Just grappling with this in my mind, and I wish it was black and white. However, there is nuance and there are circumstances where some responsibility can be applied.
For example, from a movies/art POV, free speech is pretty well established precedence, and many times the craziness can be controlled simply by market forces. I don't see Joker earning a billion dollars. When word gets out, the initial buzz will fizzle out. To offer a specific scenario, if some mass shooter says he was inspired by Punisher (or whatever), do I think the writer/producer/director should be charged with some crime? Absolutely not.
The flip-side of that coin: If a very powerful person, with a very big microphone spends a lot of time in front of a lot of people basically whipping up a frenzy around certain types of people. Then, one day, a person who draws direct, stated inspiration from said powerful person decides to go on a rampage and kills a bunch of those types of people or plans an attack or whatever. Of course the direct offender should be charged with crimes, but what about the inspiration for that crime? Can they be charged? Maybe not. What about Charles Manson's case? He didn't actually kill anybody (did he?). But should there be some mechanism to remove that person from power? To make their microphone smaller? Perhaps....but there's sooooo much gray area in there.
For example, from a movies/art POV, free speech is pretty well established precedence, and many times the craziness can be controlled simply by market forces. I don't see Joker earning a billion dollars. When word gets out, the initial buzz will fizzle out. To offer a specific scenario, if some mass shooter says he was inspired by Punisher (or whatever), do I think the writer/producer/director should be charged with some crime? Absolutely not.
The flip-side of that coin: If a very powerful person, with a very big microphone spends a lot of time in front of a lot of people basically whipping up a frenzy around certain types of people. Then, one day, a person who draws direct, stated inspiration from said powerful person decides to go on a rampage and kills a bunch of those types of people or plans an attack or whatever. Of course the direct offender should be charged with crimes, but what about the inspiration for that crime? Can they be charged? Maybe not. What about Charles Manson's case? He didn't actually kill anybody (did he?). But should there be some mechanism to remove that person from power? To make their microphone smaller? Perhaps....but there's sooooo much gray area in there.