"Yea, i started to lean toward a seperate AMP, then i thought if i push it with 2 channels at 130W each, would that yeild better result then 1x200W AMP??"
Not really, watts is a bit of an over-rated spec. What is really important is the amps ability to "control" the speaker. There are 5 watt amps that can play as loud as 100 watt amps.
Why would a seperate AMP better?? Please explain...
Generally, and I'm being very simplistic, it boils down to the power supply of the amps. Many receivers share the same power supply for everything and only have so much room within which to do so. A separate amp will use it's own power supply and because of the room will also be able to use more capacitance per channel or in other words will have more power available for transient peaks. (Read better control) Receivers are closing the gap though for instance your 4306, if I recall correctly, has a separate power supply for the amp section and two more for the video and audio.
rnrgagne,
I'm leaning toward Rotel 1095 or Emotiva MPS-1.
Rotel 1092 is 500W/ch, is that too much for the 100s?
In a nutshell no, it's not too much.
If you want to run full outboard amplification for five channels, out of the two you've got listed I would go with the Emotiva. Just be sure that the 4306 doesn't meet your needs before you go spending based on these opinions.
The 1092 is in a different league. It has two of the exact same amp modules as in the Bel-Canto Ref1000 monoblocks and the Jeff Rowland Model 501s monos.