AVS Forum banner

D* removed my distant networks no warning, no explanation

1740 Views 19 Replies 8 Participants Last post by  foxeng
My nbcw and foxw feeds no longer come thru as of 12/25 when I checked them. Went thru all the troubleshooting (laugh) with their reps to no avail. Seems like I was grandfathered in, in the past or something don't quite recall. Anyone experience the same or been able to get their dns back? Beautiful timing, Directv!, Merry (F)ing Christmas. I just got the hdtivo under the tree yesterday but now I can't record the programming I was looking forward to timeshifting. GRRRR!
Status
Not open for further replies.
1 - 20 of 20 Posts
Cable
For some idea of why it happened, see this thread: http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...4&page=1&pp=30

Pick it up on the 5th page or so


For some help in getting them back, see this thread: http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=515808


Or go to Search > Advanced Search > Thread Titles Only and look for DNS. You'll get a slew of threads.


Have you subscribed to a local channels package? If so, that's why you lost your DNS. Grandfathered subs can have locals or DNS but not both. You should have gotten a notification from DirecTV 60 days ago. Easy to miss. You may have tossed it out thinking it was junk mail.


If you are waivered, local broadcasters have the right to revoke those waivers.


Doc
See less See more
I would go cable but the offerings here are abysmal. Do I understand correctly that Dish does not offer nbc or fox?
Quote:
Originally Posted by vidwiz
Do I understand correctly that Dish does not offer nbc or fox?
For HD, you understand correctly. Even if they did, you'd have to jump through the same hoops as you will with D*.


Can you put up an antenna? Your DirecTV HD receiver will do OTA and, from what I can ascertain, KNAZ-DT (NBC) does HD. Transmitter's less than 10mi from the center of Flagstaff.


Since KSAZ's translator is right in Flagstaff, I rather doubt they'd give you a waiver.
Thanks for the input Don,


Yes, I receive knaz's digital channel currently but it is not hd (unless there is something I have to do on my receiver to enable it), and actually is missing the right hand audio channel as well.


From reading the following link, since I am in the Phoenix market, I would interpret it to say I should at least still be able to get Fox

http://www.directv.com/see/landing/fox_hd.html


got a supervisor tech coming tomorrow to 'fix' things, should be a hoot.
One more thing, how do I interpret the line beside fox below, does that mean i'm eligible? That they are O&O? Waivered?


Network Affiliate Status

ABC KNXV-DT Grade A (strong signal)

CBS KPHO-DT Grade A (strong signal)

FOX KSAZ-DT Area Grant on file

NBC KNAZ-DT Grade A (strong signal)
They're not O&O, but I'd think "area grant" means you're good to go. I'd call 'em and ask.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrDon
They're not O&O, but I'd think "area grant" means you're good to go. I'd call 'em and ask.
KSAZ IS a FOX O & O.
Quote:
Originally Posted by vidwiz
One more thing, how do I interpret the line beside fox below, does that mean i'm eligible? That they are O&O? Waivered?


Network Affiliate Status

ABC KNXV-DT Grade A (strong signal)

CBS KPHO-DT Grade A (strong signal)

FOX KSAZ-DT Area Grant on file

NBC KNAZ-DT Grade A (strong signal)
Please also note that the HD stations listed are listed using Analog data! In other words the data is phony!


But, that should change by 04/30/06, when digital testing is allowed, and I would assume a new method for determining digital availability.


As far as DNS is concerned, I have 3 digital DNS stations(West coast only) and analog NBC both coasts.


I expect my analog NBC to disappear at any time, but for now it's still there.

....jc
See less See more
Quote:
Originally Posted by foxeng
KSAZ IS a FOX O & O.
Good to know. The site I Googled had them listed as belonging to some other conglomerate.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrDon
Good to know. The site I Googled had them listed as belonging to some other conglomerate.
They have several "holding" companies of licenses - such as New World Communications - just like Clear Channel actually still has Jaycor Holdings and Citicasters on a few of theirs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by HDTVFanAtic
They have several "holding" companies of licenses - such as New World Communications - just like Clear Channel actually still has Jaycor Holdings and Citicasters on a few of theirs.
Be sure you are looking at the correct KSAZ. KSAZ-AM is owned by OWL BROADCASTING & DEVELOPMENT, INC. (NOT connected with FOX) and KSAZ-TV is owned by FOX Television Stations, Inc. dba KSAZ License, Inc. KSAZ-TV had been a part of New World Communications in 1995 when FOX bought New World Communications and was owned by Citicasters (also known as Great American Broadcasting before the name change) before that and Taft Broadcasting before that and Gulf Broadcasting before that.


