
Originally Posted by hdtvhdtv Here lately, I have noticed that the more recent releases of HD-DVD seems to be of higher picture quality. Example: T3 Rise of the Machines and The Italian Job seem to have richer colors deeper blacks as well a more realistic appearance to them when compared to the earlier releases such as The Last Sumari and Appollo 13. I am now, not as impressed with some of the earlier release like I was when they first came out. So much for VC1 improvments. I can't stand it when they keep improving the encoding and thus tempting me to keep buying more movies. Maybe I should buy the other guy who chose to use the more inferior encoding process and I would not have to worry about this disturbing trend. At least they seem to maintain a more consistant PQ even if itis of less quality. I love my Blu ray! Yeah Right! I think Not! |
Originally Posted by hdtvhdtv Example: T3 Rise of the Machines and The Italian Job seem to have richer colors deeper blacks as well a more realistic appearance to them when compared to the earlier releases such as The Last Sumari and Appollo 13. I am now, not as impressed with some of the earlier release like I was when they first came out. So much for VC1 improvments. |
Originally Posted by hdtvhdtv Here lately, I have noticed that the more recent releases of HD-DVD seems to be of higher picture quality. Example: T3 Rise of the Machines and The Italian Job seem to have richer colors deeper blacks as well a more realistic appearance to them when compared to the earlier releases such as The Last Sumari and Appollo 13. I am now, not as impressed with some of the earlier release like I was when they first came out. So much for VC1 improvments. I can't stand it when they keep improving the encoding and thus tempting me to keep buying more movies. |
Originally Posted by Gary Murrell Last Samurai is still my #1, I own over 50 it brings tears to a film lovers eye when deinterlaced with the new DVDO VP50 -Gary |
Gary...do you pay rent or make car payments? How does someone so young as you afford so much so soon? Perhaps we older folk can learn a thing or two from you? BTW, it's a priviledge to have someone so young and so dedicated we can learn from. |
If the first titles were transparent to their masters as Amir convinced many people of, then VC1 improvements would have nothing to do with this. If things were made to look the same as their masters, then the only thing VC1 could do is start making things look different than their masters. |
Originally Posted by CaptDS9E Dont know about Gary, but living in NYC, i dont need a car, thus no insurance or gas, dont smoke/drink. So i got cash to spend |
What I'd like to see is a truly objective pixel-for-pixel comparison between the masters and the decoded HD DVD output to get a true grip on how close they really are. |
Originally Posted by Gary Murrell Last Samurai is still my #1, I own over 50 it brings tears to a film lovers eye when deinterlaced with the new DVDO VP50 Bry the Italian Job wasn't overcompressed, thats the way it looks, whoever worked on that film's master went to town with NR and edge enhancement, they should never be allowed to touch another film the Italian Job looks better after the opening heist is over -Gary |
Originally Posted by Robert George No, Darin, I think you misunderstand what improvements in VC-1 actually mean. |
Originally Posted by Robert George The primary benefit of a compression codec is efficiency. The improvements to VC-1 have been in that area. The first encodes released on HD DVD have average bit rates in the upper teens, or even a bit higher in one or two cases. The newest encodes are yielding the same level of quality, perhaps a bit better, at average bit rates in the lower teens. |
Originally Posted by Robert George Forgetting the souce masters, if VC-1 is currently the overall best quality HD source, how much does it really matter how different it is from the master? |