AVS Forum banner

Status
Not open for further replies.
1 - 7 of 7 Posts

·
Banned
Joined
·
3,403 Posts
Good luck on your search for a bigger than 40 inch 4:3 Tube, if 4:3 is your goal. I have a wonderful 38 inch 16 x 9 wide F-38310 screen.




To answer your question about rear projection, it will not beat out direct view in either 4:3 or 16 X 9. Direct view is the way to go for the best picture money can buy. I wish they would make a larger 16 X 9 than the F-38310 say 50 inches, I don't care about the price, I care about the quality!




Measurement you can expect from new 40 if you buy it, 20 inches High by 33.5 wide




Measuring 4:3 you take 1/2 of the diaginol as your height, and subtract 6.5 inches from the width. My 38 inch 16 by 9 take 1/2 of the diaginol as your height 19", as your with 7/8 or devide 8 into the same diaginol then multiply by 7 = 33.25 inches in width in using a calculater. Only a 1/4 inch difference in width between your 40 inch 4:3 and my 38 inch 16 x 9 in width and 1 inch in height. I hope this helps:)




I hope this helps you. :)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
34 Posts
Discussion Starter · #3 ·
Hi Hob, thanks much for your input, it was very nice of you to explain all of that to me. So, if I understand you correctly you are saying that there is only 1" of difference in height and 1/4" in width in screen size between the Sony and your set ?


There is a problem though, isn't it true that when I would be watching 4/3 material on your 16/9 TV, there would be black or gray vertical bars on the sides and that the only way to get rid of them is to go into 'wide' mode ?


Calisto
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,132 Posts
My own opinion is..a person should be a WS tv as of 2003. Let us say a tv will last for 10 years. My last tv lasted 13 years. I am reasonably sure, within 3 years, you will want to have a WS display. Better to buy one now than wish you had one in 3 or 4 years. For $2000 (my opinion) the Sony 34RBR800 is the one to buy now. Last night I was watching Western Channel and 'Gunsmoke: (1962) looked just fine over the WS display. You will want to watch HD programming soon and, remember, the standard is 1080i- WS. I get the networks 'free' and it is the best way to receive HD. Even the local stations, doing only digital, look as good as DVD. For them you have choice of 3 x 4 or 9 x 16 formats. Local stations will be doing news, etc. in HD in several years I imagine. And, whether you choose satellite or cable or OTA, there will be much more HD content in 2 years to view. Right now, there is more HD than many people realize. Forget all the numbers as to picture size and buy a WS HD now. I am sure you will be pleased with your purchase..now and in future.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
65 Posts
hob -- maybe my math is wrong, but your figures comparing a 40" 4:3 to a 38" 16:9 don't look right.


By Pythagorean theorem, I see


40^2 = (4x)^2 + (3x)^2

1600 = 25x^2

x = 8

h = x*3 = 24"

w = x*4 = 32"


38^2 = (16x)^2 + (9x)^2

1444 = 337x^2

x = 2.07

h = x*9 = 18.63"

w = x*16 = 33.12"


So your 38" TV is an inch wider but almost five and a half inches shorter.


A few more calculations


z^2 = (4x)^2 + (3x)^2

3x = 18.63"

x = 6.21

w = 4x = 24.84"

z^2 = 617.026 + 347.077 = 964.103

z = 31.05"


tell us that when you're watching 4:3 on your 38" TV you're getting the equivalent of a 31" 4:3 set.


Are my math skills that bad that I'm deceiving myself here? Someone please feel free to correct me and send me into the corner with the dunce cap if so.


If, like I do, you watch mostly 4:3 content (not by choice but by availability) you pay a lot more to get a lot less on a widescreen.


OTOH, when you do slip in the occasional widescreen DVD or flip to one of your half-dozen can't-TiVo-it HDTV widescreen channels, it sure does look big and impressive.


::
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
92 Posts
Sony 40" is a good buy and a great compromise in this middle ground until HDTV becomes a viable reality...in like 2005.


The XBR 40 versus the RCA F38310


XBR is only 7% smaller when viewing widescreen material, yet almost 7% bigger when viewing 4:3.


That is a trade off I am more than willing to accept. Especialy considering my TV is not a dedicated movie display..I use it for TV and will for years to come.


The 40" XBR versus the 34" Sony HDTV widescreen:


16% larger with widescreen material and 104% larger with 4:3 material...not too shabby.


And the 40" XBR versus it's impressive, but smaller sibling the 36" XBR, almost 25% larger in all material.


40" is just plain....gewd! :)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
65 Posts
...until you have to move it.


KV-40XBR800:

Dimensions: 43 1/8 x 33 x 26 1/8" (1093x836x663mm) (WxHxD)

Weight:304 lbs (138kgs)


Dang them big tubes is heavies.
 
1 - 7 of 7 Posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top