I know this since the station I work for has been a sister station of KSAZ since the early 1970's. We have shared the same owners for years, even during many of the years KSAZ was known as KTSP Channel 10.


SIDEBAR - WTSP channel 10 in Tampa, FL was also part of the Taft stations back to Gulf Broadcasting when KSAZ was KTSP (they even shared the same logo since both were channel 10) but New World didn't want WTSP since they already owned a station in Tampa, WTVT channel 13, now a FOX O & O. WTSP was sold to Gannett and I think still owns WTSP. The GM of WTSP at the time used to work at my station in sales about 6 years before the sale.
See less See more
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrDon
Have you subscribed to a local channels package? If so, that's why you lost your DNS. Grandfathered subs can have locals or DNS but not both.
Not exactly. Back in the summer D* forced those with HD-DNS to also add the locals package to keep their regional HD-DNS feed. If you failed to sub to a locals package, you would lose both HD-DNS feeds. Many who had the HD-DNS feeds were grandfathered DNS subs. It seemed to be a Catch-22 where you have to sub to locals and risk losing SD-DNS to keep HD-DNS.


The end result for most was losing the opposite coast HD-DNs, but keeping both locals and SD-DNS.
Quote:
Originally Posted by herdfan
Not exactly. Back in the summer D* forced those with HD-DNS to also add the locals package to keep their regional HD-DNS feed. If you failed to sub to a locals package, you would lose both HD-DNS feeds. Many who had the HD-DNS feeds were grandfathered DNS subs. It seemed to be a Catch-22 where you have to sub to locals and risk losing SD-DNS to keep HD-DNS.


The end result for most was losing the opposite coast HD-DNs, but keeping both locals and SD-DNS.
The above information is correct. I, too, lost my four HD-DNS feeds over the holiday. But I got them back with a phone call.


Background: I obtained waivers for all four SD-DNS networks a couple of years ago because I couldn't get OTA networks and locals weren't available in my market from DirecTV. Once the locals became available here, things got tricky. As of now, I still receive East Coast SD network feeds (I pay for them) and West Coast HD network feeds. Somewhere along the line, I had "six months free locals" attached to my account, event though I've never had them hooked up. When those freebies expired a couple of days ago, suddenly all my DNS HD networks disappeared.


So last night, I phoned and convinced the CSR to give me another "six months free locals." My reasoning was that I already pay for four SD DNS feeds and pay for the HD package. So my four HD networks are back on again and I'm good ... for another six months.
See less See more
Update,


My tech came today, called D* installer line and had 83 and 89 back on for me in less than a minute. Dude had to drive 300 miles roundtrip to make the call because the D* phone reps I spoke to are apparently incompetent. Paid him $25 on the side to run my additional sat cable. I had the 6 mos free locals recently expire too, but did not have to get them again to get my dns hd channels back. I'm happily getting my hd tivo setup and configured now. Hope they don't jerk me around anymore as I believe its a 2 year committment to get my rebate. I might hold off on that rebate now that i think about it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by foxeng
Be sure you are looking at the correct KSAZ. KSAZ-AM is owned by OWL BROADCASTING & DEVELOPMENT, INC. (NOT connected with FOX) and KSAZ-TV is owned by FOX Television Stations, Inc. dba KSAZ License, Inc. KSAZ-TV had been a part of New World Communications in 1995 when FOX bought New World Communications and was owned by Citicasters (also known as Great American Broadcasting before the name change) before that and Taft Broadcasting before that and Gulf Broadcasting before that.


I know this since the station I work for has been a sister station of KSAZ since the early 1970's. We have shared the same owners for years, even during many of the years KSAZ was known as KTSP Channel 10.


