AVS Forum banner
  • Get an exclusive sneak peek into our new project. >>> Click Here
  • Our native mobile app has a new name: Fora Communities. Learn more.

best 7.1 speakers money can buy

1122 Views 15 Replies 10 Participants Last post by  miltimj
In terms of frequency response, overall power, how detailed and accurate the mids/highs are. Fronts, center, sides, rears.


I'm not gonna ask about sub cuz I already know you'll say SVS PB12-Ultra/2
Status
Not open for further replies.
1 - 16 of 16 Posts
 http://www.lansingheritage.org/image...ott/page05.jpg


Better than the JBLs IMO, better than anything actually. IMO.


A5 has the world's finest reproduction 100-10,000 hz and is unexcelled at human voice.


A7-500 has a bit better bass and more extended highs and retains excellent midrange.


Take your pick but I favor the A5s though I'm using A7-500s.


Use VERY powerful subs.


A8s for surrounds.


I'm not kidding either, people use these things in hi-fis and HTs. Must be found used now.
See less See more
I guess I'll just stick with my good 'ole Polk's which I happen to love very much, right? Like my grandpa used to tell me years ago "If it's not broken dont fix it" Another thing that confuses me though is what is the difference between speaker sounds? Like speakers being warm, neutral, or bright sounding? I think I kinda know but what is accurate sound?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Polk_Audio_LSi
I guess I'll just stick with my good 'ole Polk's which I happen to love very much, right? Like my grandpa used to tell me years ago "If it's not broken dont fix it" Another thing that confuses me though is what is the difference between speaker sounds? Like speakers being warm, neutral, or bright sounding? I think I kinda know but what is accurate sound?



I would describe accurate speakers has being more detailed and revealing than other speakers. Closer to what was actually was recorded.
Polk----There's really no such thing as an accurate speaker, every loudspeaker has flaws and compromises.


Note too that engineers don't even agree on what an accurate loudspeaker should do much less actually make such a device.


One could argue that the most accurate sound would be to use the same speakers used to monitor a given recording but then we must account for studio room acoustics and the post-production work---like what did the mastering engineer monitor with and such.


Now I favor speakers that have massive dynamic range, "big tone" and very low distortion but such speakers give away the very highest highs and deepest bass and some people think horns introduce colorations. So I pick those things I think are most important and live with the flaws. We all do, it's just that different people have different priorities in sound.


So just go with what you like and to the Devil with those who don't agree.
See less See more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Brennan
So just go with what you like and to the Devil with those who don't agree.
LOL You know what Tom? That's probably the best advice I guess I could get.
So just go with what you like and to the Devil with those who don't agree.

Tom Brennan curious which speakers do you prefer? I'm in a upgrade mind setting just making sure I'm not missing anything. A modest upgrade I don't have a Martain Logan wallet.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Brennan
A5 has the world's finest reproduction 100-10,000 hz and is unexcelled at human voice.


I'm not kidding either, people use these things in hi-fis and HTs. Must be found used now.
Oh good grief!!!! :rolleyes:
The best 7.1 system I have ever heard is the Klipsch THX Ultra2 system, utilizing dual subs and placed appropriately in a very well treated, acoustically engineered, dedicated HT room.


Absolutely awesome! (although I'm sure Alimentall will disagree).


Craig
Quote:
Originally Posted by craig john
Absolutely awesome! (although I'm sure Alimentall will disagree).
Of course ;) Though they did sound better with the Audyssey system turned on :)
Dynaudio Evidence Masters. I've never heard 7 of them in a system, but considering the two of them were the best I've ever heard (including 7.1 systems)...
"Tom Brennan curious which speakers do you prefer?"


I prefer vintage Altecs. In my HT I use Altec 605 Duplex coaxials made around 1960. In my main hi-fi I use 1961 Altec 9844 studio monitors driven by tubes.


I'm currently restoring some Altec A7-500s; I'll refinish the cabinets (in battleship gray) and have ordered new diaphrams for the horn drivers. They'll replace the 605s in the HT.


In my old house I used Altec A5s in my HT.


These old Altecs are built like battleships and have very low distortion, hair-trigger dynamics, top-shelf clarity and will get as loud as a freight train with a 25 watt tube amp. They have flaws though; the bass is solid and robust but not terribly deep and the highs are a little soft and rolled off.


Now these speakers are only available used, the "real" Altec company having been the victim of corporate cannibalism. An advantage though is that IF you prefer these speakers you're getting the very best speakers available at much cheaper prices than those who consider, oh, Wilsons or Martin Logans the very finest speakers.


I like old JBLs too, the horn ones, not L-100s and such.


If curious look on ebay under vintage speakers and pro-sound speakers.
See less See more
Looks like JBL is still rebranding Lexicon gear in their high end lines. Anyone know if there are any JBL specific tweaks over the standard Lexicon?
Best I have heard is the Vandersteen 5A's. Everyone hears different and everyone likes different sounds, so only you can decide.


There is a recent thread floating around in which the McIntosh speaker system is getting highly praise. The system cost $181,000 however.
I think you're in the wrong forum.. You probably should ask in this one .
1 - 16 of 16 Posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top