Nope....speed form my laymen's understanding is about "transient response"...how quickly a driver can adapt and change to whatever signal crosses it path... therefore not all drivers are created equal and can handle those fluctuation...jmo
Thoughts?The notion of "fast" subwoofers is misguided, in that the time-domain performance of minimum-phase systems is predictable from the amplitude response. With an 80 Hz bass management crossover frequency, all subwoofers are equally "fast." So, what we confront in the real world is essentially "fast" subwoofers communicating through "slow" rooms.
Right, that makes sense. But Toole suggests we really don't have much sensitivity to transients in the frequency range of subwoofers. From the same chapter, Toole goes on to quote a study:Nope....speed form my laymen's understanding is about "transient response"...how quickly a driver can adapt and change to whatever signal crosses it path... therefore not all drivers are created equal and can handle those fluctuation...jmo
So this would suggest that we don't actually have sensitivity to transients in low bass. How can this be? As Toole explains:Karjalainen et al. (2004) ... found that the detection thresholds of ringing decay times were above the RT of the room, rising gradually from about 0.5 s at 800 Hz to about 0.7 s at 100 Hz. Incredibly, below 100 Hz the listeners became unresponsive to modal decay times up to almost 2 s.
A kick drum may appear to be a sharp transient, but the impulsive "kick" is at frequencies much higher than the fundamental resonance "boom," which can last 200 ms or so. What sounds "tight" is actually a drumhead/volume resonance superimposed on room resonances.
Yeah, I think this might be part of what Toole is saying. Clearly, more powerful subs can go louder without distortion. But if you get 4 of the same sub, then you can go 12 dB louder than a single sub of that type. So as long as I'm not looking for 120 dB volumes, then I don't need to upgrade to the monster subs.In short, I think what Floyd E. Toole mean.
Is all subwoofers will play at same speed, as long they do not past there power requirement and specifications.
When within those requirements, one is as fast of the other.
When past specifications. Like too low for frequency or too loud for power. The sub cannot keep-up, and distort.
Giving the impression of been slow.
Darth
Thanks! That webpage had a lot of very useful info that really clears things up, and very much agrees with Toole's assertion that all subs are equally fast.https://data-bass.com/#/articles/5cbf5e7357f7140004d6d0ec?_k=nttgac
A very good read about the Myths of subwoofers--the myth of "speed" is about half-way down the page. Data-bass is a great site to learn about subs, get a ton of measurements for all sorts of subwoofers and explainations how how/why they are tested the way they are. They test everything from tapped horns, front loaded horns, bandpass, sealed, ported and variants of the theme. Ricci designs his own subwoofers--the ultra high performance type subs used for EDM festivals and powered by 20 KW arena pro amplifiers.
Enjoy the read, take a sniff at some of the subs that come off the crazy train--soon you will "need" 400 pound mega horn subs and a 220V line to feed your arena amps for power.If you dare, visit his forum and read about some of those massive sub builds--I'm not worthy!
![]()
There are pretty big differences in sound quality between drivers and subwoofer type/design. In theory for example ported subwoofers can be made so good so that the transient response difference between that and sealed is not perceivable to the human ear. BUT how many manufacturers have the time, knowledge etc. to implement it like this? Also most of the time enclosure size is made smaller than it needs to be for WAF reasons. In reality I've only heard one or maybe two really good ported subs where I couldn't really tell it was a ported design. But these are few and far between.
And then there is the driver itself which does make a difference (at least to my ears) to the perceived "fastness" but it seems like an outdated term that is too closely related to myths etc. Low(~.30) Qts/Qes seems to be factor here in my tests but I'm no expert. I think it's safe to say at least that different drivers sound differently and certain drivers just sound better in every respect. I usually trust drivers from Scan Speak and Acoustic Elegance.
Dito...I had a custom built av12x plus the good fortune of having auditioned (2)duel opposed av15hs at a friends....it was sublime...😎.There are pretty big differences in sound quality between drivers and subwoofer type/design. In theory for example ported subwoofers can be made so good so that the transient response difference between that and sealed is not perceivable to the human ear. BUT how many manufacturers have the time, knowledge etc. to implement it like this? Also most of the time enclosure size is made smaller than it needs to be for WAF reasons. In reality I've only heard one or maybe two really good ported subs where I couldn't really tell it was a ported design. But these are few and far between.
And then there is the driver itself which does make a difference (at least to my ears) to the perceived "fastness" but it seems like an outdated term that is too closely related to myths etc. Low(~.30) Qts/Qes seems to be factor here in my tests but I'm no expert. I think it's safe to say at least that different drivers sound differently and certain drivers just sound better in every respect. I usually trust drivers from Scan Speak and Acoustic Elegance.
I have two PR subs with AE drivers, I've never heard anything that sounds better, and I've heard a lot of commercially available products over the years. I've heard sealed Rythmiks, and I would have a hard time telling them apart in a blind test.
It all depends on what you want, what frequency range you desire, what SPL at what frequency and acceptable distortion levels. Data-bass will hook you up! The Xmax thing tends to come from car audio, very important when you have a very limited space so more Xmax and power tends to work well when space/location is constricted.One can have a look at the T/S parameters of really good subs like LMS Ultra, AE etc. and compare those to the cheaper stuff and there are some trends. A lot of people only look at Xmax but imo xmax is way overrated. Find a driver you think sounds excellent and then just buy many of those. My thought is basically if you don't see the drivers moving when you play at reference level then there is probably minimal distortion![]()
Dito...I had a custom built av12x plus the good fortune of having auditioned (2)duel opposed av15hs at a friends....it was sublime...😎.
No...doubt....I haven't spoken with him in a while...but his plan was to build 4 new single 15h...just because he could...😊Dito...I had a custom built av12x plus the good fortune of having auditioned (2)duel opposed av15hs at a friends....it was sublime...😎.
My two subs were kits, 24x24x25 boxes with cutouts, each with 2 18" 2500g PRs and an AV15H would give you a 16hz tune. You'd assemble everything and amplify yourself (I got a used Crown K2). The total cost was about the same as a single PB 13 Ultra. Quite a bargain.
I was taking a bit of a leap with the purchase, but if I knew then what I know now, I would have gotten at least a 3rd. No complaints though.
ThisIn short, I think what Floyd E. Toole mean.
Is all subwoofers will play at same speed, as long they do not past there power requirement and specifications.
When within those requirements, one is as fast of the other.
When past specifications. Like too low for frequency or too loud for power. The sub cannot keep-up, and distort.
Giving the impression of been slow.
Darth