SIDEBAR - WTSP channel 10 in Tampa, FL was also part of the Taft stations back to Gulf Broadcasting when KSAZ was KTSP (they even shared the same logo since both were channel 10) but New World didn't want WTSP since they already owned a station in Tampa, WTVT channel 13, now a FOX O & O. WTSP was sold to Gannett and I think still owns WTSP. The GM of WTSP at the time used to work at my station in sales about 6 years before the sale.
WTVT in Tampa, though a Fox O&O is still licensed to New World Communications as many of the other former New World Communications stations were.


WTSP went from Taft to Citicasters - and to Jaycor when Citicasters and Jaycor became one.


Later Jaycor traded it to Gannett for KIIS-FM in LA and Dallas as well as several other radio properties as a trade wiped out tax problems of a cash deal.
See less See more
Quote:
Originally Posted by HDTVFanAtic
WTVT in Tampa, though a Fox O&O is still licensed to New World Communications as many of the other former New World Communications stations were.
Really? According to the FCC it is licensed to TVT License, Inc. http://svartifoss2.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/w...ility_id=68569

and here
http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/tvq?list=0&facid=68569


In recent years, FOX has brought all of their stations into a similiar line no matter who they bought them from. They are also changing it again as we speak.


The station I work for also was owned by Gulf/Taft/Great American/Citicasters until 1996 along with WTSP. (I was there when it happened) It was after Citicasters sold the TV stations to New World (there were 4 of us, KTSP now KSAZ, WDAF, WBRC and WGHP), except WTSP, that I lost track of who owned WTSP but the last time I heard it was Gannett and I assumed that Gannett had bought them from Citicasters.
See less See more
Quote:
Originally Posted by foxeng
Really? According to the FCC it is licensed to TVT License, Inc. http://svartifoss2.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/w...ility_id=68569

and here
http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/tvq?list=0&facid=68569


In recent years, FOX has brought all of their stations into a similiar line no matter who they bought them from. They are also changing it again as we speak.


The station I work for also was owned by Gulf/Taft/Great American/Citicasters until 1996 along with WTSP. (I was there when it happened) It was after Citicasters sold the TV stations to New World (there were 4 of us, KTSP now KSAZ, WDAF, WBRC and WGHP), except WTSP, that I lost track of who owned WTSP but the last time I heard it was Gannett and I assumed that Gannett had bought them from Citicasters.
You might want to tell them to change their on air announcements in Tampa and Detroit then. I'll mention it to Mike Howey. Probably an employement announcement that runs only in the dead of night anyway and no one has caught it up to update it.


Regardless, WTVT Holdings is a holding company for Fox and probably is under the holding company New World Communications which is where this whole thread started. In fact, the Fox Chicago station states plainly on their webpage there are only 8 Fox owned stations which we all know is hockey puck:



On March 3rd, 1986, FOX Television Stations, Inc., headed by Rupert Murdoch, purchased WFLD from Metromedia, as well as WNEW, New York (now WNYW); KTTV, Los Angeles; KRLD, Dallas (now KDAF); KRIV, Houston; and WTTG, Washington DC which are all part of the FOX television network. Since then, two stations have been added in Salt Lake City and Atlanta bringing the total to eight.


http://www.foxchicago.com/_ezpost/data/11372.shtml


Edit:

http://www.foxbghsuit.com/fox0429b.htm


5. Furthermore, since the filing of their lawsuit, Plaintiffs have entered into a course of conduct, attacking New World and its parent Fox Television Stations, Inc.


............................................................ .


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WAGA_(TV)


Early in 1997, New World sold most of its stations, including WAGA, to Fox; the station then adopted the "Fox 5" branding. However, the holding entity for the station is still listed as "New World Communications of Atlanta".


............................................................ .


It was apparently done this way because:

http://www.museum.tv/archives/etv/N/...wscorporat.htm


FOX's agreement with New World Communications, announced in May 1994, represented the largest single affiliate switch ever, but was considered controversial because many saw the agreement--in which FOX paid New World $500 million and 12 New World stations changed their affiliations to FBC--as a vehicle by which FOX was able to circumvent FCC limitations on the number of stations a single company is permitted to own.




New World Communications apparently is still a holding company for Fox.
See less See more
Quote:
Originally Posted by HDTVFanAtic
New World Communications apparently is still a holding company for Fox.
It is a part of the syndication arm, not the station group which is a separate division of FOX Television, Inc. New World was much more than TV stations. It also had an national media sales division, national program syndication as well as a station group.
1 - 20 of 20 Posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top