AVS Forum banner

1 - 20 of 60 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,289 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
I intend this thread to be an ongoing [re]source of content that has been created by [semi]professional videographers - at least in terms of affiliation with big studios - who use consumer or prosumer equipment for creating actual watchable content.

Today I am giving you "Sriracha" - a short doco about the well-known hot sauce. You can watch the original movie on Vimeo for $3, or you can watch the same imagery overlaid with the author's comments on YouTube:


Shot with the GH3, so it is not 4K, uh, uh. Nevertheless, it looks great. I suppose audio was recorded onto a dedicated recorder, I haven't researched that. Budget was... $25K I believe. Could be done for less if they did not fly to Thailand and did not drop $2.5K on 30 seconds of AP footage.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
974 Posts
Audio recorder was a Zoom H1n and the shotgun is a discontinued model.
Lens used the most is the 12-35. Another mic for voice over.

On Indy Mogul, which he hosted, you can follow the progress of the film from idea to Kickstarter, to shooting, edit and publish.
I was a regular viewer of that show during that time.
Pretty sad youtube canceled it, luckily there are others.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
974 Posts
A really good documentary made with cheap gear is "Indie Game - The Movie".
Very cool and I highly recommend it.

On their website they have a gear list (5dmkii if I remember correctly).
It used to be on Netflix, don't know if it still is.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,289 Posts
Discussion Starter #4
Audio recorder was a Zoom H1n and the shotgun is a discontinued model. Lens used the most is the 12-35. Another mic for voice over.
Thanks. Shows how much one can do with just one lens.
On Indy Mogul, which he hosted, you can follow the progress of the film from idea to Kickstarter, to shooting, edit and publish. I was a regular viewer of that show during that time. Pretty sad youtube canceled it, luckily there are others.
Not sure why you are saying YouTube cancelled it; they sort of ran out of steam themselves or started individual projects.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
974 Posts
Thanks. Shows how much one can do wi..
Sorry my auto correct got it wrong, it was h4n. Still cheap.

Not sure why you are saying YouTube cancelled it; they sort of ran out of steam themselves or started individual projects.
Sorry but you are very wrong.
Indy Mogul was owned and payed for by youtube.
Russell and Griffin where employees of youtube.
This was talked about on the show several times over the years.

Youtube canceled the show and they where openly and publicly heart broken in many episodes and where very clear with the fact that they wanted to keep going and had lots of cool ideas.

They also ran a telethon to show how appricated they where just before announcing that youtube had canceled their show.

Believe me, I watched every single episode and almost all live shows for years, big fan
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,289 Posts
Discussion Starter #7
Sorry but you are very wrong. Indy Mogul was owned and payed for by youtube. Russell and Griffin where employees of youtube. This was talked about on the show several times over the years.
Oh, ok. I haven't watched that many episodes of the show. I thought they were at best sponsored by YouTube as partners; I did not know they were employees of YouTube.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,560 Posts
Content is King...
_________________________________


Brave Kitten Stands Up to Dog (43.5 million views)

Shot on...a potato?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,560 Posts
This just shows that people like to watch crap.
Yeah, it's true, YouTube is inundated with crappy videos that people eat up.

Something to consider, though...if that was, instead, shot professionally with quality cameras, cinematic look, close-ups of the animals, etc. - I'm certain it wouldn't generate nearly as many views.

Although it would look better, there would be a sense of it being staged and the viewer being forced to like the cuteness of it, as if it's a dog food commercial.

Although the actual footage is extremely crappy quality, an unspoken element is the viewer being a "fly on the wall", witnessing an actual event. The realness/crapiness of the footage contributes to that.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
974 Posts
At work we sometimes make the decision to use a shaky smartphone or handycam just to give it an extra sense of realism.
Nothing wrong with "crap" quality or content for that matter.
If its what people want to watch, then it's king.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,885 Posts
what a load of snobs,people who are not into cameras prefer to watch films like that,i would compared to some of the indie poo.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,278 Posts
I think this dog video is better than a lot of indie poo I've seen on Vimeo and Youtube. It didn't look like it had been staged and the videography sure didn't look contrived. Unlike those indies which despite the looks and the contrivance, are just pure poo.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
974 Posts
You guys do know that it's scientifically proved that while you are worked up you loose brain cells.
In other words, you sitting around beeing annoyed because some people don't film the exact same thing as yourself is causing you to literally self destruct.

Wonder if it's worth it....
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,289 Posts
Discussion Starter #17
Watching a cat and dog video requires minimal brain activity - it is as lazy an entertainment as watching flowing water or flaming fire.

The masses do not want to work on the content, neither they do not want to watch and think about inconvenient topics like global warming or the imminent nuclear obliteration of the planet - those thousands of missiles have to fall somewhere, and it is just a question of time and bad luck when a wire rusts or someone hacks into their control systems.

Instead people prefer watching fairy tales like Game of Thrones or follow lives of celebrities - celebrities who have ZERO effect on the functioning of the society, celebrities whos only achievement is a big butt or a naked belly carrying an unborn.

This is classic escapism of the late Roman Empire, and we all know how it ended.

I had in mind something else when I started this thread. The idea was that even with modest equipment one can make a video that has meaning and impact. A thousand bucks is enough to have equipment for moviemaking - it will not be the latest and greatest, but it will allow to record moving pictures and sound, edit the clips and distribute the final movie. This is completely different landscape even to the days of VHS, when there were no digital non-linear editing systems.

Here is an example: https://vimeo.com/9063103 Shot on the DVX100B - the latest version of the venerable DVX, which can be picked up for less than $500 on eBay with 200 hours or less - I saw one with 17 hours on the clock for $450. This is a professional camera for one tenth of the original price. Yes, it is not 4K or HD, but it performs its intended function, and editing DV is fast even on a 10 year old computer which one can pick for free from someone who is upgrading. Tapes are $2 apiece in bulk. Plus a mic, some stands and a couple of LED lights - I am not talking about painting with light.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,289 Posts
Discussion Starter #19
Sony A6000, 1080p. I realize that Ken and Mark will not like the milky-foggy grading, I think it looks nice most of the time.


I started thinking about an A5100 - same sensor size. Yes, no mic input and very few controls, but it has flip-out screen for selfies, similar video quality to the A6000 above, and can be found for less than $300 used on Ebay, or $400 new, body only.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,278 Posts
The style of the grading is generally OK though it may not suit everyone's taste. But it looks a bit inconsistent and the shadows are lifted up too far. The darkness here is magenta, not even grey, making the video look like a movie whose film had been projected too many times out of its life.
 
1 - 20 of 60 Posts
Top