AVS Forum banner
1 - 7 of 7 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,747 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
So, in my quest to rebuild my hometheater, this little debate arose, kinda.... If you had a CAVX MKII, would you shell out a possible 1,200 to 1,400 for the CineVista.....


My PJ of choice at this point is the Sony HW50, projecting on a 100"x42" Seymour Center Stage XD AT......


..... and the throw is unknown
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
340 Posts
Ok, i'll give you an opinion since i own a MKII as well.

First off, ive bought it when it just came out, so was using it with a optoma hd20 (720p), at the time i was happy with it as i loved a scope screen.

I then had a benq w5000 (1080p) and used it with that projector.


I started noticing things i didnt like with that lens, mostly softening of the image when in the light path, light spillage.(the pincusion i expected) vs not using it.

I didnt have much choice as i couldnt zoom with that projector as it didnt have enough zoom.


I then upgraded to the epson 6010 due to 3D etc.

I now dont use the MKII lens with this projector as i find zooming much better and cleaner/sharper/nicer, no pincusion is a great bonus too, no light spills on the sides etc.

It is an old lens so cant expect it to be as good as the newer lenses out now( even tho i havent looked at any since i started doing zoom) and was a fair bit cheaper then the current crop.


If i had the hw50, i would zoom.(my ceiling is low that i can reach it easily), but i dont know how good the cinevista is so i cant really comment on that or compare it to the MKII.


If the cinevista had no noticeable picture loss/softening, no side spills i would consider it.

Have you tried zooming? do you find your MKII very soft and the other issue's i mentioned?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,747 Posts
Discussion Starter · #4 ·
I noticed a softening and loss of sharpness, wts i'm not real picky about the picture other than a total distain for RBE. When the time comes I will give zoom a shot, as well as the MK II. This room wont be a reality for some time, I just want to hit the ground running once I do build the room :0)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
8,958 Posts
Before everyone gets too carried away, the MK2 was probably the most affordable anamorphic adapter ever released. Therefore it was always going to have performance issues. The glass used were in fact trophies, and the manufacture could not give optical specs because there were none. All I ever got was there was a 4 step polishing process, but there was no "Scratch and Dig" spec.


Because the prisms of the MK2 were made of one type of glass, there is no CA correction.

The light spill issues would be due to the anti-reflective coatings which are not true optic coatings.


The later MK3, MK4 and MK5 all have a proper optical spec surface finish of SD60/40 (this means the largest scratch on the surface is 60 x 40 microns!). They all have CA correction and they all have proper optic coatings. As a result, you pay more for that level of quality which reflects in the price of each unit.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,747 Posts
Discussion Starter · #6 ·

Quote:
Originally Posted by CAVX  /t/1480619/cavx-mkii-vs-panamorph-cinevista#post_23516549


Before everyone gets too carried away, the MK2 was probably the most affordable anamorphic adapter ever released. Therefore it was always going to have performance issues. The glass used were in fact trophies, and the manufacture could not give optical specs because there were none. All I ever got was there was a 4 step polishing process, but there was no "Scratch and Dig" spec.


Because the prisms of the MK2 were made of one type of glass, there is no CA correction.

The light spill issues would be due to the anti-reflective coatings which are not true optic coatings.


The later MK3, MK4 and MK5 all have a proper optical spec surface finish of SD60/40 (this means the largest scratch on the surface is 60 x 40 microns!). They all have CA correction and they all have proper optic coatings. As a result, you pay more for that level of quality which reflects in the price of each unit.

Thanx for chimin in Mark ! Budget gear always has its pro's and con's, but as you stated, it's a great lens..... I will give it a trial run when this room finally comes to be
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
8,958 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by kgveteran  /t/1480619/cavx-mkii-vs-panamorph-cinevista#post_23536901


Thanx for chimin in Mark ! Budget gear always has its pro's and con's, but as you stated, it's a great lens..... I will give it a trial run when this room finally comes to be

MK2:


Pros: Price

Cons: Performance.


MK5:


Pros: Performance

Cons: Price


You really do get what you pay for with these optical devices.
 
1 - 7 of 7 Posts
Top