Quote:
Originally Posted by n2siast /forum/post/18145727
I'm looking to get the parasound 2100 to use in conjuction with a receiver. My source is the Pio BDP-51. Will I be better served to use a DAC in place of a preamp? Just curious what your thoughts are.
Quote:
Originally Posted by n2siast /forum/post/18146160
I'll be using the Pioneer VSX-23 as a pre-pro. Amps are MCintosh MC-2105. Can't I go source -->DAC-->receiver-->amp-->speaker?
Quote:
Originally Posted by CDLehner /forum/post/18146258
I'm not sure I follow your original line of thinking. Unless I'm missing something, why would you want to put yet another pre-amp in line between the source, dac, pre-pro, and amp?
CD
Quote:
Originally Posted by taoggniklat /forum/post/18146344
Perhaps he wants to set it up as a 2.1 system with HT bypass.
Pioneer --> Parasound --> Amp --> Speaker
Source --> DAC --> Parasound
Quote:
Originally Posted by n2siast /forum/post/18146392
Exactly!!
However, I want to know if I can do source--> DAC--> Receiver
Quote:
Originally Posted by taoggniklat /forum/post/18146344
Perhaps he wants to set it up as a 2.1 system with HT bypass.
Pioneer --> Parasound --> Amp --> Speaker
Source --> DAC --> Parasound
Quote:
Originally Posted by n2siast /forum/post/18146392
Exactly!!
However, I want to know if I can do source--> DAC--> Receiver
Quote:
Originally Posted by CDLehner /forum/post/18147208
I'm not familiar with that particular AVR, but don't most good ones these days offer a "direct" 2-channel circuit to bypass all the HT electronics on-board? That's why I asked why he wouldn't just go source, to dac, to that "direct" input. To me...again, unless I'm missing something here...to buy a 2-channel pre, just to run it into an AVR is crazy; the AVR is just going to process whatever signal comes out of the 2-channel pre anyway.
Like these guys say, if anything...I guess run a 2-channel pre around the AVR; but if it were my money, I'd just get a different AVR...one that would do a nice 2-channel direct...and call it even.
CD
Quote:
Originally Posted by taoggniklat /forum/post/18148195
Just because it says "direct" doesn't mean that the signal does not get converted to digital again. Too often all direct mode means is that it doesn't get eq'd or have other processing done, but it is still in the digital circuit. Just depends on the model. Some of them do an a/d conversion for the analog inputs, some of them don't. If the volume control is done digitally, you know that all the inputs are converted to digital.
If the AVR does not do an a/d conversion and offers a true direct mode (no processing or eq), then yes, you could put the dac in between the source and AVR and have good results in improving your sound.
Perhaps someone with that model AVR can chime in and let the OP know how it works.
Most systems that I have seen and heard typically have the 2 channel dac and pre-amp inserted after the AVR in the signal path for optimum 2 channel listening.