd also be nice (and doesn't seem like a stretch) if they allowed you to rent a movie either by number of viewings or time limit (probably time limit woud be best). I don't really see why they couldn't do it through the TV-interface. You'd just have to pre-set some account information but, why not?

Quote:
As someone who's struggled with WAF, I can honestly say that there's a barrier to putting an additional box on the stack of equipment in the family room. There's even an issue with DVDs being different from each other w/re to how menus and previews load/autoplay ("I just want to put it in and have the movie play").

Can't you just explain it to her with, "This is how it's gonna be..." I have to admit that the clutter of devices gets to me too, sometimes. I don't want a bunch of devices sitting there not being used. If they're effectively dormant, I should put them away, sell them, or give them away. This is where it seems TiVo missed the boat. You could get a Tivo with a DVD player/recorder, you could get one that digitally recorded the satellite (or can digitally with cable card), you can get one that does HD, you can get one that has dual tuners, you could get one with lifetime subscription, etc. You could never get all of those (although, granted, you don't need sat and cable in the same box) in one box. That's dumb. It's like if you could just take 20% of each of the TiVo boxes you'd have what most are looking for.

Quote:
For cable replacement, that'd never go over in my house (wife and esp. child). I'd be interested to see how your cable-replacement experiment is going over time. Are you blogging about it somewhere?

Not blogging it. I'll post back to this thread every so often and let you know.


There is an initial investment in both the Apple TV and some TV shows to get you started (kind of dumb to just have it sit there empty with nothing to watch). I'm still figuring on having a ~$150 or so bill every 6 months or so (getting all the seasons as the pop up) and then $20 or so bills the rest of the time picking up odd shows. That's my plan. We'll see how it goes. Worst case scenerio: I go back to a cable box or just stop watching. Before Apple TV came along I was thinking I'd just buy last season's shows on DVD and then watch them and give away the DVDs when done. Apple TV takes the physical part of that away.
 
1 - 20 of 85 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top