AVS Forum banner

Disturbing trend w/ HD DVD video quality

3068 Views 40 Replies 26 Participants Last post by  txfilmguy
Here lately, I have noticed that the more recent releases of HD-DVD seems to be

of higher picture quality.

Example: T3 Rise of the Machines and The Italian Job seem to have richer colors deeper blacks as well a more realistic appearance to them when compared to the earlier releases such as The Last Sumari and Appollo 13. I am now, not as impressed with some of the earlier release like I was when they first came out. So much for VC1 improvments. I can't stand it when they keep improving the encoding and thus tempting me to keep buying more movies.

Maybe I should buy the other guy who chose to use the more inferior encoding process and I would not have to worry about this disturbing trend. At least they seem to maintain a more consistant PQ even if itis of less quality.


I love my Blu ray! Yeah Right! I think Not!
Status
Not open for further replies.
1 - 20 of 41 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by hdtvhdtv
Here lately, I have noticed that the more recent releases of HD-DVD seems to be

of higher picture quality.

Example: T3 Rise of the Machines and The Italian Job seem to have richer colors deeper blacks as well a more realistic appearance to them when compared to the earlier releases such as The Last Sumari and Appollo 13. I am now, not as impressed with some of the earlier release like I was when they first came out. So much for VC1 improvments. I can't stand it when they keep improving the encoding and thus tempting me to keep buying more movies.

Maybe I should buy the other guy who chose to use the more inferior encoding process and I would not have to worry about this disturbing trend. At least they seem to maintain a more consistant PQ even if itis of less quality.


I love my Blu ray! Yeah Right! I think Not!
Haha
See less See more
Quote:
Originally Posted by hdtvhdtv
Example: T3 Rise of the Machines and The Italian Job seem to have richer colors deeper blacks as well a more realistic appearance to them when compared to the earlier releases such as The Last Sumari and Appollo 13. I am now, not as impressed with some of the earlier release like I was when they first came out. So much for VC1 improvments.
What a shock. Baseline criteria changing as people get used to higher quality. Who could have predicted that? :) It will be interesting to see how people feel in a year.


If the first titles were transparent to their masters as Amir convinced many people of, then VC1 improvements would have nothing to do with this. If things were made to look the same as their masters, then the only thing VC1 could do is start making things look different than their masters. We've been told that the job of the encoder is to make the result look like the master, so whether making them look different than their masters would be an improvement in the codec or not would up for debate (I would vote that it would be if it meant fixing problems that were in the masters).


As far as the specific above titles themselves, differences could just be the masters.


--Darin
See less See more
I hate to say it, but many of the earlier titles still look great to me.
The Italian Job had great color depth, but the compression was terrible. I saw many issues, expecially in the beginning. There was HORRIBLE banding in the sky prior to the original heist. From there on out I was disappointed.
Last Samurai is still my #1, I own over 50


it brings tears to a film lovers eye when deinterlaced with the new DVDO VP50 :D


Bry the Italian Job wasn't overcompressed, thats the way it looks, whoever worked on that film's master went to town with NR and edge enhancement, they should never be allowed to touch another film :mad: , combined with the fact that the film was directed on the softer side


the Italian Job looks better after the opening heist is over


-Gary
See less See more
Quote:
Originally Posted by hdtvhdtv
Here lately, I have noticed that the more recent releases of HD-DVD seems to be

of higher picture quality.

Example: T3 Rise of the Machines and The Italian Job seem to have richer colors deeper blacks as well a more realistic appearance to them when compared to the earlier releases such as The Last Sumari and Appollo 13. I am now, not as impressed with some of the earlier release like I was when they first came out. So much for VC1 improvments. I can't stand it when they keep improving the encoding and thus tempting me to keep buying more movies.
I see what you're getting at but maybe you should get your eyes checked. Alot of older titles still look great and I don't find it "disturbing" in the least. Also, Italian Job looked horrible. I haven't seen FMJ yet but Italian Job is hands-down the worst-looking movie I currently own.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary Murrell
Last Samurai is still my #1, I own over 50


it brings tears to a film lovers eye when deinterlaced with the new DVDO VP50 :D




-Gary
Gary...do you pay rent or make car payments? How does someone so young as you afford so much so soon? Perhaps we older folk can learn a thing or two from you?

BTW, it's a priviledge to have someone so young and so dedicated we can learn from.
See less See more
Quote:
Gary...do you pay rent or make car payments? How does someone so young as you afford so much so soon? Perhaps we older folk can learn a thing or two from you?

