Cable
Originally Posted by vidwiz Do I understand correctly that Dish does not offer nbc or fox? |
Originally Posted by DrDon They're not O&O, but I'd think "area grant" means you're good to go. I'd call 'em and ask. |
Originally Posted by vidwiz One more thing, how do I interpret the line beside fox below, does that mean i'm eligible? That they are O&O? Waivered? Network Affiliate Status ABC KNXV-DT Grade A (strong signal) CBS KPHO-DT Grade A (strong signal) FOX KSAZ-DT Area Grant on file NBC KNAZ-DT Grade A (strong signal) |
Originally Posted by foxeng KSAZ IS a FOX O & O. |
Originally Posted by DrDon Good to know. The site I Googled had them listed as belonging to some other conglomerate. |
Originally Posted by HDTVFanAtic They have several "holding" companies of licenses - such as New World Communications - just like Clear Channel actually still has Jaycor Holdings and Citicasters on a few of theirs. |
Originally Posted by DrDon Have you subscribed to a local channels package? If so, that's why you lost your DNS. Grandfathered subs can have locals or DNS but not both. |
Originally Posted by herdfan Not exactly. Back in the summer D* forced those with HD-DNS to also add the locals package to keep their regional HD-DNS feed. If you failed to sub to a locals package, you would lose both HD-DNS feeds. Many who had the HD-DNS feeds were grandfathered DNS subs. It seemed to be a Catch-22 where you have to sub to locals and risk losing SD-DNS to keep HD-DNS. The end result for most was losing the opposite coast HD-DNs, but keeping both locals and SD-DNS. |
Originally Posted by foxeng Be sure you are looking at the correct KSAZ. KSAZ-AM is owned by OWL BROADCASTING & DEVELOPMENT, INC. (NOT connected with FOX) and KSAZ-TV is owned by FOX Television Stations, Inc. dba KSAZ License, Inc. KSAZ-TV had been a part of New World Communications in 1995 when FOX bought New World Communications and was owned by Citicasters (also known as Great American Broadcasting before the name change) before that and Taft Broadcasting before that and Gulf Broadcasting before that. I know this since the station I work for has been a sister station of KSAZ since the early 1970's. We have shared the same owners for years, even during many of the years KSAZ was known as KTSP Channel 10. SIDEBAR - WTSP channel 10 in Tampa, FL was also part of the Taft stations back to Gulf Broadcasting when KSAZ was KTSP (they even shared the same logo since both were channel 10) but New World didn't want WTSP since they already owned a station in Tampa, WTVT channel 13, now a FOX O & O. WTSP was sold to Gannett and I think still owns WTSP. The GM of WTSP at the time used to work at my station in sales about 6 years before the sale. |
Originally Posted by HDTVFanAtic WTVT in Tampa, though a Fox O&O is still licensed to New World Communications as many of the other former New World Communications stations were. |
Originally Posted by foxeng Really? According to the FCC it is licensed to TVT License, Inc. http://svartifoss2.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/w...ility_id=68569 and here http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/tvq?list=0&facid=68569 In recent years, FOX has brought all of their stations into a similiar line no matter who they bought them from. They are also changing it again as we speak. The station I work for also was owned by Gulf/Taft/Great American/Citicasters until 1996 along with WTSP. (I was there when it happened) It was after Citicasters sold the TV stations to New World (there were 4 of us, KTSP now KSAZ, WDAF, WBRC and WGHP), except WTSP, that I lost track of who owned WTSP but the last time I heard it was Gannett and I assumed that Gannett had bought them from Citicasters. |
Originally Posted by HDTVFanAtic New World Communications apparently is still a holding company for Fox. |