Blu-ray is not just Sony.
Originally Posted by briankmonkey Without a doubt. It's already starting. People are becoming more and more aware that the PS3 is best value to go with in terms of HD movies. Least expensive (MSRP $499) HDMI 1.3 HD movie player regardless of format. It also plays HD games (720p and 1080p native, 7.1 uncompressed audio) and SACD's. |
Originally Posted by brywalker You forget that the Sony loses "a crapload" for every PS3 they sell. The only thing that is going to save them is the sell through rate for software, and their attach rate for Blu-Ray right now will not support the loss they take on the system. Be aware, that is based on the $1000 players. Who knows if that will change for the $500 PS3. |
Originally Posted by Mark0 Considering Sony's financial status, do you think they can market and promote blu-ray as originally anticipated? |
Originally Posted by briankmonkey Without a doubt. It's already starting. People are becoming more and more aware that the PS3 is best value to go with in terms of HD movies. Least expensive (MSRP $499) HDMI 1.3 HD movie player regardless of format. It also plays HD games (720p and 1080p native, 7.1 uncompressed audio) and SACD's. |
Originally Posted by xbdestroya I just want to ask this straight up: What do you consider Sony's financial status to be? And why wouldn't they be able to 'fight the fight?' |
Originally Posted by realracer2 All you have to do is read the financial pages, to find out about Sony's troubles. They have been losing money for the last three years. |
Originally Posted by Rob Zuber Why do HD-DVD supporters continue to create troll threads in the BD forums and why don't the mods do anything about it? |
Originally Posted by xbdestroya This is exactly the sort of FUD and nonsense that pisses me off. People who actually don't follow finance at all, read random articles here and there, and think themselves expert based on that. |