BTW, it's a priviledge to have someone so young and so dedicated we can learn from.
Dont know about Gary, but living in NYC, i dont need a car, thus no insurance or gas, dont smoke/drink. So i got cash to spend :)
Unforgiven was fantastic. Aeon Flux - wow? Apollo 13 was beautiful. The Last Samurai was breathaking. These were the earliest titles. But using Italian Job as an example? Not the best reviews on picture quality and my copy (likely related to the disk itself) had terrible artifacts (grid patterns appearing in darker areas).
Quote:
If the first titles were transparent to their masters as Amir convinced many people of, then VC1 improvements would have nothing to do with this. If things were made to look the same as their masters, then the only thing VC1 could do is start making things look different than their masters.
No, Darin, I think you misunderstand what improvements in VC-1 actually mean. The primary benefit of a compression codec is efficiency. The improvements to VC-1 have been in that area. The first encodes released on HD DVD have average bit rates in the upper teens, or even a bit higher in one or two cases. The newest encodes are yielding the same level of quality, perhaps a bit better, at average bit rates in the lower teens. A 20%, or more, increase in efficiency is a pretty big improvement in, what, six months.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptDS9E
Dont know about Gary, but living in NYC, i dont need a car, thus no insurance or gas, dont smoke/drink. So i got cash to spend :)
On rent.


:D
CMRA, appreciate the comments


I am very blessed, I live at home with the folks while I am still attending school, no rent, car payments(junker car) or smoke/drink like Capt.


I run various business ventures to fund my HT hobby and what few bills I have, you should see the car insurance prices people my age have to pay :mad:


it is my pleasure to be part of this great community, believe me I am doing all the learning ;)


-Gary
See less See more
Why is it a disturbing trend the the newer releases are gettign better and better? HOwever, I'm not convinced that this is absolutely true.
What I'd like to see is a truly objective pixel-for-pixel comparison between the masters and the decoded HD DVD output to get a true grip on how close they really are.


Of course, we're never going to get access to the masters to do this, and if any of the studios have done this then I'd be really surprised if they wanted to tell us about it... now if one of them wanted to shout about it, that'd be something else :D
Quote:
What I'd like to see is a truly objective pixel-for-pixel comparison between the masters and the decoded HD DVD output to get a true grip on how close they really are.
While I'd be as interested in the results of this little experiment as anyone (more than most, I suppose), I'm not sure how relevant it actually is in light of the current state of both formats. As it now stands, we can make real-world comparions of a broad range of HD DVD discs, Blu-ray discs, OTA HD programming, satellite and cable HD programming. Forgetting the souce masters, if VC-1 is currently the overall best quality HD source, how much does it really matter how different it is from the master?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary Murrell
Last Samurai is still my #1, I own over 50


it brings tears to a film lovers eye when deinterlaced with the new DVDO VP50 :D


Bry the Italian Job wasn't overcompressed, thats the way it looks, whoever worked on that film's master went to town with NR and edge enhancement, they should never be allowed to touch another film :mad: , combined with the fact that the film was directed on the softer side


the Italian Job looks better after the opening heist is over


-Gary


I own 12 titles so far and have watched the rest thanks to NETFLIX..and can also say that the Last Samurai has the best picture quality so far!!!!I would put Seabiscuit 2nd with F&F Tokyo Drift 3rd.......But I get the feeling there are some GREAT GREAT picture & sound quality movies coming to HDDVD in the next few months!!!!!.I LOVE IT :)
See less See more
Obi, IMHO HD-DVD hasn't topped D-Theater yet, were you into D-Theater ?


no HD-DVD I own has surpassed "The Passion" D-Theater tape


I would rate HD-DVD and D-Theater as equals, I haven't seen BR yet on my setup, hopefully soon :)


-Gary
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert George
No, Darin, I think you misunderstand what improvements in VC-1 actually mean.
Nope. I don't misunderstand them at all.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert George
The primary benefit of a compression codec is efficiency. The improvements to VC-1 have been in that area. The first encodes released on HD DVD have average bit rates in the upper teens, or even a bit higher in one or two cases. The newest encodes are yielding the same level of quality, perhaps a bit better, at average bit rates in the lower teens.
If VC-1 isn't now making things look different than the masters (e.g., trying to clean up problems in masters), then any improvement in image quality seen could not be due to VC-1 improvements, unless you are comparing to something that doesn't look like its master. In other words, if things look just like their masters, then VC-1 efficiency improvements could not explain what hdtvhdtv mentioned.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert George
Forgetting the souce masters, if VC-1 is currently the overall best quality HD source, how much does it really matter how different it is from the master?
It goes right to the question of whether there is room for improvement in the future or not. With the same logic, you could also argue that since there aren't any BD50s out there, it is irrelevant what BD50s can do in the future. Or since there aren't any HD DVD players that can do 1080p24, it is irrelevant whether there can be in the future or not. Or since the XBOX360 doesn't have an HDMI output, it doesn't matter whether it will be able to in the future. We can agree or disagree about whether the future matters like this. Or whether it matters whether things we've been told in the past were true or not.


--Darin
See less See more
1 - 20 of 41 Posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top