Is the modem from Comcast or your personal? Also are you in a House or an Apartment? Do you have Comcast Cable in the same room with the modem? What exactly is "IT" you can't get to work?
Quote:
Originally Posted by pittsoccer33 /t/1519514/belkin-router-and-strict-nat-at-my-wits-end/0_100#post_24400040
its comcast's modem in an apartment/condo.
the signal is split two ways coming out of the wall - to the modem and to my htpc cablecard tuner for tv service.
I cant get the nat to go from strict to open.
ive also tried enabling the dmz but not port forwarding, and vice versa.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mboojigga /t/1519514/belkin-router-and-strict-nat-at-my-wits-end/0_100#post_24400052
Either way you need to get the new Wireless Gatway Router that Comcast has. Any other modems like the one you have are outdated. If you have a Comcast nearby you can take that in and swap it out with the new models. You can try this, take the 2way off and just connect the modem and see what happens.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pittsoccer33 /t/1519514/belkin-router-and-strict-nat-at-my-wits-end/0_100#post_24401064
There is definitely ingress on my line. When I had a third split going into a qam/atsc/fm tuner I was able to pick up most fm channels via the qam line, so I know there are radio signals leaking into it.
My tv service and internet performance never seemed to be affected so I never thought anything of it. It was kind of a bonus that I could use the FM tuner while receiving clearqam channels. I might have to investigate that a bit further.
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnbe /t/1519514/belkin-router-and-strict-nat-at-my-wits-end#post_24405545
I had the same problem and had to change my port forwarding completely. Since I am no authority on different routers and how port forwarding works, these are the ones I was given and it worked 1st time.
I was told to put them in exactly like this. I guess you can compare it to yours and see if something is different.
Anyone chime in if this wouldn't work in his situation and he would be wasting his time.
500 UDP
88 UDP
3074 BOTH
53 BOTH
80 TCP
3544 UDP
4500 UDP
Quote:
Originally Posted by lmychajluk /t/1519514/belkin-router-and-strict-nat-at-my-wits-end/0_100#post_24406273
I never understood why Live would require that all inbound HTTP, DNS, and IPSEC traffic be routed to the Xbox. These never made any sense. What if you have 2 Xbox's? What if you were running a web server on your network?
On a side note, being in the IT profession, I have yet to find any real explanation of what "STRICT" and "OPEN" NATs are outside of the Xbox environment. NAT is a common term, but my colleagues that are in Information Security or are Cisco-certified engineers have no idea what this concept is.